• No se han encontrado resultados

Search for non-resonant Higgs boson pair production in the bbℓνℓν final state with the ATLAS detector in pp collisions at √s =13 TeV

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "Search for non-resonant Higgs boson pair production in the bbℓνℓν final state with the ATLAS detector in pp collisions at √s =13 TeV"

Copied!
22
0
0

Texto completo

(1)

Contents lists available atScienceDirect

Physics Letters B

www.elsevier.com/locate/physletb

Search for non-resonant Higgs boson pair production in the bb  ν  ν

final state with the ATLAS detector in pp collisions at √

s = 13 TeV

.TheATLASCollaboration

a r t i c l e i n f o a b s t ra c t

Articlehistory:

Received19August2019

Receivedinrevisedform4December2019 Accepted5December2019

Availableonline13December2019 Editor:M.Doser

Asearchfornon-resonantHiggsbosonpairproduction,aspredictedbytheStandardModel,ispresented, where one ofthe Higgs bosonsdecays via the Hbb channel and the othervia one of the H W W/Z Z/τ τ channels.Theanalysisselection requireseventstohaveatleasttwob-taggedjetsand exactlytwoleptons(electronsormuons)withoppositeelectricchargeinthefinalstate.Candidateevents consistentwithHiggsbosonpairproductionareselectedusingamulti-classneuralnetworkdiscriminant.

Theanalysis uses139 fb1 ofpp collisiondata recordedatacentre-of-massenergyof13 TeVbythe ATLASdetectorattheLargeHadronCollider.Anobserved(expected)upperlimitof1.2(0.9+00..43) pbis set on thenon-resonant Higgsboson pairproductioncross-section at95% confidence level,which is equivalentto40(29+149)timesthevaluepredictedintheStandardModel.

©2019TheAuthor(s).PublishedbyElsevierB.V.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCCBYlicense (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).FundedbySCOAP3.

1. Introduction

In2012,theATLASandCMSCollaborationsreportedtheobser- vationofanewparticleinthesearchfortheStandardModel(SM) Higgsboson (H )[1,2]. Sofar,measurementsofthespin andcou- plingsofthe newparticleare consistentwiththose predictedby theBrout–Englert–Higgs(BEH)mechanismofthe SM[3–12]. The SM predicts non-resonant productionof Higgs boson pairs (H H ) in proton–proton(pp) collisions, referred to as non-resonantH H production,withthedominantproductionmodesattheLHCpro- ceedingviathegluon–gluonfusion(ggF)process.TheggFprocess hastwo leading order contributions: thefirst corresponds to the so-called‘trianglediagram’,which includesthe Higgsboson self- coupling,andthesecond istheso-called‘boxdiagram’,whichin- cludesaheavy-quarkloopwithtwofermion–fermion–Higgs( f f H ) vertices.Thesetwoamplitudesinterferedestructively,resultingin alow cross-section of only31.05±1.90 fb forthe ggF H H pro- ductionmode,computedatnext-to-next-to-leading order(NNLO) andincludingfinitetop-quarkmasseffects[13–20].Feynmandia- gramsillustratingthesetwocontributionsareshowninFig.1.The measurementofnon-resonant H H productionattheLHCstandsas animportanttestoftheBEHmechanism.Inmanybeyond-the-SM (BSM)theories,H H productioncanbeenhancedbymodifyingthe Higgs boson self-coupling, λH H H, or the top-quark Yukawa cou- pling, yt,and/orbyintroducingnewcontactinteractions between

 E-mailaddress:atlas.publications@cern.ch.

Fig. 1. FeynmandiagramsforleadingorderggFproductionofHiggsbosonpairs:the

‘trianglediagram’sensitivetotheHiggsbosonself-couplingontheleftandthe‘box diagram’ontheright.

two top-quarks or gluons and two Higgs bosons or introducing productionmechanismsviaintermediateBSMparticles[21–23].

The ATLAS and CMS Collaborations have performed searches for non-resonant H H production in a variety of final states at 13 TeV [24–33]. No significant excess of events beyond SM ex- pectationsisobservedinthesesearches,withtheATLAS andCMS data-analyses setting observed(expected) limitson non-resonant H H production to be no larger than 6.9 (10.0) and 22.2 (12.8) timesthepredictedrateintheSM,respectively[34,35].

