TítuloEvent based control of basic wastewater treatment plant control loops
Texto completo
(2) u la r lyca r r i edou t ,bu tth ec on t r o ls i gn a li son ly a c tua l i s edwh enon eo rm o r eev en t so c cu r . Th er e s to ft ep ap e ri sa sf o l l ow s . F i r s to fa l l , th es imu la t ions c en a r i oi sp r e s en t ed . Th e BSM1 lay ou t ,p e r fo rm an c eind ex e sandd e f au l tcon t ro l s t ra t egyi sp r e s en t ed .S e c ond ly ,ins e c t i on3 ,th e ev en t -b a s edc on t r o ls t r a t e gyb a s edonth ein t e r na l mod e lcon t r o lf o rmu l a t i oni sou t l in ed . Th i s g en e r i cs t ru c tu r ew a sfi r s tp r e s en t edin[14 ]in mo r ed e ta i l ,soju s tth eb a s i cs t ru c tu r eandd e s ign p r in c ip l e sa r eou t l in edh e r e .I tf o l l ow ss e c t ion4 w i thth ed efin i t i ono fth eev en tb a s edc on t ro l l e r s fo rth eBSM1b a s i cl oop sandp r e s en t a t i ono fth e s imu la t ionr e su l t s ,Th ep ap e rend sw i thc on c lud ingr ema rk sandsu g g e s t i on sf o rfu r th e rw o rk .. 2. Ma te r ia l s And Me thod s. Th i ss e c t ionp r e s en t sth eb a s i ce l em en t sth a tcon s t i tu t eth ew o rk in gs c en a r i o . Onon es id e ,th e w a s t ew a t e rp l an tl a y ou tandev a lu a t i onind ex e s tha tw i l lb eu s edt oa s s e s sth ec on t r o ls t ra t e g i e s . A l soth eg en e r i cev en t -b a s edc on t ro lap p roa chba s edonth eIMCev en t -b a s edp r e s en t ed in[14 ]w i l lb ep r e s en t ed . 2 .1 Benchma rkS imu la t ion Mode l #1 Th i ss e c t ionp r o v id e sab r i e fd e s c r ip t i ono fth e w o rk ings c ena r i op r o v id edb yth eBSM 1 . Th i si sa s imu la t ionen v i r onm en td efin in gap l an tl ay ou t ,a s imu la t ion m od e l ,influ en tl o ad s ,t e s tp r o c edu r e s andev a lua t ionc r i t e r i a .. Qin. In fluen t. B io log i ca lrea c to r s Un i t1. Un i t2. Un i t3. C la r i fie r. Un i t4. KLa5. Un i t5. P I. m=10. Qe E ffluen t. DO5. m=6. NO2 P I. m=1. Qrin. In te rna lrecyc le. Qrex. Ex te rna lrecyc le. Qw Wa s tage. F igu r e1 : B en chma rkS imu la t ion Mod e l1 w i th d e fau l tcon t ro ls t ra t egyonth eba s i cloop s ab ioma s ss ludg eag eo fabou t9d ay s . Th en i t ro g enr emov a li sa ch i ev edu s ingad en i t r ifi ca t ions t ep p e r fo rm edinth eanox i ctank sandan i t r ifi ca t ion s t epca r r i edou tinth ea e ra t edtank s . Th ein t e r na lr e cy c l ei su s edtosupp lyth ed en i t r ifi ca t ion s t epw i thNO .BSM1d efin e sth r e ed iff e r en tinflu en tda ta[15 ,16 ] :d ry w ea th e r ,ra in w ea th e rand s to rmw ea th e r . Ea chs c ena r iocon ta in s14day so f influ en tda ta w i thsamp l ingin t e rv a l so f15 m in u t e s . 2 .2 .1 T e s tp rocedu re s As imu la t ionp ro to co li se s tab l i sh edtoa s su r etha t r e su l t sa r ego tund e rth esam econd i t ion sandcan b ecompa r ed . Sofi r s ta150day sp e r iodo fs ta b i l i za t ioninc lo s ed loopu s ingcon s tan tinflu en t da taha stob ecomp l e t edtod r iv eth esy s t emtoa s t eady s ta t e ,n ex tas imu la t ion w i thd ry w ea th e r i srunandfina l lyth ed e s i r edinflu en tda ta(d ry , ra ino rs to rm )i st e s t ed . On lyth er e su l t so fth e la s ts ev enday sa r econ s id e r ed . 2 .2 .2 Ev a lua t ionc r i te r ia. 2 .2 P lan tlayou tandInfluen tload s Th es ch ema t i cr ep r e s en t a t i ono fth e WWTPi s p r e s en t edinF i g . 1 . Th ep l an tc on s i s t sinfiv eb io log i ca lr ea c to rt ank sc onn e c t edins e r i e s ,fo l low ed byas e conda rys e t t l e r . Th efi r s ttw ot ank shav ea v o lum eo f100 0 m3 e a chanda r ean o x i candp e r f e c t ly m ix ed . Th er e s tth r e et ank sh av eav o l a chanda r ea e r a t ed . Th es e t t l e r um eo f1333 m3 e s mod e l ed ha sato ta lv o lum eo f6 0 0 0 m3 andi int enlay e r s ,b e in gth e6 thl a y e r ,c oun t ingf rom bo t tomtotop ,th ef e edl a y e r . Tw or e cy c l eflow s , th efi r s tf romth el a s tt ankandth es e c ondf rom th eund e rflowo fth es e t t l e r ,c omp l e t eth esy s t em . Th ep lan ti sd e s i gn edf o ranav e r a g einflu en td ry w ea th e rflowr a t eo f1 8 4 4 6 m3/dandanav e rag e b iod eg radab l ech em i c a lo xy g end em and(COD )in 3 th einflu en to f3 0 0g /m .I t sh yd r au l i cr e t en t ion t im e ,ba s edonth ea v e r a g ed ryw e a th e rfl owra t e 3 andth eto ta lt ankands e t t l e rv o lum e( 1 2 0 00 m ) , s i s14 .4h . Th ed e f au l tw a s t a g efl owr a t e(Q w)i fix edto385 m3/dth a td e t e rm in e s ,b a s edonth e to ta lamoun to fb i om a s sp r e s en tinth esy s t em ,. Ino rd e rtocompa r eth ed iff e r en tcon t ro ls t ra t e g i e s ,d iff e r en tc r i t e r iaa r ed efin ed . Th ep e r fo rman c ea s s e s sm en ti s mad ea ttw ol ev e l s . Th efi r s tl ev e lcon c e rn sth econ t ro l . Ba s i ca l ly , th i ss e rv e sa sap roo ftha tth ep ropo s edcon t ro l s t ra t egyha sb e enapp l i edp rop e r ly .I ti sa s s e s s ed byIn t eg ra lo fth eSqua r edE r ro r( ISE )andin t e g ra t edab so lu t ee r ro r( IAE )c r i t e r ia s . Th es e cond l ev e lp rov id e sm ea su r e sfo rth eeff e c to fth econ t ro l s t ra t egyonp lan tp e r fo rman c e .I tin c lud e sEfflu en t Qua l i tyInd ex(EQ I )and Ov e ra l l Co s tInd ex (OC I ) .. 500. V a r iab l e V a lu e Ntot < 18gN .m−3 CODt < 100gCOD .m−3 NH < 4gN .m−3 −3 TSS < 30gSS .m BOD5 < 10gBOD .m−3 T ab l e1 : Efflu en tqua l i tyl im i t s.
