• No se han encontrado resultados

Centrality and rapidity dependence of inclusive jet production in √sNN=5.02 TeV proton-lead collisions with the ATLAS detector

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Centrality and rapidity dependence of inclusive jet production in √sNN=5.02 TeV proton-lead collisions with the ATLAS detector"

Copied!
22
0
0

Texto completo

(1)

Contents lists available atScienceDirect

Physics Letters B

www.elsevier.com/locate/physletb

Centrality and rapidity dependence of inclusive jet production in √

s

NN

= 5 . 02 TeV proton–lead collisions with the ATLAS detector

.ATLASCollaboration

a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t ra c t

Articlehistory:

Received12December2014 Receivedinrevisedform16April2015 Accepted14July2015

Availableonline17July2015 Editor:D.F.Geesaman

Measurementsofthecentralityandrapiditydependenceofinclusivejetproductionins

NN=5.02 TeV proton–lead (p+Pb) collisions and the jet cross-section in

s=2.76 TeV proton–proton collisions are presented.Thesequantitiesare measuredindatasetscorresponding toanintegratedluminosityof 27.8 nb1 and 4.0 pb1,respectively,recorded withthe ATLASdetector atthe LargeHadronCollider in 2013.The p+Pb collisioncentralitywascharacterisedusingthetotaltransverseenergymeasuredin the pseudorapidityinterval4.9<η<3.2 inthe directionofthe leadbeam.Results are presented for the double-differentialper-collisionyields as afunctionofjetrapidity and transversemomentum (pT)forminimum-biasandcentrality-selected p+Pb collisions,andare comparedtothejetratefrom the geometricexpectation.The totaljetyield inminimum-biasevents isslightlyenhanced abovethe expectationinapT-dependentmannerbutisconsistentwiththeexpectationwithinuncertainties.The ratios of jetspectra fromdifferent centralityselections show astrong modificationof jetproduction at all pT atforward rapiditiesand for large pT atmid-rapidity, whichmanifests as asuppression of the jetyield incentralevents andan enhancementinperipheralevents.Theseeffects implythatthe factorisation between hard and soft processes is violated at an unexpected level in proton–nucleus collisions. Furthermore,themodificationsatforward rapiditiesarefoundtobe afunctionofthetotal jetenergyonly,implyingthattheviolationsmayhaveasimpledependenceonthehardparton–parton kinematics.

©2015CERNforthebenefitoftheATLASCollaboration.PublishedbyElsevierB.V.Thisisanopen accessarticleundertheCCBYlicense(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).FundedbySCOAP3.

1. Introduction

Proton–lead (p+Pb) collisions at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) provide an excellent opportunity to study hard scattering processesinvolvinganucleartarget[1].Measurementsofjetpro- duction in p+Pb collisions provide a valuable benchmark for studies of jet quenching in lead–lead collisions by, for example, constraining the impact of nuclearparton distributions on inclu- sivejet yields. However, p+Pb collisionsalsoallowthe studyof possibleviolationsoftheQCDfactorisationbetweenhardandsoft processeswhichmaybeenhancedincollisionsinvolvingnuclei.

Previousstudiesindeuteron–gold(d+Au)collisionsattheRel- ativisticHeavyIonCollider(RHIC)observedsuchviolations,mani- festedinthesuppressedproductionofveryforwardhadronswith transverse momenta up to 4 GeV [2–4]. Studies of forward di- hadron angularcorrelationsatRHIC alsoshowed amuch weaker dijetsignal ind+Au collisions thanin pp collisions [4,5]. These

 E-mailaddress:[email protected].

effects have been attributed to the saturation of the parton dis- tributions in the gold nucleus [6–8], to the modification of the nuclearpartondistributionfunction[9],tothehigher-twistcontri- butions to the cross-section enhanced by theforward kinematics of the measurement [10], or to the presence of a large nucleus [11]. The extended kinematic reach of p+Pb measurements at theLHCallowsthestudyofhardscatteringprocessesthatproduce forwardhadronsorjetsoveramuchwiderrapidityandtransverse momentumrange.Suchmeasurementscandeterminewhetherthe factorisation violationsobserved atRHIC persist athigherenergy and, ifso, how the resulting modifications vary as a function of particle orjet momentum andrapidity.The resultsofsuch mea- surements could test the competingdescriptions ofthe RHIC re- sultsand, moregenerally,providenewinsightinto thephysicsof hardscatteringprocessesinvolvinganucleartarget.

