Analysis of the response speed of musculature of the knee in professional male and female volleyball players

(1)

Research Article

Analysis of the Response Speed of Musculature of the Knee in

Professional Male and Female Volleyball Players

D. Rodríguez-Ruiz,

1

I. Diez-Vega,

2

D. Rodríguez-Matoso,

1

M. Fernandez-del-Valle,

3

R. Sagastume,

4

and J. J. Molina

2

1_{University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Campus Universitario de Tafira, s/n,}

Edificio de Ciencias de la Actividad F´ısica y el Deporte, 35017 Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain

2_{European University of Madrid, Calle Rio Tajo s/n, Villaviciosa de Od´on, 28670 Madrid, Spain}

3_{Department of Health, Exercise, and Sport Sciences, Texas Tech University, P.O. Box 43011, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA} 4_{University of Pa´ıs Vasco, Carretera Lasarte s/n, 01007 Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain}

Correspondence should be addressed to D. Rodr´ıguez-Ruiz; [email protected]

Received 5 February 2014; Revised 9 April 2014; Accepted 6 May 2014; Published 9 June 2014

Academic Editor: Kazushige Goto

Copyright © 2014 D. Rodr´ıguez-Ruiz et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the normalized response speed (Vrn) of the knee musculature (flexor and extensor) in high competitive level volleyball players using tensiomyography (TMG) and to analyze the muscular response of the vastus medialis (VM), rectus femoris (RF), vastus lateralis (VL), and biceps femoris (BF) in accordance with the specific position they play in their teams. One hundred and sixty-six players (83 women and 83 men) were evaluated. They belonged to eight teams in the Spanish women’s superleague and eight in the Spanish men’s superleague. The use of Vrn allows avoiding possible sample imbalances due to anatomical and functional differences and demands. We found differences between Vrn in each of the muscles responsible for extension (VM, RF, and VL) and flexion (BF) regardless of the sex. Normalized response speed differences seem to be larger in setters, liberos and outside players compared to middle blockers and larger in males when compared to females. These results of Vrn might respond to the differences in the physical and technical demands of each specific position, showing an improved balance response of the knee extensor and flexor musculature in male professional volleyball players.

1. Introduction

Volleyball is a sport in which players frequently perform technical actions which, from the mechanical perspective, involve a flexion-extension of the ankle, knee, and hip joints. The efficacy of the technical action depends to a great extent on the effectiveness of this movement in actions involving displacement and/or jumping.

The development of such movements depends on the skill of the athletes, while their efficacy depends on technical (spike or block), practical (jump or landing), and conditional (physical abilities) factors. The learning and automation process which the athlete has followed during his or her training is likewise decisive. In this regard, specialisation in order to achieve a high level of performance in a sporting pursuit involves the standardisation of training methods so

as to bring about structural and neural adaptations properly aligned with the inherent demands of the activity to be performed and the position assigned to the player.

The morphological, muscular, and conditional differ-ences between the male and female players occupying partic-ular different positions may become qualitatively distinctive variables in their performance and predisposition to injury. In this regard, the greater activation of the ischiotibial muscula-ture observed in landing after a jump and/or the coactivation which occurs between the flexor and extensor musculature of the knee joint when jumping or changing direction [1–9] are the main reasons which may cause an athlete to suffer an injury or fail to achieve the desired performance.

It is therefore necessary to perform a highly precise, individualized and localized evaluation of those muscular structures which are most commonly employed when playing

(2)

volleyball. In accordance with the specific demands of male and female players and the particular position in which they play, since this will represent a conditional burden and a different technical demand [10–13] which will affect the flexor and extensor muscles of the knee joint in different ways.

In monitoring the muscular activation of the groups involved, tensiomyography (TMG) serves as a noninvasive diagnostic method which requires no effort on the part of the subject in question and which can be particularly useful to assess the rigidity, mechanical characteristics, and contractile capacity of superficial muscles when activated by an elec-trical stimulus of controlled intensity [14–27]. Meanwhile, in previous studies TMG has proven itself to be a sensitive, reliable, and methodologically valid tool to assess relevant differences of each specific player position, the sport skills, and the position on court [25]. In addition, Rodr´ıguez-Ruiz et al. [26] reported sex differences in the normalized response speed (Vrn) in the musculature responsible for extension and flexion of the knee joint. The use of Vrn allows avoiding possible sample imbalances due to anatomical and functional differences and demands. For example, Rodr´ıguez-Ruiz et al. [27] found differences for Vastus Lateralis but not for Biceps Femoris between subjects of different ages and levels of physical activity.

Based on these contributions [26, 27], the aim of this study was to employ TMG as the instrument for evaluation of the normalized response speed (Vrn) of the flexor and exten-sor musculature of the knee in high competitive volleyball players and to analyze the muscular response of the vastus medialis (VM), rectus femoris (RF), vastus lateralis (VL), and biceps femoris (BF) in accordance with the specific position they play in their teams.

