Unraveling the conduction mechanism of Al-doped ZnO films by valence band soft x-ray photoemission spectroscopy
Mercedes Gabása兲
Departamento de Física Aplicada I, Universidad de Málaga, 29071 Málaga, Spain Susana Gota
CEA-DSM/DRECAM-SPCSI, CEA-Saclay, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France José Ramón Ramos-Barrado and Miguel Sánchez
Departamento de Física Aplicada I, Universidad de Málaga, 29071 Málaga, Spain Nicholas T. Barrett
CEA-DSM/DRECAM-SPCSI, CEA-Saclay, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, France José Avila and Maurizio Sacchi
LURE, Centre Universitaire Paris Sud, B.P. 34, 91898 Orsay Cedex, France
共Received 6 April 2004; accepted 13 December 2004; published online 18 January 2005兲
We report on the correlation between the electrical behavior and valence band spectra of undoped and Al-doped ZnO films, obtained by using x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Although Al-doping can induce a conductivity increase of two orders of magnitude, we show that the gap persists and there is no semiconductor–metal transition upon doping. For the 3% Al-doped ZnO film, we measure a reduction in the band gap of
⬃150 meV with respect to the undoped and the 1% doped
films. Our results suggest that the band conduction mechanism proposed for undoped ZnO at room temperature still dominates the conduction process in doped films. © 2005 American Institute of Physics.关DOI: 10.1063/1.1856141兴
Transparent conductive oxide
共TCO兲 films have been ex-
tensively used in optoelectronic devices because of their high visible transmittance and low dc resistivity. Recent investi- gations point out that ZnO, combining semiconducting be- havior with optical transparency in the visible range, will be one of the most competitive semiconductors in the near future.1The addition to ZnO of small amounts of Al results in a marked increase in the electrical conductivity,2the opti- cal properties remaining excellent for devices.3 Similar ef- fects were observed with other IIIa elements as dopants, such as indium and gallium.4 From the technological point of view, spray pyrolysis is an interesting alternative to other methods to obtain such antireflective TCO coatings.5Several reports exist on the dc conductivity of ZnO thin films and crystals at room temperature, where a band conduction mechanism has been proposed.6Variable-range hopping con- duction has been invoked in H2-annealed films below 250 K.7The influence of Al-doping on the electronic struc- ture of ZnO has been addressed by Ohashi et al.8using band- edge emission to probe shallow donor states in the band gap.Some details of the doping effect on the band structure, though, remain unexplained. An open question is whether increased conductivity in doped films is accompanied by changes in the conduction mechanism compared to undoped ones. For elucidating this point, we have performed photo- electron spectroscopy
共PES兲 in the valence band 共VB兲 region
as a function of the Al-doping in ZnO films.Pure ZnO and Al-doped films about 100 nm thick were prepared onto quartz substrates by spray pyrolysis. The deposition parameters were chosen to ensure a good optical transparency. The structure and chemical analysis confirmed
the formation of ZnO and the absence of other phases or compounds. More details about preparation and characteriza- tion of undoped and Al-doped ZnO films have been pub- lished elsewhere.9The resistivity of the films was determined using Van der Pauw’s method. It decreases by two orders of magnitude
共from 816 to 15.35 ⍀ cm兲 with respect to the un-
doped sample for an atomic ratio关Al兴/关Zn兴 of 3%. Higher
Al-doping leads to increased resistivity.10PES spectra were recorded using synchrotron radiation at the SA73 beamline of the SuperACO storage ring
共LURE,
Orsay兲. Before spectra acquisition, samples were cleaned by
Ar+etching共energy 500 eV兲. High resolution valence band
