• No se han encontrado resultados

Static segmentation of thoracic structures for the quantification of pulmonary aeration in 3D CT images in presence of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Static segmentation of thoracic structures for the quantification of pulmonary aeration in 3D CT images in presence of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome"

Copied!
45
0
0

Texto completo

(1)

i  

Static Segmentation of Thoracic Structures for the Quantification of

Pulmonary Aeration in 3D CT Images in presence of Acute Respiratory

Distress Syndrome

by

Juan Sebastián Torres González

Master Report

Master of Science in Systems and Computing Engineering

Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of

University de los Andes (Bogotá, Colombia)

and

The University Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (Lyon, France)

Supervisor: Marcela Hernández

Co-supervisor: Maciej Orkisz

(2)

ii  

Table of Contents

List of Tables ... iii  

List of Figures...iv  

1.   Introduction ...6  

1.1 Clinical Context...6  

1.2 Project Context ...9  

1.2.1 Research teams ...9  

1.2.2 Main Problematic ...10  

1.2.3 Internship ...13  

2. Related Work...14  

2.1 Automatic lung segmentation in well-constrated images...15  

2.2 Extraction of static structures in the thoracic region ...17  

2.3 movement in the thoracic region ...17  

3. Methodology...22  

3.1 Automatic lung segmentation in well-constrasted images ...22  

3.2 Rib cage segmentation...30  

3.3 movement in the thoracic region ...32  

4. Results ...36  

4.1 Automatic lung segmentation in well contrasted images ...36  

4.2 Rib cage segmentation...40  

4.3 movement in the thoracic region ...41  

5. Conclusions and Discussion ...43  

(3)

iii  

List of Tables

Table 1. Classification of lung aeration...7  

Table 2. Voxel discrimination. ...16  

Table 3. Description of Figure 17...29  

(4)

iv  

List of Figures

Figure 1. Different aeration regions of the lung. ...7  

Figure 2. Comparison of CT pig images with different pressure conditions. ...8  

Figure 3. Comparison of non-pathological and ARDS lung. ...8  

Figure 4. Teamwork of CreaSDRA project...9  

Figure 5. Mask of lung segmentation with TurtleSeg software. ...10  

Figure 6. Cuevas’ method...11  

Figure 7. Procedure of the main project. ...12  

Figure 8. Structure of CreaSDRA project. ...14  

Figure 9. Gray-level histograms between pig and human CT images...16  

Figure 10. Respiratory Cycles, breathing mechanism. ...18  

Figure 11. Lungs and ribs motion...19  

Figure 12. Sliding motion discontinuity. ...20  

Figure 13. The Motion Mask...21  

Figure 14. Vandemeulebroucke’s method in poorly-contrast images. ...21  

Figure 15. Schema of the method proposed for an automatic lung segmentation.23   Figure 16. Automatic lung segmentation method. ...25  

Figure 17. Level set results for different parameters set up. ...28  

Figure 18. Schema of the method proposed for a rib cage segmentation...30  

Figure 19. Rib cage segmentation process. ...32  

Figure 20. 2D ray tracing technique. ...33  

Figure 21. Approximation of rib interior points to fill the intercostal space...35  

Figure 22. Building the Motion Mask. ...36  

(5)

v  

Figure 24. Comparison between lung masks...38  

Figure 25. Improvement of the automatic lung segmentation method...39  

Figure 26. Automatic lung mask with the airways remove ...39  

Figure 27. Rib cage segmentation results. ...41  

(6)

1.

Introduction

This section presents the clinical and academic context in which the project was

developed. First, I describe what ARDS means and the importance of research on this

topic; second, I explain all the actors involved in the current project like universities,

research laboratories and their teams; finally, I explain the main problematic and the

context in which this internship was developed. In the second section of this work I

present the related work for the specific objectives for this internship. In the following

sections I present the proposed methods, its results and the conclusion and future work.

1.1CLINICAL CONTEXT

The Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is a severe pathology, in

most of the cases, followed by lung injuries such as edemas, intense lung

inflammations, hypoxemias and activation of alveoli’s coagulation.1 The syndrome

causes some alveoli to fill with fluid and/or swell preventing oxygen exchange. This

leads to low levels of oxygen in the blood, which can produce serious damages to other

organs of the body. The standard procedure to manage this syndrome is as follows: once the patient arrives to the emergency room, doctors evaluate the symptoms and take

a chest X-Ray to assess the severity of the injury. Then the patient is connected to a

mechanical ventilator with Positive Expiration Pressure (PEP) technique. Its parameters are set in function of the severity of the lesion and doctor’s expertise. However, a wrong

setup of the ventilator parameters can increase the injury and cause abnormally high

death rate.

The mortality rate of patients with ARDS varies from 10% to 90% [1], however

it can be estimated an average around of 40% [2]. In France, 5% of the entries in the

emergency room are due to ARDS, 40% is the mortality rate of these patients and 25% might avoid death with better setup of mechanical ventilator [3]. This high percentage is

one of the reasons that encourage the research in this particular syndrome with the main

purpose to reduce this rate and improve patients’ prognostic.

In this project, reanimation specialists are studying the physiopathological

behavior of the syndrome and the injuries produced by mechanical ventilators. As is not

possible to make experiments with real patients, they use an animal model. Pigs were

                                                                                                               

(7)

selected as the animal of study due to its similarity to humans anatomically and

physiologically in respiratory matters.

An acquisition protocol has been established to study the pigs under induced

ARDS. The animal is connected to a mechanical ventilator. Different levels of volume

and pressure (P/V) are set (pressures between 2 cmH2O and 18 cmH2O, volumes

between 2 cm3/Kg and 15 cm3/Kg). Then CT chest images are acquired in inspiration

and expiration cycles with the main purpose of identify and quantify the different lung

aeration classes, showed in Table 1 and Figure 1.

Class   Over-aerated   Normally-aerated   Poorly-aerated   Non-aerated  

HU scale

characteristic   -1000 à -900   -900 à -500   -500 à -100   -100 à +100  

Table 1. Classification of lung aeration.

(a) (b)

Figure 1. Different aeration regions of the lung.

Image  (a)  shows  the  original  image  acquired  in  a  low  P/V  condition,  pressure  of  4cmH2O  with  a   constant  volume  of  6ml/Kg;  (b)  Shows  the  colors  that  represent  the  different  aeration  regions  of   the  lung.  Red  is  associated  with  over-­‐aerated  region;  blue  is  normally-­‐aerated;  yellow  is  poorly-­‐

aerated  and  green  is  non-­‐aerated.    

