• No se han encontrado resultados

U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security Federal Emergency Management Agency

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2023

Share "U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security Federal Emergency Management Agency"

Copied!
27
0
0

Texto completo

(1)

U.S. Dept. of Homeland Security

Federal Emergency Management Agency

FEMA’s Capability Development After Katrina

Robert A. Farmer Director of Operations

Office of Response and Recovery Wednesday, 29 October 2014

Terrorism

(2)

Hurricane Katrina Forecast Track

Hurricane Katrina was the most destructive natural disaster in U.S. History.

2

(3)

Hurricane Katrina (August 23-30, 2005)

3

(4)

Hurricane Katrina: Immediate Aftermath

New Orleans, La., Monday, August 29, 2005 -- An aerial photograph from one of the first New Orleans fly overs showing the flooding as a result of the breeched levees.

4

(5)

Hurricane Katrina Response

New Orleans, La., September 2, 2005 -- Colorado Task Force 1 (CO-TF1) Hazardous Materials Technician carries an infant to safety after being discovered floating on a furniture cushion inside of a house where the parents were incapacitated. CO-TF1 also evacuated the infant’s parents to safety.

(6)

New Orleans, La., September 4, 2005 -- A view of the roof of the Superdome which was damaged as a result of Hurricane Katrina.

Hurricane Katrina Response

New Orleans, LA. August 28, 2005 -- Residents bring their belongings and line up to get into the Superdome which was opened as a hurricane shelter in advance of hurricane Katrina

6

(7)

FEMA Capacity Building, FY2007 to FY2010

TOTAL TOTAL

Positions Funding Modernize & Integrate FEMA IT Systems 0 31,250

Facility Infrastructure 0 12,904

Shape the Workforce

Incident Mgmt Assistance Teams (IMATS) 205 35,515

NRCC/RRCC 24/7 Watch Capability 60 6,587

Operational Planning 90 13,776

Emergency Communications - MERS 61 26,621

Disaster Logistics 70 17,353

Disaster Assistance 118 12,557

Public Disaster Communications 6 959

Continuity Programs - IPAWS 5 34,634

Hazard Mitigation 23 7,586

National Preparedness 55 13,122

Grants Advocates - Regions 30 2,460

Capacity Building for Business Activities 65 19,966

GRAND TOTAL 788 235,290

(dollars in thousands)

(8)

Workforce Type Total

Reservist 6,100

Cadre of On-Call Response & Recovery Employees (CORE) 3,200

Permanent Full Time (PFT) 5,000

FEMA Corps 920

DHS Surge Capacity Force 3,865

Workforce Totals 19,085

FEMA Workforce Status Report

8

(9)

Hurricane Sandy (October 22-31, 2012)

Left: A NASA satellite image of

Hurricane Sandy on October 29; most of the U.S. coastline is artificially

highlighted to show the scale of the storm

(10)

Katrina vs. Sandy Data Comparison

Katrina Sandy

Inundation Area (square

miles) 93,000 1,800,000

U.S. Deaths 1,330 162

Housing/Property Damage $108 billion $50 billion

Peak Shelter Population 273,000 23,000

Peak Power Outages 2.5 million 8.5 million

Debris (cubic yards) 118 million 6 million

10

(11)

Hurricane Sandy – Personnel on Ground

(6 NOV)

(12)

Snapshot: Response Teams

12

(13)

Snapshot: Logistics Commodities

(14)

Snapshot: Mobile Communications

14

(15)

National Response Coordination Center ‘Before’

(September, 2005 – Hurricane Katrina)

(16)

National Response Coordination Center ‘After’

(October, 2012 – Hurricane Sandy)

16

(17)

FEMA’s Crisis Management System Implementation:

PHASE 1b (September 1 – September 30, 2012)

New Products

• Incident Action Plan (IAP)

• National Response Coordination Center Situation Report

• Senior Leadership Brief

• Daily Situational Awareness Report to National Activation Status Map

• Resource Support Section Process

• Feedback and updates from 1a

femacms.webeoc.us

WebEOC Crisis Management

System

Cloud-based System

(18)

