Contents lists available atScienceDirect
Physics Letters B
www.elsevier.com/locate/physletb
Centrality and rapidity dependence of inclusive jet production in √
s
NN= 5 . 02 TeV proton–lead collisions with the ATLAS detector
.ATLASCollaboration
a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t ra c t
Articlehistory:
Received12December2014 Receivedinrevisedform16April2015 Accepted14July2015
Availableonline17July2015 Editor:D.F.Geesaman
Measurementsofthecentralityandrapiditydependenceofinclusivejetproductionin√s
NN=5.02 TeV proton–lead (p+Pb) collisions and the jet cross-section in √
s=2.76 TeV proton–proton collisions are presented.Thesequantitiesare measuredindatasetscorresponding toanintegratedluminosityof 27.8 nb−1 and 4.0 pb−1,respectively,recorded withthe ATLASdetector atthe LargeHadronCollider in 2013.The p+Pb collisioncentralitywascharacterisedusingthetotaltransverseenergymeasuredin the pseudorapidityinterval−4.9<η<−3.2 inthe directionofthe leadbeam.Results are presented for the double-differentialper-collisionyields as afunctionofjetrapidity and transversemomentum (pT)forminimum-biasandcentrality-selected p+Pb collisions,andare comparedtothejetratefrom the geometricexpectation.The totaljetyield inminimum-biasevents isslightlyenhanced abovethe expectationinapT-dependentmannerbutisconsistentwiththeexpectationwithinuncertainties.The ratios of jetspectra fromdifferent centralityselections show astrong modificationof jetproduction at all pT atforward rapiditiesand for large pT atmid-rapidity, whichmanifests as asuppression of the jetyield incentralevents andan enhancementinperipheralevents.Theseeffects implythatthe factorisation between hard and soft processes is violated at an unexpected level in proton–nucleus collisions. Furthermore,themodificationsatforward rapiditiesarefoundtobe afunctionofthetotal jetenergyonly,implyingthattheviolationsmayhaveasimpledependenceonthehardparton–parton kinematics.
©2015CERNforthebenefitoftheATLASCollaboration.PublishedbyElsevierB.V.Thisisanopen accessarticleundertheCCBYlicense(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).FundedbySCOAP3.
1. Introduction
Proton–lead (p+Pb) collisions at the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) provide an excellent opportunity to study hard scattering processesinvolvinganucleartarget[1].Measurementsofjetpro- duction in p+Pb collisions provide a valuable benchmark for studies of jet quenching in lead–lead collisions by, for example, constraining the impact of nuclearparton distributions on inclu- sivejet yields. However, p+Pb collisionsalsoallowthe studyof possibleviolationsoftheQCDfactorisationbetweenhardandsoft processeswhichmaybeenhancedincollisionsinvolvingnuclei.
Previousstudiesindeuteron–gold(d+Au)collisionsattheRel- ativisticHeavyIonCollider(RHIC)observedsuchviolations,mani- festedinthesuppressedproductionofveryforwardhadronswith transverse momenta up to 4 GeV [2–4]. Studies of forward di- hadron angularcorrelationsatRHIC alsoshowed amuch weaker dijetsignal ind+Au collisions thanin pp collisions [4,5]. These
E-mailaddress:[email protected].
effects have been attributed to the saturation of the parton dis- tributions in the gold nucleus [6–8], to the modification of the nuclearpartondistributionfunction[9],tothehigher-twistcontri- butions to the cross-section enhanced by theforward kinematics of the measurement [10], or to the presence of a large nucleus [11]. The extended kinematic reach of p+Pb measurements at theLHCallowsthestudyofhardscatteringprocessesthatproduce forwardhadronsorjetsoveramuchwiderrapidityandtransverse momentumrange.Suchmeasurementscandeterminewhetherthe factorisation violationsobserved atRHIC persist athigherenergy and, ifso, how the resulting modifications vary as a function of particle orjet momentum andrapidity.The resultsofsuch mea- surements could test the competingdescriptions ofthe RHIC re- sultsand, moregenerally,providenewinsightinto thephysicsof hardscatteringprocessesinvolvinganucleartarget.
This paper reports the centrality dependence of inclusive jet production in p+Pb collisions at a nucleon–nucleon centre- of-mass energy √
sNN =5.02 TeV. The measurement was per- formed using a dataset corresponding to an integrated luminos- ity of 27.8 nb−1 recorded in 2013. The p+Pb jet yields were
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2015.07.023
0370-2693/©2015CERNforthebenefitoftheATLASCollaboration.PublishedbyElsevierB.V.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCCBYlicense (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).FundedbySCOAP3.
compared toanucleon–nucleonreferenceconstructedfromamea- surement of jet production in pp collisions at a centre-of-mass energy √
s=2.76 TeV using a dataset corresponding to an inte- grated luminosity of 4.0 pb−1 also recorded in 2013. Jets were reconstructed from energy deposits measured in the calorimeter usingtheanti-kt algorithmwithradiusparameter R=0.4[12].
