• No se han encontrado resultados

Arithmetic of seminormal weakly Krull monoids and domains

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Arithmetic of seminormal weakly Krull monoids and domains"

Copied!
23
0
0

Texto completo

(1)

seminormal weakly Krull monoids and domains

A. Geroldinger and F. Kainrath and A. Reinhart

International Meeting on Numerical Semigroups

Cortona, September 2014

(2)

Outline

(Unions of) Sets of Lengths Krull and weakly Krull monoids

Arithmetic: Precise versus Qualitative Results Seminormal Monoids and Domains

Main Results

Methods: Transfer Homomorphisms

(3)

Sets of lengths in monoids

Let H be a multiplicatively written, commutative, cancellative semigroup, and let a ∈ H be a non-unit.

If a = u1· . . . ·uk where u1, . . . ,uk are irreducibles (atoms), then k is called thelengthof the factorization.

LH(a) = {k | a has a factorization of length k} ⊂ N is the set of lengthsof a.

If L(a) = {k1,k2,k3, . . .}with k1<k2 <k3 < . . ., then

∆ L(a) = {k2−k1,k3−k2, . . .}

is the set of distancesof L(a).

If |L(a)| ≥ 2, then |L(am)| >m for each m ∈ N.

(4)

Sets of distances and unions of sets of lengths

We call

∆(H) = [

a∈H

∆ L(a) ⊂ N theset of distances of H. For k ∈ N, we call

Uk(H) = [

k∈L(a)

L(a)

= {` ∈ N | there is an equation u1· . . . ·uk =v1· . . . ·v`} theunion of sets of lengths containing k.

An atomic monoid H is calledhalf-factorialif one foll. equiv. holds:

(a) |L(a)| = 1 for each a ∈ H.

(b) ∆(H) = ∅.

(c) Uk(H) = {k} for each k ∈ N.

(5)

Outline

(Unions of) Sets of Lengths Krull and weakly Krull monoids

Arithmetic: Precise versus Qualitative Results Seminormal Monoids and Domains

Main Results

Methods: Transfer Homomorphisms

(6)

Denition of Krull monoids

H is called aKrull monoidif one of the foll. equiv. holds : (a) H is v-noetherian and completely integrally closed.

(b) H has a divisor theory ϕ: H → F(P) = F :

ϕis a divisor homomorphism:

For all a, b ∈ H we have a | b if and only if ϕ(a) | ϕ(b) .

For all p ∈ P there is a set X ⊂ H such that p = gcd(ϕ(X ))).

(c) There is a divisor homomorphism into any free abelian monoid.

Thedivisor class groupG is isomorphic to thev-class group:

G = q(F )/q ϕ(H) = {aq ϕ(H) = [a] | a ∈ F } ∼= Cv(H) . Let R be a domain.

R is a Krull domain i is a Krull monoid.

Integrally closed noetherian domains are Krull by Property (a).

(7)

Primary monoids and domains

1. An element q ∈ H is called primary if q /∈ H× and, for all a, b ∈ H, if q | ab and q - a, then q | bn for some n ∈ N.

2. H is called primary if m = H \ H×6= ∅ and one of the following equivalent statements are satised :

(a) s-spec(H) = {∅, H \ H×}. (b) Every q ∈ m is primary.

(c) For all a, b ∈ m there exists some n ∈ N such that a | bn. 3. Let R be a domain.

Then R is primary i R is one-dimensional and local.

(8)

Finitely primary monoids and domains

A monoid H is callednitely primary (of rank s and exponent α) if one of the following equivalent conditions holds:

(a) There exist s, α ∈ N with the following properties :

H is a submonoid of a factorial monoid F = F××[p1, . . . ,ps] with s pairwise non-associated prime elements p1, . . . ,ps s.t.

H \ H×p1· . . . ·psF and (p1· . . . ·ps)αF ⊂ H . (b) H is primary, (H : bH) 6= ∅ and bHred∼= (Ns0, +).

Clearly, numerical monoids are nitely primary of rank 1.

Let R be a domain.

If R is a one-dimensional local Mori domain such that (R : bR) 6= {0}, then R is nitely primary.

(9)

Weakly Krull monoids and domains

A monoid H isweakly Krull if

H = \

p∈X(H)

Hp and {p ∈ X(H) | a ∈ p} is nite for all a ∈ H ,

Weakly Krull domains: Anderson, Mott, and Zafrullah, 1992 Weakly Krull monoids: Halter-Koch, Boll. UMI 1995

A domain R is weakly Krull i R is a weakly Krull monoid.