This Letter describes a search for non-resonant H H produc- tion inthe bbνν final state, where  refers to a lepton(either an electron ora muon), using13 TeV pp collision datacollected with the ATLAS detector during 2015–2018 and corresponding to a total integrated luminosity of 139 fb1. The analysis uses machine-learningtechniquesbasedonfeedforwardneuralnetwork architectures[36] toconstruct an event-level classifier trainedto distinguish between the H H signal and SM backgrounds. Analy- ses searching for non-resonant H H production via similar decay channelswereperformedpreviouslyinthesingle-leptonfinalstate https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physletb.2019.135145

0370-2693/©2019TheAuthor(s).PublishedbyElsevierB.V.ThisisanopenaccessarticleundertheCCBYlicense(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).Fundedby SCOAP3.

(2)

byATLASinsearchesforH HbbW W [28] andinthedilepton channelbyCMSinsearchesforH HbbW W/bb Z Z [31].

2. ATLASdetector

The ATLAS detector [37–39] is a general-purpose particle de- tectorwithforward–backwardsymmetriccylindricalgeometry.1 It includesaninnertrackingdetector(ID),immersedinanaxialmag- netic field,which providesprecision tracking ofchargedparticles over the rangeof |η|<2.5.Calorimeter systems with eitherliq- uidargonorscintillatortilesastheactivemediumprovideenergy measurements overthe rangeof|η|<4.9.The muon spectrome- ter(MS)ispositioned outsidethecalorimetersandincludesthree air-coretoroidalmagnets.TheMSiscomposedofseveraltypesof muondetectorswhichprovidetriggerandhigh-precisiontracking capabilitiesfor |η|<2.4 and |η|<2.7,respectively. A hardware- based trigger followed by a software-based trigger reduce the recordedeventratetoanaverageof1 kHz[40].

3. Datasetandsimulatedevents

Thedatausedforthissearchwerecollectedin pp collisionsat theLHCwithacentre-of-massenergyof13 TeV.Onlythose data collected during stableLHC beam conditions andwith all ATLAS detectorsubsystems fullyoperationalare used,andcorrespondto an integrated luminosity of 139 fb1. The selection of candidate eventswithoppositelychargedleptons isbasedonacombination of single-lepton and dilepton triggers.2 The use of a given trig- gerdepends on the flavour and the transverse momenta (pT) of thetwo(pT-ordered)leptonsintheevent,andonthedata-taking period.Single-leptontriggerswith pT thresholds between22 and 28 GeVaregivenpriorityoverdileptontriggers.Thecriteriaofthe dileptontriggersarecheckedonlyifnosingle-leptontriggercrite- riaare metandhavepT thresholdsaslowas19(10) GeVforthe leading (subleading)lepton.At leastone reconstructed lepton(or leptonpair)hastomatchacorrespondingtriggerobject,inwhich casetheir offline pT mustbehigherthanthetriggerthresholdby atleast2 GeV,inordertobeontheefficiencyplateauofthecor- respondingtrigger.

MonteCarlo(MC) simulation[41] isused tomodel thesignal processes and in the estimation of SM background processes. A GEANT4 [42] simulation ofthe ATLAS detectorwas used forthe backgroundprocesses.ThesignalMCsampleswereprocessedwith afastsimulationthatreliesonaparameterisationofthecalorime- terresponse[41] andon GEANT4 forthetrackingdetectors.Simu- latedeventsare reconstructedusingthesamealgorithms asused fordataandincludetheeffectsofmultiple pp interactionsinthe sameor neighbouringbunch crossings, collectively referred to as pile-up.The simulation of pile-up collisions was performed with Pythia 8.186 [43] using the ATLAS A3 set of tuned parameters [44] and the NNPDF2.3LO parton distribution function (PDF) set [45].Simulatedeventswere reweightedtomatchthedistribution ofpile-up interactions indata. Theaverage amount ofpile-up in thedatacollectedduring2015–2018was33.7.

Thesignal processes withggF-initiated non-resonant H H pro- ductioninthebbννfinalstateweregeneratedwithaneffective

1 ATLASusesaright-handed coordinatesystemwith itsoriginat thenominal interactionpoint(IP)inthecentreofthedetectorandthez-axisalongthebeam pipe.Thex-axispointsfromtheIPtothecentreoftheLHCring,andthe y-axis pointsupwards.Cylindricalcoordinates(r,φ)areusedinthetransverseplane,φ beingtheazimuthalanglearoundthez-axis.Thepseudorapidityisdefinedinterms ofthepolarangleθasη= −ln tan(θ/2).Theangulardistanceismeasuredinunits ofR

(η)2+ (φ)2.