PES spectra were recorded at room temperature, using pho- ton energies of 35 and 70 eV. In both cases, the overall reso- lution共convolution of the beamline and the electron analyser
contributions兲 was ⬃60 meV. The photon energy h
= 35 eV corresponds to the best compromise between the maxima of the beamline photon flux and of the VB cross section. The other energy of 70 eV was chosen because of its closeness to the Al-2p core level binding energy, avoiding second-order effects. The binding energies are referred to the chemical potential measured on a clean Cu sample
共
Cu兲 in
electrical and thermal contact with the samples.Figure 1 shows the spectra measured at h= 35 eV: we observe three broad peaks at binding energies
共E
b兲 of ⬃11,
⬃8, and ⬃6 eV. The peak at the deepest E
b共⬃11 eV兲 is
attributed to the Zn-3d band. In the VB region, the peak at Eb⬃8 eV involves the O-2p orbitals hybridized with Zn-4s
and Zn-4p ones, while the lowest Eb feature共⬃6 eV兲 is at-
tributed mainly to the O-2p orbitals.11,12 In Fig. 2共h
= 70 eV
兲, we observe again the same three broad bands, now
centered at Eb⬃11, 7.9, and 5.2 eV. After referring the bind-
ing energies toCu, the spectra were aligned to the leadinga兲Electronic mail: mgabas@uma.es
APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS 86, 042104
共2005兲
0003-6951/2005/86
共
4兲
/042104/3/$22.50 86, 042104-1 © 2005 American Institute of Physics Downloaded 13 Apr 2007 to 150.214.40.140. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright, see http://apl.aip.org/apl/copyright.jspedge of the Zn-3d peak. The spectra intensity was interpo- lated by fitting the background at binding energies well above
共⬍2 eV兲 and below 共⬎14 eV兲 the VB. The results
presented in Figs. 1 and 2 are fully reproducible using a second series of samples. For a given photon energy, we observe that the overall spectra are almost independent of doping. These data match the VB PES results previously published for undoped single crystals11–13 and powdered14 ZnO. In addition, our results provide a comparison between the VB PES spectra of undoped and Al-doped ZnO thin films. An important result is the evidence that none of the samples共undoped ZnO, and 1% and 3% doped films兲 pre-
sents any density of states in the forbidden band gap region for both series of spectra共h
= 35 eV and h= 70 eV兲.
The small differences between the spectra with doping are localized at the uppermost edge of the PES VB spectra.
The insets of Figs. 1 and 2 are an enlargement of this region.
In the case of the 3% Al doped sample, we measure a shift of
⬃150 meV of the uppermost edge of the VB to lower bind-
ing energies with respect to the other samples共1% Al-doped
and undoped ZnO兲. The same result is obtained at h
= 35 and 70 eV, supporting its reliability.We interpret this shift as a narrowing of the band gap. It is known
共see, e.g., Ref. 8, and references therein兲 that the
hybridization between states of the ZnO matrix and of the Al dopant yields new donor electronic states located just below the lowermost edge of the conduction band共CB兲. As a con-
sequence, the chemical potential of the 3% Al-doped ZnO films shifts⬃150 meV upwards, approaching the bottom of
the CB. This fact can be pictured as a narrowing of the effective band gap, and gives rise to an increase of the con- ductivity. Conclusions about the occupation of the conduc- tion band as a function of doping cannot be drawn directly from our PES experiments.Recently, Imai et al. have published electronic band cal- culations of Ga-doped and undoped ZnO and ZnS, using density functional theory.15Previous experimental reports in- dicate that similar effects are observed upon Al and Ga doping.16 Assuming Ga in a substitutional unrelaxed site, Imai et al. obtain a similar density of states for undoped and Ga-doped ZnO. They also find that the chemical potential of undoped ZnO
共
ZnO兲 is well below the bottom of the CB.
