• No se han encontrado resultados

Forest carbon sequestration:the impact of forest management

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Forest carbon sequestration:the impact of forest management"

Copied!
31
0
0

Texto completo

Loading

Figure

Table 1. Annual CO 2  sequestration rates in temperate and Mediterranean forests in  Spain (adapted from Bravo et al., 2007)
Table 2. The impact of species, site quality and rotation on carbon sequestration in  stands of Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and Mediterranean Maritime pine (Pinus
Figure 2. Total carbon proportions found in the different pools of Pinus sylvestris  stands after 30 years of forest management and 3 thinnings
Table 3. Forest area by regions between 1990 and 2015 (adapted from Keenan et  al., 2015 based on FAO, 1995, 2006, 2010 and 2015)
+4

Referencias

Documento similar

Exploitation from forestry and wood harvesting, increased frequency of forest fires, and overall changes in land use (ur- banization, agricultural intensification, and

aerial captures, understory height, litter biomass, stream distance and the type of land 295. uses surrounding the focal forest patches individually explained substantial variation in

This divide between extractivism and cultivation of NTFPs reflected the important dichotomy that characterizes forest management more generally, namely between natural

VOL: Harvest volume (10 3 m 3 ), NPV: Net Present Value (10 3 €), H: Even flow harvest volume deviation (10 3 m 3 ), F: Forest ending inventory deviation (10 3 m 3 ), A: Area

The interaction effects of soil type, altitude, and type of forest stand on the total soil organic carbon stock were confirmed by the general linear model (GLM) analysis (Table

Having Mexico such an important forest land under collective management and being COMET-LA a research project which intends to create a participatory learning arena, the

scleroxylon, one of the most valuable and fragile timber species from the Chiquitano forest in Santa Cruz de la Sierra, Bolivia, (ii) to quantify the changes in

Since forest variables (forest productivity and for- est biomass) and abiotic factors (climate variables, soil texture and nu- trients, and soil topography) were only calculated at