2 Distinctsetsofsingle-leptontriggersareusedforelectronsandmuons.Dilepton triggersrequireeithertwoelectrons,twomuons,oroneelectronandonemuon.

Lagrangianintheinfinitetop-quarkmassapproximation.Thegen- erated signal eventswerereweighted withformfactors thattake into account the finite mass of the top-quark [46,47]. SM back- groundprocessesweresimulatedusingdifferentMCeventgener- ators.TheMCmatrixelement(ME)eventgeneratorsandPDFsets, the parton showering (PS) and the underlying event (UE) mod- elling, UE tuned parameters (tune), andthe accuracy ofthe the- oretical cross-sections usedto normalise thesimulated processes are summarised in Table 1.Each SM backgroundprocess is nor- malised to the best available respective theoretical cross-section.

ThemassoftheHiggsbosonwassetto125 GeVforallsignaland backgroundprocesses.The H H branchingfractions(BF)predicted bytheSM [13] areusedforallHiggsbosondecays. MadSpin [48]

was used to model top-quark spin correlations and EvtGen [49]

was usedtomodelpropertiesofb- andc-hadrondecays forpro- cessesusing Pythia andforthesignalprocesses.

SM top-quarkpair production (tt)¯ andthe production of sin- gletop-quarksinassociationwithW bosons(W t)contributewith significantbackgroundcontaminationinthebbνν finalstate.At next-to-leading-order (NLO) accuracy, there exists non-trivial in- terferencebetweenthesetwoprocessesthatmaybe enhancedin phase-spaceregionswhereintherearehighfractionsofW t events [50]. Twoschemes are typically used to remove the overlap be- tween these two processes: the so-called diagram removal (DR) and diagram subtraction (DS) schemes [51]; the former is used inthe presentanalysisto removetheoverlapping eventsandthe latterisusedtoevaluatethesystematicuncertaintyincorrespond- ing background event yields. Because of these effects, the sum of the simulated t¯t and W t processes is considered as a single background process and referred to asthe ‘Top’ process in what follows.

4. Eventselectionandobjectdefinitions

Selectedeventsarerequiredtohaveatleastone pp interaction vertexreconstructedfromatleasttwoIDtrackswithpT>0.4 GeV.

Theprimaryvertexforeacheventisdefinedasthevertexwiththe highest

(pT)2 ofassociatedID tracks[102].Eventsthat contain atleastonejetarisingfromnon-collisionsourcesordetectornoise arerejectedbyasetofqualitycriteria[103].

Loose and signal criteria are defined in orderto selectrecon- structed lepton and jet candidates, where the latter is a subset of the former. Compared to the loose objects, the signal objects arerequiredtosatisfytighteridentificationorqualitycriteriathat are designedtosuppressbackgroundcontributions.Reconstructed loose(signal) electrons arerequiredto satisfy the‘Loose’(‘Tight’) likelihoodidentificationcriteria[104].Looseelectronsarerequired tohave pT>10 GeV andtobewithin|η|<2.47.Inaddition,sig- nal electrons are required to be outside the range 1.37<|η|<

1.52,whichcorrespondstothetransitionregionsbetweenthebar- rel and endcaps of the electromagnetic calorimeters. In order to reduce background contributions fromjets misidentified as elec- trons,signal electronsarerequiredtobeisolated accordingtothe

‘Gradient’ selection criteria [104]. Reconstructed loose andsignal muon candidatesare requiredtohave pT>10 GeV,to be within

|η|<2.4,andtosatisfy the‘Medium’identificationcriteria[105].

Additionally,signalmuonsarerequiredtobeisolatedaccordingto the‘FixedCutLoose’selectioncriteria[105].Signalelectron(muon) candidates are required to originate from the primary vertex by demanding that the significanceof thetransverse impact param- eter, definedasthe absolutevalue ofthetracktransverse impact parameter,d0,measuredrelativetotheprimaryvertex,dividedby its uncertainty, σd0, satisfy |d0|/σd0 <5 (3). The difference z0 betweenthevalueofthez coordinateofthepointonthetrackat which d0 is definedandthe longitudinalpositionof theprimary

(3)

Table 1

ListoftheMEgeneratorsandPS/UEmodellingalgorithmsusedinthesimulation.AlternativegeneratorsandPS/UEmodels,usedtoestimatesystematicuncertainties,are showninparentheses.ThePDFsets,tunes,andtheperturbativeQCDhighest-orderaccuracy(leading-order,LO;next-to-leading-order,NLO;next-to-next-to-leading-order, NNLO;next-to-next-to-leading-logarithm,NNLL)usedforthenormalisationofthesamplesarealsoincluded.Thetop-quarkmassissetto172.5 GeV.