2. Method

2.1. Participants. One hundred sixty-six players were evalu-ated: 83 females (23.9 years±5.1, 178.1 cm±7.3, and 71.9 Kg± 8.9) and 83 males (25.9 years±4.8, 191.3 cm±7.4, and 87.7 Kg ±9.3). They belonged to eight teams in the Spanish Women’s Superleague and eight in the Spanish Men’s Superleague. More than 75% of the players had at some point represented their country in international matches either at senior or junior levels.

All participants were informed of the potential risks associated with the study and signed written consent forms, approved in advance by the University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria’s Research Ethics Committee, in accordance with the guidelines set out in the Declaration of Helsinki on research involving human subjects (adopted by the 18th Assembly of the World Medical Association, held in Helsinki in 1964, and amended by the 59th General Assembly, held in Seoul in 2008) which were strictly followed by all members of the research team.

2.2. Measurement Procedure. The muscles analysed by means of TMG were the vastus medialis (VM), rectus femoris (RF), vastus lateralis (VL), and biceps femoris (BF), based on the premise that these are the most significant in the technical actions involved in specific movements and jumping [28].

A pressure sensor was attached to the belly of the selected muscle, ensuring that it was positioned perpendicular to the muscle belly [29] and measurements were performed supine for VL, VM, and RF and prone (BF) both set at 30∘ angle of knee flexion [30–33]. In order to provoke contraction a bipolar electrical current was applied. One single intensity (110 mA) of one millisecond in duration was applied, via two electrodes positioned at 5 cm the proximal and distal to measurement point in such a way as not to affect the tendons [34]. A pause between electrical stimuli was set in order to avoid the phenomenon of posttetanic activation [34,35]. The reproducibility of the method and the validity of the experimental protocol employed by TMG have been studied in a number of works, revealing this to be a highly precise tool [19,26,31,34,36–39].

Evaluation of the desired muscle provides numerical information as to the magnitude of the radial displacements of the transversal muscle fibres and the moment when these occur [29,34]. Out of all the data obtained, we focus on the study of thenormalized response speed(Vrn). This parameter was used to compare gender mechanical muscles differences on high performance volleyball players [26] and subjects with different age [27].

Thenormalized response speed(Vrn) represents the rela-tionship between the difference in the radial displacement between 10% and 90% of muscle belly maximum radial displacement (Dm) and the increase in the muscular con-traction time between these same values. Valencǐc and Knež [29] state that in order to be able to compare the values obtained in different muscles this increase in time must be normalized. This is achieved by dividing the equation previously performed by the Dm for each muscle. The authors do not state that the increase in the displacement between 10% and 90% of Dm is equal to 0.8 per Dm. As a result, the normalized speed of response would be equal to 0.8 divided by the increase in the muscular contraction time between 10% and 90% of Dm. The data obtained for the left leg and the right leg were added together in order to be able to illustrate differences without differences of lateral symmetry influencing the final functional analysis [26].

(3)

demonstrating that Vrn is a parameter which allows us to isolate these anatomical and functional interferences.

2.3. Statistical Analysis. All data were checked for normal-ity using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov, where normalnormal-ity was assumed if 𝑃 > 0.05. A 2 × 4 × 5 mixed ANOVA was used to analyze the interactions between sex (male, female) or specific position (setter, middle blocker, outside hitter, or opposite hitter) with the musculature (BF, RF, VM, and VL). Degrees of freedom were corrected using Greenhouse-Geisser estimates. Bonferroni test was used for post hoc analyses. All the statistics were performed using the SPSS-v21 statistical package (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA), and with an alpha significance of 0.05.

3. Results

An interaction within subjects was shown for all muscles (F(1.92) = 35.40, 𝑃 < 0.001, 𝜂2 = 0.23). In addition, the differences between muscles remained present when allocated by sex (F(1.92) = 15.79,𝑃 < 0.001, 𝜂2 = 0.10). Nevertheless, no interactions were found when allocated by specific position (F(7.70) = 1.32,𝑃 = 0.24,𝜂2 = 0.03) or by sex and specific position (F(7.70) = 0.75,𝑃 = 0.64,𝜂2= 0.02). Normalized response speed (Vrn) was significantly differ-ent between all of them. BF has shown lower Vrn compared to RF (𝑃 = 0.022), VM (𝑃 < 0.001), and VL (𝑃 < 0.001). In addition, RF has shown lower Vrn than VM (𝑃 = 0.012) and VL (𝑃 < 0.001), and VM has shown lower Vrn than VL (𝑃 < 0.001) (Figure 1).