(3) Th eev a lua t ion mu s tin c lud eth ep e r c en tag eo f t im etha tth eefflu en tl im i t sa r en o tm e tandth e numb e ro fv i o l a t i on s . Th i sl a s tt e rmi sd efin ed a sth enumb e ro fc r o s s in g so fth el im i t ,f r omb e lowtoabov eth el im i t . Th eefflu en tc on c en t ra t ion so fN o t a lCOD(COD ,NH ,T o ta lSu s to t,T t) p end edSo l id s(TSS )and B i o l o g i c a l Oxy g en D e ou ldob eyth el im i t sg iv eninT a mand(BOD5)sh b l e1 . Ntot i sc a l cu l a t eda sth esumo f NOand K j e ldah ln i t ro g en(NK j ) ,b e in gth i sth esumo fo r gan i cn i t rog enandNH . F o r wha t ma t t e r st oth eg l ob a lp l an top e ra t ion ev a lua t ionth eEfflu en tQu a l i t yInd ex ,EQ I ,i sd e fin edtoev a lu a t eth equ a l i t yo fth eefflu en t .I ti s r e la t ed w i thth efin e st ob ep a iddu et oth ed i s cha rg eo fpo l lu t i on . EQ Ii sa v e r a g edo v e ra7day s ob s e rv a t ionp e r i odandi ti sc a l cu l a t ed w e igh t ing th ed iff e r en tc ompound so fth eefflu en tl o ad s . On th eo th e rhand ,th e Ov e r a l lC o s tInd ex , OC I ,i s d efin eda s : OCI =AE+PE+5·SP+3·EC+ME (1 ) wh e r eAEi sth ea e r a t i onen e r gy ,PEi sth epump ingen e rgy ,SPi sth es lud g ep r odu c t i ont ob ed i s po s ed ,ECi sth ec on sump t i ono fex t e rn a lca rbon sou r c eand MEi sth em ix in gen e r gy .F o racom p l e t esp e c ifi ca t i ono fth e s eind ex e sandi t sc on c r e t e compu ta t ion ,th er e ad e ri sr e f e r r edt o[ 1 5 ] . 2 .2 .3. De fau l tcon t ro ls t ra tegy. Th ed efin i t iono fth eBSM 1in c lud ead e f au l tcon t ro ls t ra t egy , wh i chi sc omm on lyu s eda sar e f e r en c efo rcomp a r i s on . Th ed e f au l tc on t r o ls t ra t egy o f BSM1[9 ]u s e stw oP r opo r t i on a l In t eg r a l(P I ) con t ro lloop sa ssh ownin F i g .1 . Th efi r s ton e inv o lv e sth ec on t r o lo fS ym an ipu l a t ing KLa O ,5 b inth efi f thtank(K . Th es e t -po in tf o rS s La 5) O ,5 i 2 mg/ l . Th es e c ondc on t r o ll ooph a st o ma in ta in tas e t -po in to f1 m g / lb ym an ipu la t ing SNO,2 a Qa. 2 .3 Ev en t -ba sedIn te rna l Mode l Con t ro l Th eIn t e rna lM od e lC on t r o l( IMC )app r o a chfo r con t ro l l e rd e s i gna sp r e s en t edin[ 1 7 ]andfu r th e r d ev e lop edin[ 1 8 ]i sb a s edonth ev e ryb a s i cp r in c ip l eo fc lo s eth elo op wh enn e c e s sa r y . Th i si s a l soon eo fth ee s s en t i a l so fev en t -b a s edcon t ro l . Anev en tw i l lb eg en e r a t edju s tinc a s eth e r ei s th en e edtof e edth ec on t r o l l e rw i thn ewin f o r ma t ionr ega rd in gth ep r o c e s sou tpu tandtou s e th i sin fo rma t i ont och an g eth ec on t r o la c t ion .In th i ss e c t ionw ew i l lp r ov id eaqu i c kr ev i ewo fth e IMCba s i c sw i thsp e c i a lemph a s i sonth econ c ep tua lm ean ingo fth ed iff e r en tk eys i gn a l sino rd e r. 1 tos e etha t ,ev enonacon t inuo st im eba s i s ,th e ev en t -b a s edra t iona l ei sinh e r en ttoth eIMCs t ru c tu r e . Th i si sno tth eca s eo fth ec la s s i ca lf e edba ck con t ro lconfigu ra t ion .. Th eIMCs ch em ei sba s edonth eno t iono ff e ed ingba ckth eun c e r ta in tytoth eIMCcon t ro l l e r .I f th e r ei snoun c e r ta in tyth e r ei snon e edtoc lo s eth e sy s t emo th e rthantos tab i l i z ei t . Th e r e fo r e ,inth e ca s eth ep ro c e s stob econ t ro l l edi sop en loops ta b l e ,th er equ i r em en to fa c cu ra t es e t -po in tt ra ck ing canb ea ch i ev edbyanop enloopcon t ro lsy s t em . W i thanop enloopcon t r o ls ch em e ,th es tab i l i tyo f th esy s t emi sgua ran t e edp rov id edtha tbo thth e p lan tandcon t ro l l e rt ran s f e rfun c t ion sa r es tab l e . A l so ,th ed e s igno fth econ t ro l l e rinanop enloop con t ro ls ch em e mays imp lyb eapp roa ch edbydy nam i cinv e r s ion . Th ed rawba cko fsu chanop en loopcon t ro lsy s t emi sth es en s i t iv i tyto mod e l inge r ro r sandth einab i l i