• No se han encontrado resultados

cultural para las pequeñas poblaciones del sudoeste de Europa

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "cultural para las pequeñas poblaciones del sudoeste de Europa"

Copied!
24
0
0

Texto completo

(1)

El Marco e

El Marco e - - ASLA: ASLA:

Soporte

Soporte a la gestión públicaa la gestión pública del del patrimoniopatrimonio cultural

cultural para las pequeñas poblacionespara las pequeñas poblaciones del del sudoeste

sudoeste de de EuropaEuropa

Ángel Palazón Sánchez

Dr. Mª Concepción Sanz Miguel

Dr. Jesús Damián García-Consuegra Bleda

(2)

The e

The e - - ASLA Framework: ASLA Framework:

Cultural Heritage Management for small Cultural Heritage Management for small

local

local autoritiesautorities in the SUDOE space.in the SUDOE space.

Ángel Palazón Sánchez

Dr. Mª Concepción Sanz Miguel

Dr. Jesús Damián García-Consuegra Bleda

(3)

The e

The e--ASLA Framework: ASLA Framework:

Cultural Heritage Management for small local

Cultural Heritage Management for small local autoritiesautorities in the SUDOE space.

in the SUDOE space.

Summary

1. E-Administration and Digital Humanities.

2. Small local administration: The digital divide 3. The e-ASLA project

4. Future possibilities of e-ASLA 5. Conclusions and future work

(4)

1. E-1. E-Administration and Digital Humanities.Administration and Digital Humanities.

What is e-Administration?

• Public Administration main objective:

ƒ Best serve the citizen, on time and spending the minimal amount of resources.

• e-Administration

ƒ “Use of Information and Communication Technology to

support the communication and information transmission in and outside the public authority” - e-Government Glossary

• Provides great benefits to administrations and citizens.

ƒ Perform tasks automatically, or computer aided.

‹ Less paper-work.

ƒ Citizens can now use Internet to interact with their administrations.

• Access general information.

‹ Access information about administrative procedures.

‹ Perform administrative procedures.

(5)

1. E-1. E-Administration and Digital Humanities.Administration and Digital Humanities.

Public Administrations and Cultural Heritage

• Public administrations are responsible for much Cultural Heritage management tasks.

ƒ “Tangible” cultural assets:

‹ Public Museums, Public libraries, Public Monuments, etc.

ƒ Digitalized resources:

‹ Electronic books, images, virtual visits to monuments and museums…

‹ Public initiatives:

• Digitalisation projects, provide electronic access to cultural contents to citizens.

• This is part of the competences of different administrations:

ƒ European Union, Countries, Regions, Local Authorities

(6)

1. E-1. E-Administration and Digital Humanities.Administration and Digital Humanities.

Cultural Heritage Management procedures

• Apply the e-Administration concepts to Cultural Heritage Management.

• Automate the management procedures.

ƒ Library management.

‹ Digital and “tangible” libraries.

ƒ Museum management.

ƒ Digitalization projects.

ƒ

ƒ (add anything you want)

(7)

1. E-1. E-Administration and Digital Humanities.Administration and Digital Humanities.

How to automate administrative procedures

• Business process

ƒ “Set of logical related tasks, performed to a achieve a defined business goal” - Davenport & Short.

• Administrative procedures = Business processes

ƒ Consequence: Apply business process management to public administration

• Business process management

ƒ Apply information technology to the business process definition, developing, execution, and results analysis.

ƒ Different technologies

‹ “Classical” information systems (Ad-hoc), ERP systems

‹ Workflow management systems

(8)

1. E-1. E-Administration and Digital Humanities.Administration and Digital Humanities.

A gentle introduction to Workflow Management

• Workflow

ƒ Computable representation of a business process

• Characterictics

ƒ Modelled by business specialist

‹ Graphical modelling

‹ Each task in a workflow is a computer program

• A process is a composition of different computer programs

‹ Easy to change without computers knowledge.

ƒ The system guides the process execution

‹ Users don’t need to know what application to use.

‹ The web portal guides them.

ƒ Eases result evaluation.

