• No se han encontrado resultados

The logic of bacterial regulatory networks

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2023

Share "The logic of bacterial regulatory networks"

Copied!
145
0
0

Texto completo

(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)

β

(10)

σ

(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)

β

(16)
(17)
(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)
(24)

(A) Random network (B) Scale-free network

(25)
(26)

DNA Systems

Devices

Parts

GTGGATTTCAGTTAATCAATTGGTTAATCTTTCAGGACCACCTAAGCAAATGCTAAAGTGGCAGAT

-10

-35 -35 -10

Pr1 Pr2

+1 +1

UAS UAS

IHF xylR

Pr XylR

XylS upper CH3

CH3

CH3 O OH

meta TCA XylR

CH3 CH3

CH3 O

OH TCA

XylR upper

XylS meta

NH2 HO

OCH3

OH CH3

Biolo gic al Di gita l

(27)
(28)

Site Habitat

Niche Community

Population Cell Genome Operon/pathway

Gene/enzyme

Complexity

(29)
(30)
(31)

ATG……TAA

P

UP element -35 Ext -10Dis + 1

RBS Ter

Activation

Repression

-24 -12 +

1

Transcription Translation

Degradation Degradation

Sigma70 family dependent promoters

Sigma54 dependent promoters Small molecule binding

Oligomerization Protein-protein interaction

Post-translational modification Translational

regulation

(I) (II) (III)

(32)
(33)

Activation

Y

1

Y

2

Y

N

X

Single Input Module (SIM)

X Y

Feedback Loop

Z W

X Y

Bifan

X Y Z

Feed Forward Loop (FFL)

Multiple Input Module (MIM)

Y

2

Y

3

Y

N

X

1

Y

1

X

2

X

3

X

N

(A) (B) (C)

(D) (E) (F)

X Y Z

S

X

S

Y

crp araC araBAD

cAMP Arabinose Type-1 coherent FFL

: Repression

(34)
(35)
(36)
(37)
(38)
(39)

(A) Amplifier (YES)

(B) NOT

(C) AND

P

P -35 -10

-35 -10 B A

P

-35 -10 A

B

A P 0 0 P 1 1

A

A P

A P B

A P 0 1 1 0

A B P 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1

(D) OR

P

-35 -10 A

A P

B B

A B P 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1

RNAP Symbology:

-35 -10 P

Promoter TF binding site

B A

TFs Cooperative interaction Degradation

(40)
(41)

(A) NOT AND (NAND)

P

-35 -10 A B

A P B

A B P 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0 (B) AND NOT (ANDN)

P

-35 -10 A B

A B P 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 A P

B

(42)

(C) XOR

P’ P

-35 -10 B -35

-10 A A P

B

P P’

-35 -10 B -35

-10

B A (D) XNOR

A P B

(A) NOT OR (NOR)

P

A B P 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 -35 -10

A B A P

B

(B) OR NOT (ORN)

P

-35 -10 B A

A B P 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 A P

B

A B P 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 0

A B P 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1

(43)
(44)
(45)
(46)
(47)
(48)
(49)
(50)

(51)

β

(52)

λ

α

β

(53)

Δ Δ

λ λ

λ

Δ

Δ

(54)

(

(55)

ori p15A Km

T1 gfplva

T0 pRV2

mcherry PlexA

-10

-35 +1

-10 -35

+1 PrecA

lexO lexO lexO

lexO (A)

ori pBR322 Ap

Ter lexA

pTrc-lexA lacIq

Ptrc (B)

(56)
(57)

xylR Pr

ori pUC Km

E B H

T7ter Pr

Sm oriT oriR6K

T0 T1

Tn7R Tn7LE H Gm

ori pUC Km

E B H

T7ter lacZ

Sm oriT oriR6K

T0 T1

Tn7R Tn7L

B Gm

Pr H

E

Tn7R

Tn7L Pr Gm

glmS PP5408

(I) (II)

(III) P. putida genome

P. putida genome

xylR’-’lacZ xylR’-’lacZ

xylR’-’lacZ

pUJ9 pNBTN7

pUJ9-Pr pTN7-PrZ

(58)

β

β

(59)

β

( ) ( )

θ θ

θ θ

( ) ( )

θ θ

(60)

( ) [ ( ) ( )]

θ θ

θ θ

(61)