tytod ea lw i thex t e rna l d i s tu rban c e sen t e r ingth esy s t em .Infa c t ,anex t e rna l ,no tm ea su rab l e ,d i s tu rban c ecanea s i lyb e a s s im i la t edtoak indo fun c e r ta in ty .Inth i sca s e , fo rmth econ t ro l l e ro fth eeff e c t s th eon lyw aytoin o fth eun c e r ta in tyonth econ t ro l l edv a r iab l ei sby th eu s eo ff e edba ck . Th e r e fo r e ,ac lo s ed loopsy s t emshou ldb eu s edtod ea lw i thun c e r t a in tywha t ev e ri t ssou r c e . Th eIMCcon t ro ls ch em e ,d ep i c t ed infigu r e(2 (a ) )ob ey stoth ep r ev iou sp r in c ip l e . W i th inth econv en t iona lIMCs t ru c tu r e ,wh e r eP i sth ep ro c e s stob econ t r o l l ed ,Pm r ep r e s en t sth e mod e lo fth ep ro c e s s ,and Qi sth eIMCcon t ro l l e r . Th es igna ltha ti sf e e d b a c ktoth econ t ro l l e rto fo rmth e ,inacon fu s ew ayca l l ed ,e r ro r .I ti sg iv en by : e = r−y+Pm u=r−P( u+d)+Pm u−n (2 ) = r−Pd+(Pm −P) u−n. (3 ). wh e r eobv iou s lyi fth e r ea r eno mod e l inge r ro r s , Pm = P,andth e r ei snoex t e rna ld i s tu rban c e , d=0 ,no rm ea su r em en tno i s e ,n=0 ,th ef e edba ck i sz e roandth esy s t emop e ra t e sinop en loop .In su chca s e ,th eIMCcon t ro l l e ri sju s td r iv enbyth e r e f e r en c es igna l .I ti sju s t wh enun c e r ta in tyin anyon eo fth ep r ev iou sfo rm sapp ea r stha tth e f e edba cks igna li sd iff e r en tf romz e roino rd e rto in fo rmth eIMCcon t ro l l e ro fi t . W ecanth inko fth i ss i tua t ioninev en tt e rm s . Th eapp ea ran c eo fun c e r ta in tyi sl ik es ign a l ingan ev en ttha tf o r c e stoc lo s eth eloop . W ecanex t end th i sra t i on a l eandcon s id e rth en e edtoc lo s eth e loopju s t wh enth eun c e r ta in tyi ss i gn ifi c an t ,say i ti sabov esom eth r e sho ld . Th i si s wha tl e tsto p ropo s eth eev en t -ba s eds ch em eshowninfigu r e (2 (b ) ) . 1. th esam eapp l i e si fw ew o rkonasamp l ed ,d i s c r e t e t im e ,con t ro lsy s t em .. 501.
(4) d e. Q. u. ev en t . Th eb ehav io ro fth esy s t emcanth e r e fo r eb e a s s im i la t edtoas equ en c eo fop en loopr e spon s e s o fth efo rmy s )=P( s ) Q( s ) j ∆ .A sp e rth ep rop j( e r t i e so fth eIMCth i sw i l la lw ay sb eas tab l eop en loopa slonga sth eIMCcon t ro l l e randth ep lan t a r es tab l e .. y. P. n Pm. 3 Ev en t -Ba sed Con t ro l le r s De s ign. r ( a) C on v e n t i ona lIn t e rna lMod e lC on t r o lC on f i gu ra t i on. Inth i ss e c t ion ,w ep r e s en tth ed e s igno fth eev en t ba s edIMCcon t ro l l e r stoth etw oba s i ccon t ro l loop sd efin edinth eBSM1s c ena r io .F o rsu chpu r po s e ,inwha tfo l low s ,th ed e s igno fth econ t ro l l e r s i sp r e s en t edfi r s ta su sua lcon t inuou st im eIMC con t ro l l e r s ,fo l low edbyi t simp l em en ta t ionund e r anev en t -ba s eds t ra t egy .. d e s. Q. u. y. P. n e v e n tg e n e ra t o r Q. Pm. e s. e. 3 .1 In te rna l Mode l Con t ro l le r s. r. samp l i ngun i t ( b) E v e n t−ba s e dIn t e rna lMod e lC on t r o lC on f i gu ra t i on. F igu r e2 : Con v en t i on a landev en t -b a s edIn t e rna l Mod e lCon t ro lc onfi gu r a t i on s Inth i ss ch em e ,ap a r tf r omth eIMCc on t r o l l e r ,Q, th er e s ti scon s id e r edt ob ep a r to fth eev en tg en e r a to r . Th e r e fo r e ,th eev en tg en e r a t o rin c lud e sth e p lan t mod e l ,Pm ,a sw e l la sar ep l i c ao fth econ t ro l l e r . Th eo th e run i to fth eev en tg en e r a t o ri sth e samp l ingun i t . Th ea imo fth i sb l o c ki st om ea su r e andtos endane r r o rs amp l et oth ec on t r o l l e rea ch t im eth eev en tc ond i t i oni ss a t i sfi ed .F o rth i spu r po s eth eSSODs amp l in ga l g o r i thmin t r odu c edin [19 ]ha sb e enc on s id e r ed .H ow ev e r ,th ek eyp r op e r t i e so fth eev en t -b a s edIMCa r et ob eind ep en d en to fth i sch o i c e .A c c o rd in gt oth es t anda rda l go r i thm ,th eou tpu ti sc ompu t edb a s