Our PES data agree with the former result, but are at vari- ance with the latter. In both sets of PES spectra
共h
= 35 eV and h= 70 eV兲, we observe a separation of ⬃3 eV between
the edge of the VB andCu. Therefore, the chemical poten- tial of both the undoped and the Al-doped ZnO films is lo- cated very close to the lowermost conduction band edge, assuming that the gap of undoped ZnO is 3.4 eV. This posi- tion of the chemical potential is consistent with an n-type semiconductor. Although Imai et al. also obtain a displace- ment of in the case of doped ZnO toward the conduction band edge, the shift does not agree quantitatively with our experimental results. They suggest thatshifts into the CB, i.e., the electrons from the dopant Ga atoms occupy the CB, resulting in metallic behavior of the Ga-doped ZnO. Our experimental results, for Al doping, disagree with this find- ing. The energy distance between the uppermost edge of the VB andCu is about 3.05 and 2.9 eV for the undoped and the 3% doped sample, respectively.17 This means that the chemical potential of the 3% Al-doped sample shifts toward the lowermost CB edge by⬃150 meV with respect to the
other samples, but the semiconductor character remains in spite of the doping. This shift of⬃150 meV is very small but
measurable, thanks to the good energy resolution obtained by combining synchrotron radiation and a high performance electron analyzer.The consequence of the experimental results presented in this letter is that the band conduction mechanism generally admitted for ZnO6 should also be dominant for the conduc- tion process in doped films. Therefore, a semiconductor–
metal transition accompanying the conductivity jump should be excluded. A slight decrease of the optical band gap
共⬃90 meV兲 has also been observed in transmittance mea-
surements when comparing undoped and 3% Al-doped ZnOFIG. 1. PES spectra of the VB region recorded with a photon energy of h= 35 eV for the undoped ZnO and 1% and 3% Al doped samples. The chemical potential
共
兲 measured in a clean Cu sample in electrical contact
with the samples is plotted together. Inset: zoom of the low Ebpart of the VB region.FIG. 2. PES spectra of the VB region recorded with a photon energy of h= 70 eV for the 1% and 3% Al doped samples. The chemical potential
共
兲
measured in a clean Cu sample in electrical contact with the samples is plotted together. Inset: zoom of the low Ebpart of the VB region.042104-2 Gabáset al. Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 042104
共
2005兲
Downloaded 13 Apr 2007 to 150.214.40.140. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright, see http://apl.aip.org/apl/copyright.jsp
films prepared by spray pyrolysis.10 The absorption edge shifts toward higher values as the aluminum concentration increases up to a ratio of
关Al兴/关Zn兴=3%, the ratio at which
the resistivity minimum occurs. For higher values, absorp- tion edges overlap. These results compare well, qualitatively and quantitatively, with our above-reported findings. Results similar to what we found in ZnO upon doping are observed in Fe3O4across the Verwey transition.18Magnetite exhibits a first-order phase transition at TV⬵120 K, with the dc con-
ductivity abruptly increasing by two orders of magnitude when heating through TV. PES spectra taken above共130 K兲
and below共110 K兲 T
Vare identical, except in the region very near the valence band threshold. Neither spectra show a Fermi step. The only detectable change between them is that the high temperature spectrum is shifted by⬃50 meV to
lower binding energy. The band gap does not collapse, but is merely reduced by⬃50 meV, with no sign of a real
insulator–metal transition. Although the parameter control- ling the transition in magnetite is the temperature, the persis- tence of the gap and its reduction are very similar to the results we found for ZnO upon doping. The Fe3O4and ZnO band gap behavior across the conductivity transition is quan- titatively similar, with a shift of several tens of millielectron volts.In summary, the hybridization between the orbitals of the Al dopant and of the ZnO matrix should lead to the appear- ance of electronic states located just below the lowermost edge of the conduction band. This is reflected in the upwards shift of the chemical potential, i.e., in the narrowing of the effective band gap. No semiconductor–metal transition ac- companied the conductivity jump in our 3% Al-doped films.
As a consequence, the band conduction mechanism should also be the principal contribution to the conduction process in doped films, as is the case in the undoped ZnO.
This work was funded by the Acción Integrada HF2001- 0145 D.G.I. and by MAT2000-1505 MCyT
共Spain兲, and by
the Programme d’Actions Intégrées PICASSO n. 04344SH,Ministère des Affaires étrangères et Ministère de la Recher- che
共France兲. The authors are grateful to the S.C.A.I. of
Málaga University and V. Pérez-Dieste for their technical collaboration.1T. Minami, MRS Bull. 25, 38
共2000兲.