Significant differences depending on sex were found in BF (F(1) = 18.57,𝑃 < 0.001,𝜂2 = 0.12) and VM (F(1) = 6.30, 𝑃 = 0.01,𝜂2 = 0.04), but not for RF (F(1) = 0.00,𝑃 = 0.99, 𝜂2 < 0.01) or VL (F(1) = 1.77,𝑃 = 0.19, 𝜂2 = 0.01). Vrn in males was greater than in females in BF (𝑃 < 0.001) but lower in VM (𝑃 = 0.013) (Figure 2).

No interactions (muscle×position) were found. When post hoc analyses were applied, no differences were found in BF (F(4) = 0.48,𝑃 = 0.75,𝜂2 < 0.01). However, significant differences were found in RF (F(4) = 3.78,𝑃 = 0.006,𝜂2 = 0.10), VM (F(4) = 5.87,𝑃 < 0.001,𝜂2 = 0.15), and VL (F(4) = 3.64,𝑃 = 0.007,𝜂2= 0.09) for all positions. Vrn in middle blockers was lower in VM compared to setters (𝑃 < 0.001), outside hitters (𝑃 = 0.023), and liberos (𝑃 = 0.021). Middle blockers also showed lower Vrn in RF (𝑃 = 0.006) and VL (𝑃 = 0.010) (Figure 3).

A main effect was shown for muscle×position (F(4) = 4.29,𝑃 = 0.003,𝜂2 = 0.11), not for muscle×sex (F(1) = 1.34, 𝑃 = 0.25,𝜂2< 0.01) or sex×position (F(4) = 0.76,𝑃 = 0.55, 𝜂2= 0.02).

When Vrn differences were analyzed depending on sex and position, significant differences were found in VM for males (F(4) = 5.66,𝑃 < 0.001,𝜂2 = 0.15), where Vrm was greater in setters when compared to opposite hitters (𝑃 = 0.025) and middle blockers (𝑃 < 0.001). No other differences were found (Figure 4).

VL VM

RF BF

V

rn (mm/s)

65,00

60,00

55,00

50,00

45,00

40,00

60,69

54,83 52,27

49,19

∗ ∗ ∗

∗ ∗

∗

Figure 1: Differences in the mean normalized response speed (Vrn) in mm/s in biceps femoris (BF), rectus femoris (RF), vastus medialis (VM), and vastus lateralis (VL), in both male and female players

(∗𝑃 ≤ 0.05) (95% of the confidence interval (IC)).

When specific positions were analyzed, middle blockers showed the lowest Vrn (51.27 ±1.04 mm/ms; 𝑃 = 0.002), followed by the opposite hitters (53.46±1.53 mm/ms;𝑃 = 0.035), and outside hitters (54.27±1.53 mm/ms;𝑃 < 0.001). The volleyball players with greater Vrn were the liberos (56.38 ±1.20 mm/ms;𝑃 = 0.045) and setters (56.38±1.53 mm/ms; 𝑃 = 0.050) (Figure 5).

4. Discussion

In this study we found evidence of differences in terms of the speed of response of the musculature responsible for extension (VM, RF, and VL) and flexion (BF) in the knee joint of professional male and female volleyball players (Figure 1). The adipose tissue arises as an important factor affecting the muscular responses to electrical stimulation. In this sense, Diez-Vega et al. [40] analyzed the correlation of the values of fat percentage (%F), front thigh skinfold (FTS), and thigh girth (TG) to the maximal radial deformation (Dm) of the rectus femoris (RF) obtained using TMG. Results did not show differences between samples (FTS versus Dm: 𝑟2 = 0.0096;𝑃 = 0.19, and %Gversus Dm:𝑟2 < 0.001;𝑃 = 0.98), neither when TG was used as a control variable (FTS versus Dm:𝑟2 = 0.01;𝑃 = 0.18, and %Gversus Dm:𝑟2 < 0.001; 𝑃 = 0.82). These results point out that Dm is not affected by body composition variables such as %F, FTS, or TG in high performance volleyball players.

(4)

∗

Female Male

V

rn (mm/s)

65,00

60,00

55,00

50,00

45,00

40,00

43,10 55,28

BF

(a)

Female Male

52,29 52,24

RF

(b)

Female Male

56,67

52,99 VM

∗

(c)

Female Male

61,58 59,79

VL

(d)

Figure 2: Sex differences in mean normalized response speed (Vrn) in mm/s in biceps femoris (BF), rectus femoris (RF), vastus medialis

(VM), and vastus lateralis (VL), comparing male and female players (∗𝑃 ≤ 0.05) (95% of the confidence interval (IC)).

These considerations are reinforced in the results found on comparing the Vrn results between men and women, it being observed that Vrn in males was greater in males than in females for BF (𝑃 < 0.001), but lower in VM (𝑃 = 0.013) (Figure 2). In this sense, Ebben et al. [41] reported that, during the precontact phase of the jump, males activate quadriceps muscle earlier than females and that males are hamstring’s activity dominate during the postcontact phase compared to females.