‹ Permits trazability and quantitative results measurement.

(9)

1. E-1. E-Administration and Digital Humanities.Administration and Digital Humanities.

Workflow example

• Course proposal.

• Each activity is a computer program.

ƒ Automatic activity.

ƒ Human activity.

‹ Web portal.

‹ Chain production like.

(10)

1. E-1. E-Administration and Digital Humanities.Administration and Digital Humanities.

Best-serve citizens with minimal cost.

• The administration should give information to their citizens.

ƒ Related to administration work

‹ New laws, how to perform administrative procedures

ƒ General information

‹ About the country, region, city…

‹ Cultural contents

• The citizens need to understand this information.

ƒ Multiple languages.

• And the citizens want to participate.

ƒ Solve their needs: Administrative procedures.

‹ Cultural heritage related administrative procedures.

(11)

1. E-1. E-Administration and Digital Humanities.Administration and Digital Humanities.

e-Administration for citizens

• Give digital access to the citizens.

ƒ Web portal technology.

ƒ Access to cultural contents.

• Preserve the multilingualism.

ƒ Give access in citizens language.

‹ Multi-language applications.

‹ Multi-language contents.

• Citizens can take part in Cultural Heritage management, via Internet.

ƒ As they do for other administrative procedure.

(12)

2. Small local administration: The digital divide.

2. Small local administration: The digital divide.

Small local authorities

• The focus of this research is Small Local Authorities.

ƒ < 20000 inhabitants

• They don’t have the same resources as national, regional, and big local authorities.

ƒ Low resources.

‹ Lack of financial support.

‹ Lack of personel.

‹ Lack of formation in new technologies.

ƒ All local authorities are different.

‹ Different countries, regions.

‹ Do the same things, but in different manner.

(13)

2. Small local administration: The digital divide.

2. Small local administration: The digital divide.

e-Administration projects

• E-Administration projects for small local authorities are generally not successful.

ƒ Very small local authorities cannot start projects due to the lack of resources.

‹ They are too small for asking for subventions.

ƒ Medium local authorities, can start the projects with subventions.

‹ But when the external subvention ends, the project ends.

ƒ Local authorities diversity is not respected.

‹ Projects are not customized, “one fits for all” don’t work here.

ƒ They add extra work for local authority workers.

• We need a sutainable development model.

(14)

3. The e

3. The e--ASLA project ASLA project

e-Administration for Small Local Authorities

• The e-ASLA project pretends to solve this problems.

ƒ http://www.e-asla.org/

• e-Administration for Small Local Authorities

ƒ < 20000 inhabitants

ƒ In SUDOE space: Spain, Portugal and France

ƒ Funded by the European Interreg IIIB SUDOE Program

• Partners:

ƒ Technical

‹ UCLM, UPM, INESC Porto, FEVAL

ƒ Users

‹ AEC, ADI Mancha-Jucar, AMNA, Camaras municipales etc.

‹ 20+ Local authorities reached, and more interested

(15)

3. The e

3. The e--ASLA project ASLA project Proposed solutions

• Develop a technology platform for e-Administration.

ƒ Reduce the technological complexity.

‹ Use of standard technologies, open source software and easy to use developer frameworks.

• Increase technology reutilization.

‹ Business – process oriented.

• Increase the ease of use

ƒ Process – oriented portal

‹ Guides workers and citizens.

‹ Administrative procedure – oriented vs data-oriented.

• Mantain the particularities of each local authority.

ƒ Easy to use business process modeller.

‹ Permits adapting the electronic procedures to each local administration, and by administration workers.

(16)

3. The e

3. The e--ASLA project ASLA project

Benefits

• 20 municipalities will have an internet public portal.

ƒ General information.

‹ Some cultural information.

ƒ Electronic tramitation.

• 20 municipalities will have its information digitalized.

ƒ Includes basic cultural information.

• 12 e-Administration processes will be developed:

ƒ Urban management, water management, taxes...

• Creation of an open source development framework

ƒ Permits easy development of more processes.

‹ Cultural Heritage management processes

(17)

3. The e

3. The e--ASLA project ASLA project

Multilingualism support

• Internet public portal, authority intranet and all the applications have multilingualism support.