θ

(62)

( ) ( )

( ) ( )

( )

( ) ( ) ( )

( ) ⁄

( ) ⁄

( ) ⁄

(63)
(64)
(65)
(66)
(67)
(68)
(69)

SOS Promoter RecA*

LexA

Nalidixic acid

LacI

q

(A) (B)

IPTG

SOS Promoter LexA RecA*

Nalidixic acid

(C)

Nalidixic acid

IPTG

ssDNA RecA*

LacI

q

GFP LexA

(D)

Nalidixic acid

IPTG

GFP

0

1 0 1

0

(E)

1

(70)

(71)

(A) (B)

(C) (D)

(72)

(C) (D)

ORN-P

lexA

ORN-P

lexA

(A) (B)

ORN-P

recA

ORN-P

recA

(73)

(A) ITPG (B) Nalidixic acid

(74)

ORN-PlexA ORN-PrecA

(A) (B)

(75)

ORN-P

lexA

ORN-P

recA

(A) 75 min (D) 75 min

(B) 120 min (E) 120 min

(C) 165 min (F) 165 min

(76)
(77)
(78)
(79)

XylR

a

XylR

i

XylS

i

XylS

h

meta operon upper operon

Pm

Pu

XylS

a

CH

3

CH

3

CH

3

COOH

m-xylene 3MBz

Meta pathway TCA Upper pathway

Metabolism Gene regulation

xylS xylR

Pr

Ps

(80)
(81)

σ σ

σ σ

(82)
(83)

σ

NOT A O

A O 0 1 1 0

A O B

AND

A B O 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 1

A O B

OR

A B O 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 (A)

XylR m-xyl

(C)

XylRa

XylRi

XylSh

Pr xylR xylS

(B)

m-xyl

XylSi Ps2

upper

XylS

XylSh XylSa

CH3

COOH 3MBz

CH3

CH3

meta

TCA Ps1

(84)
(85)

σ

max k0+k1/g k1/g k0/g θ

zero s1 s5 s9 s11 s12 max

k0/g θ

zero s1 s5 s9 s11 s12 max

k0/g θ

zero s1 s5 s6

max k0+k1/g θ2 k0/g θ1

zero s1 s5 s6

max k0/g θ

zero s1 s5 s6 max

k0+k1/g k1/g k0/g θ

zero s1 s5 s6

XylR

max k0+k1/g θ2 k0/g θ1

zero s1 s5 s9 s11 s12 XylS

max k0/g θ

zero s1 s5 s9 s11 s12 upper

rmeta XylR

XylS

upper

rmeta (A)

(B)

stead-state

stead-state

(86)

θ θ

θ XylR

a

upper

XylS

h

X

?

(A)

Single-input module like

max k0+k1/g θ2 k0/g θ1

zero s1 s5 s9 s11 s12 XylS max

k0/g θ

zero s1 s5 s9 s11 s12 upper (B)

(87)
(88)

σ σ

(C) (D)

(A)

Km oriT oriV trfA

T1 T0

pSEVA226 luxCDABE

SD

-24/-12

UAS -24/-12

-35/-10 XylS sites

Pu Ps

Pm UAS

P

(B) Control Induced

(89)

(A) XylR

i

XylR

a

upper

m-xyl

3MBz

TCA

XylS

i

XylS

a

meta XylS

h

XylR

a

XylS

h

meta XylS

a

XylR

a

XylS

h

meta meta XylS

a

Wild type

No XylS activation No XylS hyper-expression

(B)

max k

0

+k

1

/g k

1

/g k

0

/g θ zero

s1 s5 s9 s11 s12

Wild type max

k

0

+k

1

/g k

1

/g k

0

/g θ

zero s1 s5 s7 s9 s10 No XylS activation max

k

0

+k

1

/g k

1

/g k

0

/g θ

zero s1 s5 s7 s9 s10 No XylS hyper-

expression

(C)

(90)
(91)

Wild type (A)

XylR

a

XylS

h

meta XylS

a

CH3 HO

3MBA CH3

O O-

upper

3MBz

XylR

a

XylS

h

meta XylS

a

CH3 O

O-

3MBz

XylR

a

XylS

h

meta XylS

a

CH3 CH3

o-xyl

(B) (C)

Cnt

o-xyl m-xyl

40 36 32 28 24 20 16

Time (h)