As a result of P/V combinations (variable pressure and constant volume, and vice versa), we will have some images where the lungs are well contrasted and,

consequently, the boundaries between surrounding structures are well defined (Figure

(8)

volume (approx. more than 8 cm3/Kg) are set. Also, we will have the opposite case

where lungs are poorly contrasted and their boundaries are not well defined (Figure 2b),

this occurs when the volume or pressure levels are below the mentioned limit. However,

they can change depending on the severity of the injury. These last images are very

similar to those found in patients with ARDS (Figure 3).

(a) (b)

Figure 2. Comparison of CT pig images with different pressure conditions.

Image  (a)  shows  an  image  of  a  pig  with  high  level  of  pressure,  18cmH2O;  (b)  shows  the  same  pig  as   in  (a)  but  with  a  low  level  of  pressure,  2cmH2O.  The  red  circle  indicates  the  non-­‐contrast  effect  

caused  by  a  low  P/V  condition.          

(a) (b)

(9)

The  image  in  (a)  shows  a  patient  without  ARDS  while  the  image  in  (b)  shows  the  same  patient  but   with  the  syndrome.  The  red  circle  indicates  the  typical  effect  of  poorly-­‐contrast  in  the  CT  images  

due  to  the  syndrome.2    

1.2PROJECT CONTEXT

1.2.1 Research teams

The project in which the present work is developed is conducted by Prof. Dr.

Claude Guerin and Dr. Jean-Christophe Richard members of the Reanimation Unit of

the Hospital of Croix-Rousse3 (Lyon, France), the Imaging of the Heart-Vessels-Lung

(ICVP)4 research team of the research laboratory CREATIS5 (Lyon, France) and the

research team Imagine6 of the University Los Andes (Bogotá, Colombia). Also, this

project is under the master’s double degree program between the Electric Engineering

department of the University Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (Lyon, France) and the Systems

Engineering department of University Los Andes (Bogotá, Colombia). In the Figure 4 the members of the teamwork are specified.

The main work field of the research teams mentioned above is the signal

processing and medical imaging with the goal of proposing innovative approaches in the pursuit of solutions for health issues.

Figure 4. Teamwork of CreaSDRA project.

                                                                                                               

2 These images were taken from the website of the Radiology RSNA Journal. URL: http://radiology.rsna.org/content/210/1/29.full

3 URL: http://www.chu-lyon.fr/web/Hopital_Croix_rousse_2279.html

4 ICVP research team of CREATIS. URL: http://www.creatis.insa-lyon.fr/site/fr/icvp 5 Creatis research laboratory. URL: www.creatis.insa-lyon.fr

(10)

1.2.2 Main Problematic

At this moment, doctors manually segment the lung in order to quantify the

aeration inside the lung (Figure 1). They use TurtleSeg7 as segmentation tool. This is

general-purpose interactive 3D segmentation software. It assists the user in tracing

contours in various image slices taking into account the gradient of the image. Then the

contours are automatically interpolated in 3D, creating a mask that contains the

segmented lung. The time of this procedure depends on how much detail is wanted, i.e.

a mask made carefully, takes approx. 2 hours. This is one of the disadvantages because

doctors don’t have much time to do this kind of tasks in their daily workflows, reason

why the doctors take approx. 30 minutes to make a mask. As a result, the masks traced

manually, have parts where there is no anatomical correspondence and when the image

doesn't have enough anatomical information (non-contrast image) is almost impossible

to trace the contours so the masks have sharp corners, holes and artifacts lacking of

anatomical sense (Figure 5). These mistakes introduce a lot of errors in the

quantification process.

Figure 5. Mask of lung segmentation with TurtleSeg software.

The  image  shows  in  red  the  manual  mask  using  TurtleSeg.  The  arrows  indicate  the  places  where   the  mask  presents  mistakes:  the  not  inclusion  of  some  lung  regions  and  the  inclusion  of  some  body  

regions.    

To improve this procedure it should be proposed an automatic method for lung

segmentation. There are a lot of papers related to cancer and nodules in the lungs but

                                                                                                               

(11)

specifically in ARDS there is not. One particular article [4], proposes automatic lung

segmentation in ARDS cases. The main workflow of this method is presented as

follows:

a) This method makes a preprocessing in which the noise and artifacts are reduced by a

simple median filter.

b) The body and aerated tissues are separated by thresholding where the body region is

extracted from the background and the lung (the aerated part) is extracted from the

body.

c) The airways are segmented by a threshold based region growing algorithm and

different sections are identified by a decision tree algorithm based on shape

parameters, the trachea is dismissed while segments belonging to the bronchi are

accepted.

d) Landmarks for each rib are obtained in the sagittal plane (Figure 6a), after that a 3D

interpolation between all the landmarks of all the ribs are made to define a contour

of the pleura at the dorsal region (Figure 6b).

e) The extracted part of the lung is extended from the lower border of the mask to the

dorsal pleura contour generating the lung segmentation (Figure 6c).

(a) (b) (c)

Figure 6. Cuevas’ method.

Image  (a)  shows  the  landmarks  found  in  each  rib,  which  are  interpolated  in  order  to  find  the  blue   contour  in  (b)  which  delimits  the  pleura  at  dorsal  region;  in  (c)  the  final  contour,  shown  in  white,  

(12)

Despite of the explanation of this method, the article lacks of critical information

for its implementation, for example how the lung mask is extended to the dorsal pleura

contour and what kind of 3D interpolation is used over the ribs landmarks.

Inspired by the previous method, the main project proposes a procedure for

quantifying lung aeration by an automatic lung segmentation given the image

information, if this is not enough, the missing information must be inferred. Taking into

consideration that we have all the image transition from well to poorly contrasted in

both respiratory cycles we propose the following procedure (Figure 8).

• In well contrasted images, the lung segmentation is obtained automatically.

• In other image conditions, the contrasted region of the lung is segmented. Additionally, the surrounding structures of the lung are extracted to deduce the

missing regions of the lung. These structures consist in the rib cage that works

like an envelope for the lung, the diaphragm and abdominal organs that delimits

the inferior part of the lung.

• The entire information is analyzed in order to obtain the lung segmentation and

the quantification of its aeration regions in any ventilation condition.

• Finally, the results are visualized and analyzed.

(13)

Boxes  represent  tasks.  Arrows  represent  relationships/dependencies.    

In the next section, the specific goals of this internship will be explained.

1.2.3 Internship

This internship is part of the project called CreaSDRA, whose members have

been presented in the section 1.2.1. A previous internship (made by Diana Ortega) was developed within the same project and was focused on the segmentation of bronchial

tree [4]. Additionally, there was a complementary project in which pulmonary vessels

were segmented [5]. There is also one ongoing PhD that is working on lung segmentation in any P/V condition by the registration approach8. All have been oriented

towards the main objective, already mentioned: segment the lung in order to quantify its

aeration at different P/V conditions in any respiratory cycle.

