Revista Argentina de Clínica Psicológica 2020, Vol. XXIX, N°1, 931-936
DOI: 10.24205/03276716.2020.128 931
C
ORRELATIONS BETWEEN
E
NGLISH
P
ERFORMANCE AND
M
ENTAL
H
EALTH OF
C
OLLEGE
S
TUDENTS
Hang Guo
1,2*Abstract
The mental health education is fundamental to the healthy development of college students. This paper aims to identify the correlations between English performance and mental health of college students. First, the basic theories on mental health were reviewed and a five-factor model was introduced to measure the English performance. Then, a questionnaire survey was carried out to assess mental health of college students and identify its influencing factors. After that, the English performance of the respondents were evaluated based
on the scores from the school’s education administration system. The results on mental health were compared with those on English performance to reveal the correlations between English performance and mental health. The results show that more than 80% of college students recognize the importance of concentrating on their studies; the mental health of college students are generally resilient and on the medium level; the mental health is directly proportional to resilience; English performance has a significant correlation with each factor of mental health; the mental health is responsible for a 5% change in English scores. The research results help to promote the mental health and English learning of college students.
Key words: Mental Health, English Learning, Academic Emotion, English Performance. Received: 14-01-19 | Accepted: 07-08-19
INTRODUCTION
Individual development in all-around way and academic performance are interdependent, interpenetrative and build on one another. They are not substantive but supplement each other in the education and learning process (Masillo, Brandizzi, Nelson et al., 2016). Mental health can promote the cerebral development, so that it lays a sound material foundation for humans to engage in intellectual activities. Improving mental health can also stimulate the development of intellectual factors such as individual outsight, memory, imagination and thinking ability (Saraceno & Barbui, 2016). Students who develop a good mental health have a diverse range of hobbies, strong curiosity,
1School of Educational Science, South China Normal
University, Guangzhou 510631, China. 2Guangzhou College
of Commerce, Guangzhou 510631, China. E-Mail: [email protected]
and desire for knowledge, can continue to absorb new knowledge, discover new problems, take the initiative to absorb new information, and be creative and try new learning areas and methods of interest. Further, unhealthystudents lack positive interest in new knowledge and information, and are accustomed to getting in a groove, not good at absorbing new knowledge and learning methods (Fuligni, Arruda, Krull et al., 2017; Brannlund, Strandh, & Nilsson, 2017). Students' English learning and mental fitness are intertwined. English learning requires students to have keen interests, correct motivation and strong will, represented by the interests, motivation, emotion, will, morality and personality in English learning (Sabia & Rees, 2015).
The English examinations for college students in our country are constantly changing in content, form, scoring manner and standard. Now English learning holds a status that cannot be ignored. It is required to make full use of
HANG GUO
932
school resources to facilitate students' English learning, further encourage students to reach the international development level by English
learning, and strengthen the students’ education
system (Henderson & Battams, 2011; Desilva, Samele, Saxena et al., 2014). If students have no good mental health, English learning is not good since sound mental health can resist the English learning pressure. It is self-evident to improve English learning (Besier & Goldbeck, 2012). This paper introduces a comparison based on the psychological health test and the English learning scores of college students to analyze how English academic performance is subjected to change with students' mental health.
STUDENTS' MENTAL HEALTH AND ENGLISH LEARNING SCALE
Figure 1
.
Survey on the development field of
college students
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90
Field of college students'development
Peer relationship Adaptability Personality Mental
health Behavior School
work
Imp
o
rt
a
n
c
e
in
d
e
x
The mental health status of students is subject to the psychological environment, including internal quality and explicit behaviors. It is possible to check the development of students' autonomy and psychological environment by means of questionnaire survey (Nezhad & Besharat, 2010). The mental fitness of students is inseparable from their psychological environment since the latter factor has a positive
effect on personality development, academic development, behavioral habits, adaptability, mental health and peer relations of students (Bickman, Lyon, & Wolpert, 2016; Bentley, Hartley, & Bucci, 2019). The survey on students' fields of interest is shown in Figure 1. More than 80% of students still think that they should concentrate on academics, while more than 25% believe that they should develop healthy psychological conditions.