edontw op r e d efin edpa ram e t e r s :anev en tth r e sh o ld ∆∈R+, andth ein t e rn a ls t a t eo fth ea l g o r i thmj∈ Z+. ( t )i sth einpu tt oth eSSODb lo ck , Th e r e fo r e ,i fe i t sou tpu ti sc ompu t eda c c o rd in gt oe ( t ) = j ∆ . s Inth i sw ayth eev en t sa r et r i g g e r edwh encon s e c u t iv el ev e l sa r ec r o s s edb yth ee r r o rs i gn a l ,wh i ch m ean stha tth es amp l eds i gn a lch an g e si t sv a lu e toth eupp e ro rl ow e rqu an t i z a t i onl ev e lwh enth e inpu ts ign a le ( t )in c r e a s e so rd e c r e a s e sm o r ethan ∆ . Th ec lo s ed loopr e spon s eo fanev en t -b a s edcon t ro l sy s t emi sd r iv enb yth eo c cu r r en c eo fth eev en t s . A slonga snon ewev en ti sg en e r a t ed ,th einpu t i l lb ek ep tt oi t sa c tua l toth eIMCc on t r o l l e rQ w v a lu ee t ) =j ∆andth ec on t r o lsy s t emw i l lop s( e ra t einop enl oop .F r omth eexp r e s s i on( 3 )o fth e s igna lb e ings amp l ed ,i ti sth ep r e s en c eo fanyso r t o fun c e r ta in tyth a tm a yd r iv eth eg en e r a t i ono fan. Inth i ss e c t ionth ed e s igno fth eDO con t ro l l e rfo r th efi f tha e ra t edtank ,DO5,a sw e l la sfo rth e n i t ra t eonth es e condtank ,NO2 a r econ s id e r ed . F o rcon t ro l l e rd e s ignpu rpo s e s ,al in ea r mod e li s d e r iv edfi r s tfo rea chon eo fth eloop s .Ino rd e r tofa c i l i ta t eth eimp l em en ta t iono fth econ t ro l l e r a sw e l la sm in im i s eimpa c tonp lan top e ra t ionth e r equ i r edexp e r im en t stoid en t i fyth e mod e l sa r e d e s ign eda ss imp l ea spo s s ib l e . Th eexp e r im en t ca r r i edou ti stod r iv eth esy s t emtoas t eadys ta t e s i tua t ionandtoapp lya10%s t epchang einth e man ipu la t edv a r iab l e s . Th er e su l t ingda tai sco l l e c t edandu s edfo rid en t ifi ca t ion . Th el in ea rp ro c e s s mod e l sw e r eob ta in edu s ingsub spa c eid en t i fi ca t iont e chn iqu e s . Th ea lgo r i thmemp loy edw a s N4S ID[20 ] ,wh i chexh ib i t srobu s tnum e r i ca lp rop e r t i e sandr e la t iv e lylowcompu ta t iona lcomp l ex i ty . A su sua lw i th inth eP ro c e s Con t ro lcom mun i ty , wh en ev e rpo s s ib l e ,th e s e mod e l sw i l lb e r edu c edtoth eu sua lF i r s t -O rd e r -P lu s t im e -D e lay (FOPTD )o rev enju s tF i r s t -O rd e r(FO )ino rd e r tofa c i l i ta t eth eapp l i ca t iono fs imp l econ t ro l l e r tun ingru l e s .H e r eth efo l low ingF i r s tO rd e rmod e l i sob ta in edfo rth er e la t ionf romth eKLa5 toth e DO5: KDO5 0. 0163 PDO5( s )= = TDO5s+1 0 . 01 s+1. (4 ). A sacomp l em en ttoth e DO5 con t ro lonth ela s t a e ra t edtank ,th eB en chma rkf ram ew o rkp ropo s e s th econ t ro lo fth en i t ra t eonth es e condt ank ,NO2, byu s ingth ein t e rna lr e c i r cu la t ingflow ,Qrin. Th e NO2con t ro l l e rw i l la l sob etun eda c co rd ingtoth e IMCapp roa chbu tnowu s ingth eco r r e spond ing id en t ifi ed mod e l . Th ep ro c edu r efo l low sth esam e l in e sa sth eon efo rth eDO con t ro l l e rinth ep r e v iou ss e c t ionandth e mod e ltha tw i l lb eu s edfo r con t ro li s :. 502.
(5) −5 KNO2 7 . 9 1 4 51 0 PNO2( s )= = TNO2s+1 0. 0 2s+1. 3 .2 Ev en t -ba sedimp lemen ta t ion (5 ). A si tcanb eob s e rv ed ,th em od e l sh a v eb e enr e du c edtoth em in imumc omp l ex i t y . N oh igh e r o rd e r mod e l sa r en e ed ed . A sas id eb en efi t ,th e co r r e spond ingc on t r o l l e r sw i l la l s ob ev e rys imp l e f rombo thth ed e s i gnpo in to fv i ewa sw e l la sth e imp l em en ta t i onon e . Th ed e s igno fth ec o r r e spond in gIMCc on t ro l l e r s , fo l low sth eu su a lp r o c edu r e . InIMCc on t ro l ,i f P( s )d eno t e sth ep r o c e s sm od e l ,th eIMCcon t ro l l e rQ( s )i sexp r e s s eda s : 1 −1 −1 Q( s )=P( s ) F( s )=P( s ) ( λ s+1 )n. (6 ). s )i sth ew e l lkn ownIMCfi l t e r . Th eλ wh e r e F( pa ram e t e r ,d e t e rm in e sth ec l o s ed l oopt im econ s tan t . Th i st im econ s t an tc an b es e l e c t edon th eba s i so fth eop en l oopt im ec on s t an t ,T,a s λ=τ T ,w h e r e τ e x p r e s s e s t h e s p e e do f r e s p o n s e c c o fth ec lo s ed l oop w i thr e sp e c tt oth eop en loop . H e r e ,w es e l e c tth ed e s i r edc l o s ed l oopt om econ s tan ta st ent im e sf a s t e r . Th e r e f o r e ,f o r bo th =0 . 