Results such as the Vrn differences between sex and BF or VM (Vrn greater in males compared to females) are supported by Rodr´ıguez-Ruiz et al. [26]. This study suggests that morphological differences may be caused by sex differences. The shape and proportions of the pelvis, as well as the position of the bony structures of the lower limb, are especially important in this sport. Hip width and external tibia rotation prompt flexion-extension of the knee, leading to a higher probability of injury amongst women [42–44]. Further, Rodr´ıguez-Ruiz et al. [26] argue that these struc-tural differences, combined with differences in mechanical response (Vrn) of the RF, VL, VM, and BF, indicate the possible development of a certain instability in the knee joint, perhaps adversely affecting the application of forces in the jump [8] and increasing the risk of injury on landing [1,3– 5,7,9].

Several anatomic and histochemical investigations [45– 50] revealed two additional but always dissectible parts of the vastus medialis (VM) muscle: the vastus medialis obliquus (VMO) and the vastus medialis longus (VML). VMO runs into the quadriceps tendon, the superomedial quadrant of the patella, and the anterior medial capsule. The fibers in this short head are more horizontal, deviating an average of 50∘–55∘medially from the femoral axis. They have a specific

role in the alignment and, therefore, an important role at the end of the extension as they lock the muscle of the knee. The long head inserted more proximally into the base of the patella is described as VML. The fibers in this long head are directed vertically, deviating an average of 15∘–18∘medially from the longitudinal axis of the femur. VML is purely an extensor of the leg. VMO is a weak extensor of the leg, but it plays an important role in keeping the patella on track in gliding on the femoral condyles. The medially directed forces of the VMO counteract laterally directed forces of the vastus lateralis, thus preventing lateral displacement of the patella in the trochlear groove [47]. Increased values for VM in females might suggest that this muscle plays an important role in the knee stabilization, but further investigation is needed in others to confirm such hypothesis.

(5)

V

rn (mm/s)

70,00

60,00

50,00

40,00

51,85

46,21 49,87 49,63 51,07

Li

be

ro

Ou

tside hi

tt

er

M

iddle b

lo

ck

er

Op

posi

te

hi

tt

er

Se

tt

er

BF

(a)

57,21

53,42

47,64 52,60 53,34

Li

be

ro

O

utside hi

tt

er

Midd

le blo

ck

er

O

pp

osi

te hi

tt

er

Se

tt

er

RF

∗

(b)

57,35 56,07

50,29 52,39 58,89

Li

be

ro

O

utside hi

tt

er

Midd

le blo

ck

er

O

pp

osi

te hi

tt

er

Se

tt

er

VM

∗

∗ ∗

(c)

65,00

61,16

57,36 58,94 62,79

Li

be

ro

Ou

tside hi

tt

er

M

iddle b

lo

ck

er

Op

posi

te

hi

tt

er

Se

tt

er

VL

∗

(d)

Figure 3: Differences in mean normalized response speed (Vrn) in mm/s depending on the specific position (setter, opposite hitter, middle blocker, outside hitter, and libero) in biceps femoris (BF), rectus femoris (RF), vastus medialis (VM), and vastus lateralis (VL), in both male

and female players by team position (∗𝑃 ≤ 0.05) (95% of the confidence interval (IC)).

rally point they may perform various jumps or perform some other explosive action after receiving a jump. This same behaviour occurs with the setters who after a controlled jump (suspended set) generally perform another explosive action. This combines with the fact that in both positions and in the liberos there is a large number of lateral movements which end with flexion of the knee joint in order to balance the body and provide a secure platform for the subsequent technical action. Outside and opposite hitters perform greater amount of movements (different techniques) with increased knee flexion. In the case of the setters and liberos the knee flexion is related to specific movements such as controlled jumps (setters) or a large number of lateral movements ended in knee flexion (liberos). This is the reason why the setters and the liberos also reveal high values in BF (Figure 3). Sheppard et al. [51] reported differences in the ability to tolerate high stretch loads depending on the specific position, as in the depth jump, where outside and opposite players bear the major loads compared to setters, middle blockers, and liberos. In this sense, there are studies listed in the specialist bibliography demonstrating that employment of a prior activity which positively conditions the subsequent action of muscular contraction will increase the vertical jump [52,53]. This would lead us to suppose that this jump prior to an explosive action, whether in setting, in dummying a shot or jump to the opposing middle blocker and a subsequent move to the wing by the middle blocker could lead to a state of complete potentiation [54] in the rapid contraction

motor units, increasing themuscular speed of responseto a contraction generated by an external electrical stimulus in BF. Figure 3reveals that the middle blockers are the players with the lowest RF values in comparison with other positions; this being in fact statistically significant in the liberos (𝑃 = 0.006), the players with the greatest speed of response. These differences in RF could be the result of the position of the body when performing the specific technical actions of the position, as the middle blockers are always close to the net and the body position always has a high centre of gravity, whereas the liberos are in thesecond line, further away from the net with a greater variation in the flexion extension of the hip when they perform defensive actions, with a lower centre of gravity.

