• No se han encontrado resultados

Why biologists should read Aristotle (or why philosophy matters for the life sciences and why the life sciences matter for philosophy)

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Why biologists should read Aristotle (or why philosophy matters for the life sciences and why the life sciences matter for philosophy)"

Copied!
5
0
0

Texto completo

Loading

Referencias

Documento similar

In the previous sections we have shown how astronomical alignments and solar hierophanies – with a common interest in the solstices − were substantiated in the

While Russian nostalgia for the late-socialism of the Brezhnev era began only after the clear-cut rupture of 1991, nostalgia for the 1970s seems to have emerged in Algeria

Finally, experiments with solar [17–34], atmospheric [35–45], reactor [46–50], and long-baseline accelerator [51–59] neutrinos indicate that neutrino flavor change through

MD simulations in this and previous work has allowed us to propose a relation between the nature of the interactions at the interface and the observed properties of nanofluids:

No obstante, como esta enfermedad afecta a cada persona de manera diferente, no todas las opciones de cuidado y tratamiento pueden ser apropiadas para cada individuo.. La forma

For example, why is the modal mustn’t used to describe subjective prohibition (1.1.1) but not a subjective necessity that something is not the case (2.1.1)?; why is

In this respect, a comparison with The Shadow of the Glen is very useful, since the text finished by Synge in 1904 can be considered a complex development of the opposition

1. S., III, 52, 1-3: Examinadas estas cosas por nosotros, sería apropiado a los lugares antes citados tratar lo contado en la historia sobre las Amazonas que había antiguamente