• No se han encontrado resultados

How I diagnose and treat lupus

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "How I diagnose and treat lupus"

Copied!
5
0
0

Texto completo

(1)

www.elsevier.es/rmuanl

EXPERT’S

CORNER:

A

PERSONAL

APPROACH

How

I

diagnose

and

treat

lupus

D.Á.

Galarza-Delgado

,

A.C.

Arana-Guajardo

ServiciodeReumatología,DepartamentodeMedicinaInternadelHospitalUniversitario,‘‘Dr.JoséEleuterioGonzález’’,dela UniversidadAutónomadeNuevoLeón,Monterrey,NL,Mexico

Received15October2014;accepted4November2014 Availableonline6February2015

Introduction

Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is a multisystemic autoimmunedisease ofunknown originwitha waxingand waningcourseandasignificantmorbi-mortality.The objec-tive of this paper is to provide an SLE overview, aswell as recommendations regarding diagnosis and therapeutic concepts. In the first stage of the disease, the combina-tionofgenetic,genderandenvironmentalfactorsculminate inthe formationof autoantibodies yearsbeforetheonset of symptoms is observed. In the second phase,there are clinicalmanifestationsandassociationswithcomorbidities. ManagementofpatientswithSLEshouldbepredictive, pre-ventive,personalized,andparticipatoryinordertoachieve remission and prevent relapses. We can divide SLE into threecategories according totheseverityof the disease: mild,moderate,andsevere.Corticosteroidsarethe main-stayoftherapy,buttheuseofanotheragentismandatoryin ordertoreducesideeffects.Someofthebiologicalagents

Correspondingauthorat:ServiciodeReumatologíadel

Depar-tamentodeMedicinaInternadelHospitalUniversitario,‘‘Dr.José EleuterioGonzález’’,delaUANL,Av.MaderoyAv.Gonzalitoss/n, col.MitrasCentro,CP64460Monterrey,NL,Mexico.

Tel.:+528183337798.

E-mailaddress:[email protected] (D.Á.Galarza-Delgado).

usedinimmunosuppressivetherapyinSLEtreatmentinclude methotrexate,antimalarials, azathioprine,mycophenolate mofetil,cyclophosphamide,belimumabandrituximab.

Background

DiagnosingSystemicLupusErythematosus(SLE)hasbeena challengeover the years.The firstreports of the disease only considered skin manifestations. Later, William Osler recognizedthe systemicinvolvement of the disease.1 SLE

isamultisystemicautoimmunediseaseofunknownorigin.2

SLEhasanincidenceof1---10per100,000person-yearsand aprevalenceof20---70per100,000inhabitants.3SLE

preva-lenceinHispanicsis138.7---244.5per100,000people.4For

every9---10womenwithSLE,1malewillbeaffected.2SLE

hasa waxingandwaning coursewithsignificant morbidity thatcanbefatal---ifnottreatedearly---insomepatients. AdiagnosisofSLEshouldbeconsideredwhenapatienthas characteristicfeaturesofSLEassociatedwithautoantibody formation5; thus, the presence of anti-nuclear antibodies

(ANA)isconsiderednecessaryforanSLEdiagnosis.Patients withoutANAwillhavelessthana3%probabilityof develop-ingthedisease.

Theobjectivesofthispaperaretoprovideanoverview basedontheliteratureandonthepersonalexperienceof 30yearsoftreatingpatientswithSLE,providegeneraland specific recommendations regarding the diagnosis of this challenging disease, and share therapeutic concepts that

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rmu.2014.11.001

(2)

60 D.Á.Galarza-Delgado,A.C.Arana-Guajardo

Susceptibility: Genetic Gender Environmental

Autoantibodies

Latent lupus

Incomplete lupus

Preclinical phase Clinical phase

Trigger

Figure1 Proposedcurrentstagesfordevelopingclinical man-ifestationsofSystemicLupusErythematosus.

arefundamentalforthecomprehensivemanagementofthe disease.

SLE

stages

SLEstagesincludeapreclinicalandaclinicalphase,aswell asitsrelatedcomorbidities.