When Vrn differences were analyzed depending on sex and position, significant differences were found in VM for males, where Vrm was greater in setters when compared to opposite hitters (𝑃 = 0.025) and middle blockers (𝑃 < 0.001). No other differences were found (Figure 4). Perhaps, these values for VM in setters might suggest that this muscle plays an important role in the knee stabilization, but further investigation is needed in others to confirm such hypothesis. Sheppard et al. [55] also found differences on the physio-logical demands and characteristics, and the jumping ability depending on the specific position in elite male volleyball players.

(6)

V rn (mm/s) 70,00 60,00 50,00 40,00 30,00 V rn (mm/s) 70,00 60,00 50,00 40,00 30,00 Ma le Fe m al e 67,24 62,35 57,87 59,64 63,06 57,42 53,33 48,00 52,32 53,19 56,15 53,32 47,70 49,60 59,55 58,80 58,17 53,01 55,80 58,15 57,04 53,52 47,30 52,84 53,48 55,69 52,20 57,58 50,25

59,29 59,6063,16

56,88 58,36 62,56 47,17 41,67 41,80 48,89 41,74 Li be ro Ou tside hi tt er M iddle b lo ck er Op po si te hi tt er Se tt er Li be ro Ou tside hi tt er M iddle b lo ck er Op po si te hi tt er Se tt er Li be ro Ou tside hi tt er Mi dd le bl oc ke r Op po si te hi tt er Se tt er Li be ro Ou tside hi tt er Mi dd le bl oc ke r Op po si te hi tt er Se tt er

BF RF VM VL

∗

Figure 4: Mean normalized response speed (Vrn) differences in biceps femoris (BF), rectus femoris (RF), vastus medialis (VM), and vastus

lateralis (VL) depending on sex and position (∗𝑃 ≤ 0.05) (95% of the confidence interval (IC)).

Libero Outside Middle Opposite Setter V rn (mm/s) 65,00 60,00 55,00 50,00 45,00 40,00 57,85 54,22 51,29 53,39 56,52 hitter blocker hitter ∗ ∗ ∗ _∗ ∗

Figure 5: Main effect of mean normalized response speed (Vrn)

in mm/s compared by team position (∗𝑃 ≤ 0.05) (95% of the

confidence interval (IC)).

showed the lower Vrn (51.27 ± 1.04 mm/ms; 𝑃 = 0.002), followed by the opposite hitters (53.46±1.53 mm/ms;𝑃 = 0.035), and outside hitters (54.27±1.53 mm/ms;𝑃 < 0.001). The volleyball players with greater Vrn were the liberos (56.38 ±1.20 mm/ms;𝑃 = 0.045) and setters (56.38±1.53 mm/ms; 𝑃 = 0.050).

4.1. Future Studies. We believe it is necessary to continue studying the results provided by TMG, comparing these with height of jump, anthropometric measurements, and age and race of the players. These studies will provide a better

understanding of sex differences that will allow developing the most appropriate training strategies for knee injuries and muscular imbalances in females.

5. Conclusions

Differences between Vrn in the musculature responsible for extension (VM, RF, and VL) and flexion (BF) of the knee are present in professional volleyball players regardless of sex. Those differences seem to be larger in setters, liberos and outside players compared to middle blockers and larger in males when compared to females.

These results of Vrn might respond to the differences in the physical and technical demands of each specific position, showing an improved balance response of the knee extensor and flexor musculature in male professional volleyball play-ers.

Conflict of Interests

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Acknowledgments

(7)

References

[1] Y. Salci, B. B. Kentel, C. Heycan, S. Akin, and F. Korkusuz, “Comparison of landing maneuvers between male and female

college volleyball players,”Clinical Biomechanics, vol. 19, no. 6,

pp. 622–628, 2004.

[2] D. A. Padua, B. L. Arnold, C. R. Garcia, and K. P. Granata, “Gender differences in leg stiffness and stiffness recruitment

strategy during two-legged hopping,”Journal of Motor Behavior,

vol. 37, no. 2, pp. 111–125, 2005.

[3] T. W. Kernozek, M. R. Torry, H. van Hoof, H. Cowley, and S. Tanner, “Gender differences in frontal and sagittal plane

biomechanics during drop landings,”Medicine and Science in

Sports and Exercise, vol. 37, no. 6, pp. 1003–1012, 2005. [4] K. R. Ford, G. D. Myer, R. L. Smith, R. M. Vianello, S. L. Seiwert,

and T. E. Hewett, “A comparison of dynamic coronal plane excursion between matched male and female athletes when

performing single leg landings,”Clinical Biomechanics, vol. 21,

no. 1, pp. 33–40, 2006.