This paper reports the centrality dependence of inclusive jet production in p+Pb collisions at a nucleon–nucleon centre- of-mass energy

sNN =5.02 TeV. The measurement was per- formed using a dataset corresponding to an integrated luminos- ity of 27.8 nb1 recorded in 2013. The p+Pb jet yields were

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2015.07.023

0370-2693/©2015CERNforthebenefitoftheATLASCollaboration.PublishedbyElsevierB.V.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCCBYlicense (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).FundedbySCOAP3.

(2)

compared toanucleon–nucleonreferenceconstructedfromamea- surement of jet production in pp collisions at a centre-of-mass energy

s=2.76 TeV using a dataset corresponding to an inte- grated luminosity of 4.0 pb1 also recorded in 2013. Jets were reconstructed from energy deposits measured in the calorimeter usingtheanti-kt algorithmwithradiusparameter R=0.4[12].

Thecentralityof p+Pb collisionswas characterisedusingthe total transverse energymeasured in the pseudorapidity1 interval

4.9<η<3.2 in the direction of the lead beam. Whereasin nucleus–nucleuscollisionscentralityreflectsthedegreeofnuclear overlapbetweenthecollidingnuclei,centralityin p+Pb collisions is sensitive to the multiple interactions betweenthe protonand nucleonsintheleadnucleus.Centralityhasbeensuccessfullyused atlower energiesind+Au collisionsatRHICasan experimental handleonthecollisiongeometry[2,13,14].

AGlaubermodel[15]wasusedtodeterminetheaveragenum- ber of nucleon–nucleon collisions, Ncoll, and the mean value of the overlap function, TpA(b)=+∞

−∞ ρ(b,z)dz, where ρ(b,z) is the nucleon density at impact parameter b and longitudi- nal position z, in each centrality interval. Per-event jet yields, (1/Nevt)(d2Njet/dpTd y), were measured as a function of jet centre-of-massrapidity,2 y,andtransversemomentum,pT,where Njet isthe numberof jetsmeasured in Nevt p+Pb events anal- ysed. The centrality dependence of the per-event jet yields was evaluatedusingthenuclearmodificationfactor,

RpPb1 TpA

(1/Nevt)d2Njet/dpTd y

cent

d2σjetpp/dpTd y , (1)

foragivencentralityselection“cent”,whered2σjetpp/dpTd yisde- terminedusingthe jetcross-section measured in pp collisionsat

s=2.76 TeV. The factor RpPb quantifies the absolutemodifica- tionofthe jet raterelative tothe geometric expectation.In each centrality interval, the geometric expectationis the jet rate that wouldbeproducedbyanincoherentsuperpositionofthenumber ofnucleon–nucleoncollisions corresponding to the meannuclear thicknessinthegivenclassofp+Pb collisions.

Resultsarealsopresentedforthecentral-to-peripheralratio,

RCP1 Rcoll

(1/Nevt)d2Njet/dpTd y

cent

(1/Nevt)d2Njet/dpTd y

peri

, (2)

whereRcoll representstheratioofNcollinagivencentralityin- tervaltothatinthemostperipheralinterval,Rcoll

Ncollcent /Npericoll. TheRCPratioissensitivetorelativedeviationsinthejetratefrom thegeometric expectationbetween the p+Pb event centralities.

The RpPb and RCP measurements are presented as a function of inclusivejet yandpT.

Forthe2013 p+Pb run,theLHCwas configuredwitha4 TeV protonbeam and a 1.57 TeVper-nucleon Pb beamthat together producedcollisions with

sNN=5.02 TeV anda rapidity shiftof thecentre-of-massframeof0.465 unitsrelativetotheATLAS rest frame.The run wassplit intotwo periods,withthe directionsof

1 ATLASusesaright-handedcoordinatesystemwithitsoriginatthenominalin- teractionpoint(IP)inthecentreofthedetectorandthez-axisalongthebeampipe.

