• No se han encontrado resultados

Archetypal analysis with missing data: see all samples by looking at a few based on extreme profiles

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Archetypal analysis with missing data: see all samples by looking at a few based on extreme profiles"

Copied!
39
0
0

Texto completo

Loading

Figure

Table 1: Mean RSS/n (st. deviation in brackets) for each approach for the wine and waveform data.
Table 4: Mean Rand score (st. deviation in brackets) for each approach for the wine and waveform data.
Table 5: RSS/n for each approach for the air quality data. The best result is highlighted in bold.
Table 6: Percentile profiles of the archetypes of MAAEIS for the air quality data. Variables A1 A2 A3 Ozone 17 1 94 Solar radiation 96 1 52 Wind 96 78 2 Temperature 25 5 99
+7

Referencias

Documento similar

The results obtained in this work call for a new eval- uation based on a resonance shape analysis combining the transmission data and capture yields obtained in this work with

In chapter 4 we will justify that Recursive Maxima Hunting finds the points that appear in the Bayes rule when the mean of the second class is piecewise linear and the noise

However, they differ in their attitude to the remaining aspects: the second archetypoid is not satisfied with general and academic information (questions 1–9), the knowledge

In section 1.2, AA results with different strategies, such as erasing the cases with missing data or imputation, are compared versus our proposal, with a well-known benchmark data

A comparison between the averaged experimental data obtained with the predicted results from numerical simulation is done for the validation of the model. In table 2, data from

In order to improve the spectroscopic surface gravity estimates for a large amount of survey data with the help of the small subset of the data with seismic measurements, we set up

After per- forming the analysis, we will test the best model and compare its results to those obtained by a human expert who used a visual method [8] on the same data and

(2010) can be updated with these new data pairs taking two limiting factors into account: a) interferometric observations for our sample at 15 GHz are missing. However, all but