Clinicalmanifestationsonlydevelopinpredisposed indi-viduals and are secondary to a loss of tolerance with a subsequent immune dysregulation6 (Fig. 1). The

develop-ment of autoimmunity is determined by genetic, gender, andenvironmentalfactors.Advancesingenetictechniques haveidentifiedmorethan30geneticassociationswithSLE including variants of HLA and Fc␥ receptor genes, IRF5,

STAT4,PTPN22,TNFAIP3,BLK,BANK1,TNFSF4andITGAM.7

Moreover, the genetic contribution to the development of SLE has been observed in twins, with a concordance between monozygotic twins of 24---56% vs 2---5% in dizy-gotic twins.8 Female preponderance in the pathogenesis

of SLE has been demonstratedin transgenic mice. Smith-Bouvieretal.observedthatmicewiththeXXchromosome weremoresusceptibletodevelopinglupuswhencompared toXY mice.9 Environmental factorscan contribute tothe

developmentofSLEbytheinhibitionofDNAmethylation.10

Thesefactorsincludedrugs(e.g.procainamide),diet, smok-ing,UVlightexposureandinfections(Epstein---Barrvirus).11

Finally,thereisapathogenicautoantibodyproductioninSLE patients,reflectinglossoftolerance.6

Different authors have described the development of autoantibodies before the clinical onset of the disease in the past. Arbuckle et al. described the presence of at least one SLE autoantibody before the diagnosis (up to 9.4 years earlier; mean, 3.3 years) in asymptomatic patients.Antinuclear,antiphospholipid,anti-Roandanti-La antibodiesprecededtheotherautoantibodiesinthiscohort of patients.12 Subsequently, McClain et al. described the

clinicalsignificanceofthepresenceofantiphospholipid anti-bodiespriortoanSLEdiagnosis,aswellasthepresenceof theseautoantibodiesinpatientswithamoresevereclinical outcome.13

Inordertoclassifypatientsintheearlystagesofthe dis-ease,differentauthorshaveproposeddefinitionsaccording

Table1 GeneralrecommendationsforSLE*patients.

Balanceddietandexercise

Avoidsubstancesanddrugsthatmightinducelupus Nosmoking

Vaccinationschedule

Assessmentofcardiovascularriskfactors Screeningofcancer

Evaluationofreproductivehealth Assessmentofcognitivefunction

* Systemiclupuserythematosus.

tothesymptomsandthepresenceofclassificationcriteria. First, theterm undifferentiatedconnectivetissue disease (UCTD)is usedinindividuals withadisease manifestation suggestive but not diagnosticof a specific connective tis-suedisease.UCTDaccountsfor10---20%ofreferredpatients, 10---15%willfulfilltheclassificationcriteriaforSLE5years later.14 Factors that predict evolution to SLE are young

age,alopecia,serositis,discoidlupus,apositiveanti-human globulin(Coombs)testandanti-Smoranti-DNAantibodies.15

Ganczarczyketal.describedtheterm‘‘latentlupus’’to definepatientswithfeaturesconsistentwithSLEwhichmay ormaynotbeapartoftheAmericanCollegeof Rheumato-logy(ACR)classificationcriteria,butstillare≤4.16

Incompletelupusreferstopatients withless thanfour ACRclassificationcriteriaforSLE.Swaaketal.ina multicen-tricstudy,observedthatonlythreeof122incompletelupus patientsdevelopedSLEduring3yearsoffollow-up,and sug-gestedthat incompleteSLEforms asubgroup withagood prognosis.17 Later,Greeretal.confirmedthisobservation.

Theyfollowed38incompletelupuspatientsover19months andonlytwodevelopedSLE.18Anadditionaltermis

preclin-icallupus,whichdefinesindividualswithincreasedgenetic riskforthedevelopmentofSLEbutnoclinicalsymptoms.19

Afterthepreclinicalstage,theclinicalstageoccurswith the onset of symptoms. The GLADEL (Grupo Latinoameri-canodeEstudiodeLupus)cohort,amultinationalinception prospectivecohortinLatinAmericancenters,describedthe symptomsin1214patientswithSLE.Theyfoundthat arthral-gia and/or arthritis, fever, photosensitivity, alopecia and malarrashwerethemostcommonsymptomsatonset.20

SLE

treatment

SLEmanagementrepresentsthe‘‘P4’’,anewparadigmof modern medicine.P4Medicine stands for Predictive, Pre-ventive,PersonalizedandParticipatoryMedicine.

SLE is a syndrome with high variability in the disease course as well as in the severity of the manifestations; thereforeeachSLEpatientshouldbetreatedonan individ-ualized basisinordertoimplementapropertreatment.21

Thegoalofthetreatmentistoachieveremission,prevent flares and use of drugs with the minimum dose required topreventlong-termsideeffects.The treatmentincludes lifestyle modification,patienteducation, physical activity andmedicalor(insomecases)surgicalintervention.