Thex-axispointsfromtheIPtothecentreoftheLHCring,andthe y-axispoints upward.Cylindricalcoordinates(r,φ)areusedinthetransverseplane,φbeingthe azimuthalanglearoundthebeampipe.Thepseudorapidityisdefinedinlaboratory coordinatesintermsofthepolarangleθasη= −ln tan(θ/2).During2013p+Pb data-taking,thebeamdirectionswerereversedapproximatelyhalf-waythroughthe runningperiod,butinpresentingresultsthedirectionoftheprotonbeamisalways chosentopointtopositiveη.

2 Thejetrapidityyisdefinedasy=0.5lnEE+ppz

z whereE andpzaretheen- ergyandthecomponentofthemomentumalongtheprotonbeamdirectioninthe nucleon–nucleoncentre-of-massframe.

theproton andlead beamsbeingreversed attheendofthefirst period. The first period provided approximately 55% of the inte- gratedluminosity withthePbbeamtravellingtopositiverapidity andthe protonbeamtonegative rapidity,andthe second period provided theremainderwiththe beamsreversed.The analysisin this paperuses the events fromboth periods of data-taking and y isdefinedsothat y>0 alwaysreferstothedownstreampro- tondirection.

2. Experimentalsetup

The measurements presented in this paper were performed using the ATLAS inner detector(ID), calorimeters, minimum-bias trigger scintillator (MBTS), and trigger and data acquisition sys- tems[16].The IDmeasureschargedparticleswithin |η|<2.5 us- inga combinationofsiliconpixeldetectors,siliconmicrostripde- tectors,andastraw-tubetransitionradiationtracker,allimmersed ina2 Taxialmagneticfield[17].Thecalorimetersystemconsists ofa liquidargon(LAr)electromagnetic(EM) calorimetercovering

|η|<3.2,a steel/scintillatorsamplinghadroniccalorimetercover- ing |η|<1.7,aLArhadroniccalorimetercovering1.5<|η|<3.2, and two LAr electromagnetic and hadronic forward calorimeters (FCal)covering3.2<|η|<4.9.TheEMcalorimetersuseleadplates astheabsorbersandaresegmentedlongitudinallyinshowerdepth into three compartments with an additional presamplerlayer in front for|η|<1.8. The granularity of the EM calorimeter varies withlayer andpseudorapidity. The middlesampling layer, which typicallyhasthelargestenergydepositinEMshowers,hasaη×

granularity of 0.025×0.025 within |η|<2.5. The hadronic calorimeterusessteelastheabsorberandhasthreesegmentslon- gitudinal in shower depth with cell sizes η× φ =0.1×0.1 for |η|<2.53 and 0.2×0.2 for 2.5<|η|<4.9. The two FCal modules are composed of tungsten and copper absorbers with LAr as the active medium, which together provide ten interac- tion lengthsof material.TheMBTS detects chargedparticles over 2.1<|η|<3.9 using two hodoscopes of16 counters each, posi- tionedatz= ±3.6m.

The p+Pb and pp events usedinthisanalysiswere recorded usinga combinationofminimum-bias(MB) andjet triggers[18].

In p+Pb data-taking,theMB triggerrequiredhitsinatleastone counter in each side of the MBTS detector. In pp collisions the MBconditionwas thepresenceofhitsinthepixelandmicrostrip detectors reconstructed as a track by the high-level trigger sys- tem. Jetswere selected usinghigh-level jet triggers implemented witha reconstruction algorithm similar to the procedureapplied inthe offline analysis. Inparticular, it usedthe anti-kt algorithm with R=0.4, abackground subtractionprocedure,anda calibra- tion of the jet energy to the full hadronic scale. The high-level jettriggers wereseededfromacombinationoflow-levelMB and jethardware-basedtriggers.Sixjettriggerswithtransverseenergy thresholds ranging from 20 GeV to 75 GeV were used to select jets within |η|<3.2 and a separate trigger with a threshold of 15 GeV wasused toselect jetswith3.2<|η|<4.9. Thetriggers were prescaledinafashion whichvariedwithtimetoaccommo- datetheevolutionoftheluminositywithinanLHCfill.

