• No se han encontrado resultados

Exploratory use of automatic prosodic labels for the evaluation of Japanese speakers of L2 Spanish

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Exploratory use of automatic prosodic labels for the evaluation of Japanese speakers of L2 Spanish"

Copied!
5
0
0

Texto completo

Loading

Figure

Table 1: Contrast between the objective and the subjective met- met-rics. In the subjective metrics int means intelligibility, f lu
Table 2: Count of the different tones. The speakers f16a, f11r, f13r, f15a, m09a, m10a, m12r, m14r are the native speakers r ∈ R of
Figure 1: Sample of an utterance spoken by a non-native speaker (upper version) and by a native speaker (lower version)

Referencias

Documento similar

The paper has the following outline: In Section 2 we present a revision of corpora available for automatic speech recognition in Spanish and Mexican Spanish, in Section 3 we present

With the rise in the number of Spanish speakers around the world, university instructors are realizing the benefits of using service learning (SL) as a means to connect students

These users can be common users of the Observatory’s public website (general audience), the graduates involved in the Observatory’s studies, the Spanish universities that

The aims of this paper are to adapt to Spanish speakers the Servant Leadership Survey (SLS) by van Dierendonck and Nuijten (2011), and to analyze its factorial validity

No obstante, como esta enfermedad afecta a cada persona de manera diferente, no todas las opciones de cuidado y tratamiento pueden ser apropiadas para cada individuo.. La forma

Nevertheless, the ratio of corporations using patents of introduction is higher than that obtained from the analysis of the entire patent system as a whole (around 8.5% from 1820

Comparing Spanish and Japanese against the English language we found that both languages have fewer vowel and consonant sounds than in English. In the case of

The validity of food and nutrient intake obtained with DH-E was estimated using Pearson correlation coefficients between the DH-E conducted at the end of the study (DH-E2) and the