• No se han encontrado resultados

1.2 PLANTEAMIENTO DEL PROBLEMA

1.2.4. Formulación del problema

Using experiments with more than 1,000 subjects, this paper provides clean evidence for people’s tendency to neglect correlations in information sources when forming beliefs and the corresponding cognitive mechanisms. While we deliberately designed a tightly controlled and abstract information structure to obtain a clean view on the cognitive bias and corresponding remedies, an interesting question is whether correlation neglect persists in more natural informational environments. While studying belief formation using naturalistic information naturally comes at the loss of some internal validity, in Appendix2.G, we explore one possible avenue by investigating subjects’ behavior when they are confronted with real newspaper reports covering correlated information. To this end, we make use of a naturally occurring informational redundancy in professional GDP forecasts that arose because a German research institute contributed to a joint forecast, but also issued a separate (different) forecast at the same time. Again, the (incentivized) beliefs subjects state when they are confronted with these correlated forecasts are con-sistent with the neglect of informational redundancies, hence suggesting that the bias we identify in this paper also plays out in more naturalistic environments.

Economists have recently increased their efforts to explicitly model erroneous prob-ability judgments (see, e.g., the discussion in Rabin,2013). While most of the literature has focused on formalizing specific biases and drawing out corresponding economic im-plications (Rabin and Schrag,1999; Rabin,2002; Rabin and Vayanos,2010; Benjamin et al.,forthcoming), more recently economists have started to model the mental process of belief formation (Gennaioli and Shleifer,2010; Bordalo et al.,2015b; Schwartzstein,

36Also see, e.g., Bordalo et al. (2013), Bordalo et al. (2015a), Taubinsky (2014), Kőszegi and Szeidl (2013), and Gabaix (2014) for the application of limited attention to consumer choice.

2014). While none of these theories are designed to apply in the settings we considered, our empirical results are broadly supportive of this type of models in that we emphasize the interplay of complexity and focus in generating correlation neglect. An interesting question is which other prevalent and economically important features of real informa-tion structures induce the neglect patterns we document in this paper, and how the result-ing biases are conceptually linked to correlation neglect. As our “face value” treatments have shown, the tendency to naïvely process distorted signals is not universal across contexts.

References

Akerlof, George A. and Robert J. Shiller (2009): Animal spirits: How Human Psychology Drives the Economy, and Why it Matters for Global Capitalism. Princeton University Press. [8,9]

Andreoni, James and Tymofiy Mylovanov (2012): “Diverging Opinions.” American Economic Journal:

Microeconomics, 4 (1), 209–232. [10]

Benjamin, Dan, Collin Raymond, and Matthew Rabin (forthcoming): “A Model of Non-Belief in the Law of Large Numbers.” Journal of the European Economic Association. [37]

Bohren, Aislinn (2013): “Informational Herding with Model Misspecification.” Working Paper. [11]

Bordalo, Pedro, Nicola Gennaioli, and Andrei Shleifer (2013): “Salience and Consumer Choice.” Jour-nal of Political Economy, 121 (5), 803–843. [37]

Bordalo, Pedro, Nicola Gennaioli, and Andrei Shleifer (2015a): “Memory, Attention and Choice.”

Working Paper. [37]

Bordalo, Pedro, Nicola Gennaioli, and Andrei Shleifer (2015b): “Stereotypes.” Working Paper. [10, 37]

Brandts, Jordi, Aya Ebru Giritligil, and Roberto A. Weber (2014): “An Experimental Study of Persua-sion Bias and Social Influence in Networks.” Working Paper. [11]

Brocas, Isabelle, Juan D. Carrillo, Stephanie W. Wang, and Colin F. Camerer (2014): “Imperfect Choice or Imperfect Attention? Understanding Strategic Thinking in Private Information Games.” Review of Economic Studies, 81 (3), 944–970. [10]

Budescu, David V. and Adrian K. Rantilla (2000): “Confidence in Aggregation of Expert Opinion.”