1 . T h er e s u l t i n gIM Cc o n t r o l l e r s loop s ,τ c r eada s :. 1 ( Txs+1 ) −1 Qx( s )=Px( s ) Fx( s )= Kx ( Txτ s )2 c +1 (7 ). F o rth eev en t -ba s edimp l em en ta t ion ,w eju s tn e ed tosp e c i fyth esamp l ingt im eo fth eev en tg en e ra to randth ep r e c i s ionin t e rv a ltha tw i l ld e t e r m in eth eev en tquan t i sa t ion . A sth eo rd e ro f magn i tudo fbo thloop si sth esam e ,th ep r e c i s ionin t e rv a lfo rev en td e t e c t ionh a sb e encho s en a s ∆DO5= ∆NO2= ∆=0. 01 .A l so ,th eth esam p l ingt im eo ffo rev en td e t e c t ionha sb e enfix ed to1m in . Th i sm ean stha tap ro c e s sm ea su r em en t w i l lb etak enev e rym inu t eandth eev en t -d e t e c t ion w i l lb eex e cu t ed .I fnoev en ti sd e t e c t edth enno s igna lw i l lb et ran sm i t t edtoth ea c tua to r . Th e s es e t t ing sa r i s e qu i t e na tu ra l lyf romth e dynam i c so fth eloop sund e rcon s id e ra t ion . Th e s e l e c t iono fth e s epa ram e t e r sw i l ld e t e rm in eth e t ra ckfo l low ingcapab i l i t i e so fth eco r r e spond ing loop . No t i c ewh e r ea sth econ t ro l l e r sd efin edinth e d e fau l tcon t ro ls t ra t egydoop e ra t eincon t inuou s t im eh e r eth e man ipu la t ed v a r iab l e mov e sa r e d r iv en byth eg en e ra t ion o fth eco r r e spond ing ev en t s . A sa ma t t e ro fcompa r i son ,th eP Icon t ro l l e rpa ram e t e r stha tw ou ldr e su l tf romt ran s la t ingth e IMCd e s ign sin toi t sP Ifo rma r ecompa r ed w i th th eP Itun ingsp e c ifi edinth eb en chma rk . T a b l e(2 )show sbo thtun ing s .I ti sob s e rv edtha t th eev en t -ba s edimp l em en ta t iona l low sh igh e rcon t ro l l e rga in stha ta r et radu c edin tob e t t e rt ra ck ing andfa s t e rd i s tu rb an c ea t t enua t ion . T ab l e2 :P Icon t ro l l e rtun ing s P r op o s e d B en chma r k Kp Ti Kp Ti DO5 1 .227 0 .01 25 0 .002 SNO2 25 .2700 0 .02 10 .000 0 .025 Loop. wh e r exs tand sf o rDO5andNO2ine a chca s e . A tth i spo in ti ti sw o r tht on o t i c eth a t ,ev enth ed e s igno fth econ t r o l l e ri sp r e s en t edw i th inth eIMC f ram ew o rk ,th ep r e s en t edc on t r o l l e r sa r e ,infa c t , fi l t e r edP Icon t r o l l e r s . Th e r e f o r e ,th es am ek indo f con t ro llawa sth eon e simp l em en t edinth eb en ch ma rk . Eff e c t iv e ly ,th ef e edb a c kc on t r o l l e rKx( s )a s so c i a t edtoQx( s )r e ad s 1 Txs+1 2 2 Kx λxs +2sλ x 2 1 1 Tx = 1+ (8 ) Kλx Txs λx/ 2 s+1. Kx( s ) =. Th i si sa P Ic on t r o l l e rw i th p a r am e t e r s Kp = (2 Tx/Kxλx) ,Ti=Tx andfi l t e r edw i thal owpa s s fi l t e rw i tht im ec on s t an tλx/ 2 . Th e r e f o r e ,a tth e end ,i tcanb es e ene i th e ra saP Io ra sanIMC .. 4 S imu la t ionre su l t s Inth i ss e c t ion ,w ep r e s en tth eapp l i ca t iono fth e d e s ign edev en t -ba s edIMCcon t ro ltoth etw oba s i c con t ro lloop sd efin edinth eBSM1s c ena r io . Th e mo t iv a t ioninshow ingth i sapp l i ca t ioni sa l soto showth efa c ttha tth ed e s igno fth econ t ro l l e rcan b eadd r e s s edinacomp l e t eind ep end en tw ayf rom i t sev en t -ba s edimp l em en ta t i on . Th i si son eo fth e ma inadv an tag e so fth i sm e thodtha ta l low sth e ind ep end en t( r e )ad ju s tm en to fbo thpa r t so fth e con t ro lsy s t em. Th et im er e spon s e sa sw e l la squan t i ta t iv em e t r i c s tha tshowth ep e r fo rman c eo fth ep ropo s edcon t ro l l e r sincompa r i sonw i thth ed e fau l tcon t ro l l e r s in c lud edinth eb en chma rk . H e r e ,ju s tth et im e. 503.
