• No se han encontrado resultados

Code: ECTS Credits: 6. Degree Type Year Semester

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Code: ECTS Credits: 6. Degree Type Year Semester"

Copied!
5
0
0

Texto completo

(1)

Use of languages

No Some groups entirely in Spanish:

No Some groups entirely in Catalan:

No Some groups entirely in English:

spanish (spa) Principal working language:

Contact

[email protected] Email:

Beatriz Hernández Méndez Name:

2017/2018 Physiotherapeutic Evaluation and Diagnosis in

Neurology

Code: 102997 ECTS Credits: 6

Degree Type Year Semester

2500892 Physiotherapy OT 4 0

Teachers

Laura Arevalo Barrios

External teachers

Álvaro Pérez Muñoz Gemma Puigfel Dalmau Núria Raguer Sanz Roberta Ghedina

Prerequisites

It is recommended having acquired the skills and aims given on the subjects: Physiotherapy in Neurology I and II.

Objectives and Contextualisation

To deepen the knowledge and training of skills related to daily clinical assessment and diagnosis in neurology physiotherapy, being able to:

Assess major sensory and motor impairments, activity limitations and participation restrictions of patients with neurological disorders.

Make use of the more standardised scales utilised in neurology.

Perform a medical records that allows:

- Planning an individualised treatment for neurological patients according to their developmental stage

(2)

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

- Establishing short and long term objectives - Assessing the evolution

Get used to assessments that have been done by other specialists within the Neurorehabilitation team.

Skills

Develop critical thinking and reasoning and communicate ideas effectively, both in the mother tongue and in other languages.

Develop independent learning strategies Display critical reasoning skills.

Evaluate the functional state of the patient, considering the physical, psychological and social aspects.

Integrate, through clinical experience, the ethical and professional values, knowledge, skills and attitudes of physiotherapy, in order to resolve specific clinical cases in the hospital and non-hospital environments, and primary and community care.

Make a physiotherapy diagnosis applying internationally recognised norms and validation instruments.

Solve problems.

Work in teams.

Learning outcomes

Describe and apply advanced evaluation procedures in physiotherapy in order to determine the degree of damage to the nervous system and possible functional repercussions.

Develop critical thinking and reasoning and communicate ideas effectively, both in the mother tongue and in other languages.

Develop independent learning strategies Display critical reasoning skills.

Establish a diagnostic physiotherapy hypothesis based on complex clinical cases in neurological pathologies.

Solve complex clinical cases in the field of neurology.

Solve problems.

Work in teams.

Content

1. CIF Model and medical records in neurological physiotherapy.

Beatriz Hernández Méndez; Laura Arévalo Barrios 2. Exploration: general and health conditions.

Beatriz Hernández Méndez; Laura Arévalo Barrios

3. Core assessement, balance, gait, upper extremity, peripheral nervous system and pain.

Beatriz Hernández Méndez; Laura Arévalo Barrios 4. Standardised Scales.

Beatriz Hernández Méndez; Laura Arévalo Barrios 5. Transdisciplinary assessment in neurorehabilitation.

Álvaro Pérez Muñoz; Gemma Puigfel Dalmau; Núria Sanz Raguer 6. Clinical Case Studies.

(3)

Beatriz Hernández Méndez; Laura Arévalo Barrios; Roberta Ghedina 7. Papers Review.

Beatriz Hernández Méndez; Laura Arévalo Barrios

Methodology

The teaching is based on theoretical and practical classes.

Activities

Title Hours ECTS Learning outcomes

Type: Directed

LABORATORY PRACTICES (PLAB) 20 0.8 6, 1, 2, 5, 4, 7

THEORY (TE) 21 0.84 6, 1, 3, 2, 5, 4, 7, 8

Type: Supervised

PRESENTATION / ORAL PRESENTATION PAPERS 2 0.08 6, 1, 2, 5, 4, 7, 8

Type: Autonomous

PERSONAL STUDY 60 2.4 6, 1, 3, 2, 5, 4, 7

READING ARTICLES / REPORTS OF INTEREST 25 1 6, 1, 3, 2, 5, 4, 7

WRITING PAPERS 18 0.72 6, 1, 2, 5, 4, 7, 8

Evaluation

The evaluation system will be:

Written evaluation through objective tests of selection of multiple-choice items:

2 exams one hour each.

30 questions test with four possible answers, only one will be correct.

Each correct answer add 1 point and each wrong subtracts 0.25 points 40% of the overall mark

Practical evaluation through objective structured assessment:

Practical application and reasoning of different rating scales.

Duration: 15 minutes.

35% of the overall mark.

Oral evaluation through structured tests:

Oral presentation with audiovisual material of an neurological article using assessment scales applied in a clinical trial.

Reasoning of the scales used and proposed other scales that could be used.

Duration: 15 minutes 15% of the overall mark.

Delivery reports / written work:

Drafting of a clinical records and planningtreatment goals by observing a real clinical case.

(4)

1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

10% of the overallmark.

To pass the course must meet the following conditions:

Pass every single part of the contents with a score ≥5, except the delivery report which there is no minimum score.

