CHEMICALLY DERIVED GRAPHENE CHEMICALLY DERIVED GRAPHENE:
ELECTRONIC AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES
PROPERTIES
Cristina Gómez-Navarro
Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
Max-Planck-Institute for Solid State Research
Why Graphene?
Single layer of graphite
Extraordinary properties
•One atom thick: real 2D material
y p p
•Electronic band structure, transport properties
Semi-metal with field effect
μ~100.000 cm2/Vs
High quality: Ballistic transport on micron scale Semi metal with field effect
•Mechanical properties
High strength of carbon-carbon bond 2D flexible but stiff films
Applications: Proof of concept devices
FET: graphene ribbons
Han, PRL 2007
Transparent electrodes
Wang, nanoletters 2008
Gas sensors
Schein, Nature Materials 2007Bio devices
Mohanty, nanoletters 2008
NEMS El t h i l R t
NEMS: Electromechanical Resonators
Bunch, Science 2007Current ways to obtain Graphene
• Mechanical exfoliation of graphite.
•Very simple method but:Very simple method, but:
•High multilayer/monlayer ratio.
•Finding monolayers time consuming
Not applicable Not applicable
to technology yet
Novoselov et al Nature, 2005
•Epitaxial growth on silicon carbide and metals
Berger et al Science 2006
•Limited to certain substrates
•Uniformity, size domain?
•UHV, high temperatures
Berger, et al Science, 2006 Land, Surface Science, 1992
•Chemical approach:
Vi hit id G hit id il l d
•Via graphite oxide: Graphite oxide, easily layered
•Mainly monolayers Solution based
Inexpensive, scalable, substrates
Stanovich et al Nature , 2006
•Solution based
•Reducing graphite oxide on surface?
Initial idea
Graphite oxide: graphite functionalized with epoxy
C O C C O
1
st: Synthesizing graphite oxide
C-O-C and hydroxyl C-OH groups in the interlayer and C-OH -COOH groups at the edges of the graphene sheets.
Graphite o ide la ers are eas to separate in ater leading to “graphene o ide”
2
nd: Adsorption of single GO layers on surface
Graphite oxide layers are easy to separate in water…leading to “graphene oxide”
Solution process
2 : Adsorption of single GO layers on surface
300nm
3
rd: Reducing GO by chemical procedures on surface Hydrazine or hydrogen plasma
Q lit d ti f h bt i d t h thi t ?
Schniepp et al J Phys. Chem. B, 110, 8535, 2006
Quality and properties of graphene obtained trough this route?
AFM imaging of GO
0 5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5
Height (nm)
single double on single double
700nm 6 0 0 n m 6 0 0 n m
100 200 300 400
-0.5 0.0
H 0.5
X (nm)
700nm
1 st layer h~ 1 0±0 1nm
Very high mono\multilayer ratio
1 st layer h 1.0±0,1nm 2nd layer h ~ 0,8±0,1nmVery high mono\multilayer ratio
h in agreement with theoretical expectation
Electronic transport GO
Electrodes by e-beam lithography
1 0µm
IV curves as a function of reduction time with hydrazine
Time of
1.0µm
400nm
3 0x10-10
4,0x10-10 Iwithouthydraz
4 0x10-9 6,0x10-9 1,5x10-7 2,0x104,0x10-7-6
8
1,0x10
-7Iwithouthydraz I5hvapor
I5hdisol
Time of reduction
Before reduction good insulator
1,0x10-10 2,0x10-10 3,0x10
(A) 0,0
2,0x10-9 4,0x10
I(A)
0,0 5,0x10-8 1,0x10-7
I(A)
0,0 2,0x10-6
I(A)
0,0 5,0x10
-8(A)
I5hdisol I22hdisol
-2 0x10-10 -1,0x10-10
I 0,0
9
-4,0x10-9 -2,0x10-9
I
-1,5x10-7 -1,0x10-7 -5,0x10-8
I
4 0x10-6 -2,0x10-6
I
-5,0x10
-8I(
Reduction improves conductivity 3 orders of magnitude
-10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 -3,0x10-10
2,0x10
X Axis Title
-10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 -6,0x10-9
X Axis Title
-10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 -2,0x10-7
X Axis Title
-10 -8 -6 -4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 -4,0x10
X Axis Title
-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3
-1,0x10
-7Bias Voltage(V)
Fixed channel length Maximum in conductivity after 24h of NH or 5 sec H plasma
Electronic transport reduced GO
10M RT vacuum
RT air