(3)

avoid Echinacea, melatonin, garlic, and alfalfa sprouts, whichhavebeendescribedtoprecipitatetheircondition.22

It is also important to inform patients to avoid disease reactivationdrugssuchasprocainamide,hydralazine, sul-fonamides,anti-TNFa, ibuprofen or estrogen.23,24 Smoking

alsoappearstoinfluence theonsetandcourseof the dis-ease among patients with SLE.25,26 The effect of drugs

likemethotrexate(MTX)andhydroxychloroquine(HCQ)may diminishwithsmoking.

ThevaccinationscheduleinSLEpatientsincludesayearly influenzavaccineandapneumococcalvaccineevery5years. Hepatitis Band Tetanus toxoid vaccinations also seem to besafe,andnotassociatedwithflares.27 Thequadrivalent

human papillomavirus vaccine is also safe and not asso-ciated with increased lupus activity.28 It is important to

considerthatinactivatedlivevaccinesarecontraindicated in patientstaking immunosuppressive drugs and/or gluco-corticoidsatadose>20mg/day.27

Most SLE patients are diagnosed in the reproductive years,thusreproductivehealthis animportantissue.Itis recommendedforSLEpatientstohave aninactivedisease forasixmonthperiodpriortoconception.Therearethree main types of contraceptives: barrier methods, intrauter-inedevicesandthehormonalmethod.Hormonalmethods include combinedor progestin-only. The use of combined methodsisassociatedwithanincreasedriskofSLE,29

how-ever,progesteronemethodshaveproventobesafeforSLE patients.30

In addition tothe control of the disease, SLE patients shouldhaveasystematicassessmentofcomorbidities.SLE patients develop prematureatherosclerosis and their risk of heart attack and stroke is 10 times higher than that of age-matched controls.31 Atherosclerosis is the result

of the complex interplay between dysfunctional immune regulation,inflammation,traditionalriskfactors,aberrant endothelialcellfunctionandrepair,andthetherapeuticsfor treatingtheunderlyingautoimmunedisease.32SLEpatients

alsohaveanincreasedriskofdifferenttypesofcancersuch asnon-Hodgkinlymphoma,lungcancer,andcervical dyspla-sia.Lupusdiseaseactivity,smokingandimmunosuppressive drug exposure are some of the causes of the increase in cancerrisk.33Therefore,SLEpatientsshouldhave

colonos-copies,Papsmear,andmammogramschedules.

Cognitive dysfunction prevalence in SLE ranges from 12% to 87%. Petri et al. compared cognitive functioning inrecentlydiagnosedSLE patientsversusnormalcontrols. Using Automated Neuropsychological Assessment Metrics (ANAM), SLE patients performed significantly worse than normalcontrols.Therefore,acognitiveassessmentis nec-essaryinallSLEpatientsfromtheonsetofthedisease.

WecandivideSLEintothreecategoriesbasedondisease severity:mild,moderate,andsevere(Fig.2).

Corticosteroids (CS) are the mainstay of treatment for SLE in any category, with proven efficacy.34 The

dose varies according to the severity of symptoms. A low dose is 0.1---0.2mg/kg/day, an intermediate dose is 0.3---0.5mg/kg/day,andahighdoseis0.6---2mg/kg/day.The useofthisdrugisassociatedwithanincreaseinserumlipids, bloodpressure,weightandglucose,inadditiontocataracts andosteoporoticfractures.Theadverse sideeffectsofCS depend on both the current and the cumulative dosage. Thamer etal. demonstratedthe hazardratio for accrued

Disease severity

Mild

Malar rash Arthralgia

Fatigue

Sun protection Antimalarials

NSAID Analgesics Belymumab

Prednisone Azathioprine Methotrexate Mycophenolate

mofetil

Prednisone/ Methylprednisolone

Mycophenolate mofetil Cyclophosphamide

Azathioprine Plasmapheresis

IVIg Rituximab Arthritis

Serositis Crops of mout

ulcers

Renal Cerebral features Alveolar hemorrhage

Hemolytic anemia Thrombocytopenia Necrotizing vasculitis

Severe serositis

Moderate

Comorbidity assessment

Treatment

Severe

Figure 2 Stepwise approach in the treatment of SLE. NSAID,Nonsteroidalantiinflammatorydrugs;IVIg,intravenous immunoglobulin;SLE,systemiclupuserythematosus.