(6) r e spon s e sco r r e spond in gt oth ed ryinflu en tp ro fi l ea r eshown .H ow ev e r ,int ab l e( 3 ) ,th ep e r f o r man c em e t r i c sc o r r e spond in gt oa l lth r e einflu en t s a r eshownandc omp a r edw i thth ep e r f o rm an c eo f th eo r ig ina lb en chm a rkd e f au l tc on t r o l l e r .I ti s w o r thtoh igh l i gh tth a tinth el i t e r a tu r e ,th eim p rov em en tinth e s etw ol oop si su su a l lyadd r e s s ed byth eu s eo fo th e r, m o r eadv an c ed ,c on t ro lap p roa ch e ssu cha sm od e lp r ed i c t iv ec on t r o l[21 ] . H e r ew eshowth a tth e r ei ss t i l lr oomf o rimp rov e m en ti fwha ti sin t r odu c edi sn o tach an g einth e compu ta t iono fth ec on t r o ll awi t s e l fbu tini t sim p l em en ta t ion .H e r ea sev en t -d r iv enc on t r o l l e r s . A sw i thth ee s t ab l i sh edb en chm a rk ,on ew e eko f ev o lu t ioni scon s id e r ed .F i gu r e s( 3 )and( 4 )show th eev o lu t iono ffi f tht ankd i s s o lv edoxy g enand s e condanox i ct ankn i t r a t e sc on c en t r a t i on sa long w i thth eco r r e spond in gm an ipu l a t edv a r i ab l e s .I t canb es e enth a tth et r a c k in gp e r f o rm an c eo fth e ev en t -b a s edc on t r o l l e r si ssup e r i o rt oth a ton eo f th eP Icon t r o l l e r sp r o v id ed b yth eb en chma rk . Th eb en efi t sa r er em a rk ab lyb e t t e rinth e NO2 loop , wh e r em o r ea c cu r a t et r a c k in gi sa ch i ev ed . Inth eDO5c on t r o ll oop ,qu i t eh i ghp r e c i s ioni s a l r eadya ch i ev edbyth eb en chm a rkc on t r o l l e r .In th eso lu t ionp r o v id edh e r e ,inadd i t i on w i thth e s l igh tt ra ck in ge r r o rr edu c t i on ,th e r ei sth efa c t tha tDOm ea su r e sa r en e ed edw i thju s ton em inu t e samp l ing . Th i spo in tw i l la l l ow ,f o rex amp l e ,th e u s eo fmod e rnsm a r ts en s o r sw i thw i r e l e s sc ommu n i ca t ioncapab i l i t i e sb yimpo s in gl ow e rd a t at ran s m i s s ionn e ed s .. t iv e lyth et ra ck ingp e r fo rman c eo fbo thloop si s c l ea r lysup e r io rinab so lu t eandagg r ega t edt e rm s . How ev e r ,i ti sw e l l knowntha tsom e t im e s ,to a ch i ev eth i sin c r em en tint ra ck ingp e r fo rman c ea t loopl ev e l ,ha ssma l lr ep e r cu s s ion sa tp lan tl ev e l o rev en ti t mayin c r ea s eth eov e ra l lco s t sa tth e exp en s e so fno timp rov ingth ep lan tt r ea tm en t effi c i en cy . Inth i sca s e ,th ep ropo s edcon t ro l l e r s a ch i ev eanond e sp r e c iab l eimp rov em en tonth e p lan tt r ea tm en tcapa c i tya tth eexp en s e so fp ra c t i ca l lyth esam eov e r a l lco s t .C l ea r ly ,th eav e rag e o fefflu en tnu t r i en tcon c en t ra t ion sa sw e l la sefflu en tl im i tv io la t ion sa r es l i gh t lyimp rov ed .. F igu r e3 : SO5 con t ro lloop p e r fo rman c e and KLa5 man ipu la t edv a r iab l e. Th e ma inimp a c to fth eev en t -b a s edimp l em en ta t ioncanb es e eninth em an ipu l a t edv a r iab l e s . Wh e r ea sfo rth ed i s s o lv edo xy g enc on t r o ll oop ,th e con t ro ls igna lf o l l ow sav e rys im i l a rp a t t e rn(w i th v e rys l igh td iff e r en c e s ) ,th ein t e rn a lr e c i r cu la t ion flowra t e ha sh i gh e rb andw id th a sth e ma jo r r e spon s ib l efo rth et r a c k in gimp r o v em en t . F igu r e s(5 )and( 6 )sh owa m o r ed e t a i l edv i ewo f th eop e ra t iono fbo thl oop sdu r in gd a y8 th .A sex p e c t ed ,th enumb e ro fev en t si s mu ch m o r ed en s e wh enth ed i s tu rb an c een t e r sin t oeff e c tandth e con t ro l l edv a r i ab l ei sd r iv enaw a yf r omth er e f e r en c ev a lu e .Inbo thc a s e s ,i tc anb eapp r e c ia t ed tha twh enth ec on t r o l l edv a r i ab l esuff e r sh ighd e v ia t ionf romth er e f e r en c ev a lu e ,anh i gh e rnum b e ro fev en t sa r eg en e r a t edth a tc o r r e spond sto a mo r econ t inu ou sc on t r o la c t i on( a lw ay sw i th in th ee s tab l i sh eds amp l et im e s )th a ti ss l i gh t lyan t i c ipa t edw i thr e sp e c tt oth eb en chm a rkon e . A mo r equan t i t a t iv ep e r f o rm an c ec omp a r i soni s shownintab l e( 3 )wh e r eth em e t r i c sp r o v id edby th eBSM1s c en a r i oa r eemp l o y ed .P e r f o rman c ea t bo thcon t ro ll oopandp l an tl ev e la r eu s ed . Eff e c -. F igu r e4 : SNO2 con t ro lloopp e r fo rman c eand Qintrman ipu la t edv a r iab l e. 5 Con c lu s ion s Th i spap e rha sana ly s edth eapp l i ca t iono fth e ev en t -b a s eds t ra t egyfo rth econ t ro lo fth etw o ba s i cloop sin w a s t ew a t e rt r ea tm en tp lan t s . th e ev en t -b a s edcon t ro l l e r sa r ed efin edint e rm so fth e IMCcon t ro lfo rmu la t ion . Th i sfo rmu la t ionp ro v id e sth en i c ef ea tu r eo fa l low ingtos e l e c tth eba s i ccon t ro l l e r sw i th ou tth en e edtoth inkin toth e ev en t -b a s eds t ra t eg i e s .A sas e conds t ep ,th econ t ro l l e ri simp l em en t edin toth eev en t -ba s edfo rmu -. 504.