According to all previous, this internship has the purpose to help in the

achievement of the main objective. For this, the internship must be supported by the

work already done and should contribute to the doctoral thesis currently in progress. Taking this into account and based on the procedure of the main project (Figure 7), the

specific objectives of this internship are:

a) Obtain an initial lung mask automatically in the cases of well contrasted images. Also, segment automatically the feasible region of the lung in poorly contrasted

images.

b) Segment the thoracic static structures like the rib cage in poorly contrasted images. This segmentation will be used as anatomical point of reference and for the

extraction of a priori data.

c) Find in the thoracic region the structures that present a strong movement in the respiratory cycles in poorly contrasted images.

The Figure 8 shows how this internship fits into the CreaSDRA project and with

the teams involved (Figure 4).

                                                                                                               

8 The doctoral student is Alfredo Morales from the University of Los Andes (Bogotá, Colombia) and the University Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (Lyon, France).

(14)

Figure 8. Structure of CreaSDRA project.

Boxes  represent  the  task  or  specific  projects  of  CreaSDRA.  Arrows  represent  

relationships/dependencies.  Red  boxes  correspond  to  the  tasks  that  I  did  during  this  internship.   Initials  in  the  upper  right  corner  correspond  to  the  name  of  the  person  in  charged  of  that  specific   task/project,  where:  MD  is  the  medical  team;  DO  is  Diana  Ortega;  AM  is  Alfredo  Morales  and  JS  is  

Juan  Sebastian  Torres  (my  self).    

In the next section, will be described the related work corresponding to the

specific objectives of this internship, previously mentioned.

2. Related Work

Thanks to the high resolution (sub millimeter measures) and the fast

acquisitions (complete chest image in a single breath hold), for the last 10 years the

computed tomography (CT) has become the principal method for acquisition of thorax

images. Because of this, there has been an increase in research on computer analysis of

thoracic CT scans [6]. This computer analysis consists usually in segmentation of the

bronchial tree (airways), pulmonary vessels and lung itself. Also, a large number of

(15)

Based on the objectives of this work, the related work will be divided in three

main sections: automatic lung segmentation methods in well contrasted images,

extraction of static structures in the thoracic region and movement in the thoracic

region.

2.1AUTOMATIC LUNG SEGMENTATION IN WELL-CONSTRATED IMAGES

As the lung is essentially filled of air, it has a low density on CT thorax images

and therefore appears as a dark region. This produces a great contrast between its

surrounding structures (Figure 2 in pigs and Figure 3 in humans). This difference is the

basis of the principal lung segmentation methods [6].

Representative methods of lung segmentation [7] [8] [9] [10] have similar

methodologies:

a) Voxel discrimination within the Hounsfield scale (Table 2) is made. Image

histograms between humans and pigs are very similar as we can see it in Figure 9,

so the same HU values can be used to process pig images. Then, with this

information the background is identified, for example in [7] they find an optimal

threshold value by finding the mean gray-level values corresponding to body and

non-body voxels and in [8] they find the threshold value by analyzing the shape of a

cumulative gray-level profile constructed with the pixels along the diagonal of the

section image.

b) Once the background is identified, usually a connected component analysis and

region-growing algorithm is used to extracts the thorax region and the main lung

volume, generally the lung is identified by size characteristics. After that a

morphological filters are used to fill unwanted “holes”, normally associated to

vessels in parenchyma.

c) Airway segmentation is obtained by 3D region-growing algorithm where the seed is

placed in the trachea (initial slices) and its stopping criterion is the volume

explosion (it means that the airways have merged into the lung-density lung tissue).

This method is already implemented in the project by [5].

d) Left and right lung separation. However, the lungs of pigs have a third lobe, which

(16)

e) Smoothing the mask to remove unwanted cavities (i.e., pulmonary vessels and

airways) using morphological operation.

HU value Description

-1024 to -900 Air and cavities fill with it, like the trachea, airways and lungs.

-900 to -200 Almost all the lung tissue.

-200 to 200 Body tissue like the chest wall, cavities fill with blood. Almost all except the bones.

200 to 1000 Bones.

Table 2. Voxel discrimination.

(a)

(b)

(17)

As  it  can  be  seen,  there  are  not  big  differences  in  the  discrimination  of  the  HU  values  between  the   typical  histogram  of  CT  images  of  pigs  (a)  and  the  typical  histogram  of  CT  images  of  human  images  

in  (b).        

The method proposed in this work (section 3.1) is very influenced by these main

steps and by the method of [7].

Nevertheless, these automatic lung segmentation methods are not suitable

solutions with images that are poorly contrasted and/or don't have a well-defined border

between the lung and its surrounding structures [6].

2.2EXTRACTION OF STATIC STRUCTURES IN THE THORACIC REGION

In this work the static structure in the thoracic region of greater importance is

the rib cage, which consists of the ribs, spine and sternum. In the PhD work of the

project, the rib cage will be used as anatomical landmark and a basis of the extraction of

a priori information in a deformable registration method.

The articles found in the literature about the segmentation of the rib cage usually

include the segmentation and labeling of the ribs [11] [12] [13], which implies a more

complex method for segmenting the ribs.

For this reason, the method proposed in this work is simpler and focused in

segmentation of ribs. Segmentation of the spine and sternum will be part of the same

method.

2.3 MOVEMENT IN THE THORACIC REGION

The respiratory cycle is divided into two phases, the inspiration and expiration.

During the inspiration, the external intercostals muscles contracts and pull upward the

ribcage, at the same moment the diaphragm contracts and pulls downward, so the rib

cage and therefore the lungs expand. During the expiration, the diaphragm relaxes and

(18)

Figure 10. Respiratory Cycles, breathing mechanism.9

During these phases, the motion made by the lungs, diaphragm, rib cage (among

others), is independently with respect of each other. Lungs motion is grater than rib

cage motion, which produces an effect of sliding motion between them [14]. This effect

can be seen in the Figure 11 despite that the figure shows a registration of two images

of the same pig but with different P/V conditions.

                                                                                                               

9 Image taken from: The Biology Corner. Anatomy: Respiratory System. URL: http://www.biologycorner.com/anatomy/respiratory/notes_respiratory_system.html

(19)

Figure 11. Lungs and ribs motion.

