• No se han encontrado resultados

Plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance in Australia

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "Plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance in Australia"

Copied!
5
0
0

Texto completo

(1)

© Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.

Plasmid-Mediated Quinolone Resistance in Australia

JOSE-MANUEL RODRIGUEZ-MARTINEZ,

1,2

LAURENT POIREL,

1

ALVARO PASCUAL,

2

and PATRICE NORDMANN

1

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to search for plasmid-encoded quinolone resistance determinants QnrA and QnrS in

fluoroquinolone-resistant and extended-spectrum

-lactamase (ESBL)-producing enterobacterial isolates

recov-ered in Sydney, Australia, in 2002. Twenty-three fluoroquinolone-resistant, of which 16 were also ESBL-positive,

enterobacterial and nonrelated isolates were studied. PCR with primers specific for

qnrA

and

qnrS

genes and

primers specific for a series of ESBL genes were used. A

qnrA

gene was identified in two ESBL-positive isolates,

whereas no

qnrS

-positive strain was found. The QnrA1 determinant was identified in an

Enterobacter cloacae

iso-late and in a carbapenem-resistant

Klebsiella pneumoniae

isolate, both of which expressed the same ESBL

SHV-12. Whereas no plasmid was identified in the

E. cloacae

isolate,

K. pneumoniae

K149 possessed two conjugative

plasmids, one that harbored the

qnrA

and

bla

SHV-12

genes whereas the other expressed the carbapenemase gene

bla

IMP-4

. The

qnrA

gene, was located in both cases downstream of the

orf513

recombinase gene and upstream of

the

qnrA1

gene, a structure identical to that found in

sul1

-type integron In36 and

qnrA

-positive strains from

Shanghai, China. However, the gene cassettes of the

sul1

-type integrons were different. This study identified the

first plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance determinant in Enterobacteriaceae in Australia.

99

INTRODUCTION

Q

UINOLONE RESISTANCEusually results in Enterobacteriaceae from mutations in genes coding for chromosomally encoded type II topoisomerases or for efflux pumps and porins.2,3 How-ever, recent reports indicate that quinolone resistance may be also plasmid mediated.3,9,13The first plasmid-mediated quinolone re-sistance protein Qnr (termed recently QnrA) was identified from urine in a Klebsiella pneumoniaeisolate from Birmingham, Al-abama by L. Martinez-Martinez and G. Jacoby.7The plasmid-me-diated quinolone resistance gene qnrAencodes a 218-amino-acid protein of the pentapeptide family that protects gyrase from quinolone inhibition.14 Recently, another plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance determinant, QnrS, has been reported from Japan.1Molecular studies showed that the qnrAgene was located with other resistance determinants in sul1-type integrons harbor-ing a duplication of the 3-conserved sequence of integrons and orf513gene,12,13this latter gene encoding a putative recombinase involved in site-specific acquisition of resistance genes.

Plasmid-mediated determinant QnrA has been identified from remotely related areas, such as the United States, China, Thailand, Korea, Turkey, Germany, and France.9,16The origin

of the QnrA determinant has been identified recently as being the water-borne environmental species Shewanella algae.11The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of the qnrA and qnrSgenes in clinical isolates recovered in Sydney, Aus-tralia, to evaluate further the dissemination of these novel plas-mid-mediated quinolone resistance determinants.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Bacterial strains

Twenty-three ciprofloxacin-resistant nonduplicate entero-bacterial strains isolated in 2002 in the metropolitan area of Syd-ney, Australia, and recovered during a 2-month period from urine samples were studied, including 11 Klebsiella pneumoniae, 8 Es-cherichia coli, 1 Enterobacter cloacae, 1 Enterobacter agglom-erans, 1 Proteus mirabilisand 1 Citrobacter youngaestrain. They were randomly taken from the strain collection of the Antibiotic Reference Laboratory, Department of Microbiology, The Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, Australia. In addition, previously studied E. coliEC158 and K. pneumoniaeK149 strains isolated

1Service de Bactériologie-Virologie, Hôpital de Bicêtre, Assistance Publique/Hôpitaux de Paris, Faculté de Médecine Paris-Sud, Université

Paris XI, K.-Bicêtre, France.