3. Dataselection

In the offline analysis, charged-particle tracks were recon- structed inthe IDwiththe samealgorithm usedin pp collisions [19].Thep+Pb eventsusedforthisanalysiswererequiredtohave

3 Anexceptionisthethird(outermost)samplinglayer,whichhasasegmentation of0.2×0.1 upto|η|=1.7.

(3)

Fig. 1. Distributionof EPbT for minimum-bias p+Pb collisionsrecordedduring the2013run,measuredintheFCalat4.9<η<3.2 inthePb-goingdirection.

Theverticaldivisionscorrespondtothesixcentralityintervalsusedinthisanalysis.

Fromrighttoleft,theregionscorrespondtocentralityintervalsof0–10%,10–20%, 20–30%,30–40%,40–60%and60–90%.

a reconstructed vertex containing at least two associated tracks with pT>0.1 GeV,atleast onehit ineach ofthetwo MBTSho- doscopes, and a difference betweentimes measured on the two MBTSsidesoflessthan10 ns.Eventscontaining multiple p+Pb collisions(pileup)weresuppressedbyrejectingeventshavingtwo ormorereconstructedvertices,eachassociatedwithreconstructed tracks with a total transverse momentum scalar sum of atleast 5 GeV.Thefractionofeventswithone p+Pb interactionrejected by thisrequirementwas lessthan 0.1%. Events witha pseudora- pidity gap (definedby the absence ofclusters inthe calorimeter withmorethan0.2 GeV oftransverseenergy)ofgreaterthantwo units on the Pb-going side of the detector were also removed from the analysis. Such events arise primarily from electromag- netic or diffractive excitation ofthe proton.After accounting for event selection, the number of p+Pb events sampled by the highest-luminosityjettrigger(whichwasunprescaled)was53bil- lion.Theeventselection criteriadescribed herewere designedto selectasampleof p+Pb eventstowhichacentralityanalysiscan beappliedandforwhichmeaningfulgeometricparameterscanbe determined.

The pp events used in this analysis were required to have a reconstructed vertex, with the same definitionas the vertices in p+Pb eventsabove.Nootherrequirementswereapplied.

4. Centralitydetermination

The centrality of the p+Pb events selected for analysis was characterisedbythetotaltransverseenergy EPbT intheFCalmod- uleonthePb-goingside.The EPbT distributionforminimum-bias p+Pb collisionspassingtheeventselectiondescribedinSection3 ispresentedinFig. 1.Followingstandardtechniques[20],central- ityintervalsweredefinedintermsofpercentilesofthe ETPbdis- tributionafteraccountingforanestimatedinefficiencyof(2±2)% forinelastic p+Pb collisionstopass theappliedeventselection.

Thefollowingcentralityintervalswereusedinthisanalysis,inor- derfromthemostcentraltothemostperipheral:0–10%,10–20%, 20–30%, 30–40%, 40–60%, and60–90%, with the 60–90% interval servingasthereferenceinthe RCPratio.Events witha centrality beyond90% werenotusedintheanalysis,sincetheuncertainties onthecompositionoftheeventsampleandinthedetermination ofthegeometricquantitiesarelargefortheseevents.

A Glauber Monte Carlo (MC) [15] analysis was used to cal- culate Rcoll and TpA for each centrality interval. First, a Glauber MC program[21] was used tosimulatethe geometryofinelastic

Table 1

AverageRcollandTpAvaluesforthecentralityinter- valsusedinthisanalysisalongwithtotalsystematic uncertainties. The Rcoll valuesare with respectto 60–90%events,whereNcoll =2.98+00..2129.