Process MEgenerator

(alternative)

ME PDF PS/UEmodel

(alternative)

UE tune Predictionorderfor totalcross-section

tt [52,53]¯ Powheg-Box v2[54,55] NNPDF3.0NLO [56] Pythia8.230 [57] A14 [58] NNLO + NNLL [59–65]

(MadGraph 5_aMC@NLO) (Herwig 7.0.4) (H7-MMHT14)

Single-tops-channel,W t [52,66,67]

Powheg-Box NNPDF3.0NLO Pythia8.230 A14 NLO + NNLL [68,69]

(MadGraph 5_aMC@NLO) (Herwig 7.0.4) (H7-MMHT14)

Single-topt-channel[52,66] Powheg-Box, MadSpin [48] NNPDF3.04fNLO Pythia8.230 A14 NLO + NNLL [70]

(MadGraph 5_aMC@NLO) (Herwig 7.0.4) (H7-MMHT14)

W,Z/γ+jets [71] Sherpa2.2.1 [72,73] NNPDF3.0NNLO Sherpa2.2.1 Sherpadefault NLO(LO)2(4) partons [74–78]

(Z/γ+jets) (MadGraph 5_aMC@NLO) (Pythia 8.230) (A14)

Diboson(W W,W Z,Z Z ) [79]

Sherpa2.2.2 NNPDF3.0NNLO Sherpa2.2.2 Sherpadefault NLO(LO)1(3) partons [75–78]

tt W ,¯ t¯t Z [80] MadGraph5_aMC@NLO [81] NNPDF3.0NLO Pythia8.210 A14 NLO [82,83]

tt H [80]¯ MadGraph5_aMC@NLO NNPDF3.0NLO Pythia8.210 A14 NLO [84,85]

W H,Z H [86] Pythia8.186 [43] NNPDF2.3LO [45] Pythia8.186 A14 NNLO QCD + NLO EW [87–93]

ggFH [94] Powheg-Box v2NNLOPS [95] CT10 [96] Pythia8.212 AZNLO [97] NNNLO QCD + NLO EW [98]

SMH Hbbνν[99] MadGraph5_aMC@NLO 2.6.2 CT10 Herwig7.0.4 [100] H7-MMHT14 [101] NNLO [14–20]

vertexisrequiredtosatisfy|z0×sinθ|<0.5 mm,whereθ isthe polarangleofthetrackwithrespecttothez-axis.

Jetsare reconstructed fromtopological clusters of energy de- positsinthe calorimeters[106] usingthe anti-kt algorithm[107, 108] with a radius parameter of R=0.4 and calibrated as de- scribed in Ref. [109]. Candidate loose jets are required to have pT>20 GeV. Signaljetsare requiredto have|η|<2.8 andmust satisfypile-upsuppressionrequirementsbasedontheoutputofa multivariate classifier [110], which identifies jetsconsistent with a primary vertex in the region |η|<2.4 and pT <120 GeV.

The MV2c10multivariate algorithm [111] isused to identify jets containing b-hadrons (b-tagged jets). An MV2c10 working point with a b-tagging efficiency of 70%, estimated from simulated tt¯ events[112], is used. The b-tagged jetsmust have pT>20 GeV and |η|<2.5. The momentum of b-tagged jets is adjusted us- ing the muon-in-jet correction, as described in Ref. [6], by ac- countingformomentumlossesduetomuonsoriginatingfromin- flightsemileptonicb-hadrondecaysoccurringwithintheb-tagged jet.

The missing transverse momentum pmissT , the magnitude of whichis denotedby EmissT ,isconstructed fromthe negative vec- torial sumofthe transverse momenta ofcalibrated looseobjects intheevent.Anadditionaltermisincludedtoaccountfortheen- ergy ofID tracks that are matched to the primary vertexin the eventbutnottoanyoftheselectedlooseobjects[113].

Toavoiddouble-counting,looseobjectsaresubjecttotheover- lapremovalprocedure definedasfollows.Ifareconstructedelec- tron andmuon share a trackin theID, the electron is removed.