[5] T. E. Hewett, K. R. Ford, G. D. Myer, K. Wanstrath, and M. Scheper, “Gender differences in hip adduction motion

and torque during a single-leg agility maneuver,”Journal of

Orthopaedic Research, vol. 24, no. 3, pp. 416–421, 2006. [6] B. Yu, C.-F. Lin, and W. E. Garrett, “Lower extremity

biome-chanics during the landing of a stop-jump task,” Clinical

Biomechanics, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 297–305, 2006.

[7] E. Pappas, M. Hagins, A. Sheikhzadeh, M. Nordin, and D. Rose, “Biomechanical differences between unilateral and bilateral

landings from a jump: gender differences,”Clinical Journal of

Sport Medicine, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 263–268, 2007.

[8] G. Hughes, J. Watkins, and N. Owen, “Gender differences in

lower limb frontal plane kinematics during landing,”Sports

Biomechanics, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 333–341, 2008.

[9] K. F. Orishimo, I. J. Kremenic, E. Pappas, M. Hagins, and M. Liederbach, “Comparison of landing biomechanics between

male and female professional dancers,”The American Journal

of Sports Medicine, vol. 37, no. 11, pp. 2187–2193, 2009.

[10] E. Gualdi-Russo and L. Zaccagni, “Somatotype, role and

perfor-mance in elite volleyball players,”Journal of Sports Medicine and

Physical Fitness, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 256–262, 2001.

[11] M. J. Duncan, L. Woodfield, and Y. Al-Nakeeb, “Anthropomet-ric and physiological characteristics of junior elite volleyball

players,”The British Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 40, no. 7,

pp. 649–651, 2006.

[12] G. G. Malousaris, N. K. Bergeles, K. G. Barzouka, I. A. Bayios, G. P. Nassis, and M. D. Koskolou, “Somatotype, size and body

composition of competitive female volleyball players,”Journal of

Science and Medicine in Sport, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 337–344, 2008. [13] M. C. Marques, R. van den Tillaar, T. J. Gabbett, V. M. Reis, and

J. J. Gonz´alez-Badillo, “Physical fitness qualities of professional volleyball players: determination of positional differences,” Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, vol. 23, no. 4, pp. 1106–1111, 2009.

[14] R. Dahmane, V. Valenˇciˇc, N. Knez, and I. Erˇzen, “Evaluation of the ability to make non-invasive estimation of muscle contractile properties on the basis of the muscle belly response,” Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, vol. 39, no. 1, pp. 51–55, 2001.

[15] R. Dahmane, S. Djordjeviˇc, B. ˇSimuniˇc, and V. Valenˇciˇc, “Spatial fiber type distribution in normal human muscle: histochemical

and tensiomyographical evaluation,”Journal of Biomechanics,

vol. 38, no. 12, pp. 2451–2459, 2005.

[16] R. Dahmane, S. Djordjeviˇc, and V. Smerdu, “Adaptive potential of human biceps femoris muscle demonstrated by histochem-ical, immunohistochemical and mechanomyographical

meth-ods,”Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, vol. 44,

no. 11, pp. 999–1006, 2006.

[17] B. Simunic, H. Degens, J. Rittweger, M. Narici, I. B. Mekjavic, and R. Pisot, “Noninvasive estimation of myosin heavy chain

composition in human skeletal muscle,”Medicine and Science

in Sports and Exercise, vol. 43, no. 9, pp. 1619–1625, 2011. [18] A. M. Hunter, S. D. Galloway, I. J. Smith et al., “Assessment

of eccentric exercise-induced muscle damage of the elbow

flexors by tensiomyography,”Journal of Electromyography and

Kinesiology, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 334–341, 2012.

[19] B. ˇSimuniˇc, “Between-day reliability of a method for

non-invasive estimation of muscle composition,”Journal of

Elec-tromyography and Kinesiology, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 527–530, 2012. [20] E. Rey, C. Lago-Pe˜nas, and J. Lago-Ballesteros, “Tensiomyo-graphy of selected lower-limb muscles in professional soccer

players,”Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, vol. 22,

no. 6, pp. 866–872, 2012.

[21] L. Carrasco, B. Sa˜nudo, M. de Hoyo, F. Pradas, and M. E. da Silva, “Effectiveness of low-frequency vibration recovery method on blood lactate removal, muscle contractile properties

and on time to exhaustion during cycling at 𝑉𝑂2max power

output,”European Journal of Applied Physiology, vol. 111, no. 9,

pp. 2271–2279, 2011.

[22] J. M. Garc´ıa-Manso, D. Rodr´ıguez-Ruiz, D. Rodr´ıguez-Matoso, Y. de Saa, S. Sarmiento, and M. Quiroga, “Assessment of muscle fatigue after an ultra-endurance triathlon using

tensiomyogra-phy (TMG),”Journal of Sports Sciences, vol. 29, no. 6, pp. 619–

625, 2011.