Centrality Rcoll TpA[mb1] 0–90% 0.107+00..005003 60–90% 0.043+00..003004 40–60% 2.16+00..0807 0.092+00..004006 30–40% 3.00+00..2114 0.126+00..003004 20–30% 3.48+00..3318 0.148+00..004002 10–20% 4.05+00..4921 0.172+00..007003 0–10% 4.89+00..8327 0.208+00..019005

p+Pb collisions andcalculatethe probability distributionof the number of nucleon participants Npart, P(Npart). The simulations used a Woods–Saxonnuclear densitydistribution and an inelas- tic nucleon–nucleoncross-section, σNN, of 70±5 mb. Separately, PYTHIA 8 [22,23] simulations of4 TeV on 1.57 TeV pp collisions provided a detector-level EPbT distribution for nucleon–nucleon collisions,tobeusedasinputtotheGlaubermodel.Thisdistribu- tionwasfittoagammadistribution.

Then, an extension ofthe wounded-nucleon(WN) [24] model thatincludedanon-lineardependenceof EPbT onNpart wasused todefineNpart-dependentgammadistributionsfor EPbT ,withthe constraint that the distributions reduce to the PYTHIA distribu- tion for Npart=2. The non-linear term accounted for the pos- sible variation of the effectiveFCal acceptance resulting froman Npart-dependentbackwardrapidity shiftoftheproducedsoftpar- ticleswithrespecttothenucleon–nucleonframe[25].Thegamma distributions were summed over Npart witha P(Npart) weighting toproduceahypothetical EPbT distribution.Thatdistributionwas fittothemeasured EPbT distributionshowninFig. 1withthepa- rameters of the extended WN model allowed to vary freely. The best fit, which contained a significant non-linear term, success- fully described the EPbT distribution in dataover several orders ofmagnitude. Fromtheresultsofthefit,thedistributionof Npart valuesandthecorresponding

Npart

werecalculatedforeachcen- tralityinterval.TheresultingRcollandTpA valuesandcorrespond- ingsystematicuncertainties,whicharedescribedinSection8,are showninTable 1.

5. MonteCarlosimulation

Theperformanceofthejetreconstructionprocedurewasevalu- atedusingasampleof36 millioneventsinwhichsimulated

s= 5.02 TeV pp hard-scatteringeventswereoverlaid withminimum- bias p+Pb eventsrecordedduringthe2013run.Thusthesample contains an underlying event contribution that is identical inall respects to the data. The simulatedevents were generated using PYTHIA [22] (version 6.425, AUET2B tune [26], CTEQ6L1 parton distributionfunctions[27])andthedetectoreffectswerefullysim- ulatedusingGEANT4[28,29].Theseeventswereproducedfordif- ferent pT intervalsofthegenerator-level (“truth”) R=0.4 jets.In total,thegenerator-levelspectrumspans10<pT<103 GeV.Sep- arate sets of 18 million events each were generated for the two differentbeamdirectionstotakeintoaccountanyz-axisasymme- tries inthe detector.For each beamdirection, the four-momenta ofthegeneratedparticleswerelongitudinallyboostedbyarapid- ity of ±0.465 to match the corresponding beam conditions. The eventsweresimulatedusingdetectorconditionsappropriatetothe two periods ofthe 2013 p+Pb runandreconstructed usingthe samealgorithmsaswereappliedtotheexperimentaldata.Asep-

Referencias

Documento similar

Stepanov Institute of Physics, National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Minsk, Belarus 91 National Scientific and Educational Centre for Particle and High Energy Physics, Minsk,

Stepanov Institute of Physics, National Academy of Sciences of Belarus, Minsk, Belarus 91 National Scientific and Educational Centre for Particle and High Energy Physics, Minsk,

35 ( a ) Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing; ( b ) Department of Modern Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Anhui; ( c

35 ( a ) Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing; ( b ) Department of Modern Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Anhui; ( c

34 ( a ) Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing; ( b ) Department of Modern Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Anhui; ( c

34 ( a ) Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing; ( b ) Department of Modern Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Anhui; ( c

23 Academy of Scientific Research and Technology of the Arab Republic of Egypt, Egyptian Network of High Energy Physics, Cairo, Egypt... 24 National Institute of Chemical Physics

National Centre for Particle and High Energy Physics, Minsk, Belarus..