H v-noetherian: H weakly Krull ⇐⇒ v-max(H) = X(H).

H Krull ⇒ H seminormal v-noetherian weakly Krull a. H = bH.

We suppose that all weakly Krull monoids are

v-noetherian

Hp are nitely primary for each p ∈ X(H).

(H : bH) = f 6= ∅.

Example: 1-dim. noeth. domains R s.t. R is a f.g. R-module

(10)

Outline

(Unions of) Sets of Lengths Krull and weakly Krull monoids

Arithmetic: Precise versus Qualitative Results Seminormal Monoids and Domains

Main Results

Methods: Transfer Homomorphisms

(11)

Arithmetic of Krull monoids: Precise Results

Let H be a Krull monoid with class group G such that each class contains a prime divisor.

1. (Carlitz 1960) H is half-factorial if and only if |G| ≤ 2.

2. Let 2 < |G| < ∞. Then

∆(H) is a nite interval with min ∆(H) = 1.

All Uk(H) are nite intervals.

.... and much more .... for example ....

If G is cyclic of order n, then ∆(H) = [1, n − 2], max U2k(H) = kn, and max U2k+1(H) = kn + 1.

3. If G is innite, then ∆(H) = Uk(H) = N2 for all k ∈ N.

(12)

Arithmetic of weakly Krull monoids: Qualitative Results

Let R be a non-principal order in an algebraic number elds with Picard group G.

Apart from quadratic number elds (Halter-Koch 1983), there is no characterization of half-factoriality.

∆(R) is nite. If |G| ≤ 2, then it is open whether 1 ∈ ∆(R).

For each k ∈ N2 the following are equivalent:

Uk(R) is nite.

The natural map X(bR) → X(R) is bijective.

There is no information

on the structure of the set of distances ∆(R)

nor on the structure of the unions Uk(R).

(13)

Outline

(Unions of) Sets of Lengths Krull and weakly Krull monoids

Arithmetic: Precise versus Qualitative Results Seminormal Monoids and Domains

Main Results

Methods: Transfer Homomorphisms

(14)

Seminormality: Denitions and Remarks

TheseminormalizationH0 of H is dened by

H0 = {x ∈ q(H) | there is some N ∈ N such that xn∈H for all n ≥ N}

Then

H ⊂ H0⊂ bH ⊂ q(H).

H is seminormal if H = H0. Equivalently, if x ∈ q(H) and x2,x3 ∈H, then x ∈ H.

A domain R isseminormal if one of the foll. equiv. holds:

(a) R is seminormal.

(b) Pic(R) → Pic R[X ] is an isomorphism.

Traverso (1970), Swan (1980); Survey by Vitulli (2010)

(15)

Seminormal nitely primary monoids

Let H ⊂ bH = F = F××[p1, . . . ,ps]be nitely primary.

H0 =p1· . . . ·psF ∪ H.

If F×= {1}, then H0 ∼= (Ns∪ {0}, +) ⊂ (Ns0, +).

A(H0) =εp1k1 · . . . ·psks | ε ∈F×,min{k1, . . . ,ks} =1 .

H0 is seminormal, v-noetherian, and

nitely primary of rank s and exponent 1.

For a domain R the following statements are equivalent : (a) R is a seminormal one-dimensional local Mori domain.

(b) R is seminormal nitely primary.

(16)

Outline

(Unions of) Sets of Lengths Krull and weakly Krull monoids

Arithmetic: Precise versus Qualitative Results Seminormal Monoids and Domains

Main Results

Methods: Transfer Homomorphisms

(17)

Algebraic Structure of seminormal weakly Krull monoids

Let H be a seminormal weakly Krull monoid with nontrivial conductor f = (H : bH) ( H, and let P= {p ∈ X(H) | p ⊃ f}.

Then we have

1. H is Krull and Pb is nite.

2. The monoid Iv(H) of v-invertible v-ideals satises Iv(H) ∼= F (P) × Y

p∈P

(Hp)red,

and it is seminormal, v-noetherian, and weakly factorial, 3. There is an exact sequence

1 → bH×/H×→ a

p∈X(H)

Hbp×/Hp×

→ Cε v(H)→ Cϑ v( bH) → 0 .

(18)

Arithmetic Structure

Suppose in addition that G = Cv(H) is nite, and that every class contains a p ∈ X(H) with p 6⊃ f.