2S. B. Majumder, M. Jain, P. S. Dobal, R. S. Katiyar, Mater. Sci. Eng., B 103, 16
共2003兲.
3T. Makino, K. Tamura, C. H. Chia, Y. Segawa, M. Kawasaki, A. Ohtomo, and H. Koinuma, Phys. Rev. B 65, 121201
共2002兲.
4K. Haga, P. S. Wijesena, and H. Watanabe, Appl. Surf. Sci. 169–170, 504
共2001兲; P. Nunes, E. Fortunato, P. Tonello, F. Braz Fernández, P. Vilarinho,
and R. Martins, Vacuum 64, 281共2002兲.
5J.-H. Lee and B.-O. Park, Mater. Sci. Eng., B 106, 242
共2004兲.
6J. Shoenes, K. Kanazawa, and E. Kay, J. Appl. Phys. 48, 2537
共1977兲; S.
B. Krupanidhi and M. Sayer, ibid. 56, 3308
共1984兲; Y. Natsume, H.
Sakata, T. Hirayama, and H. Yanagida, ibid. 72, 4203
共1992兲.
7Y. Natsume and H. Sakata, Mater. Chem. Phys. 78, 170
共2002兲.
8N. Ohashi, T. Sekiguchi, K. Aoyama, T. Ohgaki, Y. Terada, I. Sakaguchi, T. Tsurumi, and H. Haneda, J. Appl. Phys. 91, 3658
共2002兲.
9R. Ayouchi, F. Martín, D. Leinen, and J. R. Ramos-Barrado, J. Cryst.
Growth 247, 497
共2003兲; R. Ayouchi, D. Leinen, F. Martín, M. Gabás, E.
Dalchiele, and J. R. Ramos-Barrado, Thin Solid Films 426, 68
共2003兲; R.
Ayouchi, doctoral thesis, University of Málaga, 2005.
10H. Mondragón-Suárez, A. Maldonado, M. De la L. Olvera, A. Reyes, R.
Castanedo-Pérez, G. Torres-Delgado, and R. A. Somoza, Appl. Surf. Sci.
193, 52
共2002兲.
11W. Ranke, Solid State Commun. 19, 685
共1976兲.
12E. I. Solomon, P. M. Jones, and J. A. May, Chem. Rev.
共Washington, D.C.兲
93, 2623共1993兲.
13G. Zwicker and K. Jacobi, Solid State Commun. 54, 701
共1985兲.
14E. P. Mikheeva, S. V. Koscheev, S. Ph. Ruzankin, G. M. Zhidomirov, S. A.
Leontiev, V. G. Devjatov, and A. E. Cherkashin, J. Electron Spectrosc.
Relat. Phenom. 94, 59
共1998兲.
15Y. Imai, A. Watanabe, and I. Shimono, J. Mater. Sci.: Mater. Electron. 14, 149
共2003兲.
16A. Tiburcio-Silver, A. Sánchez-Juárez, and A. Avila-García, Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 55, 3
共1998兲; K. T. Ramakrishna Reddy, H. Gopa-
laswamy, P. J. Reddy, and R. W. Miles, J. Cryst. Growth 210, 516共2000兲.
17In a recent paper, a value of 3.0– 3.2 eV was obtained from UPS measure- ments on a ZnO
共1 0 1¯ 0兲 single crystal: K. Ozawa and K. Edamoto, Surf.
Sci. 547, 257
共2003兲.
18J. H. Park, L. H. Tjeng, J. W. Allen, P. Metcalf, and C. T. Chen, Phys. Rev.
B 55, 12813
共1997兲.
042104-3 Gabáset al. Appl. Phys. Lett. 86, 042104
共
2005兲
Downloaded 13 Apr 2007 to 150.214.40.140. Redistribution subject to AIP license or copyright, see http://apl.aip.org/apl/copyright.jsp