ƒ Applications interface will be translated to:

‹ Spanish, French, Portuguese and English.

‹ More languages may be added.

• Contents may be multilingual.

ƒ Creation of multilingual contents is supported.

ƒ But contents depend on the local authorities workers.

(18)

3. The e

3. The e--ASLA project ASLA project

Diversity support

• Graphical business process modeller.

ƒ Tool for administration workers, not for programmers.

ƒ Possibilities:

‹ Adapt the processes to each local administration.

‹ Easy creation of totally new processes.

• Note: New activities need to be implemented.

• Activity bank.

ƒ Offers implemented programs.

ƒ Can be used as activities in a process.

ƒ Parametrizable activities.

• Business process bank.

ƒ Offers working business processes.

ƒ A local administration only have to do minor changes.

(19)

4. Future possibilities for e

4. Future possibilities for e--ASLA ASLA

e-ASLA framework future possibilities.

• Cultural Heritage management processes can be implemented easily.

ƒ As other administrative processes could be.

‹ And adapted to each administration.

ƒ Activities from other administrative processes can be reused.

• Process oriented – portal permits the citizens to interact in these processes.

• Increased access to digital contens.

ƒ Multilingual portals.

ƒ Contents digitalization.

(20)

5. Conclusions and future work 5. Conclusions and future work

Final Remarks

• E-Administration reduces the digital gap for small municipalities.

• Also, helps the citizens in accessing multlingual contents

• And opens possibilities for better Cultural Heritage Management, automating the related

administrative procedures

• The e-ASLA project provides the basic technological platform to achieve this.

(21)

5. Conclusions and future work 5. Conclusions and future work

Future work

• Use the e-ASLA framework to define cultural assets management processes.

ƒ Libraries, museums, monuments, digital contents management…

ƒ Digital humanists can model the processes.

• Create multilingual general contens.

ƒ Educate the authority workers on the importance of multilingualism.

• Create multilingual cultural contens.

ƒ Digital humanists needed.

(22)

Supporters Supporters

• This research is supported by:

ƒ The Education and Science Council of the Junta of Castilla-La Mancha, and the European Social Fund, at the “Ayudas para la formación y contratación de

personal investigador” programme.

• The e-ASLA project is supported by the European Community Interreg IIIB SUDOE Programme

(23)

e e - - ASLA Project Partners ASLA Project Partners

(24)

Thanks for your attention Thanks for your attention

• You can ask anything you want.

ƒ Languages supported: Spanish & English

• Contact Information

ƒ For more information related to this presentation, don’t hesitate to ask me:

ƒ Ángel Palazón Sánchez

‹ Business Process Management and Integration Technologies for e-Administration Researcher

‹ Distributed Information Systems and Software Engineering Group (SIDIS), University of Castilla-La Mancha

‹ E-mail: [email protected]

ƒ E-ASLA project

‹ http://www.e-asla.org/

Referencias

Documento similar

The objectives of this work are to identify elements and devices in the smart airport with which to bring the local cultural heritage closer to the passenger and to propose an

Having regard to the legal texts existing at international level in the field of protection and management of the natural and cultural heritage, regional and spatial planning, local

Section 2 | Course Planning and Implementation 34 A Training Guide | Disaster Risk Management of Cultural Heritage in Urban Areas 35 After Disaster Before Disaster During Disaster

i to stimulate the global reflection on culture as a universal public good, notably in view of challenges pertaining to the protection of cultural heritage and cultural diversity,

Oral Corpus of the Portugal‐Spain border Contribution to the knowledge of Cultural Intangible Heritage in this territory With respect to the linguistic heritage of the borderland,

Specialisation in cultural business activities, in small towns outside metropolitan areas, is largely but not conclusively explained by the conventional theories of local

In order to contextualize the particularities of the means that have been adopted for the management of the ADW, we use Throsby’s (2001) typology of most commonly-used

Shows the critera for value presrving within the framework of cultural heritage management & sustainable tourismresearcher, 2021 Social Economic & Urban The cultural natural