Figure 2
.
Five-factor model of college
students' learning autonomy scale
Learning
autonomy
Self-willingness
self-plan
Self-control
Self-reflection
Learning creativity
The mental health status of students is significant for students to learn knowledge and skills, enrich their emotions, create good attitudes and values, and develop good behavior habits (Ishii, Tachikawa, Shiratori et al., 2018). Figure 2 is a five-factor model of students' autonomy scale, i.e. independent will, self-plan, self-monitoring, self-reflection and learning creativity used to assess students' learning.
RESULTS AND ANALYSIS
Factors influencing psychological fitness of students
There are many factors that influence the mental health of students, but the most important thing is the psychological environment the students hold, including teacher-student relationship, classmate relation, family ties, competition, academic burden and order discipline (Marino, Vieno, Lenzi et al., 2016). To reveal these factors, this questionnaire survey is conducted among sophomore students in a university for the purpose of exposing the disparities in the mental health dimension between students of different genders and in
CORRELATIONS BETWEEN ENGLISH PERFORMANCE AND MENTAL HEALTH OF COLLEGE STUDENTS 933
different family backgrounds. A total of 500 questionnaires were distributed and 455 were available. The descriptive statistics in the dimensions of students' mental health are given in Table 1. It is known that the average score of the mental health scale of students is 3.37, which means that overall mental health is at a medium level; the average score of the hope dimension in the mental health is the maximum, followed by the self-efficacy, optimism dimensions, and the dimension with the minimum score is resilience. Table 2 shows the differences in the dimensions of mental health among students of different genders. It is obvious that there is no difference between men and women in the optimism dimension, but obvious difference in the self-efficacy, resilience and hope dimensions. The scores of boys are significantly higher than that of girls. Table 3 shows the disparities in the different dimensions of mental health among students who have different economic positions. There are disparities in the self-efficacy dimension between boys and girls, where the self-efficacy of boys is stronger. However, there is no significant disparities in the resilience, hope and optimism dimensions.
There are many factors that influence the mental health of students. It is allowed to evaluated from negative dimensions such as coercion, paranoia, hostility and interpersonal relationship of mental health. The mental health
scale of students in each dimension is given in Figure 3. It is observed that the coercion and emotional lability has a significantly negative influence on the mental health of students.
Table 1.
Descriptive statistics of various
dimensions of college students' mental health
Questionnaire dimension Min Max M SD
Self-efficacy 1.09 5.09 3.46 0.72
Toughness 1.42 4.76 3.13 0.66
Hope 1.76 5.09 3.48 0.67
Optimistic 1.59 5.09 3.41 0.67
Aggregate table 1.72 4.55 3.37 0.52
Figure 3
.
Survey on the development field of
college students
1.0 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 2.0
Psychological imbalance Emotional instability Maladjustment Learning pressure Anxious Depressed Interpersonal relationship Hostile Paranoia Force
Average mental health
Table 2.
Differences in the dimensions of mental health among college students of different
genders
Questionnaire dimension Male Female t p
M SD M SD
Self-efficacy 3.52 0.73 3.42 0.71 2.00 0.066
Toughness 3.20 0.68 3.08 0.64 2.45 0.028
Hope 3.62 0.64 3.39 0.68 4.81 0.009
Optimistic 3.41 0.65 3.40 0.68 0.32 0.828
Aggregate table 3.44 0.51 3.32 0.52 3.24 0.011
Table 3.
Difference analysis of different economic conditions of college students in different
dimensions of mental health
Questionnaire dimension Not good General Better F p
M SD M SD M SD
Self-efficacy 3.52 0.70 3.44 0.73 3.56 0.67 1.42 0.273
Toughness 3.48 0.58 3.47 0.68 3.52 0.65 0.31 0.81
Hope 3.08 0.74 3.11 0.66 3.25 0.63 2.08 0.147
Optimistic 3.44 0.66 3.39 0.66 3.52 0.70 1.79 0.192
HANG GUO
934
Statistical results of mental health resilience and academic performance
Figure 4
.