(2)

in Melbourne in September, 2002, that both produce metallo- -lactamase IMP-4 were included in this study.10Sixteen isolates (69.5%) produced extended-spectrum -lactamases (ESBLs) and were detected as reported.4E. coliNCTC50192 harboring four plasmids of 154, 66, 38, and 7 kb was used as size marker for plasmids. E. coliJ53 AzRwas used as the host in the conjuga-tion experiments and E. coliDH10B in the transformation ex-periments.6E. coliLO was used as a qnrA1-positive5and E. coli (pBCH2.6) as qnrS-positive control strains.1

Susceptibility testing

MICs for nalidixic acid and fluoroquinolones were determined by an agar dilution technique and interpreted, when available, ac-cording to the guidelines of the CLST.8MICs of -lactams, chlo-ramphenicol, tetracycline, tobramycin, and gentamicin were de-termined by an agar dilution technique with Mueller-Hinton agar (Sanofi-Diagnostic Pasteur), as described previously.5

PCR amplification

Genomic DNAs of bacterial isolates were obtained as de-scribed previously.6PCR experiments were carried out using

specific primers for the qnrAand qnrSgenes. Primers QnrA-A and QnrQnrA-A-B5for the qnrAgene and QnrS-A2 (5-AGT GAT CTC ACC TTC ACC GC-3) and QnrS-B2 (5-CAG GCT GCA ATT TTG ATA CC-3) for the qnrSgene amplifying in-ternal fragments of 661 and 550 bp, respectively, were used. Once the corresponding gene was identified using a series of primers for genes coding for ESBLs,6primers specific for -lactamase gene blaSHV (SHV-A, 5-ATG CGT TAT WTT CGC CTG TGT-3, and SHV-B, 5-TTA GCG TTG CCA GTG CTC G-3) were used in combination with qnrA-specific primers to evaluate a putative colinearity between those genes. The PCR products were sequenced with an Applied Biosys-tems sequencer (ABI 377).

Plasmid and Southern blot analyses

Plasmid analysis of the clinical isolates, transconjugants, and transformants was performed by using the Kieser technique,5 followed by an agarose gel electrophoresis analysis. Southern blot analysis was performed using whole-cell DNA restricted with BamHI and NdeI restriction enzymes, agarose gel elec-trophoresis, and membrane transfer, followed by hybridization using qnrAand blaSHV-12-specific probes.6

RODRIGUEZ-MARTINEZ ET AL. 100

TABLE1. QUINOLONESUSCEPTIBILITYPROFILES OFCLINICALISOLATES, TRANSCONJUGANTFROMK. pneumoniaeK149, AND RECOMBINANTCLONE INE. coliREFERENCESTRAINS

MICs in mg/L for strainsb

K. pneumoniae E. coliJ53

E. cloacae K149 transconjugant E. coliDH10B

Qn17 (p149) (p149)b (p149SN12)c

Antibioticsa qnrA qnrA qnrA E. coliJ53 AzR qnrA E. coliDH10B

NAL 256 32 32 4 8 2

CIP 16 1 0.25 0.12 0.25 0.002

OFX 32 4 1 0.01 0.5 0.01

NFX 32 2 1 0.01 1 0.01

MFX 32 2 1 0.03 0.5 0.002

SPX 32 2 1 0.01 0.5 0.005

AMX 512 512 512 4 512 4

AMC 512 512 8 4 128 4

PIP 64 512 256 2 512 2

TZP 8 128 4 1 128 2

CAZ 256 512 8 0.06 512 0.06

CTX 32 256 4 0.06 128 0.06

FEP 0.5 64 2 0.01 32 0.06

IMP 0.25 8 0.12 0.06 0.12 0.06

TM 128 128 4 NDd ND ND

GM 128 128 8 ND ND ND

C 128 128 128 ND ND ND

TET 128 128 128 ND ND ND

aNAL, nalidixic acid; CIP, ciprofloxacin; OFX, ofloxacin; NFX, norfloxacin; MFX, moxifloxacin; SPX, sparfloxacin, AMX, amoxicillin; AMC, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid; PIP, piperacillin; TZP, piperacillin-tazobactam; CAZ, ceftazidime; CTX, cefo-taxime; FEP, cefepime; IMP, imipenem; TM, tobramycin; GM, gentamicin; C, chloramphenicol; TET, tetracycline. Breakpoints used for quinolone and fluoroquinolone susceptibility testing were the following: for nalidixic acid, susceptible if MIC16 mg/L and resistant if MIC32 mg/L; for ciprofloxacin, moxifloxacin, and sparfloxacin, susceptible if MIC 1 mg/L and resistant if MIC 4 mg/L; for ofloxacin, susceptible if MIC 2 mg/L and resistant if MIC 8 mg/L; for norfloxacin, susceptible if MIC 4 mg/L and resistant if MIC 16 mg/L.

bE. coliJ53 (p149) transconjugant was obtained from K. pneumoniaeK149.