organdamagetobe1.5,1.64and2.51withprednisonedoses of 6mg/day, 12mg/day and >18mg/day, respectively.35 It

is important to note that SLE diagnosis is not equivalent tothe useof methylprednisolone,andthatin manycases the deleterious effects of CS may outweigh the benefits. Therefore,thegoalistheuseofCSaccordingtotheclinical manifestationsandslowtaperingto1---2mg/day.Inorderto reduceCSdosesandsideeffects,theuseofanotheragent ismandatory.34

MildSLEincludesmucocutaneouslesions,arthralgiasand fatigue.Sun protectionconsists of avoiding whenthe sun is at its highest (10am to 4pm) and patients should use agentswithasunprotectionfactorofat least50,applied 20---30minpriortoexposure,andreappliedevery4h.Topical therapiesdependonwhetheritisalocalizedorwidespread skindisease.Therapiesincludesteroidsand/or calcineurin inhibitors.36Systemictherapiesincludeantimalarialagents,

MTX,azathioprine,mycophenolatemofetil(MMF),dapsone, and cyclophosphamide (CYC), and are used in refrac-tory diseases or in poor responses to treatment.34,36 For

cutaneovascularmanifestations(Raynaudsyndrome,livedo reticularis,etc.) theuse ofcold-preventivemeasures and calcium channel blockers can be beneficial. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatorydrugs (NSAID)canbeusedinheadaches, myalgias, arthralgias, and serositis. NSAID use must be monitored;sideeffectscouldberenal,gastrointestinalor cardiovascular.In myexperience,I have seen severe sec-ondarysideeffectssuchasasepticmeningitis.Ibuprofenis thedrugmostfrequentlyinvolvedinasepticmeningitis,but sulindacandnaproxenhavealsobeendescribed.37

(4)

62 D.Á.Galarza-Delgado,A.C.Arana-Guajardo

responds to NSAID and CS. Belimumab is a fully human-ized IgG1 mAb that binds to soluble BLyS (B lymphocyte stimulator),inhibiting itsactivity.21 BLISS-52 andBLISS 76

demonstratedsignificantclinicalresponseswithBelimumab comparedtoplacebosinpatientswithmildandmoderate diseaseactivity(withoutnephritis/CNS).39,40

The severe SLE stage includes hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia,diffuse alveolar hemorrhage, necrotiz-ingvasculitis,neuropsychiatriclupusandrenalinvolvement. In this stage, CS is used in high doses and intravenous methylprednisolone pulses for severe cases. In hemolytic anemia and thrombocytopenia the treatment includes CS anddanazol,Rituximab,intravenousimmunoglobulin(IVIg), MMF,CYC,plasmapheresisand/or splenectomy for refrac-tory cases.41 The use of CYC and high doses of CS are

alsoemployedfordiffusealveolarhemorrhage,and plasma-pheresis for refractory cases.We made an observational, retrospectivestudythatincludedtwelveSLEpatientswith alveolar hemorrhage. We found that simultaneous treat-mentwithCS,CYC,plasmapheresisandIVIgwasassociated with a mortality of 17%, contrary to the rate previously describedofupto70---90%.42

According tothe recommendations, glucocorticoid and immunosuppressive therapy is indicated for severe neu-ropsychiatric manifestations (myelopathy, optic neuritis, etc.).AnticoagulationtherapyisindicatedfortheSNC man-ifestationsofantiphospholipidsyndrome.43Inourpractice,

wehavealsoobservedthatthecombinationof methylpred-nisolone,CYC,IVIgandRituximabwaseffectiveforpsychosis refractorytoconventionaltreatment.

Renal involvement is considered the most important prognostic factor. The Task Force Panel for screening, treatment, and management of Lupus Nephritis (LN) rec-ommendedthe treatment to be basedon the type of LN accordingtotheISN/RPScriteria.44Thetreatmentconsists

of the use of corticosteroids either solely or in combina-tionwithimmunosuppressiveagents.Therecommendations for LN treatment include an induction and a maintaining therapy. There are 2 regimens for Class III/IV LN, low-dose ‘‘Euro-Lupus’’ CYC and high-dose CYC followed by maintenancetreatmentwithMMForazathioprine.45 Inour

practice,webelievethatalow-doseCYCismorebeneficial topatientsdecreasing adverse effects,suchasinfections, gonadal toxicity and increased risk of cancer. We do not sharetheideathatmethylprednisolonepulseswillprovide agreaterbenefitthanprednisone.Andfinally,LNresponse shouldbeevaluated3---6monthsafterinitiatingtreatment. In conclusion, SLE is a challenging diseaseto diagnose andtreat. Advancesin research have allowedus toknow whichindividualsareatriskofdevelopingthedisease.Each patientshouldbetreatedonanindividualizedbasis accord-ingtotheirclinicalmanifestationsinordertoprovideproper treatment.