Analysis of college students'
mental health toughness
2.8 3.0 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.8 4.0 Mental toughness Positive cognition Emotional control Family support Interpersonal assistance Target focus A v er ag e 0.55 0.60 0.65 0.70 0.75 0.80 0.85 0.90 S ta n d ar d d ev ia ti o n
The mental health status of students is resilient. The mental fitness is directly proportional to the mental health resilience. There is a significant correlation between students' English performance and psychological resilience, positive and negative academic emotions. For the mental health resilience of students, the questionnaire survey in Section 3.1 should be used. As shown in Figure 4, students' mental health resilience is analyzed. There are several dimensions for mental health resilience of students including target focusing, interpersonal assistance, family support, emotional control and positive cognition. The mean value of all scores is 3.44, which means the psychological resilience is at the upper-middle level. On the whole, the psychological resilience level is higher. In addition, in the resilience dimension, the positive cognition and target focusing dimensions have the maximum mean scores, followed by the emotional control and interpersonal assistance dimensions, but the family support dimension has the minimum score. The students' current emotions in English learning are shown in Figure 5. In this dimension, there are positive-high arousal, positive-low arousal, negative-high arousal and negative-low arousal. It can be clearly seen that the average score of positive academic emotion is significantly higher than that of the opposite
side. Students’ current inputs in English learning
are shown in Table 4. Their inputs should be measured by three variables: vitality, dedication and focus. The mean value of learning inputs by
the three variables are different a little, the maximum is by the dedication, followed by the focus and vitality.
Table 4.
The status quo of college students'
English learning investment
Variable Average value Standard deviation
Vitality 3.40 0.81
Dedication 3.72 0.79
Concentration 3.59 0.87
Figure 5
.
Current situation of college
students' English learning emotion
2.4 2.6 2.8 3.0 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.8 4.0
Negative high wake up Negative low wake up Actively low wake up
Actively high wake up
English learning emotions
A v er ag e v al u e 0.64 0.66 0.68 0.70 0.72 0.74 S ta n d ar d d ev ia ti o n
CORRELATION ANALYSIS OF STUDENTS' ENGLISH PERFORMANCE AND MENTAL HEALTH
The English scores of students are taken from students' English test scores available from the school's educational administration system. The mental health level of students is taken from questionnaire survey. Figure 6 is a correlation analysis between mental health indicators and English scores. It can be seen that there is a significant correlation between English scores and each dimension of mental health. The regression analysis of mental health indicators and English scores is shown in Figure 5. Students’
English scores are subjected to their mental health. In the regression model, R2 is 0.05, which means that the mental health of students can respond to 5% change of students' English scores.
Figure 7 is the relationship between students' mental health and their English learning, including students' English learning autonomy, psychological environment features and mental health. Mental fitness can lead students to learn
CORRELATIONS BETWEEN ENGLISH PERFORMANCE AND MENTAL HEALTH OF COLLEGE STUDENTS 935
independently, autonomic behavior, autonomous atmosphere, self-monitoring to develop their learning interest. In order to improve students' English performance, we can enhance the mental health resilience of
students, concern their psychological education to create a good atmosphere for their psychological development.
Table 5.
Regression analysis of mental health indicators and English achievements
Dependent variable
Independent variable
Non-standardized coefficient
Standardized coefficient
R2 p F
B Standard error Beta
Total score Mental health index -0.55 0.22 0.17 0.05 0.01 7.62
Figure 6
.
Correlation analysis between mental health indicators and English scores
0.10 0.12 0.14 0.16 0.18 0.20 0.22 0.24 0.26 0.28
Peer intimacy
Honest
Joint activity
Attachment
Trust loyalty
Understanding sensitivity
Share giving
Correlation
Figure 7
.
