Diplomacy Dialogue
Part I:
Precursors of Business
Diplomats
Diplomacy Dialogue
« Business Diplomacy »
Business Diplomacy is not a new
contemporary phenomenon. Since ancient times, traders had twin tasks – selling
goods/services and negotiating levies, tariffs, right to conduct business,
conditions of residence etc..
In the international system business diplomacy takes prominence when globalization is accompanied by an
increase of interaction with non-traditional business partners (civil society, regional
political groupings).
Diplomacy Dialogue
Marco Polo (1271-1295)
Venetian, worked for
Qubilai Khan, Mogol rulers, Muslim Merchant
community,
Dictated his experiences to Rustichello da Pisa
“Travels of Marco Polo”,
detailed descriptions of the wealth of China, a Japan
filled with gold, and the exotic custom of Central Asia, West Asia and
Southeast Asia.
Bestseller, stimulus for travel and discovery
Zheng He (1371–1433
), mariner, explorer, diplomat and fleet admiral (Ming Dynasty).commanded expeditionary voyages to Southeast Asia, Western Asia, South Asia and East Africa from from 1405 to 1433. His larger ships stretched 120 meter's in length (Columbus's Santa Maria, was 26 meters). These
carried hundreds of sailors on four tiers of decks)
Diplomacy Dialogue
Mateo Ricci (
利瑪竇) 1552-1610
Diplomacy Dialogue
Other organisations involved in trade and Business Diplomacy
1. Swedish East Asia Company - 1907-1979
2. UK- East Asia Company -16th–19th-century 3. DK- East Asiatic Company - 1897 to 1970
4. French East-India Company – 1664-1719 5. Basler Mission – 1859- 1928
6. Mixture of Trade, Honorary Consular, Religious Missionary, Military
reconnaissance
Diplomacy Dialogue
Part II:
Theory Building-
New York- 1980-1984
Relation between diplomacy and
global business
Diplomacy Dialogue
New York 1980s
UNITAR- survey (1981) of training needs of diplomats assigned to the UN-NY, Nr. 2 need was negotiation skills (bilateral and
multilateral)
Interviews with Trade Attachés of missions to the UN in NY (1981) with focus on their scope and experience of negotiations
Realising some trade officials were previously political diplomats and businessmen on rotational basis
USA rotating door: Government, law firm, financial company, university, and back to government
Diplomacy Dialogue
Non-rotational practices of trade missions
Strict role separation and no crossing of role boundaries between government-private sector- foreign office:
West Germany- strictly prohibited until retirement
France- parachutage at the top by elite members of ruling party, former government and ENA
graduates
UK- then mostly from government/foreign service towards private sector but not reverse
Austria: separate lines in Embassies, trade officials reporting to Austrian chambers of commerce, not to MoFA (till today)
Diplomacy
Dialogue
Part III:
Initial Research (2001)
Survey of 7 USA- TNCs
Findings
Diplomacy Dialogue
Interaction with Constituencies
© Saner & Yiu, 2000
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Int Orgs
Int NGOs
Nat NGOs
Host Govt
Home Govt
Most Increase
% of respondents saw increase (Q7)
Diplomacy Dialogue
© Yiu & Saner, 2001
Monitoring Business Environment
57% of the respondents reported that companies systematically
analysed the political-social and
environmental developments in
the key regions and countries
where these companies were
active
Diplomacy Dialogue
Knowledge Areas Crucial for Business Success Worldwide
© Yiu & Saner, 2001
In order of importance
Decision-making process of host countries
Diplomatic instruments (trade agreements, treaties)
Most Very Least
Diplomacy Dialogue
Corporate Reputation
47% of the respondents reported that companies systematically
monitor their corporate reputation in the countries of operation
© Yiu & Saner, 2001
Dialogue
Survey of Four Swiss Pharma &
Food TNCs
Second Study (2005)
CSEND All rights reserved 2021
Diplomacy Dialogue
Survey Methods
Semi-structured interviews based on a non- intrusive questionnaire
Informal inquiry and discussions with staff in charge of BDM
Total of 20 Swiss MNCs were contacted
Data were gathered from 6 companies
4 of them are reported here
DialogueCOMPANY Total Annual Sales
(in billions of USD c))
Number of Employees Worldwide
Number of
Countrie s Present
Sales Revenue Originating in Europe a) (in billions of USD)
Sales Revenue Originating Outside Europe
(in billions of USD)
World’s Top 100 Non-financial
TNCs by Foreign Assets,
Sales &
Employment d)
Roche 26.5 65,000 150 9.9 16.0 6
Novartis Group
28.2 81,392 140 10.2 17.9 34
Syngenta 7.2 19,000 90 2.8 b) 4.3 N.A.