[23] J. M. Garc´ıa-Manso, D. Rodr´ıguez-Matoso, D. Rodr´ıguez-Ruiz, S. Sarmiento, Y. de Saa, and J. Calder´on, “Effect of cold-water immersion on skeletal muscle contractile propierties in

soccer players,”The American Journal of Physical Medicine &

Rehabilitation, vol. 90, no. 5, pp. 356–363, 2011.

[24] J. M. Garc´ıa-Manso, D. Rodr´ıguez-Matoso, S. Sarmiento et al., “Effect of high-load and high-volume resistance exercise on the

tensiomyographic twitch response of biceps brachii,”Journal of

Electromyography and Kinesiology, vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 612–619, 2012.

[25] D. Rodr´ıguez-Ruiz, M. E. Quiroga, D. Rodr´ıguez-Matoso et al., “The tensiomyography used for evaluating high level beach

volleyball players,”Revista Brasileira de Medicina do Esporte,

vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 95–99, 2012.

[26] D. Rodr´ıguez-Ruiz, D. Rodr´ıguez-Matoso, M. E. Quiroga, S. Sarmiento, and M. E. da Silva-Grigoletto, “Study of extensor and flexor musculature in the knees of male and female volleyball

players,”European Journal of Sport Science, vol. 12, no. 5, pp.

399–407, 2012.

[27] D. Rodr´ıguez-Ruiz, J. M. Garc´ıa-Manso, D. Rodr´ıguez-Matoso, S. Sarmiento, M. da Silva-Grigoletto, and R. Pisot, “Effects of age and physical activity on response speed in knee flexor

and extensor muscles,”European Review of Aging and Physical

Activity, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 127–132, 2013.

[28] D. Rodr´ıguez-Ruiz,Effects of three strength training methods to

improve jumping ability in high level volleyball players [Ph.D. thesis], University of Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Las Palmas, Spain, 1999.

[29] V. Valenˇciˇc and N. Knez, “Measuring of skeletal muscles’

dynamic properties,”Artificial Organs, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 240–

(8)

[30] S. Djordjevic, V. Valencic, N. Knez et al., “Contractile properties of skeletal muscles of two groups of sportsmen-sprinters and

cyclist measured by tensiomyography,” in Proceedings of the

Pre-Olympic Congress, Brisbane, Australia, September 2000, abstract no. 220.

[31] B. Simunic and V. Valencic, “Non-invasive selective measure-ment of m. vastus medialis and m. vastus lateralis contractile

properties at different knee angles,” inProceedings of the 10th

Electrochemical and Computer Science Conference, vol. B, pp. 363–366, IEEE, Portoroz, Slovenia, September 2001.

[32] M. L. Gorelick and J. M. M. Brown, “Mechanomyographic assessment of contractile properties within seven segments

of the human deltoid muscle,” European Journal of Applied

Physiology, vol. 100, no. 1, pp. 35–44, 2007.

[33] D. Rodr´ıguez-Matoso, J. M. Garc´ıa-Manso, S. Sarmiento et al., “Evaluaci´on de la respuesta muscular como herramienta de control en el campo de la actividad f´ısica, la salud y el deporte,” Andaluza de Medicina del Deporte, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 28–40, 2012.

[34] B. Simunic,Model of longitudinal contractions and transverse

deformations in skeletal muscles [Ph.D. thesis], University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia, 2003.

[35] D. Rodr´ıguez-Matoso, D. Rodr´ıguez-Ruiz, M. E. Quiroga, S. Sarmiento, Y. de Saa, and J. M. Garc´ıa-Manso, “Ten-siomiograf´ıa, utilidad y metodolog´ıa en la evaluaci´on

muscu-lar,”Revista Internacional de Medicina y Ciencias de la Actividad

F´ısica y el Deporte, vol. 10, no. 40, pp. 620–629, 2010.

[36] D. Kriˇzaj, B. ˇSimuniˇc, and T. ˇZagar, “Short-term repeatability of

parameters extracted from radial displacement of muscle belly,” Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 645–651, 2008.

[37] J. Tous-Fajardo, G. Moras, S. Rodr´ıguez-Jim´enez, R. Usach, D. M. Doutres, and N. A. Maffiuletti, “Inter-rater reliability of muscle contractile property measurements using non-invasive

tensiomyography,”Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology,

vol. 20, no. 4, pp. 761–766, 2010.

[38] D. Rodr´ıguez-Matoso, D. Rodr´ıguez-Ruiz, S. Sarmiento, D. Vaamonde, M. E. da Silva-Grigoletto, and J. M. Garc´ıa-Manso, “Reproducibility of muscle response measurements using

ten-siomyography in a range of positions,” Revista Andaluza de

Medicina del Deporte, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 81–86, 2010.