Image  shows  the  registration  of  two  images  of  the  same  pig  but  with  different  P/V  conditions:   green  image  corresponds  to  P1  =  4cmH2O;  purple  image  corresponds  to  P2  =  18cmH2O;  gray  color  

correspond  to  common  areas  between  the  two  images.  The  yellow  arrows  indicate  the  motion  of   the  lung  and  the  light  green  arrows  indicates  the  motion  of  the  ribs.  The  same  effect  can  be  seen  in  

respiratory  cycle,  where  the  lung  motion  is  greater  than  the  one  in  the  ribs.      

If each voxel of the image is associated a vector representing its movement, lung

vectors will have greater magnitude than those of the ribs, which creates a discontinuity

in the motion field (Figure 12).

Moreover, deformable registration aims to find a transformation that minimizes

a similarity measure between two images. This transformation must be smooth implying

a sense of continuity. In this case, the sliding motion becomes a problem due to its

(20)

Figure 12. Sliding motion discontinuity.

In  the  image  we  can  see  the  blue  arrows  as  vectors  associated  with  the  motion  of  the  structures.  If   the  arrows  of  the  lungs  and  the  ribs  are  compared  at  the  red  line,  a  great  difference  in  magnitude   will  be  seen  in  the  interface  of  the  these  structures,  which  creates  the  discontinuity  of  the  motion  

field.10    

To resolve this problem, [14] proposes to separate all the structures having the

sliding motion problem in the thorax image, grouping them into two regions: moving

structures (lungs, mediastinum and abdomen) and less-moving ones (the remainder).

This segmentation is called Motion Mask (Figure 13).

The segmentation proposed by [14] is based on level-set framework which

initially requires the patient body segmentation, obtained by thresholding and connected

component analysis; the bony anatomy, which is obtained from a rib cage segmentation;

and the lung segmentation, obtained by a method based on [15]. All these masks

determine the evolution of the level set, imposing restrictions on the shape and image

information.

                                                                                                               

(21)

Figure 13. The Motion Mask.

The  Motion  Mask  separates  the  thorax  images  into  moving  structures  (lungs,  mediastinum  and   abdomen,  region  in  white)  and  less-­‐moving  ones  (the  remainder).11  

This method was tested in the case of poorly contrasted images. The results are

shown in the Figure 14. The blue circles in the three images show that the Motion Mask

(in red) included less-motion structures. The lower circle indicates a strange leakage at

the bottom of the image. This errors may be due to full segmentation of the lung is not

possible (in poorly contrasted images), which affects the final aspect of the Motion

Mask, as it is sensitive to the quality of the segmentation mask of the lung [14].

(a) (b) (c)

Figure 14. Vandemeulebroucke’s method in poorly-contrast images.

Motion  Mask  in  red  is  superposed  to  the  original  image.  Circles  in  blue  indicate  where  the  Motion   Mask  presents  errors  by  including  less-­‐moving  structures.  

 

The idea of using this mask for this project is to define the movement of those

structures that are observed in poorly contrasted images to help define the movement of

structures that are not visible (such as the diaphragm) and to identify non-visible parts

of lung. The use of this mask is part of the Alfredo’s doctoral thesis.

                                                                                                                11 The figure was taken from [14].

(22)

In this paper we propose a different approach to the calculation of the Motion

Mask presented here (section 3.3).

To summarize this section, this paper focuses on proposing methods that provide

the most information that then will be used by a method based on the deformable

registration to suggest a segmentation of lung images well or poorly contrasted. These

methods correspond to the red boxes in the main workflow shown in the Figure 8. In

well-contrasted images, a method for automated segmentation of the lung is proposed

(based on [4]). In poorly contrasted images, a method of segmentation of the rib cage is

proposed (simple method without labeling the ribs), and generating a motion mask

independent on the contrast of the ROI is proposed (based on [14]), to avoid errors in

the deformable registration, due to motion discontinuities structures thoracic region.

3. Methodology

3.1AUTOMATIC LUNG SEGMENTATION IN WELL-CONSTRASTED IMAGES

As it was said in the section 2.1, the method proposed in this work for an

automated segmentation of the lung in well contrasted images is based on the main

common steps found in the literature and the main process of [7], one of the most used.

The main idea is to have an automated mask and more accurate than manual.

Also, in order to compare with these manual masks, the envelop of the lung should be

segmented, this means that vessels and airways should be part of the mask. Anyhow, for

the quantification of the aeration, the option of removing the airways should be

available.

(23)

Figure 15. Schema of the method proposed for an automatic lung segmentation.

The  arrows  indicate  the  differences  between  the  images  in  each  step  of  the  method.    

a) An analysis of the histogram (considering the Table 2 and Figure 9a) has been made

to set the best HU value to divide the image into aerated and non-aerated voxels.

The HU value chosen was T = -200 HU (Figure 16a).

b) To remove the background, a connected threshold region-growing algorithm is used.

Four seed points were automatically placed, one on each corner of the first axial

slice. Normally, one seed in one corner might be enough, but as it can be seen in the

Figure 16b, the table where the pig lies divides the background in more than one

connected component.

c) To extract the lung from the other structures of the image, a 3D connected

component analysis is made. The biggest connected component (should be the lung)

is kept, the others are removed (set to 0), as it’s shown in the Figure 16d.

d) Until now the resulting mask has larger pulmonary vessels Figure 16e. To remove

these vessels a 2D slice-by-slice morphological filling hole strategy is used Figure

16f. To ensure that there is no leakage in this strategy a closing operation is

performed (the size of the structuring element is chosen to attach the closest regions,

about 1mm).

e) Finally, the trachea and airways (segmented by [4]) are removed from the mask

Figure 16g and Figure 16h. To achieve this, the airways mask is dilated because it

(24)

followed by an arithmetic operation (subtraction) between the two masks (lung and

airways) is enough to remove the airways and detach the trachea from the lung. To

remove the remaining regions of the trachea and principal airways separated from

the lung, an opening operation is performed.

(a) (b)

(c) (d)

(25)

(g) (h)

Figure 16. Automatic lung segmentation method.

(a)  Original  image;  (b)  thresholding  with  T  =  -­‐200  HU;  (c)  removing  background  with  growing   region;  (d)  extracting  the  lung  with  3D  connected  component  analysis;  (e)  morphological  filling   hole  in  2D  to  remove  vessels;  (f)  lung  segmentation;  (g)  lung  segmentation  without  airways;  (h)  3D  

visualization  of  the  mask  without  airways.    

However, The mask obtained from the method until this point present some

small mistakes, as it can be seen in the Figure 24: portions of the mask overlap some

borders of the ribs and non-lung structures. Although this overlapping occurs in very

small parts, it happens in many places along the volume (in all pigs). These mask are

used in deformable registration methods, so these mistakes introduce a considerable

error in the registration.