(7) T ab l e3 :B en chm a rkD e f au l tCon t ro l(DC )andEv en t -Ba s ed(EB )con t ro lcompa r i son . D r y. R a in S to rm EB DC EB DC EB NO2lo op 3 IAE( gN/m d) 1 .25 0 .26 1 .57 0 .40 1 .52 0 .40 32 ISE( gN/m)d 0 .47 0 .02 0 .70 0 .06 0 .70 0 .07 3 Maxd ev ia t ion gN/m 0 .86 0 .22 0 .90 0 .52 1 .0 0 .60 DO5lo op IAEg( −COD) /m3d 0 .25 0 .14 0 .21 0 .12 0 .24 0 .13 ISE( g( −COD) /m3) 2 d 0 .02 0 .005 0 .02 0 .003 0 .02 0 .005 Maxd ev ia t ion g( −COD) /m3 0 .26 0 .11 0 .24 0 .1 0 .26 0 .11 Efflu en ta v e r a g ec on c en t r a t ion s 3 SNH( l im i t =4gN/m ) 2 .53 2 .45 3 .21 3 .35 3 .05 3 .07 3 TSS( l im i t =3 0gSS/m ) 13 ,0 13 .0 16 .17 16 .09 15 .27 15 .28 T o ta lN( l im i t =1 8gN/ l ) 16 ,89 16 .74 14 .71 14 .65 15 .83 15 .70 3 T o ta lCOD( l im i t =1 0 0gCOD/m ) 48 ,22 48 .21 45 .43 45 .32 47 .65 47 .66 3 BOD5( l im i t =1 0g/m ) 2 ,75 2 .75 3 .45 3 .45 3 .20 3 .20 Qua l i t y/Co s tva r ia b l e s EQ I(kgpo l l .un i t s /d a y ) 6115 ,63 6058 .26 8174 .98 8216 .17 7211 .48 7190 .45 OC I 16381 ,93 16382 .24 15984 .5 16035 .06 17253 .75 17250 .39 Efflu en tv io la t ion s 3 95%p e r c en t i l eo fe f .SNH( gN/m ) 7 .36 7 .02 8 .03 8 .0 7 .76 7 .62 3 95%p e r c en t i l eo fe f .t o t a l( gN/m ) 15 .77 15 .73 19 .07 18 .6 20 .03 19 .61 3 95%p e r c en t i l eo fe f . TSS( gCOD/m ) 20 .18 19 .70 21 .70 21 .6 20 .78 20 .76 DC. F igu r e5 : SO5 c on t r o ll oop p e r f o rm an c e and KLa5 fo ron ed a ysh ow in gev en tg en e r a t i on. F igu r e6 : SNO2 con t ro lloopp e r fo rman c eand Qintrfo ron edayshow ingev en tg en e ra t ion. la t ionw i thou tn e edf o ran yo th e rch an g e .. u sua lIMCapp roa chtha tu s mo r ea im eda ts e t po in tfo l l ow ing .T oth i send ,th ed i r e c t syn th e s i s app roa chfo rloadd i s tu rban c ew i l lr e su l tp rom i s inga si ta l sosha r e sth esam ed e s ignp r in c ip l e sa s th eIMCcon t ro l l e r .. Th eev en t -ba s ed app r o a ch h a sb e enc ompa r ed w i thth ed e fau l tc on t r o l l e r sp r o v id edinth eb en ch ma rktha ta r eimp l em en t eda sc on t inu ou sP Icon t ro l l e r s .I th a sb e ens e enth a tth eev en t -ba s ed app roa chou tp e r f o rm sth ec on t inu ou son ebo tha t loopl ev e landa to v e r a l lop e r a t i on a ll ev e l . A sth ep rob l emt a c k l edinth i sp ap e ri s ,b a s i ca l ly , ar egu la t ionp r ob l emwh e r eth ec on t r o l l e r sta ski s ba s i ca l lytoa t t enu a t eth eeff e c to finflu en tload inpu td i s tu rb an c e s ,i tw ou lda l s ob ein t e r e s t ingto s tudyth eu s eo fo th e rs o lu t i on sr a th e rthanth e. A cknow ledgemen t Th i sw o rkw a spa r t ia l lysuppo r t edbyth eSpan i sh M in i s t ryo fE conomyand Comp e t i t iv en e s sp ro g ram und e r M INECO/FEDERg ran t DP I2016 77271 -R. 505.
(8) c 2018 by th e au tho r s . Subm i t t ed fo r po s s ib l e op en a c c e s s pub l i ca t ion und e r th et e rm s and cond i t ion so f th e C r ea t iv e Common s A t t r ibu t ion CC -BY -NC 3 .0 l i c en s e (h t tp :// c r ea t iv e common s .o rg/ l i c en s e s/by -n c/3 .0/ ) .. Re fe rence s [1 ]R .V i lanov a ,I . San t ı́n , and C .P ed r e t , “Con t ro lene s ta c ion e sd epu rado ra sd eagua sr e s id ua l e s : E s tado a c tua lyp e r sp e c t iv a s ,” R e v i s ta I b e r o am e r i c anad e Au tomá t i c aeIn fo rmá t i c ain o l .14 ,no .4 ,pp .329–345 ,2017 . du s t r ia l,v [2 ] —— ,“Con t ro lyop e ra c iónd ee s ta c ion e sd epu rado ra sd eagua sr e s idua l e s : Mod e ladoys imu la c ión ,”R e v i s taI b e r o am e r i c anad e Au tomá t i c ae In fo rmá t i c aindu s t r ia l ,v o l .14 ,no .3 ,pp .217–233 , 2017 . [3 ]J .Z engandJ .L iu , “E conom i c mod e lp r ed i c t iv econ t ro lo fw a s t ew a t e rt r ea tm en tp ro c e s s e s ,” Indu s t r ia l & En g in e e r in g Ch em i s t r y R e s e a r ch , v o l .54 ,no .21 ,pp .5710–5721 ,2015 . [4 ]I .San t in ,M .Ba rbu ,C .P ed r e t ,andR .V i lanov a , “Con t ro ls t ra t eg i e sfo rn i t rou sox id eem i s s ion sr e du c t ionon w a s t ew a t e rt r ea tm en tp lan t sop e ra t ion ,”Wa t e rR e s e a r ch,v o l .125 ,pp .466–477 , 2017 . [5 ]C .V lad , M . Sba r c iog , M . Ba rbu , and A .V . W ouw e r ,“ Ind i r e c tcon t ro lo fsub s t ra t econ c en t ra t ionfo raw a s t ew a t e rt r ea tm en tp ro c e s sbyd i s so lv edoxyg ent ra ck ing ,”Con t r o lEn g .App l .In fo, v o l .14 ,pp .38–47 ,2012 . [6 ]D .V r e ck o ,N . Hv a la ,and M .S t ra za r ,“Th eap p l i ca t iono f mod e lp r ed i c t iv econ t ro lo fammon ia n i t rog eninana c t iv a t eds ludg ep ro c e s s ,”Wa t e r o l .64 ,no .5 ,pp .1115– S c i en c eandT e chno lo g y,v 1121 ,2011 . [7 ]A . Capodag l io ,A . Ca l l ega r i ,and D . Mo lognon i , “On l in e mon i to r ing o fp r io r i ty and dang e rou s po l lu tan t sinna tu ra landu rbanw a t e r s : As ta t e o f th e -a r tr ev i ew ,”Mana g .En v . Qua l i t y :In