1. Suppose the natural map X(bH) → X(H) is bijective.

1.1 Uk(H) is a nite interval for all k ≥ 2.

1.2 Suppose that ϑ: Cv(H) → Cv( bH) is an isomorphism.

Then there is a transfer homomorphism θ : H → B(G).

In particular, (unions of) sets of lengths and (monotone) catenary degrees of H and B(G) coincide.

2. Suppose the natural map X(bH) → X(H) is not bijective.

Then for all k ≥ 3, we have

N3 ⊂ Uk(H) ⊂ N2.

(19)

Characterization of Half-Factoriality

Suppose in addition that the class group G = C(H) is nite, and that every class contains a p ∈ X(H) with p 6⊃ f.

Then the following statements are equivalent : (a) c(H) ≤ 2.

(b) H is half-factorial.

(c) |G| ≤ 2, the natural map X(bH) → X(H) is bijective, and the homomorphism ϑ: Cv(H) → Cv( bH) is an isomorphism.

where

π : X( bH) → X(H), is dened by π(P) = P ∩ H for all P ∈ X(bH)

(20)

Outline

(Unions of) Sets of Lengths Krull and weakly Krull monoids

Arithmetic: Precise versus Qualitative Results Seminormal Monoids and Domains

Main Results

Methods: Transfer Homomorphisms

(21)

Transfer Homomorphisms

Consider

H −−−−→ D = F(P)×T ∼= Iv(H)

β

y βe

 y B = B(G, T , ι) −−−−→ F = F(G)×T where

H ,→ D is saturated, and the class group G = C(H, D) satises G = {[p] | p ∈ P} ⊂ G.

ι : T → G is dened by ι(t) = [t].

β :e D → F be the unique homomorphism satisfying eβ(p) = [p]

for all p ∈ P and eβ | T = idT.

1. The restriction β = eβ | H : H → B is a transfer hom.

2. Transfer homomorphisms preserve sets of lengths. In particular, unions of sets of lengths and half-factoriality.

(22)

Combinatorial weakly Krull monoids: B(G, T , ι)

Let G be a nite abelian group and T = D1× . . . ×Dn a monoid.

Let

ι : T → G a homomorphism, and

σ : F (G) → G satisfying σ(g) = g.

Then

B(G, T , ι) = {S t ∈ F(G)×T | σ(S) + ι(t) = 0 } ⊂ F(G)×T the T -block monoid over G dened by ι.

Special Cases:

If G = {0}, then B(G, T , ι) = T = D1× . . . ×Dn is a nite product of nitely primary monoids.

If T = {1}, then

B(G, T , ι) = B(G) = {S ∈ F(G) | σ(S) = 0} ⊂ F(G) is the monoid of zero-sum sequences over G.

(23)

Saturated submonoids inherit the properties under consideration

Consider a saturated submonoid

H ⊂ D = F(P)×Yn

i=1

Di,

where P ⊂ D is a set of primes, n ∈ N0, and D1, . . . ,Dn are primary monoids. Then we have .

1. If C(H, D) is a torsion group, then H is a weakly Krull monoid.

2. If D1, ...,Dn are seminormal nitely primary, then H is seminormal and v-noetherian with (H : bH) 6= ∅.

Referencias

Documento similar

Our results reveal striking differences between the vibrissa- related domains of the motor and primary somatosensory cortices regarding the layer distribution and size of

Figure 1 shows the weights given to the four comfort domains by the main Building Performance Certification Programs: LEED sets 47% of credits for IAQ and 35% for lighting

Results show that both HFP-based and fixed-point arithmetic achieve a simulation step around 10 ns for a full-bridge converter model.. A comparison regarding resolution and accuracy

On the other hand, an important category of interval arithmetic techniques for enclosing Chebyshev expansions include the paral- lelepiped and Lohner’s QR decomposition methods and

With a scope in multi-domain service provision and operation features like SLA management between administrative domains, service mapping, associate metrics, and proper

In this study, we examine the effect of unemployment on the satisfaction in five domains of life; work or main activity, financial situation, housing situation, leisure time and

We let PoM denote the category whose objects are positively ordered monoids, and whose morphisms are maps preserving addition, order and the zero element.. Let M, N and P be

The first result about the asymptotic behaviour of convex domains in H 2 (−1) was given in 1972 by Santal´ o and Ya˜ nez ([SY72]) for a family of h-convex domains (a convex domain