(3)

Conjugation and transformation experiments

Transfer of the qnrA1gene into reference strain E. coliJ53 AzRby conjugation was attempted by liquid and solid mating-out assays. Transconjugants were selected on trypticase soy (TS) agar plates containing sodium azide (100 mg/L) and amox-icillin (100 mg/L) or chloramphenicol (30 mg/L). In addition, plasmid extracts of qnrA1-positive strains were used for trans-formation assays in E. coliDH10B, as described, giving rise to transformants selected on plates containing amoxicillin (100 mg/L) or chloramphenicol (30 mg/L).6

Cloning experiments and sequence analysis

Cloning experiments were performed with the restriction en-zymes SacI or BamHI from whole-cell DNAs extracted as pre-viously described using the vector pBK-CMV, followed by ex-pression of recombinant plasmids in E. coli DH10B and selection on TS agar containing kanamicin (30 mg/L) and nalidixic acid (4 mg/L), gentamicin (8 mg/L), or chloram-phenicol (30 mg/L). Antibiograms obtained by disk diffusion were performed with E. coli DH10B harboring recombinant plasmids, and sizes of the plasmid inserts were determined by restriction analysis. Both strands of each recombinant plasmid were sequenced. The nucleotide sequences were analyzed with software available over the internet at the National Center for Biotechnology Information Web site (http://www.ncbi.nlm. nih.gov).

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Retrospective analysis of the antibiotic resistance profile of the SHV-12-positive E. coli transconjugant obtained from K.

pneumoniae isolate K149 (IMP-4 and SHV-12 positive) re-covered in Australia10 indicated that the transferred plasmid p149 conferred reduced susceptibility to several quinolones whereas the IMP-4-positive plasmid did not. Thus, PCR ex-periments were performed to screen for the putative qnrAgene that gave a positive result for the K. pneumoniaeK149 isolate but not for the IMP-4-positive E. coliEC158 strain recovered during the same period of time. Consequently, a survey was conducted to evaluate prevalence of QnrA and QnrS determi-nants among a collection of ciprofloxacin-resistant enterobacte-rial isolates recovered in Melbourne over a 2-month period. This screening gave negative results for the qnrSgene (the first sur-vey of that type), whereas one of the 23 clinical strains analyzed was positive for the qnrAgene (8.7%). This isolate, E. cloacae strain Qn17, was also positive for the blaSHV-12gene. The nu-cleotide sequences of the two qnrA-like genes were identical to that of the known qnrA, latter termed qnrA1.9K. pneumoniae K149 was resistant to ampicillin, ceftazidime, ticarcillin, ticar-cillin plus clavulanic acid, imipenem, fosfomycin, tetracycline, chloramphenicol, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, tobramycin, gentamicin, kanamycin, rifampin, and sulfonamides of interme-diate susceptibility to nalidixic acid and resistant to fluoro-quinolones (Table 1). E. cloacaeQn17 was resistant to amoxi-cillin, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, tetracycline, chloramphenicol, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, aminoglycosides, rifampin, sul-fonamides, nalidixic acid, and fluoroquinolones.

Conjugation, plasmid analysis, and Southern hybridization experiments (data not shown) did not identify any plasmid in E. cloacaeQn17, whereas a 160-kb conjugative plasmid was identified in K. pneumoniaeK149 that possessed both the qnrA and blaSHV-12 genes. However, PCR mapping did not reveal any co-linearity between those two genes. In addition, PCR combinations with primers specific for a class 1 integron did

(4)

not identify any gene cassette upstream of orf513. Another 150-kb plasmid was identified in K. pneumoniaeK149, which har-bored the carbapenemase gene blaIMP-4located inside a class 1 integron structure, as reported previously.16

Quinolone resistance was transferred with a conjugation fre-quency (the number of transconjugants divided by the number of the donor cells) of 5105. Transconjugant E. coliJ53 (p149) containing the qnrAgene displayed resistance to ampi-cillin, ceftazidime, tetracycline, chloramphenicol, trimetho-prim-sulfamethoxazole, tobramycin, and gentamicin. It showed reduced susceptibility to nalidixic acid and fluoroquinolones (Table 1), but susceptibility to sulfonamides.