Thecentralityof p+Pb collisionswas characterisedusingthe total transverse energymeasured in the pseudorapidity1 interval
−4.9<η<−3.2 in the direction of the lead beam. Whereasin nucleus–nucleuscollisionscentralityreflectsthedegreeofnuclear overlapbetweenthecollidingnuclei,centralityin p+Pb collisions is sensitive to the multiple interactions betweenthe protonand nucleonsintheleadnucleus.Centralityhasbeensuccessfullyused atlower energiesind+Au collisionsatRHICasan experimental handleonthecollisiongeometry[2,13,14].
AGlaubermodel[15]wasusedtodeterminetheaveragenum- ber of nucleon–nucleon collisions, Ncoll, and the mean value of the overlap function, TpA(b)=+∞
−∞ ρ(b,z)dz, where ρ(b,z) is the nucleon density at impact parameter b and longitudi- nal position z, in each centrality interval. Per-event jet yields, (1/Nevt)(d2Njet/dpTd y∗), were measured as a function of jet centre-of-massrapidity,2 y∗,andtransversemomentum,pT,where Njet isthe numberof jetsmeasured in Nevt p+Pb events anal- ysed. The centrality dependence of the per-event jet yields was evaluatedusingthenuclearmodificationfactor,
RpPb≡ 1 TpA
(1/Nevt)d2Njet/dpTd y∗
cent
d2σjetpp/dpTd y∗ , (1)
foragivencentralityselection“cent”,whered2σjetpp/dpTd y∗isde- terminedusingthe jetcross-section measured in pp collisionsat
√s=2.76 TeV. The factor RpPb quantifies the absolutemodifica- tionofthe jet raterelative tothe geometric expectation.In each centrality interval, the geometric expectationis the jet rate that wouldbeproducedbyanincoherentsuperpositionofthenumber ofnucleon–nucleoncollisions corresponding to the meannuclear thicknessinthegivenclassofp+Pb collisions.
Resultsarealsopresentedforthecentral-to-peripheralratio,
RCP≡ 1 Rcoll
(1/Nevt)d2Njet/dpTd y∗
cent
(1/Nevt)d2Njet/dpTd y∗
peri
, (2)
whereRcoll representstheratioofNcollinagivencentralityin- tervaltothatinthemostperipheralinterval,Rcoll≡
Ncollcent /Npericoll. TheRCPratioissensitivetorelativedeviationsinthejetratefrom thegeometric expectationbetween the p+Pb event centralities.
The RpPb and RCP measurements are presented as a function of inclusivejet y∗andpT.
Forthe2013 p+Pb run,theLHCwas configuredwitha4 TeV protonbeam and a 1.57 TeVper-nucleon Pb beamthat together producedcollisions with √
sNN=5.02 TeV anda rapidity shiftof thecentre-of-massframeof0.465 unitsrelativetotheATLAS rest frame.The run wassplit intotwo periods,withthe directionsof
1 ATLASusesaright-handedcoordinatesystemwithitsoriginatthenominalin- teractionpoint(IP)inthecentreofthedetectorandthez-axisalongthebeampipe.
Thex-axispointsfromtheIPtothecentreoftheLHCring,andthe y-axispoints upward.Cylindricalcoordinates(r,φ)areusedinthetransverseplane,φbeingthe azimuthalanglearoundthebeampipe.Thepseudorapidityisdefinedinlaboratory coordinatesintermsofthepolarangleθasη= −ln tan(θ/2).During2013p+Pb data-taking,thebeamdirectionswerereversedapproximatelyhalf-waythroughthe runningperiod,butinpresentingresultsthedirectionoftheprotonbeamisalways chosentopointtopositiveη.
2 Thejetrapidityy∗isdefinedasy∗=0.5lnEE+−ppz
z whereE andpzaretheen- ergyandthecomponentofthemomentumalongtheprotonbeamdirectioninthe nucleon–nucleoncentre-of-massframe.
theproton andlead beamsbeingreversed attheendofthefirst period. The first period provided approximately 55% of the inte- gratedluminosity withthePbbeamtravellingtopositiverapidity andthe protonbeamtonegative rapidity,andthe second period provided theremainderwiththe beamsreversed.The analysisin this paperuses the events fromboth periods of data-taking and y∗ isdefinedsothat y∗>0 alwaysreferstothedownstreampro- tondirection.