The relationship between college students' mental health and college students' English
learning
The relationship between college students' mental
health and college students' English learning
College students' autonomy in English learning
Psychological environment characteristics
The effect of mental health on English learning
Learning autonomy dimension
Influencing factors of learning autonomy
Teacher-student relationship, classmate relationship, order and discipline, competition, academic burden
Teacher-student relationship
Classmate relationship
Order and discipline
Competition
Academic burden
Self-willingness, self-plan, self-control, self-reflection, Learning creativity
Family, social, individual and class factors
Leading factors of autonomous learning
Driving factors of autonomous behavior
Creative factors of autonomous atmosphere
Motivation factors of autonomous monitoring
Inhibitory factors of learning interest
HANG GUO
936
CONCLUSION
This paper makes a comparison based on the mental health test and English learning scores of students to analyze how the English academic performance is subjected to students' mental health. Here come specific conclusions:
(1) The questionnaire survey shows that the overall mental health of students falls into a medium level, and the dimension of hope in the mental health gets the maximum mean score. There are significant gaps in the self-efficacy, resilience and hope dimensions between boys and girls, and the scores of boys are significantly higher than those of girls.
(2) The mental health level of students is directly proportional to the mental health resilience. There is a significant correlation between students' English learning scores and psychological resilience, positive and negative academic emotions. The questionnaire survey shows that the psychological resilience of students is at the upper-middle level, and the overall level of psychological resilience is higher. In addition, in the resilience dimension, the average scores of positive cognition and target concentration dimensions are the maximum, followed by the emotional control and interpersonal assistance dimensions, but in family support dimension, the score is the minimum.
(3) There is a significant correlation between English performance and each dimension of
mental fitness. It is certain that students’ English
scores are subjected to their mental health level which can responds to 5% change in students' English scores.
REFERENCES
Bentley, N., Hartley, S., & Bucci, S. (2019). Systematic review of self-report measures of general mental health and wellbeing in adolescent mental health. Clinical Child and
Family Psychology Review, 22(2), 225-252.
Besier, T., & Goldbeck, L. (2012). Growing up with cystic fibrosis: achievement, life satisfaction, and mental health. Quality of
Life Research,21(10), 1829-1835.
Bickman, L., Lyon, A. R., & Wolpert, M. (2016). Achieving precision mental health through effective assessment, monitoring, and feedback processes. Administration and
Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health
Services Research,43(3), 271-276.
Brannlund, A., Strandh, M., & Nilsson, K. (2017). Mental-health and educational achievement: the link between poor mental-health and upper secondary school completion and grades. Journal of Mental Health, 26(4), 318-325.
Desilva, M., Samele, C., Saxena, S., Patel, V., & Darzi, A. (2014). Policy actions to achieve integrated community-based mental health services. Health Affairs,33(9), 1595-1602. Fuligni, A. J., Arruda, E. H., Krull, J. L., & Gonzales,
N. A. (2017). Adolescent sleep duration, variability, and peak levels of achievement and mental health. Child Development, 89(2), 18-28.
Henderson, J., & Battams, S. (2011). Mental health and barriers to the achievement of the
‘right to health’. Australian Journal of
Primary Health,17(3), 220-226.
Ishii, T., Tachikawa, H., Shiratori, Y., Hori, T., Aiba, M., Kuga, K., & Arai, T. (2018). What kinds of factors affect the academic outcomes of university students with mental disorders? a retrospective study based on medical records. Asian Journal of Psychiatry, 32, 67-72.
Marino, C., Vieno, A., Lenzi, M., Fernie, B. A., Nikcevic, A. V., & Spada, M. M. (2016). Personality traits and metacognitions as predictors of positive mental health in college students. Journal of Happiness
Studies, 19(2), 365-379.
Masillo, A., Brandizzi, M., Nelson, B., Lo Cascio, N., Saba, R., Lindau, J. F., Telesforo, L.,
Montanaro, D., D’Alema, M., Girardi, P.,
McGorry, P., & Nastro, P. F. (2016). Youth mental health services in italy: An achievable dream. Early Intervention in Psychiatry, 12(3), 433-443
Nezhad, M. A. S., & Besharat, M. A. (2010). Relations of resilience and hardiness with sport achievement and mental health in a sample of athletes. Procedia - Social and
Behavioral Sciences,5, 757-763.
Sabia, J. J., & Rees, D. I. (2015). Body weight, mental health capital, and academic achievement. Review of Economics of the
Household,13(3), 653-684.
Saraceno, B., & Barbui, C. (2016). Global mental health: achievements, concerns and (unanswered) questions. Epidemiology and