Acta Psychologica, 104, 371–398. [11]

Budescu, David V. and Hsiu-Ting Yu (2007): “Aggregation of Opinion Based on Correlated Cues and Advisors.” Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 20, 153–177. [11]

Camerer, Colin F. (1987): “Do Biases in Probability Judgment Matter in Markets? Experimental Evi-dence.” American Economic Review, 77 (5), 981–997. [8,18]

Caplin, Andrew and Mark Dean (forthcoming): “Revealed Preference, Rational Inattention, and Costly Information Acquisition.” American Economic Review. [10,31,34]

Caplin, Andrew, Mark Dean, and Daniel Martin (2011): “Search and Satisficing.” American Economic Review, 101 (7), 2899–2922. [10,31,34]

Chandrasekhar, Arun G., Horacio Larreguy, and Juan P. Xandri (2015): “Testing Models of Social Learning on Networks: Evidence from a Framed Field Experiment.” Working Paper. [11]

Charness, Gary, Edi Karni, and Dan Levin (2010): “On the Conjunction Fallacy in Probability Judg-ment: New Experimental Evidence Regarding Linda.” Games and Economic Behavior, 68 (2), 551–556. [10]

Charness, Gary and Dan Levin (2009): “The Origin of the Winner’s Curse: A Laboratory Study.” Amer-ican Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 207–236. [9,29]

Corazzini, Luca, Filippo Pavesi, Beatrice Petrovich, and Luca Stanca (2012): “Influential Listeners:

An Experiment on Persuasion Bias in Social Networks.” European Economic Review, 56, 1276–

1288. [11]

DeMarzo, Peter M., Dimitri Vayanos, and Jeffrey Zwiebel (2003): “Persuasion Bias, Social Influence, and Unidimensional Opinions.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118 (3), 909–968. [11]

Esponda, Ignacio and Emanuel Vespa (2014): “Hypothetical Thinking and Information Extraction in the Laboratory.” American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 6 (4), 180–202. [10]

Eyster, Erik and Matthew Rabin (2005): “Cursed Equilibrium.” Econometrica, 73 (5), 1623–1672. [58]

Eyster, Erik and Matthew Rabin (2010): “Naïve Herding in Rich-Information Settings.” American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 2 (4), 221–243. [11]

Eyster, Erik and Matthew Rabin (2014): “Extensive Imitation is Irrational and Harmful.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129 (4), 1861–1898. [11,13]

Eyster, Erik, Matthew Rabin, and Dimitri Vayanos (2013): “Financial Markets Where Traders Neglect the Informational Content of Prices.” Working Paper. [58]

Eyster, Erik and Georg Weizsäcker (2011): “Correlation Neglect in Financial Decision-Making.” Work-ing Paper. [11]

Fiedler, Klaus and Peter Juslin (2006): Information Sampling and Adaptive Cognition. Cambridge University Press. [26]

Fischbacher, Urs (2007): “z-Tree: Zurich Toolbox for Ready-Made Economic Experiments.” Experi-mental Economics, 10 (2), 171–178. [18]

Gabaix, Xavier (2014): “A Sparsity-Based Model of Bounded Rationality.” Quarterly Journal of Eco-nomics, 129 (4), 1661–1710. [36,37]

Gabaix, Xavier, David Laibson, Guillermo Moloche, and Stephen Weinberg (2011): “Costly Informa-tion AcquisiInforma-tion: Experimental Analysis of a Boundedly RaInforma-tional Model.” American Economic Review, 96 (4), 2899–2922. [31]

Ganguly, Ananda R., John H. Kagel, and Donald V. Moser (2000): “Do Asset Market Prices Reflect Traders’ Judgment Biases?” Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 20 (3), 219–245. [18]

Gennaioli, Nicola and Andrei Shleifer (2010): “What Comes to Mind.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125 (4), 1399–1433. [10,37]

Gneezy, Uri, Arie Kapteyn, and Jan Potters (2003): “Evaluation Periods and Asset Prices in a Market Experiment.” Journal of Finance, 58 (2), 821–838. [8]

Golub, Benjamin and Matthew O. Jackson (2010): “Naïve Learning in Social Networks and the Wis-dom of Crowds.” American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 2 (1), 112–149. [11]

Greiner, Ben (2004): “The Online Recruitment System ORSEE 2.0 – A Guide for the Organization of Experiments in Economics.” University of Cologne, Working paper series in economics, 10 (23), 63–104. [18]

Grimm, Veronika and Friederike Mengel (2014): “An Experiment on Belief Formation in Networks.”