Cloning experiments using DNA from K. pneumoniaeK149 gave rise to an E. coli (p149SN12) recombinant strain that showed reduced susceptibility to quinolones (Table 1). Analy-sis of the sequence of the 3,495-bp insert indicated that qnrA1 was located in a complex In4family class 1 integron similar to In36,15with the presence of an ampRgene downstream of qnrA (Fig. 1). The identical fragment was detected in E. cloacae Qn17. However, further PCR mapping did not identify the over-all structure of In36or In37in both isolates. In particular, PCR failed to detect IS6100downstream of qnrA, whereas it has been detected in the qnrA-positive integrons In36and In37.15

This study emphasizes that the QnrA determinants are also found in enterobacterial isolates in the Australian continent. QnrA-like determinants were identified in ESBL-producing en-terobacterial isolates, as reported previously.9It is noteworthy that it has been detected in a carbapenem-resistant K. pneumo-niaeisolate, emphasizing that some strains may harbor a large pool of resistance genes leading to panresistance. Another in-teresting feature observed in that study is the possible chromo-somal location of the qnrA1 gene in E. cloacae Qn17, sug-gesting that the qnrA-structure could have integrated into the chromosome of that isolate, possibly by a transposition process, as already suggested.15

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

This work was funded by a grant from the Ministère de l’E-ducation Nationale et de la Recherche (UPRES-EA3539), Uni-versité Paris XI, France, and by a grant from the European Com-munity (6th PCRD, LSHM-CT-2003-503335). Strains were kindly provided by the Antibiotic Reference Laboratory, De-partment of Microbiology, The Prince of Wales Hospital, Rand-wick NSW. L.P. is a researcher from the INSERM (Paris, France) and J.M.R.M. was a recipient of a travel grant from the Spanish Society for Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Dis-eases in 2004.

REFERENCES

1. Hata, M., M. Suzuki, M. Matsumoto, M. Takahashi, K. Sato, S. Ibe, and K. Sakae.2005. Cloning of a novel gene for quinolone resistance from a transferable plasmid in Shigella flexneri2b. An-timicrob. Agents Chemother. 49:801–803.

2. Hooper, D.C. Emerging mechanisms of fluoroquinolone resis-tance. 2001. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 7:337–341.

3. Jacoby, G.A.2005. Mechanisms of resistance to quinolones. Clin. Infect. Dis. 41(Suppl. 2):S120–S126.

4. Jarlier, V., M.-H. Nicolas, G. Fournier, and A. Philippon.1988. Extended broad-spectrum -lactamases conferring transferable re-sistance to newer -lactam agents in Enterobacteriaceae: hospital prevalence and susceptibility patterns. Rev. Infect. Dis. 10:867– 878.

5. Kieser, T.1984. Factors affecting the isolation of CCC DNA from

Streptomyces lividansand Escherichia coli. Plasmid 12:19–36. 6. Mammeri, H., M. Van De Loo M, L. Poirel, L.

Martinez-Mar-tinez, and P. Nordmann.2005. Emergence of plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance in Escherichia coliin Europe. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 49:71–76.

7. Martinez-Martinez, L., A. Pascual, and G.A. Jacoby. 1998. Quinolone resistance from a transferable plasmid. Lancet

351:797–799.

8. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards.2005. Performance standards for antimicrobial susceptibility testing; fourteenth informational supplement M100–S15. National Com-mittee for Clinical Laboratory Standards, Wayne, PA.

9. Nordmann, P., and L. Poirel.2005. Emergence of plasmid-me-diated quinolone resistance in Enterobacteriaceae. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 56:52–59.

10. Poirel, L., J.N. Pham, L. Cabanne, B.J. Gatus, S.M. Bell, and P. Nordmann. 2004. Carbapenem-hydrolysing metallo- -lacta-mases from Klebsiella pneumoniaeand Escherichia coliisolated in Australia. Pathology 36:366–367.

11. Poirel, L., J.M. Rodriguez-Martinez, H. Mammeri, A. Liard, and P. Nordmann.2005. Origin of plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance determinant QnrA. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.

49:3523–3525.