Lessons Learned – Using WebEOC During Sandy

• After Action Reports for Hurricane Isaac & Sandy concluded that WebEOC was correct choice for FEMA’s Crisis Management System

• Real time data easily shared between FEMA Headquarters, Regions and Incident Management Assistance Teams

• Cloud capability allowed use on any web connected device, laptop, tablet, iPad, smart phone

• Intuitive System - Offgoing personnel able to train incoming reliefs on new features or changes within minutes

• Widespread use of WebEOC through out country in 19 other Federal

Departments and Agencies, 40 States, hundreds of cities/counties and industry provided a number of users that had prior experience using WebEOC and

reduced learning curve experienced when new systems are introduced

• Focusing on a single shared web database reduced creation of new single purpose databases, spreadsheets and share point sites allowing best practices to be captured, refined, shared and continued

18

(19)

1. Transportation

(Dept of Transportation)

2. Communications

(Dept of Homeland Security -- National Communications System)

3. Public Works and Engineering (Dept of Defense - U.S. Army Corps of Engineers)

4. Firefighting

(Dept of Agriculture)

5. Emergency Management

(Dept of Homeland Security – FEMA)

6. Mass Care, Emergency Assistance, Housing & Human Services

(Dept of Homeland Security -- FEMA)

7. Logistics Mgmt. & Resource Support (General Services Administration -- FEMA)

8. Public Health and Medical Services (Dept of Health and Human Services)

9. Search and Rescue

(Dept of Homeland Security -- FEMA )

10. Oil & Hazardous Materials Response (Environmental Protection Agency)

11. Agriculture & Natural Resources (Dept of Agriculture)

12. Energy

(Dept of Energy)

13. Public Safety & Security (Dept of Justice)

15. External Affairs

(Dept of Homeland Security )

Emergency Support Functions

19

(20)

FEMA Corps

FEMA Corps team members talk with a local volunteer in Sea Bright, NJ during Hurricane Sandy recovery efforts

FEMA Corps team members walk through a devastated neighborhood in Union Beach, NJ

20

(21)

Tools FEMA Currently Uses

Full website (www.fema.gov) & Mobile website (m.fema.gov)

Blog (blog.fema.gov)

Disaster Pages

Widgets

Facebook

Twitter

YouTube

Mobile App

Text messages

21

(22)

22

Sandy After-Action Review

22

(23)

Integrating Federal senior leader coordination and communications into response and recovery operations

Coordinating Emergency Support Functions (ESFs) and Recovery Support Functions (RSFs)

Refining the mission assignment process

Implementing incident management structures

Using planning and analysis to drive operational decision-making

Ensuring continuous improvement of disaster doctrine, policies, and plans

Ensuring Unity of Effort Across the Federal Response

(24)

24

Ensuring Unity of Effort Across the Federal Response

 Executed a Principal-Level Exercise for Cabinet officials in preparation for the 2013 Hurricane Season

 Streamlined the Mission Assignment process

 Issued new guidance on the National Incident Management Assistance Teams

 Developing procedures to improve effective tasking of Other Federal Agencies for recovery purposes

 Enhancing the Agency’s

analytic capability to collect, verify, and disseminate

information

 Improving crisis action

planning at all levels of the response

Accomplishments In Progress

(25)

Ensuring a qualified disaster workforce

 FEMA Qualification System (FQS)

implementation was in progress during Sandy response and recovery efforts

Preparing to deploy the entire workforce

 FEMA deployed nearly all of its available, deployable personnel

Supporting deployed personnel

 Challenges with staging, administrative, and logistical support

Ensuring continuity of operations

 Balancing large deployments with steady-state operations

25

Developing an Agile, Professional, Emergency

Management Workforce

(26)

26

Developing an Agile, Professional, Emergency Management Workforce

26

 Drafted a new FEMA personnel

26

deployment policy

 Piloted a wireless Joint Field Office in New Jersey

 Trained senior leaders on the National Response Framework and National Disaster

Recovery Framework

 Reviewing the Agency’s

staffing plan to ensure FEMA meets incident management requirements while still

carrying out mission critical functions

 Supporting the logistical, administrative, and

accessibility requirements of deployed personnel

Accomplishments In Progress

26

(27)

Questions

Referencias

Documento similar