Journal of Applied Research and Technology
www.jart.icat.unam.mx
Journal of Applied Research and Technology 17 (2019) 250-257
Behrouz Afshar-Nadjafi a *, Hamed Pourbakhshb, Mohammad Mirhabibib, Hasan Khodaeib, Babak Ghodamib, Fahimeh Sadighib, Soheil Azizib
𝑐′
𝜋 𝜋̂
𝑡1= 𝑏
𝑈−𝐷
𝑡2=𝑦 (1−
𝐷 𝑈 )−𝑏
𝑈−𝐷
𝑡3=𝑦 (1−
𝐷 𝑈 – 𝑝)−𝑏
𝐷
𝑡4= 𝑏
𝐷
𝐼𝑚𝑎𝑥= 𝑦 (1 − 𝐷
𝑈 ) – 𝑏
𝑇𝑃(𝑦, 𝑏) = 𝑠𝑦(1 − 𝑝) + 𝑣𝑦𝑝 − 𝑐𝑦 − 𝐾 − 𝑑𝑦 − 𝜋𝑏 − 𝜋̂𝑏2
2𝐷(1−𝐷
𝑈)−ℎ(𝑦(1−
𝐷 𝑈)−𝑏)2
2(𝑈−𝐷) −ℎ(𝑦(1−
𝐷
𝑈)−𝑏−𝑝𝑦)2
2𝐷
𝐸(𝑇) =(1−𝐸(𝑝))𝑦
𝐷
𝐸𝑇𝑃𝑈(𝑦, 𝑏) = [𝑠𝐷(1 − 𝐸(𝑝)) + 𝑣𝐷𝐸(𝑝) − 𝑐𝐷 −𝐾𝐷
𝑦 − 𝑑𝐷 − 𝜋𝐷𝑏
𝑦 − 𝜋̂𝑏2
2𝑦(1−𝐷
𝑈)−ℎ𝐷(𝑦(1−
𝐷 𝑈)−𝑏)2 2𝑦(𝑈−𝐷) − ℎ(𝑦(1−
𝐷
𝑈)−𝑏−𝐸(𝑝)𝑦)2
2𝑦 ] /(1 − 𝐸(𝑝))
𝜕𝐸𝑇𝑃𝑈(𝑦,𝑏)
𝜕𝑏
𝑏∗=[−𝜋𝐷+ℎ𝑦
∗(1−𝐸(𝑝))](1−𝐷𝑈)
𝜋̂+ℎ
𝜕𝐸𝑇𝑃𝑈(𝑦,𝑏)
𝜕𝑦 = 0
𝑦∗= √
2𝐷𝐾(𝜋̂+ℎ) (1−𝐷
𝑈)
−𝜋2𝐷2
2ℎ(𝜋̂+ℎ)((𝐸(𝑝)+0.5)+𝐸2(𝑝) 2(1−𝐷 𝑈)
)−ℎ2(1−𝐸(𝑝))2
𝜕2𝐸𝑇𝑃𝑈(𝑦,𝑏)
𝜕𝑏2 = −(𝜋̂+ℎ)
𝑦(1−𝐷𝑈)(1−𝐸(𝑝))
𝜕2𝐸𝑇𝑃𝑈(𝑦,𝑏)
𝜕𝑏𝜕𝑦 =𝜕2𝐸𝑇𝑃𝑈(𝑦,𝑏)
𝜕𝑦𝜕𝑏 = 1
𝑦2(1−𝐸(𝑝))[𝜋𝐷 +(𝜋̂+ℎ)𝑏
(1−𝐷 𝑈)]
𝜕2𝐸𝑇𝑃𝑈(𝑦,𝑏)
𝜕𝑦2 = −1
𝑦3(1−𝐸(𝑝))[2𝐷(𝐾 + 𝜋𝑏) +(𝜋̂+ℎ)𝑏2
(1−𝐷
𝑈) ]
1
2𝛼1=𝜕2𝐸𝑇𝑃𝑈(𝑦,𝑏)
𝜕𝑏2 ≤ 0 ; ∀ 𝑏 , 𝑦
𝛼2 = 𝑑𝑒𝑡∇2𝐸𝑇𝑃𝑈
(
𝑦, 𝑏)
= 𝑑𝑒𝑡[
𝜕2𝐸𝑇𝑃𝑈(𝑦,𝑏)
𝜕𝑏2
𝜕2𝐸𝑇𝑃𝑈(𝑦,𝑏)