2. Experimentalsetup
The measurements presented in this paper were performed using the ATLAS inner detector(ID), calorimeters, minimum-bias trigger scintillator (MBTS), and trigger and data acquisition sys- tems[16].The IDmeasureschargedparticleswithin |η|<2.5 us- inga combinationofsiliconpixeldetectors,siliconmicrostripde- tectors,andastraw-tubetransitionradiationtracker,allimmersed ina2 Taxialmagneticfield[17].Thecalorimetersystemconsists ofa liquidargon(LAr)electromagnetic(EM) calorimetercovering
|η|<3.2,a steel/scintillatorsamplinghadroniccalorimetercover- ing |η|<1.7,aLArhadroniccalorimetercovering1.5<|η|<3.2, and two LAr electromagnetic and hadronic forward calorimeters (FCal)covering3.2<|η|<4.9.TheEMcalorimetersuseleadplates astheabsorbersandaresegmentedlongitudinallyinshowerdepth into three compartments with an additional presamplerlayer in front for|η|<1.8. The granularity of the EM calorimeter varies withlayer andpseudorapidity. The middlesampling layer, which typicallyhasthelargestenergydepositinEMshowers,hasaη×
φ granularity of 0.025×0.025 within |η|<2.5. The hadronic calorimeterusessteelastheabsorberandhasthreesegmentslon- gitudinal in shower depth with cell sizes η× φ =0.1×0.1 for |η|<2.53 and 0.2×0.2 for 2.5<|η|<4.9. The two FCal modules are composed of tungsten and copper absorbers with LAr as the active medium, which together provide ten interac- tion lengthsof material.TheMBTS detects chargedparticles over 2.1<|η|<3.9 using two hodoscopes of16 counters each, posi- tionedatz= ±3.6m.
The p+Pb and pp events usedinthisanalysiswere recorded usinga combinationofminimum-bias(MB) andjet triggers[18].
In p+Pb data-taking,theMB triggerrequiredhitsinatleastone counter in each side of the MBTS detector. In pp collisions the MBconditionwas thepresenceofhitsinthepixelandmicrostrip detectors reconstructed as a track by the high-level trigger sys- tem. Jetswere selected usinghigh-level jet triggers implemented witha reconstruction algorithm similar to the procedureapplied inthe offline analysis. Inparticular, it usedthe anti-kt algorithm with R=0.4, abackground subtractionprocedure,anda calibra- tion of the jet energy to the full hadronic scale. The high-level jettriggers wereseededfromacombinationoflow-levelMB and jethardware-basedtriggers.Sixjettriggerswithtransverseenergy thresholds ranging from 20 GeV to 75 GeV were used to select jets within |η|<3.2 and a separate trigger with a threshold of 15 GeV wasused toselect jetswith3.2<|η|<4.9. Thetriggers were prescaledinafashion whichvariedwithtimetoaccommo- datetheevolutionoftheluminositywithinanLHCfill.
3. Dataselection
In the offline analysis, charged-particle tracks were recon- structed inthe IDwiththe samealgorithm usedin pp collisions [19].Thep+Pb eventsusedforthisanalysiswererequiredtohave
3 Anexceptionisthethird(outermost)samplinglayer,whichhasasegmentation of0.2×0.1 upto|η|=1.7.
Fig. 1. Distributionof EPbT for minimum-bias p+Pb collisionsrecordedduring the2013run,measuredintheFCalat−4.9<η<−3.2 inthePb-goingdirection.
Theverticaldivisionscorrespondtothesixcentralityintervalsusedinthisanalysis.
Fromrighttoleft,theregionscorrespondtocentralityintervalsof0–10%,10–20%, 20–30%,30–40%,40–60%and60–90%.
a reconstructed vertex containing at least two associated tracks with pT>0.1 GeV,atleast onehit ineach ofthetwo MBTSho- doscopes, and a difference betweentimes measured on the two MBTSsidesoflessthan10 ns.Eventscontaining multiple p+Pb collisions(pileup)weresuppressedbyrejectingeventshavingtwo ormorereconstructedvertices,eachassociatedwithreconstructed tracks with a total transverse momentum scalar sum of atleast 5 GeV.Thefractionofeventswithone p+Pb interactionrejected by thisrequirementwas lessthan 0.1%. Events witha pseudora- pidity gap (definedby the absence ofclusters inthe calorimeter withmorethan0.2 GeV oftransverseenergy)ofgreaterthantwo units on the Pb-going side of the detector were also removed from the analysis. Such events arise primarily from electromag- netic or diffractive excitation ofthe proton.After accounting for event selection, the number of p+Pb events sampled by the highest-luminosityjettrigger(whichwasunprescaled)was53bil- lion.Theeventselection criteriadescribed herewere designedto selectasampleof p+Pb eventstowhichacentralityanalysiscan beappliedandforwhichmeaningfulgeometricparameterscanbe determined.
The pp events used in this analysis were required to have a reconstructed vertex, with the same definitionas the vertices in p+Pb eventsabove.Nootherrequirementswereapplied.
