Reclutamiento de PC en ripples y fast ripples

Bill Sillar

The social context of technology, the physical properties of materials, and a con- sideration of how to decide which analytical procedures to use in relation to specific research questions.

Recent debate has emphasised how much technologies are shaped by cultural choice. At the same time there is a growing emphasis on how material culture influ- ences the people who use it.

"… Gell’s agentive object, however seductive the idea may at first seem, is a case of an analogy gone too far" (Morphy 2009, 6)

Essential Reading

Gosden, C. 2005. What do objects want? Journal of Archaeological Method and

Theory 12/3, 193-211.

Jones, A. 2004. Archaeometry and materiality: materials-based analysis in theory and practice. Archaeometry 46/3, 327-338 and discussion in Archaeometry 47/1, 175-207. INST ARCH Pers, On-line

Renfrew, C. 2004. Towards a theory of material engagement. In: de Marrais, E., Gosden, C., Renfrew, C. (eds.) Rethinking Materiality: the Engagment of mind

with the Material World. Cambridge, McDonald Institute for Archaeological

Research, 23-32. INST ARCH AH DEM and ISSUE DESK IOA DEM 1 Further Reading

Blackman, M. J., Stein, G. J., Vandiver, P. B. 1993. The standardization hypothesis and ceramic mass production: Technological, compositional, and metric in- dexes of craft specialization at Tell Leilan, Syria. American Antiquity 58/1, 60- 80. Online

Buchli, V. 2004. Material culture: current problems. In: Meskell, L., Preucel, R. W. (eds), A companion to social archaeology. Oxford, Blackwell, 179-194. INST

Chilton, E. S. 1999. Material meaning: Critical approaches to the interpretation of ma-

terial culture. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press. INST ARCH KD 3 CHI Cole, M. 1996. Cultural psychology: a once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA:

Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Chapter 5. SCIENCE LIBRARY: PSYCHOLOGY S 20 COL

de Atley, S. P., Bishop, R. L. 1991. Towards an integrated interface for archaeology and archaeometry. In: Bishop, R. L., Lange, F. W. (eds), The ceramic legacy

of Anna O. Shepard. Niwot, University Press of Colorado, 358-381. INST ARCH KD 3 BIS

Dobres, M.-A. 2000. Technology and social agency: outlining a practice framework

for archaeology. Oxford, Blackwell. INST ARCH AH DOB

Dobres, M.-A., Hoffman, C. R. 1994. Social agency and the dynamics of prehistoric technology. Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 1/3, 211-258. NET Dobres, M.-A., Hoffman, C. R. (eds.) 1999. The social dynamics of technology: Prac-

tice, politics, and world views. Washington: Smithsonian Institute Press. INST ARCH AH DOB

Foucault, M. 1991. Discipline and punish: the birth of the prison. London, Penguin. LAW H 20 FOU

do try to understand his concept of power and how this relates to the buildings and other artefacts used

Gell, A. 1988. Technology and magic. Anthropology Today 4/2, 6-9. ANTHROPOLOGY Pers, Online

Gell, A. 1998. Art and Agency. Oxford, Clarendon. ANTHROPOLOGY E 10 GEL

One of the basic texts in the discussion about the agency of objects

Gosselain, O. P. 1992. Technology and style: Potters and pottery among Bafia of Cameroon. Man N.S. 27, 259-586. ANTHROPOLOGY Pers

Hodder, I. 2004. Neo-thingness. In: J. Cherry, C. Scarre, St. Shennan (eds), Explain-

ing social change: studies in honour of Colin Renfrew. Cambridge, McDonald

Institute for Archaeological Research, 45–52. INST ARCH AH CHE

Hodder, I. 2005. Changing entanglement and temporalities. In: Hodder, I. (ed.),

Changing materialities at Çatalhöyük: reports from the 1995-99 seasons.

Cambridge, McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research/London, British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara, 1-22. INST ARCH DBC 10 HOD

Hosler, D. 1994. The sounds and colors of power. Cambridge, MIT Press. INST ARCH DFA 100 HOS

Ingold, T. 2007. Materials against materiality. Archaeological Dialogues 14/1, 1–16. Jones, A. 2002. Archaeological theory and scientific practice. Cambridge, Cambridge

University Press. INST ARCH AJ 10 JON

Jones, A. 2007. Memory and material culture. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 32-41.

Lechtman, H. 1977. Style in technology - some early thoughts. In: H. Lechtman, R. S. Merrill (eds.), Material culture. Styles, organization, and dynamics of technol-

ogy. Proceedings of the American Ethnological Society (1975). St. Paul, West

Publishing, 3-20. INST ARCH BD LEC

Lemonnier, P. 1986. The study of material culture today: towards an anthropology of technical systems Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 5, 147-186. NET Lemonnier, P. (ed.) 1993. Technological choices: transformations in material cultures

since the Neolithic. London, Routledge. INST ARCH BD LEM

Lemonnier, P. 1992. Elements for an anthropology of technology. Ann Arbor, Mu- seum of Anthropology, University of Michigan. INST ARCH BD LEM

Martin, A. 2005. Agents in Inter-Action: Bruno Latour and agency. Journal of Archae-

ological Method and Theory 12/4, 283-311. Online

Martinón-Torres, M., Rehren, Th. 2009. Post-medieval crucible production and distri- bution: a study of materials and materialities. Archaeometry 51/1, 49-74. On- line.

Mauss, M. 1979. Sociology and psychology. London, Routledge and Kegan Paul. [Essay 'body techniques' first published in France in 1935]. Science MAU

Short Loan Collection

Miller, D. 1994. Artefacts and the meaning of things. In: T. Ingold (ed.) Companion

Encyclopaedia of Anthropology. London, Routledge, 420-459. INST ARCH BD ING

Morphy, H. 2009. Art as a mode of action. Some problems with Gell’s Art and Ag- ency. Journal of Material Culture 14/5, 5–27. NET

highly critical of the concept

*Nanoglu, St. 2006. Regional perspectives on the Neolithic anthropomorphic imagery of Northern Greece. Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology 19/2, 155-176. INST ARCH PERS and NET

concept of citation or reiteration (Judith Butler)

Nelson, M. C. 1991. The study of technological organization. Journal of Archaeologi-

cal Method and Theory 3, 57-100. INST ARCH 1364 Online

Pfaffenberger, B. 1988. Fetishised objects and human nature: towards an anthropol- ogy of technology. Man 23/2, 236-252. On-Line

Pfaffenberger, B. 1992. Social anthropology of technology. Annual Review of Anthro-

pology 21, 491-516. ANTHROPOLOGY Pers

Schiffer, M. B. 1999. The material life of human beings: Artifacts, behavior and com-

munication. London, Routledge. INST ARCH BD SCH

Schiffer, M. B. (ed.) 2001. Anthropological perspectives on technology. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press. INST ARCH K Qto SCH

Schlanger, N. (ed.) 2006. Marcel Mauss: Techniques, technology and civilisation. Ox- ford, Berghahn. ANTHROPOLOGY D 10 MAU

Sigaut, F. 1994. Technology. In: T. Ingold (ed.), Companion Encyclopaedia of An-

thropology. London, Routledge, 420-459. INST ARCH BD ING

Sillar, B. 2009. The Social Agency of things? Animism and materiality in the Andes.

Cambridge Archaeological Journal 19, 367-377.

Sillar, B., Tite, M. 2000. The challenge of ‘technological choices’ for material science approaches in archaeology. Archaeometry 42/1, 2-20. On-line