12. Poirel, L., M. Van De Loo, H. Mammeri, and P. Nordmann.

2005. Association of plasmid-mediated resistance with extended-spectrum -lactamase VEB-1. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.

49:3091–3094.

13. Tran, J.H., and G.A. Jacoby.2002. Mechanism of plasmid-me-diated quinolone resistance. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:5638– 5642.

14. Tran, J.H., G.A. Jacoby, and D.C. Hooper.2005. Interaction of the plasmid-encoded quinolone resistance protein Qnr with Escherichia coli DNA gyrase. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.

49:118–125.

15. Wang, M., D.F. Sahm, G.A. Jacoby, and D.C. Hooper.2004. Emerging plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance associated with the qnr gene in Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical isolates in the United States. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 48:1295–1299. 16. Wang, M., J.H. Tran, G.A. Jacoby, Y. Zhang, F. Wang, and

D.C. Hooper.2003. Plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance in clin-ical isolates of Escherichia colifrom Shanghai, China. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 47:2242–2248.

Address reprint requests to: Dr. Patrice Nordmann Service de Bactériologie-Virologie Hôpital de Bicêtre 78, rue du Général Leclerc 94275 Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France

(5)

1. Haeng Soon Jeong , Il Kwon Bae , Jeong Hwan Shin , Si Hyun Kim , Chulhun L. Chang , Joseph Jeong , Sunjoo Kim , Chae

Hoon Lee , Nam Hee Ryoo , Jeong Nyeo Lee . 2011. Fecal Colonization of Enterobacteriaceae Carrying Plasmid-Mediated

Quinolone Resistance Determinants in Korea. Microbial Drug Resistance 17:4, 507-512. [

Abstract

] [

Full Text

] [

PDF

] [

PDF

Plus

]

2. José Manuel Rodríguez-Martínez, María Eliecer Cano, Carmen Velasco, Luis Martínez-Martínez, Álvaro Pascual. 2011.

Plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance: an update. Journal of Infection and Chemotherapy 17:2, 149-182. [

CrossRef

]

3. Justine S. Gibson, Rowland N. Cobbold, Peter Heisig, Hanna E. Sidjabat, Myat T. Kyaw-Tanner, Darren J. Trott. 2010.

Identification of Qnr and AAC(6#)-1b-cr plasmid-mediated fluoroquinolone resistance determinants in multidrug-resistant

Enterobacter spp. isolated from extraintestinal infections in companion animals. Veterinary Microbiology 143:2-4, 329-336.

[

CrossRef

]

4. J. Sanchez-Cespedes, S. Marti, S. M. Soto, V. Alba, C. Melci##n, M. Almela, F. Marco, J. Vila. 2009. Two chromosomally

located qnrB variants, qnrB 6 and the new qnrB 16, in Citrobacter spp . isolates causing bacteraemia. Clinical Microbiology

and Infection 15:12, 1132-1138. [

CrossRef

]

5. L. Meradi, A. Djahoudi, A. Abdi, M. Bouchakour, J.-D. Perrier Gros Claude, M. Timinouni. 2009. Résistance aux quinolones

de types qnr, aac (6#)-Ib-cr chez les entérobactéries isolées à Annaba en Algérie. Pathologie Biologie . [

CrossRef

]

6. Johann DD Pitout. 2008. Multiresistant Enterobacteriaceae: new threat of an old problem. Expert Review of Anti-infective

Therapy 6:5, 657-669. [

CrossRef

]

7. Luis Martínez-Martínez, María Eliecer Cano, José Manuel Rodríguez-Martínez, Jorge Calvo, Álvaro Pascual. 2008.

Plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance. Expert Review of Anti-infective Therapy 6:5, 685-711. [

CrossRef

]

8. P. Nordmann, H. Mammeri. 2007. Résistance plasmidique aux quinolones. Antibiotiques 9:4, 246-253. [

CrossRef

]

9. T SAGA, T AKASAKA, H TAKASE, M TANAKA, K SATO, M KAKU. 2007. First detection of the plasmid-mediated

quinolone resistance determinant qnrA in Enterobacteriaceae clinical isolates in Japan. International Journal of Antimicrobial

Agents 29:6, 738-739. [

CrossRef

]

10. Ari Robicsek, George A Jacoby, David C Hooper. 2006. The worldwide emergence of plasmid-mediated quinolone resistance.

Referencias

Documento similar