Ambipolar behaviour similar to pristine graphene
6M 8M
R(Ω)
Ambipolar behaviour similar to pristine graphene
Conductivity: σ=0.1-1 S/cm
S D
Bias V
Gate V
60 40 20 0 20 40 60
2M
4M Mobility: μ=-0.1-1 cm2/Vs
n e μ =1σ
For high quality graphene μ=1.000-100.000 cm2/Vs
-60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60
Gate Voltage(V)
-18 experimental data
-21 -20 -19
18 p
linear fit
(I/A)
Temperature dependence indicates a hopping transport mechanism
T0 ⎟⎞1n
⎜⎛
25 -24 -23
Ln( -22
Hopping e
TI I
0
0
⎟⎠
⎜⎝
=
0.14 0.16 0.18 0.20 0.22 0.24 -25
T -1/3 (K -1/3)
High resolution imaging of GO
GO on HOPG
1 0 0 n m
1.7nm
AFM: wrinkling STM: ordered\disordered regions
Raman spectroscopy: GO
5x103
before reduction
G/D ratio:
sp
2carbon domain size of ~ 5-6 nm
2x103 3x103 4x103
(counts)
before reduction 24h N2H4
G band D band
Ferrari et al Phys Rev B 2000
1200 1400 1600 1800
0 1x103
I 2x10
w ave number (cm-1)
Ferrari et al. Phys Rev B 2000 Tuinstra et al. J Chem Phys 1970
w ave number (cm )
Model
Graphene islands
-19
-18 experimental data
linear fit
-24 -23 -22 -21 -20
Ln(I/A)
STM
1.7nm 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.20 0.22 0.24
-25
T -1/3 (K -1/3)
Hopping conduction
Defect regions
Gomez-Navarro et al. Nanoletters 7 3499 2007
2nd step: Chemical Vapor Deposition of ethylene 2nd step: Chemical Vapor Deposition of ethylene
•High T
•Decomposition of C H
•Decomposition of C
2H
4•obtaining atomic C
to be incorporated in vacancies to be incorporated in vacancies
•High T facilitates healing
Flow ethylene for 3 min at 800 ºC
CVD treated GO: improved conductivity
3 0
After CVD conductivity increases two orders of magnitude
2.2 2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0
ds / μA
Conductivity: σ=20-200 S/cm Mobility: μ~50-100 cm
2/Vs
7
8 GO
reduced GO CVDGO
-16 -12 -8 -4 0 4 8 12 16
1.4 1.6 1.8
I d2.0
V / V
4 5 6
CVDGO
pristine graphene
u nts
VG / V
2 3 4
Co u
10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 100 101 102 103 104 0
1
10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
σ / Scm
-1Lopez et al. Advanced Materials, 2009
CVD treated GO: Raman and coductivity
/G
80 100 120
Scm-1
6x104 7x104
G
u.
D
-15
-14 Experimental Data
Linear Fit
hopping transport High D/G ratio Correlation D/G conductivity
20 40 60
onductivity / S
4x104 5x104
Intensity / a.
-18 -17 -16
LnI ds (A)
n
T T
e I I
1 0 ⎟⎠⎞
⎜⎝
=
⎛1.15 1.20 1.25 1.30 1.35 1.40 1.45 1.50
Co 0
D/G Intensity Ratio 1000 1250 1500 1750
3x104
Raman shift / cm-1
0,15 0,20 0,25 0,30 0,35 0,40
-19
T-1/3 (K-1/3)
e I I =
0New smaller graphene regions
Oxidized/
defective Graphene
regions
defective regions CVD created graphene
regions
CVD GO
RGO
Conclusions on electrical transport
• GO routes provides access to a large scale production of graphene monolayers.
• Reduction improves conductivity in 3 orders of magnitude
• CVD of ethylene increases conductivity in 2 orders of magnitude.
• CVDGO still contains a considerable amount of defects.
6 7
8 GO
reduced GO CVDGO
pristine graphene
• Large range of conditions for improvement.
3 4 5
Counts
700nm
10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 100 101 102 103 104 0
1 2
10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1 100 101 102 103 104 σ / Scm-1
Gomez-Navarro et al. Nanoletters 2007 Lopez et al. Advanced Materials 2009
GO: mechanical properties
A
δ
Au Au
SiO2 SiO2
)
3/ ( 32 Ew t l
K
eff= + 17 T / l
Correlation between conductivity
40 F
ff
Force Constant Young modulus,
built-in tensions
1.6Correlation between conductivity and elastic modulus
20 30 40
(nN)
Force curves
E=0.3 TPa
0 6 0.8 1.0 1.2 1.4
(S/cm)
0 10 20
F(
δ
T=4 nN
0 0 0 1 0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 6 0 7 0.0
0.2 0.4
σ 0.6
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Z piezo displacement (nm)
K
1, K
2, K
3…
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 E (TPa)
Gomez-Navarro et al. Nanoletters 2008