𝜕𝑏𝜕𝑦
𝜕2𝐸𝑇𝑃𝑈(𝑦,𝑏)
𝜕𝑦𝜕𝑏
𝜕2𝐸𝑇𝑃𝑈(𝑦,𝑏)
𝜕𝑦2
]
=(𝜋̂+ℎ) 𝑦4(1−𝐷
𝑈)(1−𝐸(𝑝))2
[
2𝐷𝐾 −𝜋2𝐷2(1−𝐷 𝑈)
𝜋̂+ℎ
]
; 𝑓𝑟𝑒𝑒 𝑖𝑛 𝑠𝑖𝑔𝑛
1
2 𝐸𝑇𝑃𝑈(𝑦, 𝑏)𝐸𝑇𝑃𝑈(𝑦, 𝑏)
𝜕𝐸𝑇𝑃𝑈(𝑦,𝑏)
𝜕𝑏 = 0 𝜕𝐸𝑇𝑃𝑈(𝑦,𝑏)
𝜕𝑦 = 0
𝑏∗ 𝑦∗
𝜋2𝐷2≤ min {2𝐷𝐾(𝜋̂+ℎ)
(1−𝐷
𝑈) , 2𝐷𝐾ℎ(1−𝐸(𝑝))2 (2𝐸(𝑝)+1)(1−𝐷𝑈)+𝐸2(𝑝)}
𝐸𝑇𝑃𝑈(𝑦, 𝑏) 𝑏∗ 𝑦∗
𝜋2𝐷2≤2𝐷𝐾(𝜋̂+ℎ)
(1−𝐷
𝑈) 𝛼2≥
0 𝐸𝑇𝑃𝑈(𝑦, 𝑏)
𝑏∗≥ 0 𝜋2𝐷2≤ 2𝐷𝐾ℎ(1−𝐸(𝑝))2
(2𝐸(𝑝)+1)(1−𝐷 𝑈)+𝐸2(𝑝)
𝑏∗ 𝜋2𝐷2> 2𝐷𝐾ℎ(1−𝐸(𝑝))2
(2𝐸(𝑝)+1)(1−𝐷𝑈)+𝐸2(𝑝) 𝑏∗< 0 (𝑦∗, 𝑏∗) 𝐸𝑇𝑃𝑈(𝑦, 𝑏) 𝑦 > 0
𝑏 ≥ 0 𝐸𝑇𝑃𝑈(𝑦, 𝑏) 𝑦 > 0
𝑏 ≥ 0 𝑏∗= 0
𝜋 = 0
𝐸𝑇𝑃𝑈(𝑦, 𝑏) 𝑏∗
𝑏∗ 𝑦∗
𝑏∗=ℎ𝑦
∗(1−𝐸(𝑝))(1−𝐷𝑈) 𝜋
̂+ℎ 𝑦∗= √2ℎ(𝜋̂+ℎ)((𝐸(𝑝)+0.5)(1−2𝐷𝐾(𝜋𝐷𝑈)+0.5𝐸̂+ℎ)2(𝑝))−ℎ2(1−𝐸(𝑝))2(1−𝐷𝑈)
𝜋 = 0 𝐸(𝑝) = 0 𝑏∗ 𝑦∗
𝑏∗= √2𝐷𝐾ℎ(1−
𝐷 𝑈) 𝜋
̂(𝜋̂+ℎ)
𝑦∗= √ℎ(1−2𝐷𝐾𝐷
𝑈)√𝜋̂+ℎ
𝜋̂ (𝑐′)
𝑐′> 𝑐 (𝑝 = 0)
𝑇𝑃𝑈(𝑦, 𝑏) = (𝑠 − 𝑐′)𝐷 −𝐷
𝑦(𝐾 + 𝜋𝑏) − 𝜋̂𝑏
2+ℎ(𝑦(1−𝐷𝑈)−𝑏)2 2𝑦(1−𝐷
𝑈)
𝑇𝑃𝑈(𝑦, 𝑏)
𝑏∗∗=[ℎ𝑦
∗−𝜋𝐷](1−𝐷 𝑈) 𝜋̂+ℎ
𝑦∗∗= √ℎ(1−2𝐷𝐾𝐷 𝑈)
(𝜋̂+ℎ) 𝜋
̂ −𝜋2𝐷2
ℎ𝜋̂
𝑝%
𝑐′
𝑇𝑃𝑈(𝑦∗∗, 𝑏∗∗, 𝑐′) − 𝐸𝑇𝑃𝑈(𝑦∗, 𝑏∗) = (𝑠 − 𝑐′)𝐷 − 𝐷
𝑦∗∗(𝐾 + 𝜋𝑏∗∗) −𝜋̂𝑏
∗∗2+ℎ(𝑦∗∗(1−𝐷𝑈)−𝑏∗∗)2
2𝑦∗∗(1−𝐷𝑈) − 𝐸𝑇𝑃𝑈(𝑦∗, 𝑏∗)
𝑇𝑃𝑈(𝑦∗∗, 𝑏∗∗, 𝑐′) − 𝐸𝑇𝑃𝑈(𝑦∗, 𝑏∗) ≥ 0
𝑐′≤ 𝑠 − 1
𝑦∗∗(𝐾 + 𝜋𝑏∗∗) −𝜋̂𝑏∗∗2+ ℎ(𝑦∗∗(1 −𝐷𝑈) − 𝑏∗∗)2 2𝐷𝑦∗∗(1 −𝐷