t .J, v o l .27 ,p .507 ?536 ,2017 . [8 ]P .Ing i ld s enandH .W end e lbo e ,“ Imp rov ednu t r i en tr emov a lu s ingins i tucon t inuou son l in es en so r sw i thsho r tr e spon s et im e ,”Wa t .S c i .T e ch no l,v o l .48 ,p .95 ?102 ,2013 .. [11 ]H . -g .Han ,L .Zhang ,andJ . f .Q iao ,“Da ta -ba s ed p r ed i c t iv econ t ro lfo rw a s t ew a t e rt r ea tm en tp ro c e s s ,”IEEE A c c e s s ,v o l .6 ,pp .1498–1512 ,2018 . [12 ]A . P aw low sk i , J . M endo za , J . Gu zmán , M . B e r engu e l , F . A c i én , and S . Do rm ido , “Eff e c t iv eu t i l i za t iono fflu ega s e sinra c ew ayr e a c to rw i thev en t -ba s edphcon t ro lfo rm i c roa lga e cu l tu r e ,”B io r e sou r c et e chno lo g y, v o l .170 , pp . 1–9 ,2014 . [13 ]A .P aw low sk i ,J .L . Gu zman , F . Rod r ı́gu e z , M .B e r engu e l ,J .Sán ch e z ,andS .Do rm ido ,“S im u la t ion o fg r e enhou s ec l ima t e mon i to r ing and con t ro lw i th w i r e l e s ss en so rn e tw o rkandev en t ba s edcon t ro l ,”S en so r s,v o l .9 ,no .1 ,pp .232– 252 ,2009 . [14 ]R .V i lanov a ,“Anin t e rna lmod e lcon t ro lapp roa ch toev en t -ba s edcon t ro l ,”in20173 r dIn t e rna t iona l Con f e r en c eon E v en t -Ba s e d Con t r o l , Commun i c a t ion and S i gna lP r o c e s s in g(EBCCSP ) , May 2017 ,pp .1–6 . [15 ]J .B . Copp , “D ev e lopm en to fs tanda rd i s edin flu en tfi l e sfo rth eev a lua t iono fa c t iv eds ludg e con t ro ls t ra t eg i e s ,”IAWQ ,IAWQS c i en t ifi cand T e chn i ca lR epo r t ,1999 . [16 ]H .V anhoo r en and K . Nguy en , “D ev e lopm en t o f as imu la t ion p ro to co l fo r ev a lua t ion o f r e sp i rom e t ry -ba s edcon t ro ls t ra t eg i e s ,” Un iv e r s i tyo fG en t ,G en t ,B e lg ium ,T e ch .R ep . ,1996 . [17 ]D .E .R iv e ra ,M . Mo ra r i ,andS .Sk og e s tad ,“ In t e rna l Mod e l Con t ro l .4 .P IDcon t ro l l e rd e s ing ,” Ind .En g .Ch em .D e s .D e v . ,v o l .25 ,pp .252–265 , 1986 . [18 ] M . Mo ra r iand E .Zafi rou ,R o bu s tP r o c e s s Con . Eng l ew oodC l iff s , NJ ,P r en t i c e -Ha l l ,1989 . t r o l [19 ] M .B e s ch i ,S .Do rm ido ,J .San ch e z ,andA .V i s io l i , “Cha ra c t e r i za t iono fsymm e t r i cs end -on -d e l taP I con t ro l l e r s ,”Jou rna lo fP r o c e s s Con t r o l,v o l .22 , no .10 ,pp .1930–1945 ,d e c2012 . [20 ]P .V . Ov e r s ch e eand B .d e Moo r ,“N4S ID :sub spa c ea lgo r i thm sfo rth eid en t ifi ca t iono fcom b in ed d e t e rm in i s t i c s to cha s t i csy s t em s .” Au to o l .30 ,pp .75–93 ,1994 . ma t i c a,v [21 ]I .San t in ,C .P ed r e t ,and R .V i lanov a ,“App ly ingv a r iab l ed i s so lv edoxyg ens e tpo in tinatw o l ev e lh i e ra r ch i ca lcon t ro ls t ru c tu r etoaw a s t ew a t e rt r ea tm en tp ro c e s s ,”Jou rna lo fP r o c e s s Con t r o l ,v o l .28 ,pp .40–55 ,2015 .. [9 ]J .A l ex ,L .B en ed e t t i ,J . Copp ,K .V .G e rna ey , U .J epp s son ,I . Nop en s , N .P on s ,L .R i eg e r , C . Ro s en ,J .P .S t ey e r ,P .V an ro l l egh em , and S . W ink l e r ,“B en chma rkS imu la t ion Mod e lno . 1(BSM1 ) ,” D epa r tm en to fIndu s t r ia lE l e c t r i ca l Eng in e e r ingand Au toma t ion , Lund Un iv e r s i ty , T e ch .R ep . ,2008 . [10 ]X . Du ,J . W ang ,V .J ega th e e san ,and G .Sh i , “D i s so lv ed oxyg encon t ro lin a c t iv a t eds ludg e p ro c e s su s inga n eu ra ln e tw o rk -ba s edadap t iv e p ida lgo r i thm ,”App l i e dS c i en c e s,v o l .8 ,no .2 , p .261 ,2018 .. 506.
(9)
Documento similar
Once analysed the possible use of dried sewage sludge from wastewater treatment plant in Prague, Czech Republic, in cement-based composites mix design, we can conclude that
While this is not a general case and the picture could be diferent when simulating other scenarios, two aspects should be high- lighted: (1) despite of the constraints imposed
‘[he last chapter is meant as a first step towards a grammatical model tbat takes into account levels uf linguistic organisatiun higher tban the clause. As Dik himself ts
Pues, no existe ninguna plataforma en la provincia de Teruel que se dedique a aunar testimonios esperanzadores y donde se fomente el medio rural como un espacio
Coronavirus subgenomic mRNA (sgmRNA) transcription requires a discontinuous RNA synthesis mecha- nism driven by the transcription-regulating sequences (TRSs), located at the 3 ⴕ end
The resulting profiles were essentially identical, thus show- ing that the nucleus is the preferential accumulation site of the PSTVd (+) mc and linear (ml) genomic forms, in
In vitro translation assays performed with cell lystates, recombinant METTL3 protein and in vitro-transcribed mRNAs confirmed that full-length METTL3 or an amino-terminal
The focus of this paper was to investigate the contribution of different physicochemical parameters to bulking episodes, and to develop logistic regression models to predict