Working Paper. [11]

Hanna, Rema, Sendhil Mullainathan, and Joshua Schwartzstein (2014): “Learning through Noticing:

Theory and Experimental Evidence in Farming.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129 (3), 1311–

1353. [10,32]

Hossain, Tanjim and Ryo Okui (2013): “The Binarized Scoring Rule.” Review of Economic Studies, 80 (3), 984–1001. [22]

Kahneman, Daniel and Amos Tversky (1973): “On the Psychology of Prediction.” Psychological Re-view, 80 (4), 237–251. [11]

Kallir, Ido and Doron Sonsino (2010): “The Neglect of Correlation in Allocation Decisions.” Southern Economic Journal, 75 (4), 1045–1066. [11]

Kluger, Brian D. and Steve B. Wyatt (2004): “Are Judgment Errors Reflected in Market Prices and Allocations? Experimental Evidence Based on the Monty Hall Problem.” Journal of Finance, 59 (3), 969–998. [18]

Kőszegi, Botond and Adam Szeidl (2013): “A Model of Focusing in Economic Choice.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 128 (1), 53–104. [37]

Kübler, Dorothea and Georg Weizsäcker (2005): “Are Longer Cascades More Stable?” Journal of the European Economic Association, 3 (2-3), 330–339. [11]

Levy, Gilat and Ronny Razin (forthcoming): “Correlation Neglect, Voting Behaviour and Polariza-tion.” American Economic Review. [11]

Maines, Laureen (1990): “The Effect of Forecast Redundancy on Judgments of a Consensus Fore-cast’s Expected Accuracy.” Journal of Accounting Research, 28, 29–47. [11]

Maines, Laureen (1996): “An Experimental Examination of Subjective Forecast Combination.” Inter-national Journal of Forecasting, 12, 223–233. [11]

Massey, Cade and George Wu (2005): “Detecting Regime Shifts: The Causes of Under- and Overre-action.” Management Science, 51 (6), 932–947. [26]

Möbius, Markus M., Thuan Phan, and Adam Szeidl (2013): “Treasure Hunt: Social Learning in the Field.” Working Paper. [11]

Ortoleva, Pietro and Erik Snowberg (2015): “Overconfidence in Political Behavior.” American Eco-nomic Review, 105 (2), 504–535. [11]

Rabin, Matthew (2002): “Inference by Believers in the Law of Small Numbers.” Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117 (3), 775–816. [37]

Rabin, Matthew (2013): “Incorporating Limited Rationality into Economics.” Journal of Economic Literature, 51 (2), 528–43. [37]

Rabin, Matthew and Joel L. Schrag (1999): “First Impressions Matter: A Model of Confirmatory Bias.”

Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114 (1), 37–82. [37]

Rabin, Matthew and Dimitri Vayanos (2010): “The Gambler’s and Hot-Hand Fallacies: Theory and Applications.” Review of Economic Studies, 77 (2), 730–778. [37]

Schwartzstein, Joshua (2014): “Selective Attention and Learning.” Journal of the European Eco-nomic Association, 12 (6), 1423–1452. [10,37]

Selten, Reinhard (1998): “Axiomatic Characterization of the Quadratic Scoring Rule.” Experimental Economics, 1 (1), 43–62. [14]

Shiller, Robert J. (2000): Irrational Exuberance. Princeton University Press. [8]

Simon, Herbert A. (1956): “Rational Choice and the Structure of the Environment.” Psychological Review, 63, 129–138. [31]

Spiegler, Ran (2015): “Bayesian Networks and Boundedly Rational Expectations.” Working Paper.

[11]

Taubinsky, Dmitry (2014): “From Intentions to Actions: A Model and Experimental Evidence of Inat-tentive Choice.” Working Paper. [37]

Weizsäcker, Georg (2010): “Do we Follow Others When we Should? A Simple Test of Rational Expec-tations.” American Economic Review, 100 (5), 2340–2360. [11]