4. Centralitydetermination
The centrality of the p+Pb events selected for analysis was characterisedbythetotaltransverseenergy EPbT intheFCalmod- uleonthePb-goingside.The EPbT distributionforminimum-bias p+Pb collisionspassingtheeventselectiondescribedinSection3 ispresentedinFig. 1.Followingstandardtechniques[20],central- ityintervalsweredefinedintermsofpercentilesofthe ETPbdis- tributionafteraccountingforanestimatedinefficiencyof(2±2)% forinelastic p+Pb collisionstopass theappliedeventselection.
Thefollowingcentralityintervalswereusedinthisanalysis,inor- derfromthemostcentraltothemostperipheral:0–10%,10–20%, 20–30%, 30–40%, 40–60%, and60–90%, with the 60–90% interval servingasthereferenceinthe RCPratio.Events witha centrality beyond90% werenotusedintheanalysis,sincetheuncertainties onthecompositionoftheeventsampleandinthedetermination ofthegeometricquantitiesarelargefortheseevents.
A Glauber Monte Carlo (MC) [15] analysis was used to cal- culate Rcoll and TpA for each centrality interval. First, a Glauber MC program[21] was used tosimulatethe geometryofinelastic
Table 1
AverageRcollandTpAvaluesforthecentralityinter- valsusedinthisanalysisalongwithtotalsystematic uncertainties. The Rcoll valuesare with respectto 60–90%events,whereNcoll =2.98+−00..2129.
Centrality Rcoll TpA[mb−1] 0–90% – 0.107+−00..005003 60–90% – 0.043+−00..003004 40–60% 2.16+−00..0807 0.092+−00..004006 30–40% 3.00+−00..2114 0.126+−00..003004 20–30% 3.48+−00..3318 0.148+−00..004002 10–20% 4.05+−00..4921 0.172+−00..007003 0–10% 4.89+−00..8327 0.208+−00..019005
p+Pb collisions andcalculatethe probability distributionof the number of nucleon participants Npart, P(Npart). The simulations used a Woods–Saxonnuclear densitydistribution and an inelas- tic nucleon–nucleoncross-section, σNN, of 70±5 mb. Separately, PYTHIA 8 [22,23] simulations of4 TeV on 1.57 TeV pp collisions provided a detector-level EPbT distribution for nucleon–nucleon collisions,tobeusedasinputtotheGlaubermodel.Thisdistribu- tionwasfittoagammadistribution.
Then, an extension ofthe wounded-nucleon(WN) [24] model thatincludedanon-lineardependenceof EPbT onNpart wasused todefineNpart-dependentgammadistributionsfor EPbT ,withthe constraint that the distributions reduce to the PYTHIA distribu- tion for Npart=2. The non-linear term accounted for the pos- sible variation of the effectiveFCal acceptance resulting froman Npart-dependentbackwardrapidity shiftoftheproducedsoftpar- ticleswithrespecttothenucleon–nucleonframe[25].Thegamma distributions were summed over Npart witha P(Npart) weighting toproduceahypothetical EPbT distribution.Thatdistributionwas fittothemeasured EPbT distributionshowninFig. 1withthepa- rameters of the extended WN model allowed to vary freely. The best fit, which contained a significant non-linear term, success- fully described the EPbT distribution in dataover several orders ofmagnitude. Fromtheresultsofthefit,thedistributionof Npart valuesandthecorresponding
Npart
werecalculatedforeachcen- tralityinterval.TheresultingRcollandTpA valuesandcorrespond- ingsystematicuncertainties,whicharedescribedinSection8,are showninTable 1.
5. MonteCarlosimulation
Theperformanceofthejetreconstructionprocedurewasevalu- atedusingasampleof36 millioneventsinwhichsimulated√
s= 5.02 TeV pp hard-scatteringeventswereoverlaid withminimum- bias p+Pb eventsrecordedduringthe2013run.Thusthesample contains an underlying event contribution that is identical inall respects to the data. The simulatedevents were generated using PYTHIA [22] (version 6.425, AUET2B tune [26], CTEQ6L1 parton distributionfunctions[27])andthedetectoreffectswerefullysim- ulatedusingGEANT4[28,29].Theseeventswereproducedfordif- ferent pT intervalsofthegenerator-level (“truth”) R=0.4 jets.In total,thegenerator-levelspectrumspans10<pT<103 GeV.Sep- arate sets of 18 million events each were generated for the two differentbeamdirectionstotakeintoaccountanyz-axisasymme- tries inthe detector.For each beamdirection, the four-momenta ofthegeneratedparticleswerelongitudinallyboostedbyarapid- ity of ±0.465 to match the corresponding beam conditions. The eventsweresimulatedusingdetectorconditionsappropriatetothe two periods ofthe 2013 p+Pb runandreconstructed usingthe samealgorithmsaswereappliedtotheexperimentaldata.Asep-