Until this point, in the steps where morphological operations are performed no

image information is taken into account to generate the lung mask, reason why the

overlapping occurs. To improve it, this information has to be considered.

As it has been exposed, the problem occurs just in the borders of the current

mask. One possible solution should take into account the image information around the

mask's border. This kind of solution guides us to think in Active Contours methods. So

a local level set method (implemented by Shawn Lankton12 and based on a Chan-Vese

energy function) is implemented [ [16]]. The following equations show the general

expressions of this method.

(1)

(2)

                                                                                                               

12 http://www.shawnlankton.com/2009/04/sfm-and-active-contours/

E(φ,µinout)= δ(φ(x ! ))

Ω

β(x ! ,y ! )ECVdy d! x !

Ω

ECV =(I−µin)

2

+(I−µout)

(26)

The first term of the equation (1) allows you to select the pixels belonging to the

contour; the second term calculates the data within a neighborhood centered at each

point belonging to the contour. The equation (2) represents the expression of Chan-Vese

energy function.

The modified parameters to set up the level-set method are: restriction on the

curvature of the contour after each evolution of the level-set (values between 0 and 1

where 1 have the major restriction of curvature), the radius of the local region to be

analyzed (in pixels or voxels) and the number of iterations for convergence.

The main reason for choosing this method is to perform an analysis of the gray

level on the edge of the lung, so the mask would be adjusted to the information of the

image.

The inputs of this method are: the original image and the current mask as

initialization (very close to the wanted one, because it's known that a good initialization

is very important to active contours methods). The following figure shows the tests

done to obtain the best parameters of the level set method (number of iterations, curve

smoothness and local radius).

(27)

(d) (e) (f)

(g) (h)

(28)

(k) (l) (m)

Figure 17. Level set results for different parameters set up.

Pig Iterations Smoothness Curve Local Ball Radius Image Description

1 250 0.9 10 (a)

It can be seen that the red mask overlaps a small part of the ribs, however this red mask reaches the frontal corners of the lung but not the blue one (the overlapping

between the two mask is presented in purple). Also, there are some regions added by the blue mask near the trachea. 1 250 0.9 5 (b) Related to the last image, the blue part of the mask near the trachea has disappeared.

1 250 0.9 30 (c)

Related to the last two images, all the blue parts added by the blue mask have disappeared. This means that the blue mask is better adjusted to the data of the image. We can infer that bigger the radius

of the local analysis of the energy, more information about the regions would be so it can be possible to adjust better the mask

to the data.

1 250 0.2 10 (d), (e)

In (d) it can be seen that having a low smoothness parameter (not so restrictive) the mask can reach at the pointed corners in comparison with image 1 (all the other parameters are the same between these two images). Also, this obtained mask is more adjusted to the data than image 1. In

(e) the issues around the gastric sonde. The level set mask contains this part but not the lung segmentation. However, apart

of this, the mask fits well all along the other slices.

1 250 0.2 10 (f)

In general, the level set mask fits well the lung along the volume but near the trachea the mask presents an error (the local radius is bigger and the smoothness parameter, as

it is set, permits more flexibility to the contour letting deform enough the initial mask to include some adjacent structures).

(29)

5 250 0.9 10 (g), (h)

(g) This and the image below correspond to pig 05. The level set setup is the same as in image 1. This image shows some differences around the principal bronchi.

However, all the structures in the blue mask are structures that present a strong movement. Along the entire volume the

mask fits well the lung information. (h) Here it is shown some issues around

the gastric sonde. Apart of this, as we already said, along all the volume the

mask fit well.

5 250 0.5/0.9 15 (i), (j)

(a) Blue mask: 250 iterations, 0.5 smoothness, 15 radius; (b) red mask: 250 iterations, 0.9 smoothness, 15 radius. Notice the differences at the corners of the

lung and near the trachea.

17 250 0.3/0.5/0.9 15 (k), (l), (m)

(a) Blue mask: 250 iterations, 0.3 smoothness, 15 radius; (b) red mask:

250 iterations, 0.5 smoothness, 15 radius; (c) green mask: 250 iterations,

0.7 smoothness, 15 radius. Notice the differences at the corners of the lung

and near the trachea between the three images.

Table 3. Description of Figure 17.

Based on the results shown in the figure above, it can observed that is very

difficult to find the correct setup of the level set method to segment completely the lung

(reach the corners and hard curvatures). However, this method improves the automatic

lung segmentation method because it doesn’t contains any rib structure and other

non-lung structure in the obtained mask.

By the other hand, it is necessary to improve this level set mask so we can

segment completely the lung. To do this, this mask can be taken as an input of a region

growing method to grow until the gray level is low enough. Based on the

characterization of the aeration (Table 1), the limit values for the region to grow are set

between -1024 HU and -400 HU.

The results of this method (with and without the level set and growing region

(30)

3.2RIB CAGE SEGMENTATION

As stated in section 2.2, the following method related to the segmentation of the

rib cage is simpler with respect to literature because it doesn’t require labeling. The

method proposed is described as follows:

Figure 18. Schema of the method proposed for a rib cage segmentation.

a) An analysis of the histogram (considering the Table 2 and the Figure 9) has been

made to set the best HU value that separates the high-density tissues as bones from

others. The threshold value is T = +200 HU (Figure 19b).

b) The ribs and the spine are attached by a closing operation. The structuring element

size is chosen in function of the space between the ribs and the vertebras, about

3mm (Figure 19d).

c) To find a point on the spine (which is a seed point for a threshold-base region

growing algorithm), the nearest “white” region is searched from the point of the

Carina (in the axial slice) towards the bottom of the image. This point is

interactively provided by the user or deduced from the bronchi segmentation.

d) Sometimes the pig is tilted on the table as it’s shown in the Figure 19a. Therefore,

with the points of the Carina and spine, a line of search is established to find the

(31)

direction, like a wave front) that grows as it approaches the sternum, until this one is

found (Figure 19f).

e) The points found in (c) and (d) serve as seed points of a threshold-base

region-growing algorithm.

f) Because the bone tissue at the center has lower density (bone marrow) than near the

surface, is necessary to make a closing operation and then a 3D hole-filling strategy

to have a correctly segmentation.

(a) (b)

(32)

(e) (f)

Figure 19. Rib cage segmentation process.

(a)  Original  image  where  the  point  of  the  Carina  is  indicated  (this  point  is  located  in  the  tracheal   bifurcation,  where  the  main  bronchi  unfold);    (b)  thresholding  step  with  T  =  +200  HU;  (c)  shows  the  

space  between  the  ribs  and  the  spine  and  (d)  the  result  of  attaching  operation  by  morphology;  (e)   how  the  spine  point  is  obtained  and  (f)  how  the  sternum  point  is  obtained.  