Nestlé 73.9 253,000 87 23.8 50.1 48
© Saner & Yiu, 2011
Diplomacy Dialogue
Research Challenges
“Trust” issue and personal connection
BDM function was organised
differently in different companies and BDM managers held positions in different parts of the hierarchy (Consequence: different titles)
Taking lot of time and perseverance
© Saner & Yiu, 2011
Dialogue
Dedicated Staff for BD?
Professional Backgrounds?
PR
Consultants
75%
Senior Gov’t Officials
50%
Diplomats 50%
Former Exec. 25%
Lawyers 25%
© Saner & Yiu, 2011
3 out of 4
companies said yes
Diplomacy Dialogue
Part IV:
Traditional vs new
Diplomacies
Diplomacy Dialogue
Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations,
Vienna, 18 April 1961
PRIVILEGES AND IMMUNITIES, DIPLOMATIC AND CONSULAR RELATIONS, ETC
The Convention was adopted on 14 April 1961 by the United Nations Conference on Diplomatic
Intercourse and Immunities held in Vienna, Austria.
The Conference also adopted the Optional
Protocol concerning the Acquisition of Nationality, the Optional Protocol concerning the Compulsory Settlement of Disputes, the Final Act and four
resolutions annexed to that Act.
Diplomacy Dialogue
Traditional & Modern Diplomacy
Past -- "the management of international
relations by negotiation; the method by which these relations are adjusted and managed by ambassadors and envoys." (Sir Harold
Nicolson, Diplomacy, 1939)
Former US Secretary of State George Shultz stated that "the raw material of diplomacy is information: getting it, assessing it, and
putting it into the system for the benefit and puzzlement of others.“ (Peace Works, 1997)
Diplomacy Dialogue
Post-Modern Diplomacy
Present and Future -- "the art of advancing national interests through the sustained
exchange of information among governments, nations, and other groups. Its purpose is to
change attitudes and behaviour as a way of reaching agreements and solving problems.“
(Gorden Smith, 1999)
"(Diplomacy) is defined as the mechanism of
representation, communication and negotiation through which states and other international actors conduct their business “ (Jan Melissen, 1999).
Diplomacy Dialogue
Assessment: Diplomacy
The concept of diplomacy broadened to include state and non state actors
The scoped of diplomacy broadened to
“facilitate communication between state & non-state actors & to exert influence on policy making &
implementing at local, regional and international levels.
“diplomacy is continuation of politics
by other means”
Diplomacy Dialogue
James Baker
Bloomberg, Ch. Rose show, 19th June 2012
Diplomacy should:
– Manage differences &
– Magnify commonalities!
Diplomacy Dialogue
Calling for New Diplomacy Roles in Public & Private Sector
“New Genres of
Diplomats”
Diplomacy Dialogue
Multiplicity of Diplomatic Actors
Diplomacy is the exclusive domain of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs
(Satow, 1979)
PASTPRESENT NON-
STATE ACTORS
Corporate Diplomat
Business Diplomat
National NGO diplomat
Transnational NGO Diplomat
Economic Diplomat
Commercial Diplomat
Economic Diplomats
Commercial Diplomats
T-NGO Diplomats N-NGO
Diplomats Corporate
Diplomats
Business Diplomats
Postmodern
Economic Diplomacy
Shaping socio-economic/
ecological development policies
•Negotiating global economic governance architecture
•Setting standards at multilateral organisations
•Managing multi-stakeholder coalitions & alliances
Diplomacy Dialogue
Initial Publication with wide impact
International Economic Diplomacy:
Mutations in Post-modern Times Discussion Papers in Diplomacy
Raymond Saner & Lichia Yiu Netherlands Institute of
International Relations
‘Clingendael’, 2001
https://www.clingendael.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/20030100_cli_paper_dip_issue84.
Diplomacy Dialogue
Part V
Business Diplomacy
Diplomacy Dialogue
Business Diplomacy
Managing Relationships with non-business Stakeholders
Is about
Diplomacy Dialogue
Corporate Diplomat vs
Business Diplomat
CSEND All rights reserved 2021
CD BD
Labour Union
Tribal Leader
Political Party NGOs/Media
TNC
Subsidiaries abroad
Country 1
Country 2
Country 3
Country 4
CD = between TNC HQs and TNC subsidiaries BD = between TNC and external constituencies
Diplomacy Dialogue
Hierachy of Options for an Enterprise
In order to promote an enterprise’s interest, an enterprise may use a
number of strategies:
Product quality, price, M+A, Hostile Take-over, Cartels, Out-sourcing, PR, Public Affairs, Lobbying & Business Diplomacy (non-business
partnerships/relations)
Diplomacy Dialogue
« Business Diplomacy »
R. Saner, L. Yiu (2014)
Business Diplomats are best qualified to
nurture a business culture which supports, leads, and cajoles an enterprise towards
orienting its business activities towards
an overall balance of divers objectives and respect of obligations which at times are in opposition with each other and at other times coalesce towards the achieving of a sustained business based on publicly
agreed criteria of good conduct.
