• No se han encontrado resultados

Shaking table tests of structures with hysteretic dampers: experimental results vs. prediction using non-linear static methods

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Shaking table tests of structures with hysteretic dampers: experimental results vs. prediction using non-linear static methods"

Copied!
27
0
0

Texto completo

Loading

Figure

Fig. 1 Test model geometry and set-up. a Elevation, b plan (bottom view)
Fig. 2 Detail of the RC slab
Fig. 4 Experimental set-up
Figure  7  shows the time histories of the relative displacement v of the slab with respect to  the shaking table, in the direction of the shaking, for several seismic simulations
+7

Referencias

Documento similar

Presently, all the results obtained using a one-hour-ahead prediction are presented, i.e., the prediction of the total amount of photovoltaic energy generated for the next hour by

Prediction of safety parameter using a linear regression technique The cross-validation results obtained in this study (Table 2) showed that the best calibration models obtained

– Spherical Mexican hat wavelet on the sphere software (developed by the Observational Cosmology and Instrumentation Group at

In the preparation of this report, the Venice Commission has relied on the comments of its rapporteurs; its recently adopted Report on Respect for Democracy, Human Rights and the Rule

the increase of normal stiffness with joint closure; the softening of shear strength; the rate of change of dilatancy with shear displacements, and, regarding the

Second, the sample of less massive (M  ≤ 1.5 M  ) giant stars with planets covers the same mass range as the MS pro- genitors and subgiant stars where the metal signature has

The broad “WHO-ICF” perspective on HrWB provided at Figure 1 has a significant implication also for HRQoL. The develop- ment of ICF and its conceptual approach has challenged to

A comparison between the averaged experimental data obtained with the predicted results from numerical simulation is done for the validation of the model. In table 2, data from