 

The result of this method is explained in the section 4.2.

3.3 MOVEMENT IN THE THORACIC REGION

As stated in section 2.4 the method proposed in this part has the objective to

divide the thoracic region as [14] does it, to build its Motion Mask but in poorly

contrasted images. To accomplish this, it’s necessary to find the dorsal border of the

lung. The method is inspired by [9] (already described in the section 1.2.2), where

anatomical information (rib cage) is used to infer this border despite the lack of data.

a) With the rib cage mask, the spine point and sternum point obtained in the previous

section, a central point is defined from which a ray-tracing strategy is implemented.

The rays are launched from this point radially along all 360 degrees each 1 degree

(this step value was experimentally set) in an axial cross section. Along the ray is

sought the first intersection with a “white” region, the rib cage (Figure 22a). This

operation is repeated slice by slice (axial slices) all over the volume. As final result,

we have a cloud points that represent the internal points of the rib cage (Figure

(33)

(a) (b)

(c)

Figure 20. 2D ray tracing technique.

Slice-­‐by  –slice  (axial)  technique  to  find  the  interior  points  of  the  ribs.  In  (a)  a  schema  explaining  the   technique;  in  (b)  is  shown  the  resulting  points  (in  blue)  in  a  axial  slice;  in  (c)  it  can  be  seen  some  

points  (in  red)  in  a  3D  view  with  the  rib  cage  superposed.      

b) To deduce the information of the dorsal border of the lung and the intercostal space.

The Figure 21a shows the points found in red and the ribs. Here, we can clearly see

that the intercostal space is empty. An approximation between the points in radial planes is performed (Figure 21b). This approximation is performed by B-Spline

curves [17]. The eq.1 shows the general expression of B-Splines.

C(u)= Ni,p(u)Pi

i=0 n

(34)

Where

C(u) is the B-Spline curve,

Ni,p(u) are the basis functions,

p is the B-Spline

degree,

n is the total number of control points,

Pi are the control points and

u is the

parametrical variable.

In this case, the B-Splines approximately fit the points previously found. This raises

a problem of curve fitting, which can be expressed as linear optimization problem. The main idea is to find the control points

Pi that minimize the root mean squared

error (RMSE) between the B-Splines and the current points.

The number of control points and the degree of the B-Splines are set experimentally (best combination is

n = 25 and

p = 3).

As it was previously said, the 2D approximation is performed in the radial planes

with the points found by the ray-tracing technique. The results of this approximation

can be seen in the Figure 21c (the approximated points are in red and as it can be

seen, there’s no empty intercostal space). To fill the space entirely, the same process

is done but now in axial planes where the points to fit are the ones found by the

previous approximation. The Figure 21d shows the schema of this process and

Figure 22e-f show the results.

(35)

(d) (e) (f)

Figure 21. Approximation of the points inside the ribs to fill the intercostal space.

(a)  interioir  rib  points  (red)  obtained  by  the  ray-­‐tracing  technique;  (b)  schema  of  how   approximation  to  these  last  points  is  made  in  radial  planes;  (c)  points  obtained  applying  the  schema  

in  (b);  (d)  schema  of  how  approximation  to  the  obtained  points  is  made  in  axial  planes;  (e)  and  (f)   shows  the  results  of  this  procedure.  

c) Once the intercostal space is filled with points and the dorsal border of the lung is

traced by the “axial B-Splines” (Figure 22a,c), the motion mask is created. In the

abdominal area, where there is no sternum (like in the Figure 22a-b), the 2D contour

is opened and it is extended in a straight line (considering the direction established

by the spine and sternum point) until the border of the image (Figure 22b).

Otherwise, the contour is closed and there is no extension (Figure 22d). All the

pixels that are inside of the "contour" are labeled as part of the motion mask (Figure

22b,d).

d) Finally, a binary operation (AND) is made between the motion mask and the body

mask. A preprocessing is needed in order to obtain this last mask. This can be

derived from the method proposed in the section 3.1 (step b) by taking the image

with the background removed and executing a 3D morphological filling-hole

(36)

(a) (b) (c) (d)

(e) (f) (g)

Figure 22. Building the Motion Mask.

(a-­‐d)  shows  the  contour  obtained  and  its  generated  masks;  in  the  image  (e)  the  blue  body  mask;  in   (f)  the  motion  mask  (yellow)  in  a  preliminary  step,  the  red  circle  indicates  the  extension  of  the   mask  until  the  border  of  the  image,  like  in  (b);  in  (g)  the  final  motion  mask  (yellow).  In  the  images  

(e-­‐g)  the  original  image  is  superposed;      

The results of this method are presented in the section 4.3.

4. Results

Due to the imaging protocol developed in this project, we have approximately

480 images (14 pigs*17 P/V conditions*2 respiratory cycles). The images were

acquired by a CT Siemens Biograph 64, with image resolution around 0.5x0.5x0.7

mm3. Most of the analyses made in this project were qualitative and tested in several

images.

4.1AUTOMATIC LUNG SEGMENTATION IN WELL CONTRASTED IMAGES

Once the current method was executed in all images with the highest-pressure

condition (a total of 16 volumes, one per pig), some of the images in some pigs (a total

(37)

is lying (at the lower part of the image), called here “bed”. According to the current

process (based on the placement of 4 seed points on each corner to remove the

background and later, the connected component analysis where the biggest connected

component is taken), the lung is not segmented but the bed is (Figure 23). This happens

because, in these cases, the bed is the biggest connected component in the image.

Figure 23. “Bed” segmentation problem.

In  this  image  it  can  be  observe  that  the  “bed”  is  segmented  (blue  part  of  the  image)  instead  of  the   pig’s  lung.  

Respecting the lung mask results, some of the manual masks made in this

project have errors with respect to the ideal segmentation. The errors are easily

identifiable. For this reason, qualitative analysis was performed between the manual

mask and the masks obtained by the method proposed in this work.

The Figure 24 show the errors in the manual mask where aerated regions are not

included while the mask resulting from the automated segmentation does it (yellow

arrows). Similarly, the red arrows show when the manual mask includes body tissue

that is not part of the lung while our mask does not include it. However, in

poorly-contrast regions like the ones indicated by the blue arrows, our mask fails not including

lung tissue while the manual mask includes it. This shows the sensitivity of our method

(38)

(a) (b) (c)

(d) (e) (f)

Figure 24. Comparison between lung masks.