However, if the muon sharing the track with the electron is calorimeter-tagged,3thenthemuonisremovedinsteadoftheelec- tron.IfajetandanelectronarereconstructedwithinR=0.2 of eachother,thenthejetisremoved.Ifajetandamuonarewithin R=0.2 of eachother,andthe jethaslessthan threetracksor carrieslessthan50% ofthemuonpT,thenthejetisremoved;oth- erwise,themuon isremoved.Electronsormuonsseparatedfrom theremainingjetsbyR<0.4 areremoved.

The analysis selects candidate events with exactly two oppo- sitelychargedsignalleptons,electronsormuons,andatleasttwo signal b-tagged jets. To enhance sensitivity to the signal process

3 Acalorimeter-taggedmuonhasonlyareconstructedtrackintheIDmatched toenergydepositsinthecalorimetercompatiblewithaminimumionisingparticle, butnocorrespondingtracksegmentintheMS.

and to maximise rejection of the expected SM backgrounds, the analysisusesamultivariateapproachtoselectsignalevents.

5. Analysisstrategy

Theanalysisreliesontheuseofamultivariatediscriminantde- signedtoselectcandidateeventsconsistentwithnon-resonantH H production.Section 5.1describesthearchitectureandthetraining ofthe deep neural network(DNN) classifier fromwhich thedis- criminant is constructed. Section 5.2 describes the signal region selection criteria. Section 5.3describesthe final backgroundesti- mationprocedure.

5.1. DeeplearningapproachtotargetH H

The discriminant uses the outputs of a DNN classifier that is builtusingthe Keras librarywith Tensorflow asabackend[114, 115] andusesthe lwtnn library[116] tointerfacewiththeanaly- sissoftwareinfrastructureoftheATLASexperiment.Thesampleof eventsused fortraining iscomposedof equalnumbersof events fromthe signalandeach ofthe dominantbackgroundprocesses:

Top(asdefinedinSection 3), Z/γ→ (Z-),and Z/γτ τ

(Z-τ τ) production.The signal sample used inthe training ofthe classifier containsonly the H HbbW W componentduetoits larger BF relative to the H Hbbτ τ and H Hbb Z Z compo- nents. However,the sumofall threesignal componentsisevalu- ated asthesignal when performing thestatisticalanalysis. Addi- tionally, all processes that make up the training sample (H H bbW W, Top,Z-,and Z-τ τ) havethe same weightduring the trainingoftheclassifier.Thetrainingsampleiscomposedofsimu- latedcandidateeventswithm>20 GeV andhavingoneormore b-taggedjets, whereeventswithexactly oneb-tagged jetare in- cludedtoincreasethenumberofeventsavailablefortraining.For thetrainingeventswithexactlyoneb-taggedjet,eachobservable thatrequiresatleasttwob-taggedjetsissettoitsmeanvalueas computedwiththefullsetoftraining eventsthatcontainatleast two b-taggedjets. Observablesthatrequiretwo b-taggedjetsare definedusingtheleadingtwob-taggedjets.Theclassifiercontains two fullyconnectedhiddenlayers each with250nodes.Rectified linearunit(ReLU)activations areusedforeachlayer[117].Inor- dertoimprovetherobustnessofthetrainingandtoreduceeffects duetoovertraining, thereisa dropoutlayer thatrandomly drops 50% ofthe nodesbetween thetwo fullyconnected layers during training[118].Theclassifierproducesfouroutputsthatarepassed through asoftmaxactivation, constraining their sumto one[36].

Referencias

Documento similar

A search is presented for exotic decays of a Higgs boson into undetectable particles and one or two isolated photons in pp collisions at a center-of-mass energy of 8 TeV.. The

6 High Energy Physics Division, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL, United States of America 7 Department of Physics, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, United States of

33 (a) Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing; (b) Department of Modern Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Anhui; (c) Department

Institute of High Energy Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing; (b) Department of Modern Physics, University of Science and Technology of China, Anhui; (c) Department

87 The University of Michigan, Department of Physics, 2477 Randall Laboratory, 500 East University, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1120, United States 88 Michigan State University, Department

4 (a) Department of Physics, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey; (b) Istanbul Aydin University, Istanbul, Turkey; (c) Division of Physics, TOBB University of Economics and

64 Department of Physics and Astronomy, Iowa State University, Ames IA, United States of America. 65 Joint Institute for Nuclear Research, JINR Dubna,

32 Institute of High Energy Physics and Informatization, Tbilisi State University, Tbilisi, Georgia.. 33 RWTH Aachen