• No se han encontrado resultados

The masses of population II white dwarfs

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2020

Share "The masses of population II white dwarfs"

Copied!
18
0
0

Texto completo

Loading

Figure

Figure 1. HST CMDs of four nearby globular star clusters, extending from bright giant stars to the faintest white dwarfs (M4—Richer et al
Figure 2. Footprint of the HST/WFPC2 (dotted line), Gemini/GMOS (solid line), and Keck/LRIS (dashed) instruments
Figure 4. GMOS photometry (upper left), WFPC2 photometry (lower left), astrometry showing position relative to the instrumental footprints (upper right), and postage stamp section of the GMOS image centered on the target (lower right) for object WD 09.
Figure 5. Keck/LRIS spectra for 10 white dwarfs along the sightline to M4 (left). The S/N per resolution element at a wavelength of ∼4030 Å in these data is 30–50;
+7

Referencias

Documento similar

A wavelength cut-off at ~4000Å would result in ~30% of all white dwarfs having mass / cooling age uncertainties > 10%, adding. substantial noise to the GAIA white

In the “big picture” perspective of the recent years that we have described in Brazil, Spain, Portugal and Puerto Rico there are some similarities and important differences,

The sign of this slope is in agreement with theoretical expectations (Duffy et al. Concentrations and masses from CLASH. The color of data points and lines encodes the redshift of

Then a high identi cation eciency over the whole momentum range was ensured by a logical \or" of criteria based on dE/dx and E/p: for particles with momentum greater than 0 : 05

The lifetime signed impact parameter probability dis- tribution was determined as a function of the tau lifetime as follows: impact parameter distributions, for di erent lifetimes,

Except where explicitly stated, all quantities calculated using charged particles used only charged particle tracks which had hits in at least the TPC or OD, to ensure good

Therefore, most likely, a measurement of the ‘inclusive’ t ¯t + 1-jet cross section would not lead to any significant improve- ment compared to the mass measurements already

In the impact parameter di erence method the knowledge of the tau pair production point is limited by the size of the interaction region, whose dimensions are larger than the