Funding

Nofinancialsupportwasprovided.

Conflict

of

interest

Theauthorshavenoconflictsofinteresttodeclare.

References

1.WallaceDJ,HahnBH.Duboislupuserythematosus.7thed. Lip-pincottWilliams&Wilkins;2007.

2.O’NeillS,CerveraR.Systemiclupuserythematosus.BestPract ResClinRheumatol.2010;24:841---51.

3.Pons-EstelGJ,AlarcónGS,ScofieldL,etal.Understandingthe epidemiologyandprogressionofsystemiclupuserythematosus. SeminArthritisRheum.2010;39:257---68.

4.Atisha-FregosoY,Jakez-OcampoJ,LlorenteL.Systemiclupus erythematosusinHispanics.Autoimmunity.2011;44:555---61. 5.SmithPP,GordonC.Systemiclupuserythematosus:clinical

pre-sentations.AutoimmunRev.2010;10:43---5.

6.ChoiJ,KimST,CraftJ.Thepathogenesisofsystemiclupus ery-thematosus---anupdate.CurrOpinImmunol.2012;24:651---7. 7.Deng Y, Tsao BP. Genetic susceptibility to systemic lupus

erythematosus in the genomic era. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2010;6:683---92.

8.DeapenD,EscalanteA, WeinribL, et al. Arevised estimate oftwinconcordanceinsystemiclupuserythematosus.Arthritis Rheumatol.1992;35:311---8.

9.Smith-BouvierDL,DivekarAA,SadidharM,etal.Aroleforsex chromosomecomplementin the femalebias in autoimmune disease.JExpMed.2008;12:1099---108.

10.Tsokos GS. Systemic lupus erythematosus. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:2110---21.

11.Somers EC, Richardson BC. Environmental exposures, epige-neticchangesandtheriskoflupus.Lupus.2014;23:568---76. 12.ArbuckleMR,McClainMT, RubertoneMV,et al.Development

ofautoantibodiesbefore theclinicalonsetofsystemic lupus erythematosus.NEnglJMed.2003;16:1526---33.

13.McClainMT,ArbuckleMR,HeinlenLD,et al.Theprevalence, onset, and clinical significance of antiphospholipid antibod-iespriortodiagnosisofsystemiclupuserythematosus.Arthritis Rheumatol.2004;50:1226---32.

14.BertsiasGK,SalmonJE,BoumpasDT.Therapeuticopportunities insystemiclupuserythematosus:stateoftheartandprospects forthenewdecade.AnnRheumDis.2010;69:1603---11. 15.Calvo-Alen J, Alarcon GS, Burgard SL, et al. Systemic lupus

erythematosus:predictors of its occurrenceamong a cohort ofpatientswithearlyundifferentiatedconnective tissue dis-ease:multivariateanalysesandidentificationofriskfactors.J Rheumatol.1996;23:469---75.

16.Ganczarczyk L, Urowitz MB, Gladman DD. Latent lupus. J Rheumatol.1989;16:475---8.

17.SwaakAJ,vandeBrinkH,SmeenkRJ,etal.Incompletelupus erythematosus:resultsofamulticentrestudyunderthe supervi-sionoftheEULARStandingCommitteeonInternationalClinical Studies Including Therapeutic Trials (ESCISIT). Rheumatology (Oxford).2001;40:89---94.

18.Greer JM,PanushRS. Incomplete lupuserythematosus. Arch InternMed.1989;149:2473---6.

19.Deane KD, El-Gabalawy H. Pathogenesis and prevention of rheumatic disease:focus onpreclinical RAand SLE.NatRev Rheumatol.2014;10:212---28.

20.Pons-EstelBA,CatoggioLJ,CardielMH,etal.TheGLADEL multi-nationalLatinAmericanprospectiveinceptioncohortof1214 patientswith systemiclupus erythematosus: ethnicand dis-easeheterogeneityamong‘‘Hispanics’’.Medicine(Baltimore). 2004;83:1---17.

21.Sthoeger Z, Sharabi A, Mozes E. Novel approaches to the development of targeted therapeutic agents for systemic lupus erythematosus. J Autoimmun. 2014, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jaut.201406.002[Epubaheadof print].

(5)

23.SkaerTL. Medication-inducedsystemic lupus erythematosus. ClinTher.1992;14:496---506.