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5

(D) Pu-lux fusion (E)

No XylS hyper-expression

No XylS activation

(92)
(93)

Cnt

o-xyl

m-xyl

0 0.5 1 1.5 2

Time (h)

240 200 160 120 80

2.5 40

(A) (B)

(C) (D)

z

z

(94)
(95)

σ

(96)
(97)

σ σ σ σ

(98)

σ

σ

(99)

β

β β

IHF -70

UASd

UASp -10

-35 +1

-10

-35 +1 0

1 2 3

0 90 180 270 360

OD600

Time (min)

(A) (B)

(I)

(II)

(III) (IV)

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

- / - IHF/ - - /XylR IHF/XylR

Relative protmoer activity

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

- / - IHF/ - - /XylR IHF/XylR

Relative protmoer activity

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

- / - IHF/ - - /XylR IHF/XylR

Relative protmoer activity

(C) (D)

(E) (F)

0 20 40 60 80 100 120

- / - IHF/ - - /XylR IHF/XylR

Relative protmoer activity

Pr1

Pr2

(100)

β

β

(101)

β

0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200

1 3 5 7 9 11

Time (h) wt

ihf

0 2 4 6 8 10

OD600

Time (h)

(A) 1 (B)

0.1

0.01

β-galactosidase activity (M.U.)

(102)

β

(A) Type-4 incoherent FFL (I4-FFL) X

Y

Z

SX

SY

IHF

XylR

Pu

m-xyl Stationary

Phase (B) TOL I4-FFL motif

-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5

0 0.5 1

-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5

0 0.5 1

-1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5

0 0.5 1

Time IHF

XylR

Pu (C)

(103)

β

β

0

200 400 600 800

lag early exp mid exp latter exp

β-galactosidase activity(M.U.)

Suc Glu

(A) (B)

0 2 4 6 8 10

Succinate

Glucose 1

0.1

0.01

Time (h)

OD600

lag early exp

mid exp

latter exp

(104)

β

β

(105)

β

β

σ

0 500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500

wt crc

β-Galactosidase activity (M.U.)

Suc Glu

(106)
(107)
(108)
(109)

(110)
(111)

   

 

(112)

  Type I coherent FFL

X

Y

Z SX

SY

Metabolic Amplifier Motif X

Y

Z SX

SY

W XylR

XylS

meta m-xyl

3MB

upper crp

araC

araBAD cAMP Arabinose

(A) (B)

(113)
(114)

β (A) I4-FFL stabilization by Crc

IHF

Pu

XylR

Stationary Phase

Crc m-xyl

Glu

Prote

in levels

OD600 XylR (B)

(C) OD600

XylR prodution rate

IHF Crc

(115)
(116)
(117)
(118)
(119)
(120)
(121)
(122)
(123)

σ σ

(124)

σ

σ

σ

(125)

σ

σ

(126)

σ

σ σ

(127)
(128)
(129)
(130)
(131)

σ

σ

(132)
(133)
(134)

σ

σ

(135)
(136)
(137)
(138)
(139)
(140)
(141)
(142)
(143)
(144)
(145)

Referencias

Documento similar

We noticed that in h 90 csx1D strain, ste11 + mRNA was reduced to 10% of wild type levels, both in regular minimal media and in nitrogen starvation conditions.. Therefore, the

RNA-binding proteins control translation efficiency of mRNAs initiating protein synthesis by the conventional cap-dependent, or the alternative internal ribosome entry site

[r]

SCO2463 probable ABC transporter SCO0231 small hydrophobic hypothetical protein SCO2479 putative membrane protein SCO0518 hypothetical protein. SCO2496 putative

11 Deciphering the role of protein-protein interaction networks in the functional profiling of high-throughput experiments 81 11.1 Ppi networks in Gene Ontology

Several tumor-suppressors have been shown to be excluded from the cell nucleus in cancer cells by the nuclear export receptor CRM1 and abnormal expression of CRM1 is

Quería  dar  las  gracias  a  todas  esas  personas  con  las  que  he  compartido  pasillos,  sonrisas  y  buenos  momentos  durante  estos  años.  Los  vecinos 

As a proof of concept of the bacterial RepA-WH1 prion-like protein as a feasible minimalist model system for human neurodegenerative amyloidoses, in this Thesis