• No se han encontrado resultados

Complejidad de los efectos no letales de depredadores y su transmisión en tramas tróficas : experimentos en terreno y laboratorio con organismos intermareales

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Complejidad de los efectos no letales de depredadores y su transmisión en tramas tróficas : experimentos en terreno y laboratorio con organismos intermareales"

Copied!
149
0
0

Texto completo

Loading

Figure

Table 2. Log linear analysis of the two-way contingency table for a) frequency of escape under the  three considered treatments (Heliaster, Control y Stichaster) and for the two levels of aggregation  (Aggregated, Single) and b) the same analysis but just
Figure 2. Frequency of chemical predator detection by Tetrapygus niger under laboratory  conditions
Figure 4. Logistic regression for the probability of detection at different distances between predator  and prey in Tetrapygus niger
Tabla 1. Resumen de ANDEVA univariado de medidas repetidas (RMandeva) considerando como  factores inter-sujeto al tamaño de acuario y el tratamiento de depredador y como factor intra-sujeto  al tiempo (4 bloques de 30 min), en la respuesta conductual de co
+4

Referencias

Documento similar

In the previous sections we have shown how astronomical alignments and solar hierophanies – with a common interest in the solstices − were substantiated in the

Díaz Soto has raised the point about banning religious garb in the ―public space.‖ He states, ―for example, in most Spanish public Universities, there is a Catholic chapel

We seek to characterize the transport in a time-dependent flow by identifying coherent structures in phase space, in particular, hyperbolic points and the associated unstable and

In the preparation of this report, the Venice Commission has relied on the comments of its rapporteurs; its recently adopted Report on Respect for Democracy, Human Rights and the Rule

H I is the incident wave height, T z is the mean wave period, Ir is the Iribarren number or surf similarity parameter, h is the water depth at the toe of the structure, Ru is the

In the “big picture” perspective of the recent years that we have described in Brazil, Spain, Portugal and Puerto Rico there are some similarities and important differences,

For instance, the best overall accuracy of bagging in Breast with 20% noise is achieved using a 10% sampling ratio: The test error goes from 4.1% when no noise is injected to 3.5%

In particular, different versions of the training set for the base learners can be used, as in bagging (bootstrap sampling of training data), class-switching (noise injection in