[39] B. Simunic, D. Krizaj, M. Narici, and R. Pisot, “Twitch param-eters in transversal and longitudinal biceps brachii response,” Annales Kinesiologiae, vol. 1, pp. 61–80, 2010.

[40] I. Diez-Vega, D. Rodr´ıguez-Ruiz, M. Fernández-del Valle, D. Matoso-Rodr´ıguez, J. Cerdá-Béjar, and J. J. Molina, “Influence of fat percentage, front thigh skinfold and girth on the

maxi-mum radial displacement of the dominant rectus femoris,”The

British Journal of Sports Medicine, vol. 473, no. 10, article e3, pp. 24–25, 2013.

[41] W. P. Ebben, M. L. Fauth, E. J. Petushek et al., “Gender-based analysis of hamstring and quadriceps muscle activation

during jump landings and cutting,” Journal of Strength and

Conditioning Research, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 408–415, 2010. [42] L. J. Huston, M. L. V. H. Greenfield, and E. M. Wojtys, “Anterior

cruciate ligament injuries in the female athlete: potential risk

factors,”Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, vol. 372, pp.

50–63, 2000.

[43] K. A. Bergstrøm, K. Brandseth, S. Fretheim, K. Tvilde, and A. Ekeland, “Activity-related knee injuries and pain in athletic

adolescents,”Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy,

vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 146–150, 2001.

[44] F. A. Forde,Analysis of knee mechanics during the squat exercise:

differences between females and males [Ph.D. thesis], University of Florida, Gainesville, Fla, USA, 2005.

[45] H. G. B. Speakman and J. Weisberg, “The vastus medialis

controversy,”Physiotherapy, vol. 63, no. 8, pp. 249–254, 1977.

[46] K. Bose, R. Kanagasuntheram, and M. B. H. Osman, “Vastus

medialis oblique: an anatomic and physiologic study,”

Orthope-dics, vol. 3, no. 9, pp. 880–883, 1980.

[47] L. Travnik, F. Pernus, and I. Erzen, “Histochemical and mor-phometric characteristics of the normal human vastus

medi-alis longus and vastus medimedi-alis obliquus muscles,”Journal of

Anatomy, vol. 187, no. 2, pp. 403–411, 1995.

[48] J. K. Hubbard, H. W. Sampson, and J. R. Elledge, “Prevalence and morphology of the vastus medialis oblique muscle in

human cadavers,”The Anatomical Record, vol. 249, no. 1, pp. 135–

142, 1997.

[49] J. Peeler and J. E. Anderson, “Structural parameters of the vastus medialis muscles and its relationship to patellofemoral joint

deterioration,”Clinical Anatomy, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 307–314,

2006.

[50] A. Rainoldi, D. Falla, R. Mellor, K. Bennell, and P. Hodges, “Myoelectric manifestations of fatigue in vastus lateralis,

medi-alis obliquus and medimedi-alis longus muscles,” Journal of

Elec-tromyography and Kinesiology, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 1032–1037, 2008. [51] J. M. Sheppard, J. B. Cronin, T. J. Gabbett, M. R. Mcguigan, N. Etxebarria, and R. U. Newton, “Relative importance of strength, power, and anthropometric measures to jump performance of

elite volleyball players,”Journal of Strength and Conditioning

Research, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 758–765, 2008.

[52] G. Duhie, W. Young, and D. Aitken, “The acute effects of heavy loads on jump squat performance: an evaluation of the

complex and contrast methods of power development,”Journal

of Strength and Conditioning Research, vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 530– 538, 2002.

[53] D. French, W. Kraemer, and C. Cooke, “Changes in dynamic exercise performance following a sequence of preconditioning

isometric muscle actions,”Journal of Strength and Conditioning

Research, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 678–685, 2003.

[54] I. E. Brown and G. E. Loeb, “Post-activation potentiation—a

clue for simplifying models of muscle dynamics,”The American

Zoologist, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 743–754, 1998.

(9)

Submit your manuscripts at

http://www.hindawi.com

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014

Anatomy

Research International

Peptides

Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com

International Journal of

Volume 2014

Zoology

Molecular Biology International

The Scientific

World Journal

Bioinformatics

Advances in

Marine Biology

Journal of Hindawi Publishing Corporation

http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 Hindawi Publishing Corporation

Signal Transduction

Journal of

BioMed

Evolutionary Biology

International Journal of

http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 Biochemistry Research International

Archaea

http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 Genetics

Hindawi Publishing Corporation

http://www.hindawi.com Volume 2014 Advances in

Virology

Hindawi Publishing Corporation http://www.hindawi.com

Nucleic Acids

Journal of

Volume 2014

Analysis of the response speed of musculature of the knee in professional male and female volleyball players

Research Article