In case of not passing a single part of the contents average won't be made, even though students who have not passed the subject/module through continuous assessment may take a final exam or a final test synthesis. Except the delivery report, which will do average whatever the note.

It is compulsory to attend the practicalclasses. You may miss 30% of the classes though proof of reason for absence will be required.

The following rules are considered the guidelinesto obtain a "not evaluable" qualification:

Not attending any of the assessment tests Missing more than 30% of practical classes The same evaluation criteria are applied for exchange students.

Evaluation activities

Title Weighting Hours ECTS Learning

outcomes

Delivery reports / written work 10% 1.5 0.06 6, 1, 3, 2, 5, 4,

7, 8

Oral evaluation through structured tests 15% 0.25 0.01 6, 1, 2, 5, 4, 7,

8

Practical evaluation through objective structured assessment 35% 0.25 0.01 6, 1, 2, 5, 4, 7

Written evaluation through objective tests of selection of multiple-choice items

40% 2 0.08 6, 1, 3, 2, 5, 4, 7

Bibliography

Bisbe, M; Santoyo, C; Segarra V. Fisioterapia en Neurología: Procedimientos para restablecer la capacidad funcional. Madrid: Panamericana, 2012.

Butler D. Movilización del sistema nervioso. Barcelona: Paidotribo, 2002.

Cano, R; Collado, S. Neurorrehabilitación: Métodos específicos de valoración y tratamiento. Madrid:

Panamericana, 2012.

Junqué, C; Barroso, J. Manual de Neuropsicología. Madrid: Síntesis, 2009.

Kandel, E; Schuwartz, J; Jessell, T. Principios de Neurociencia. Madrid: McGraw-Hill Interamericana, 2001.

Miralles, R. Biomecánica Clínica del Aparato Locomotor. 1ª ed. Barcelona: Masson, 1998.

Paeth, B. Experiencias con el Concepto Bobath: fundamentos, tratamientos y casos. 2ª ed. Madrid:

Panamericana, 2006.

Perfetti, C. Ejercicio Terapéutico Cognoscitivo para la Reeducación Motora del Hemipléjico Adulto.

Barcelona: Edikamed, 1998.

Perry J. Gait Analysis. Normal and pathological function. USA: Slack; 1992.

Sallés L, et al. Organización motora del córtex cerebral y el papel del sistema de las neuronas espejo.

Repercusiones clínicas para la rehabilitación. Med Clin (Barc), 2014.

Shumway-Cook, A; Woollacott, M. Motor Control: Translating Research into Clinical Practice, 4th ed.

Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2012.

Serra Catafau, J. Tratado de Dolor Neuropático. 1ª ed. Madrid: Panamericana, 2007.

Shacklock, M. Neurodinámica Clinica. España: Elsevier, 2007.

(5)

13.

14.

15.

16.

17.

18.

19.

Shacklock, M. Neurodinámica Clinica. España: Elsevier, 2007.

Stokes, M. Fisioterapia en la Rehabilitación Neurológica. 2ª ed. Madrid: Elsevier, 2006.

Tutusaus, R; Potau J.M. Sistema Fascial: Anatomía, valoración y tratamiento. Madrid: Panamericana, 2015.

Velasco M, et al. Abordaje Clínico de la Disfagia Orofaríngea:diagnóstico y tratamiento. Nutr clín Med.2007;1(3)174-202.

Vendrell JM. Las Afasias: semiología y tipos clínicos. Rev Neurol. 2001;32(10):980-6.

World Health Organization. Clasificación Internacional del Funcionamiento, de la Discapacidad y de laSalud: CIF. Ministerio de Trabajo y Asuntos Sociales, Secretaría General de Asuntos Sociales, Instituto de Migraciones y Servicios Sociales (IMSERSO), 2001.

Zamorano, E. Movilización Neuromeníngea: tratamiento de los trastornos mecanosensitivos del sistema nervioso. Madrid: Panamericana, 2013.

More literature in class.

Referencias

Documento similar

However, the degree of independence of the media companies where journalists work, and their personal values are perceived as the most influential factors in the ethical

These seven competencies, together with the knowledge, skills, attitudes and values related to the area of Built Environment and your degree, will be your letter of introduction

There have been several previous reviews of the challenges and in- centives faced by stakeholders of ATMPs at the preclinical, clinical and clinical practice phases in the

 The expansionary monetary policy measures have had a negative impact on net interest margins both via the reduction in interest rates and –less powerfully- the flattening of the

This study aims to evaluate the efficacy to heal long bone delayed unions and non-unions, as secondary objective of the EudraCT 2011-005441-13 clinical trial, through clinical

Recognizing the values of honesty and transparency in communications, ethical codes of the Ukrainian journalists and public relations practitioners follow similar ethical

The goals of this study are to ascertain the level of inactivity in a population of healthy subjects, namely Physiotherapy Degree students of the University of Vigo and study

The experimental and clinical work contained in this dissertation shows that the degree and extent of post-myocardial infarction tissue composition changes (mainly