In  the  images  the  yellow  arrows  indicate  the  errors  in  the  manual  mask  where  aerated  regions  are   not  included;  the  red  arrows  indicate  when  the  manual  mask  includes  body  tissue;  blue  arrows  

indicate  the  place  where  the  automatic  mask  not  includes  lung  tissue.    

 

The next figure shows how the mask in Figure 24 is improved with level set and

growing region methods, considering the image information so all the lung is

segmented. It can be notice that the method proposed generates a mask that fits very

well to the lung, reaching pointy sides and not including non-lung voxels. However, this

method segments the esophagus in almost all processed images, because in some slices

of the volume, the mask automatically obtained contains the esophagus, so the

region-growing algorithm segments it, as it can be seen in (b) and (f) (small region

disconnected from the lung and near the trachea). Nevertheless, the results of the mask

(39)

(a) (b) (c)

Figure 25. Improvement of the automatic segmentation of the lung method.

Image  (a)  shows  in  blue  the  lung  mask  obtained  by  the  automatic  method  proposed  without  any   improvement;  (b)  in  yellow  the  level  set  mask  with  parameters  250  iterations,  0.9  smoothness  and  

10  radius;  (c)  in  red  the  improvement  region  growing  mask.  The  images  are  from  the  pig  05  in   maximum  pressure  condition.  Notice  the  upper  corners  of  the  lung  and  the  borders  along  the  lung;   the  improvement  obtained  can  be  seen  in  (c).  However,  the  esophagus  appears  as  part  of  the  mask  

in  (c).    

 

As it was stated in the section 3.1, additionally to the segmentation of the lung

envelope for comparative purposes, it is also important to remove the respiratory

airways for purposes of quantifying the aeration. However the option of removing them is up to the experts. The Figure 26, the automatic lung mask is shown with the airways

removed.

(a) (b) (c)

(40)

(a)  and  (b)  shows  the  automatic  lung  mask  in  blue  without  the  airways;  (c)  shows  a  3D  view  of  this   mask.  

4.2RIB CAGE SEGMENTATION

Qualitative analysis was performed as ground truth reference was missing.

Anyhow, the point of this method is the segmentation of all the ribs of pigs. Therefore,

the method is tested in 3 different ventilation conditions in four different pigs. These conditions represent images from poorly contrast to well contrast. The Table 4 and

Figure 27 show the results of the evaluation.

Pig/Condition [P]=cmH2O [V] = cm3/Kg

Condition 1 [P]=cmH2O [V] = cm3/Kg

Condition 2 [P]=cmH2O [V] = cm3/Kg

Condition 3 [P]=cmH2O [V] = cm3/Kg

Results

Pig 4163 V = 5

Inspiration P = 2

Inspiration P = 10

Inspiration, P = 18

All ribs were segmented but in

Condition 1, food from the

stomach were included in the mask

Pig 4277 V = 5

Expiration P = 2

Expiration P = 12

Expiration P = 18

All ribs were segmented

Pig 4443 P = 8

Expiration V = 4

Expiration V = 8

Expiration V = 15

All ribs were segmented

Pig 4610 V = 5

Expiration P = 4

Expiration P = 12

Expiration P = 18

All ribs were segmented

Table 4. Results of the rib cage segmentation.

Given the previous results, we can infer that for all of conditions and for all pigs

this method works. However, the Pig 4163, on the condition that represents

poorly-contrast image, in the segmentation was included a portion of undigested food because

the lower ribs are very near to the stomach. This should be taken into account in the

(41)

(a) (b) (c) (d)

(e) (f)

Figure 27. Rib cage segmentation results.

Image  in  (a)  shows  the  results  of  the  rib  cage  segmentation  in  the  pig  4610  in  inspiration  phase   with  18cmH2O  of  pressure;  (b)  the  pig  4610  in  expiration  phase  with  4cmH2O  of  pressure;  (c)  the  

pig  4277  in  expiration  phase  with  2cmH2O  of  pressure;  (d)  the  pig  4443  in  expiration  phase  with   4cm/Kg  of  volume;  (e-­‐f)  the  pig  4163  in  inspiration  phase  with  2cmH2O  of  pressure,  in  this  case  the  

red  arrows  show  the  portion  of  food  attached  to  the  ribs  by  the  segmentation.  

4.3 MOVEMENT IN THE THORACIC REGION

A qualitative analysis has been made in order to validate the motion mask

(42)

As it has already shown in the section 2.3, the motion mask of [14] (executable

software was obtained from CREATIS’ software VV13) includes less-motion structures

(Figure 14). In the Figure 28 we can observe that the method proposed in this work

doesn’t include less-moving structures. However, the blue arrows in the Figure 28

indicate that in some cases our mask includes some small portions of the intercostal

space or body tissue (at the level of the sternum), also purples arrows indicate portions

of bone included. This is caused by not take into account the image information during

the approximation step to define the contours. An evolution of the contours with image

information constraints must be integrated in future work. Therefore, to adjust the mask

to the image information (i.e. the gradients) a deformable model could be used. The

current mask could be used as an initialization of the model, knowing that this is one of

the greatest difficulties on this topic.

(a) (b) (c) (d)

(d) (e)

Figure 28. Motion Mask improvements and errors.

Images  (a)  to  (d)  shows  the  motion  mask  obtained  by  the  method  proposed  in  this  work.    Arrows   indicates  the  errors  found;  blue  arrows  show  the  places  where  body  and  intercostal  tissue  is  

                                                                                                               

(43)

included  in  the  mask;  purple  arrows  shows  where  small  portions  of  the  bones  are  also  included.   Images  (d)  and  (e)  shows  a  3D  reconstruction  of  the  mask.  

5. Conclusions and Discussion

In this work, an automatic method for lung segmentation in CT images of pigs was presented. The input images of this method were always well contrasted.

Additionally, a qualitative comparison between manual segmentation using TurtleSeg

software and the segmentation through the proposed method were carried out, the latter showing an improvement on the accuracy.

Also a segmentation method of the rib cage was proposed which is independent

of the lack of contrast inside the lung and has only one input: the point of the Carina. This method was successfully tested in different pigs with different P/V conditions.

However, in a low P/V condition of the pig 4163 a portion of undigested food was

included in the result mask (ribs near the stomach).

Finally, a method based in [9] [14] that separates the thorax into two structures:

motion structures (like the lungs, diaphragm and liver) and less-motion structures (ribs,

for example) in poorly contrasted images was proposed. This mask not includes less-motion structures as seen in the method of [14]. However, there are some small regions

that should not be in the mask like small portions of bone and body tissue.

The future work could include a quantitative evaluation of the automatic lung segmentation method proposed. This could be realized by taking as reference masks the

ones generated in the PhD work of this project.

