• No se han encontrado resultados

CO2 Efflux in vertisol under different land use systems

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "CO2 Efflux in vertisol under different land use systems"

Copied!
15
0
0

Texto completo

Loading

Figure

Table 1. Some physical and chemical properties of the vertisols at each land use system at two soil profile depths
Figure 1. Monthly mean, minimum and maximum air temperatures, and monthly precipitation between July, 2001  and January, 2002 at the research site
Figure 2. Seasonal variation in morning (a) and afternoon (b) soil temperature at five different land uses
Figure 3. Seasonal variation in morning (a) and afternoon (b) soil water content (%) at 20 cm soil profile depths at  five different land uses
+6

Referencias

Documento similar

Changes in soil bulk density, soil organic carbon and water holding capacity are analysed in soils currently tilled, and after five to fifteen years of abandonment in order to

studying the autocorrelation and partial correlation function for soil water content measured at a shallower depth as well as the cross-correlation function between soil water

217 The soil control variables used to provide SIDSS with relevant 218 information are matric potential ( W m ) and volumetric soil water 219 content ( h v ), which are common

Estimated critical soil water contents for reed growth dynamics and peat combustion risk in Las Tablas de Daimiel National Park (TDNP) undisturbed charophytes and peat

The five morphological properties of the soil (soil texture, soil structure type, dry consistence, biological activity and HCl reaction) in our empirical categorical

The selection included two supporting ecosystem properties (soil conditions, composed of soil formation and soil stability, and habitat quality), four regulating services

A decrease of bulk density in the top soil (< 10 cm) was found although for deeper layers, an increase was detected. This practice does not present important differences

Since forest variables (forest productivity and for- est biomass) and abiotic factors (climate variables, soil texture and nu- trients, and soil topography) were only calculated at