Diplomacy Dialogue
Negotiation Arenas of Global Economic Governance
(Saner, Yiu, 2000)
COPYRIGHT, DD/CSEND, 2006 BG Group London
Standard and rule setting organisations and actors
International level
National level
Community level
Regulatory and enforcing bodies (governments) and formal political actors
Civil society representatives, consumer groups, non-state rule setting groups, tribal leaders
Diplomacy Dialogue
Part VI
Learning from Failed
Business Diplomacy
Diplomacy Dialogue
Learning from failures of Western food sector TNCs
Failed to understand product-
environment relation and failed to assess power of NGOs and
International Organisations
Nestlé in Developing Countries
1973-1984 International Boycott
Diplomacy Dialogue
Diplomacy Dialogue
Alternative products to natural process of breastfeeding so called “Baby Milk Formula”
were distributed in poor countries with misleading marketing of the product.
Nestlé and other food product companies insisted that it was not their responsibility if the water used for the formula was
poisonous and that mothers should have the choice to either breastfeed or use formula
but mothers had little knowledge on
proper use and the effects of the product and often water was not clean. Free samples given caused mothers’ breast milk to dry up. Babies got seriously ill and even died.
Diplomacy Dialogue
Nestlé baby milk formula/scandal /boycott/loss of reputational capital
Social rights groups began dragging the food industry's exploitative practices into the
spotlight in the early 1970s.
(Nestlé and other food companies)
The New Internationalist published an exposé on Nestlé's marketing practices in 1973, “Babies
Mean Business” which described how the
company got Third World mothers hooked on baby formula.
But it was "," a booklet published by London's War on WantThe Baby Killer Organisation in 1974, that really blew the lid off the baby formula industry.
Diplomacy Dialogue
BD Failure: Nestlé and Baby Milk Formula
1977: world-wide boycott was launched
against the Nestlé Corporation. Consumers all over the world stopped purchasing Nestlé
products.The World Health Organization drafted the International Code on the
Marketing of Breast Milk Substitutes
WHO Code States: Manufacturers and
distributors should not provide samples of products, directly or indirectly, to pregnant women, mothers or members of their families.
Diplomacy Dialogue
Nestlé under fire for marketing claims on baby milk formulas
Source: The Guardian, 1 Feb 2018
https://www.theguardian.com/business/2018/feb/01/nestle- under-fire-for-marketing-claims-on-baby-milk-formulas
Dialogue
Saved fromfbcdn-sphotos-a-a.akamaihd.net
Diplomacy Dialogue
Response by Nestlé:
Our former Chairman Peter Brabeck-Letmathe passionately believes that water is a human right. Everyone, everywhere in the world, has the right to clean, safe water for drinking and sanitation.
His critics use a video interview that Peter
gave in 2005 to claim that he thinks all water sources should be privatized. This is false.
He supports the United Nations' view on water:
‘There is enough freshwater on the planet for seven billion people, but it is distributed
unevenly and too much of it is wasted, polluted and unsustainably managed’.
https://www.nestle.com/ask-nestle/human-rights/answers/nestle-chairman- peter-brabeck-letmathe-believes-water-is-a-human-right
Diplomacy Dialogue
Financial Times
Wednesday October 5, 2005
One example with Oil Companies:
Their problems are also concerns of the UN and the international community at large, calling for cooperation not confrontation
Diplomacy Dialogue
Footprints
1990: MOSOP (Movement for the Survival of Ogoni People) is founded and the Ogoni Bill of Rights is declared, leading to several peaceful protests under the leadership of Ken Saro-Wiwa
January 4, 1993: First organized Ogoni Day by MOSOP against Shell's presence in Ogoniland.
January 1993: Shell requests military support to build a pipeline through Ogoni. Response were wide-spread
public protest by the Ogoni people.
May 1994: Saro-Wiwa and several other Ogoni leaders are arrested, framed and accused for the murder of 4 Ogoni chiefs, sentenced to death and killed.