𝑈)
− 𝐸𝑇𝑃𝑈(𝑦∗,𝑏∗)
𝐷
𝑝%
𝑈 =
12,000 𝐷 = 10,000 𝐾 = 450
𝜋̂ = 0.5 𝜋 = 1.2 ℎ =
75 𝑑 = 5 𝑠 = 220 𝑣 = 30
𝑐′= 125 𝑐 = 100 𝐸(𝑝) = 6%
𝑦∗= 1691.17 𝑏∗= 236.71 𝐸𝑇𝑃𝑈(𝑦∗, 𝑏∗) = 1,010,030.28
𝑦∗= 10241.09 𝑏∗∗= 1669.06 𝑇𝑃𝑈(𝑦∗∗, 𝑏∗∗) = 947,165.47 𝑀𝑐 = 110
15%
𝑏∗ 𝑦∗
𝑀𝑐 = 110
𝑀𝑐 = 110
𝐸(𝑝)
𝑬(𝒑)
𝐸(𝑝)
𝐸(𝑝) 𝑀𝑐
𝐸(𝑝)
𝐸(𝑝)
𝑏∗ 𝐸(𝑝) = 0
0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000
0 0.1 0.2 0.3
y* b*
𝐸(𝑝)
𝐸(𝑝) 𝐸(𝑝)
(𝑝) > 20%
𝐶′
𝐶′ 𝑀𝑐 = 110
800,000 850,000 900,000 950,000 1,000,000 1,050,000 1,100,000 1,150,000 1,200,000
0 0.1 0.2 0.3
ETPU TPU
𝑴𝒄 𝑬(𝒑).
𝑬(𝒑).
500,000 700,000 900,000 1,100,000 1,300,000
80 100 120 140 160
ETPU TPU
Omar, M., Zubir, M.B., & Moin, N.H. (2010). An alternative approach to analyze economic ordering quantity and economic production quantity inventory problems using the completing the square method. Computers and Industrial. Engineering, 59(2), 362-364.
Pentico, D.W., Drake, M.J., & Toews, C. (2009). The deterministic EPQ with partial backordering: a new approach. Omega, 37(3), 624-636.
𝑪′.