24.XiaoX,Chang C.Diagnosisandclassificationofdrug-induced autoimmunity(DIA).JAutoimmun.2014;48:66---72.

25.Ekblom-KullbergS, KautianienH, Alha P,et al. Smokingand the risk of systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Rheumatol. 2013;32:1219---22.

26.Bourré-TessierJ,PeschkenCA,BernatskyS,etal.Associationof smokingwithcutaneousmanifestationsinsystemiclupus ery-thematosus.ArthritisCareRes(Hoboken).2013;65:1275---80. 27.MoscaM,Tani C,AringerM,et al. EuropeanLeague Against

Rheumatism recommendations for monitoring patients with systemiclupuserythematosusinclinicalpracticeandin obser-vationalstudies.AnnRheumDis.2010;69:1269---74.

28.MokCC,HoLY,FongLS,et al.Immunogenicityandsafetyof aquadrivalenthumanpapillomavirusvaccineinpatientswith systemiclupuserythematosus:acase-controlstudy.AnnRheum Dis.2013;72:659---64.

29.BernierMO,MikaeloffY,HudsonM,etal.Combinedoral con-traceptiveuseandtheriskofsystemiclupuserythematosus. ArthritisRheum.2009;61:476---81.

30.AndreoliL,FrediM,NalliC,etal.Pregnancyimplicationsfor sys-temiclupuserythematosusandtheantiphospholipidsyndrome. JAutoimmun.2012;38:J197---208.

31.AskanaseA,ShumK,MitnickH.Systemiclupuserythematosus: anoverview.SocWorkHealthCare.2012;51:576---86.

32.SkaggsBJ,HahnBH,McMahonM.Acceleratedatherosclerosis inpatientswithSLE---mechanismsandmanagement.NatRev Rheumatol.2012;14:214---23.

33.BernatskyS,KaleM,Ramsey-GoldmanR,etal.Systemiclupus andmalignancies.CurrOpinRheumatol.2012;24:177---81. 34.Lateef A, Petri M. Unmet medical needs in systemic lupus

erythematosus. Arthritis Res Ther. 2012;14 Suppl. 4:S4, http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/ar3919[Epub18.12.12].

35.ThamerM,HernanMA,ZhangY,etal.Prednisone,lupusactivity, andpermanentorgandamage.JRheumatol.2009;36:560---4.

36.Okon LG, Werth VP. Cutaneous lupus erythematosus: diag-nosis and treatment. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2013;27:391---404.

37.MorisG,Garcia-MoncoJC.Thechallengeofdrug-induced asep-ticmeningitis.ArchInternMed.1999;159:1185---94.

38.BallEM,BellAL.Lupusarthritis---dowehaveaclinicallyuseful classification?Rheumatology(Oxford).2012;51:771---9. 39.Navarra SV, Guzman RM, Gallacher AE, et al. Efficacy and

safetyofbelimumabinpatientswithactivesystemiclupus ery-thematosus:arandomised,placebo-controlled,phase3trial. Lancet.2011;377:721---31.

40.Furie R, Petri M, Zamani O, et al. A phase III, random-ized, placebo-controlled study of belimumab, a monoclonal antibody that inhibits B lymphocyte stimulator, in patients withsystemiclupuserythematosus.ArthritisRheum.2011;63: 3918---30.

41.Newman K, Owlia MB, El-Hemaidi I, et al. Management of immunecytopeniasinpatientswithsystemiclupus erythemato-sus---oldandnew.AutoimmunRev.2013;12:784---91.

42.Sauceda-DuránAY,Pérez-BarbosaL,Galarza-DelgadoDA,etal. Hemorragia Aleolar en pacientes con enfermedades autoin-munes.Revisióndeunaseriede15casos.Reumatologíaclínica. 2006;2:65.

43.BertsiasGK,IoannidisJP,AringerM,etal.EULAR recommen-dationsforthemanagementofsystemiclupuserythematosus withneuropsychiatricmanifestations:reportofataskforceof theEULARstandingcommitteeforclinicalaffairs.AnnRheum Dis.2010;69:2074---82.

44.WeeningJJ,D´AgatiVD,SchwartzMM,etal.Theclassificationof glomerulonephritisinsystemiclupuserythematosusrevisited. KidneyInt.2004;65:521---30.

Figure

Figure 1 Proposed current stages for developing clinical man- man-ifestations of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.
Figure 2 Stepwise approach in the treatment of SLE.

Referencias

Documento similar