Since then, broad upheavals, violence, repression,
kidnapping, killing also of Shell personnel, destruction
Diplomacy Dialogue
Resistance
Diplomacy Dialogue
Shell in Nigeria
(Saner, Yiu & Sondergaard, 2000, „Business Diplomacy Management“
Accepting exploitation conditions set by military
ruler (joint venture with “National Energy Company”
source of corruption, mismanagement)
Perceived as “treasurer” of military rulers providing finances for arms purchases used to repress ethnic minorities (Ogoni tribe)
“business as usual”= lost time to create perceptual distance between Shell and dictator = target for
insurgents
Underestimating international NGO’s power,
catastrophic loss of reputational capital despite
effort to “repair” perceived past mistakes (building schools, hospitals, clean up polluted rivers etc)
Diplomacy Dialogue
Clean Up (2018)
Diplomacy Dialogue
Court Decision against Shell Al Jazeera, 29 January 2021
https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2021/1/29/dutch-court-orders-shell-to-pay-nigerian- farmers-over-oil-spills
A Dutch court has ordered the
Nigerian subsidiary of Shell to pay compensation over oil spills in
Nigeria’s Niger Delta, a ruling which could pave the way for
more cases against multinational
oil firms.
Diplomacy Dialogue
Learning from failures by Western energy sector MNCs present in
DCs
Failed to understand perception by locals of being seen as ally of authoritarian régime
Failed to see power of NGOs and international media
Shell in Nigeria
1990-2021
Diplomacy Dialogue
Part VII
Business Diplomacy
carrots & sticks
Diplomacy Dialogue
Definition of BD (2)
International business diplomacy is the representation and
communication activities deployed by international businesses with
host government representatives and non-governmental
representatives in order to establish
and sustain a positive relationship to
maintain legitimacy and a ‘license to
operate’. (Ruël 2014)
Diplomacy Dialogue
Going beyond good intentions
Laudable attempts to hold companies accountable
A) United Nations Guiding Principles (Bus+HRs) B) Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR)
C) OECD Responsible Business Conduct (RBC)
D) Global Compact- sustainable principles (UNGC) E) Economic, Social, Governance Investment (ESG)
So far- all non-binding, voluntary, non-reliable- blue
washing, green washing, SDG washing etc (see dismissal of CEO of Danon company by old style activist
shareholders- Friedman principle)
But sticks grow stronger- companies not complying with OECD RBC end up loosing at court see Shell and Bank
ING in the Netherlands; Germany and France are passing laws on RBC, time to end “business as usual” and non- complying companies loose export subsidies (Canada)
Outcomes achieved by NCPs (2011-2019)
Note: The results of the two graphs are cumulative. A case may be reflected in both graphs if it qualifies for both.
Source: OECD Database of Specific Instances.
Diplomacy Dialogue
5th May 2021: District court ruled in The Hague.
Shell has to reduce its CO2 emissions by 45 percent net by 2030 compared to 2019, the Action brought by environmentalists. The court was clear: the British-Dutch group
“must do its part in the fight against dangerous climate change”. And the
obligation applies not only to their own companies, but also to suppliers and end users.
From nice to have/towards must do
Diplomacy Dialogue
ING bank violation of OECD Guidelines on climate change
19th April 2019; Five NGOs - Oxfam novib, Greenpeace Netherlands, Banktrack and Friends of the earth NL filed a complaint against ING bank for failing to sufficiently commit and contribute to the targets set in the international climate agreement
concluded in Paris in 2015.
ING agreed to reduce its thermal coal
exposure to close to zero by 2025 and refrain
from financing new coal-fired power plants;
Diplomacy Dialogue
Royal Road for companies’ future
Seek SDG opportunities
Go for co-creation and
partnerships with non-business partners
Re-think production process,
following example of Caux Japan
Diplomacy Dialogue
Main SDG Goals to Which Businesses Contribute
https://www.shimadzu.com/sites/shimadzu.com/files/sustainability/common_value/image_04_p c.jpg
Diplomacy Dialogue
Sector Specific Analysis by Value Chain
(Source: Caux Round Table, 2016, human rights due diligence workshop)
http://crt-japan.jp/files2016/SHE/2016%20%20human%20rights%20due%20diligence%20workshop%20in%20Japan%20EN.pdf
Example: Food
Diplomacy Dialogue
Business Diplomacy Management: A Core Competency for Global Companies Raymond Saner, Lichia Yiu, Mikael Sondergaard Academy of Management Executive, Feb. 2000, vol. 14(1):80-92
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/271527585_Busine ss_Diplomacy_Management_A_Core_Competency_for_Glo bal_Companies
Business Diplomacy in Implementing the Global 2030 Development Agenda: Core Competencies Needed at the Corporate and Managerial Level. Yiu, Lichia and Saner, Raymond, 2017
(https://www.academia.edu/36337768/Business_Diplomacy_i n_Implementing_the_Global_2030_Development_Agenda_C ore_Competencies_Needed_at_the_Corporate_and_Manageri al_Level
International Business Diplomacy: How can
multinational corporations deal with global challenges?
Roel, Huub, Advanced Series in Management, Volume 18, by Emerald Publishing Limited, 2017