Related to the segmentation method of the rib cage, this method must be totally automated by finding the point of the Carina. Also, this method should be more robust

in the cases where artifacts appear near the rib cage.

Finally, the method proposed in this project to build a Motion Mask, should be improved by taking into account constrains of the image as intensity values, shapes,

(44)

References

[1]   A.  Artigas,  K.L.  Brigham,  J.  Carlet,  K.  Falke,  L.  Hudson,  M.  Lamy,  J.R.  LeGall,  A.   Morris,  R.  Spragg  G.R.  Bernard,  "Report  of  the  American-­‐European  consensus   conference  on  ARDS:  definitions,  mechanisms,  relevant  outcomes  and  clinical   trial  coordination.  The  Consensus  Committee.,"  Intensive  Care  Med,  vol.  20,  no.   3,  pp.  225-­‐232,  1994.  

[2]   Foundation  ARDS.  Facts  about  ARDS  Acute  Respiratory  Distress  Syndrome.   [Online].  http://www.ardsusa.org/facts.htm  

[3]   C.  Brun-­‐Buisson  et  al.,  "Epidemiology  and  outcome  of  acute  lung  injury  in   european  intensive  care  units,"  Intensive  Care  Medicine,  vol.  30,  pp.  51-­‐61,   2004.  

[4]   L.  Cuevas,  P.  Spieth,  A.  Carvalho,  and  M.  &  Koch,  E.  Abreu,  "Automatic  Lung   Segmentation  of  Helical-­‐CT  Scans  in  Experimental  Induced  Lung  Injury,"  in  

4th  European  Conference  of  the  International  Federation  for  Medical  and   Biological  Engineering,  vol.  22,  Antwerp,  Belgium,  2008,  pp.  764–767.  

[5]   D.C.  Ortega,  "Airway  Tree  Segmentation  Based  on  CT  Images  of  Patients  with   Acute  Respiratory  Distress  Syndrome  (ARDS)  ,"  Universidad  de  Los  Andes;   Université  Claude  Bernard  Lyon  1,  Lyon,  France,  Master's  Degree  2012.   [6]   J.-­‐C.  Prieto  et  al.,  "Segmentation  of  the  pulmonary  vascular  tree,"  in  2012  

XXXVIII  Conferencia  Latinoamericana  En  Informatica  (CLEI),  Medellin,   Colombia,  2012,  pp.  1-­‐7.  

[7]   I.  Sluimer,  A.  Schilham,  M.  Prokop,  and  B.  van  Ginneken,  "Computer  Analysis   of  Computed  Tomography  Scans  of  the  Lung:  A  Survey,"  IEEE  Transactions  on   Biomedical  Imaging,  vol.  25,  no.  4,  pp.  385-­‐405,  2006.  

[8]   S.  Hu,  Eric  A.  Hoffman,  and  Joseph  M.  Reinhardt,  "Automatic  Lung  

Segmentation  for  Accurate  Quantitation  of  Volumetric  X-­‐Ray  CT  Images,"  

IEEE  Transactions  on  Medical  Imaging,  vol.  20,  no.  6,  pp.  490-­‐498,  2001.   [9]   S.G.  Armato  III  and  H.  MacMahon,  "Automated  lung  segmentation  and  

computer-­‐aided  diagnosis  for  thoracic  CT  scans,"  in  International  Congress   Series,  vol.  1253,  London,  UK,  2003,  pp.  077-­‐982.  

[10]   A.  Silva,  B.  S.  Ferreira,  C.  Silva,  J.  S.  Santos,  "Fast  Pulmonary  Contour  

Extraction  in  X-­‐ray  CT  Images:  A  Methodology  and  Quality  Assessment,"  in  

Medical  Imaging  2001:  Physiology  and  Function  from  Multidimensional  Images,   vol.  4321,  San  Diego,  CA,  2001,  pp.  216-­‐224.  

[11]   T.  Klinder,  C.  Lorenz,  J.  Von  Berg,  S.  P.  M.  Dries,  and  T.  &  Ostermann,  J.  Bülow,   "Automated  model-­‐based  rib  cage  segmentation  and  labeling  in  CT  images,"   in  Proceedings  of  the  10th  international  conference  on  Medical  image  

computing  and  computer-­assisted  intervention,  2007,  pp.  195-­‐202.  

[12]   J.  Staal  and  B.  &  Viergever,  M.  A.  van  Ginneken,  "Automatic  rib  segmentation   and  labeling  in  computed  tomography  scans  using  a  general  framework  for   detection,  recognition  and  segmentation  of  objects  in  volumetric  data,"  

Medical  Image  Analysis,  vol.  11,  no.  1,  pp.  35-­‐46,  2007.  

[13]   H.  Shen,  L.  Liang,  and  M.  S.  &  Qing,  S.  0001,  "Tracing  Based  Segmentation  for   the  Labeling  of  Individual  Rib  Structures  in  Chest  CT  Volume  Data,"  in  MICCAI  

(45)

(2),  2004,  pp.  967-­‐974.  

[14]   J.  Vandemeulebroucke,  O.  Bernard,  S.  Rit,  J.  Kybic,  and  P.  &  Sarrut,  D.  Clarysse,   "Automated  segmentation  of  a  motion  mask  to  preserve  sliding  motion  in   deformable  registration  of  thoracic  CT,"  Med  Phys,  vol.  39,  no.  2,  pp.  1006-­‐ 1015,  Feb  2012.  

[15]   E.  M.  van  Rikxoort,  B.  deHoop,  M.  A.  Viergever,  M.  Prokop,  and  B.  van   Ginneken,  "Automatic  lung  segmentation  from  thoracic  computed  tomog-­‐   raphy  scans  using  a  hybrid  approach  with  error  detection  ,"  Med.  Phys.,  vol.   36,  no.  7,  pp.  2934-­‐2947,  2009.  

[16]   Shawn  Lankton.  (2009,  July)  Sparse  Field  Active  Contours,  Shawn  Lankton   Online.  [Online].  http://www.shawnlankton.com/2009/04/sfm-­‐and-­‐active-­‐ contours/  

[17]   L.  Piegl,  T.  Wayne,  The  NURBS  book,  2nd  ed.  New  York,  NY,  USA:  Springer-­‐ Verlag  New  York,  Inc.,  1997.  

[18]   D.  Rueckert  et  al.,  "Nonrigid  Registration  Using  Free-­‐Form  Deformations:   Application  to  Breast  MR  Images,"  IEEE  Transactions  on  Medical  Imaging,  vol.   18,  no.  8,  pp.  712-­‐721,  1999.  

             

Referencias

Documento similar