• No se han encontrado resultados

Majoron Dark Matter and Constraints on the Majoron-Neutrino Coupling

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2024

Share "Majoron Dark Matter and Constraints on the Majoron-Neutrino Coupling"

Copied!
11
0
0

Texto completo

(1)

TIII / Physics

Majoron Dark Matter and Constraints on the Majoron-Neutrino Coupling

Tim Brune The quest for new physics

December 2018

Tim Brune, December 2018

(2)

Singlet Majoron Model

PhysicsTIII /

Motivation

What it is the origin of (small) neutrino masses?

What is dark matter?

The Majoron Model

Chikashige, Mohapatra, and Peccei D.1981

Majoron: Goldstone boson from spontaneous breaking of globalU(1)B−L

Small left-handed neutrino masses via Seesaw mechanism Majoron mass→ dark matter?

Constraints formJ =0:Kachelriess, Tomas, and Valle.2000,Tomas, P ¨as, and Valle.2001 Constraints on non-standard Majoron models:Cepedello et al.2018

Constraints on Majoron-Neutrino couplings from SN data and 0νββJ for m

J

6= 0?

Brune and P ¨as.2018. eprint:1808.08158

(3)

Singlet Majoron Model

PhysicsTIII /

Symmetry Breaking

Add three right-handed neutrinosNRand a singlet complex scalarσ ,L(σ) =−2, to SM:

L=−LyN¯ RH−1 2

RcλNRσ+h.c.

SSB at Seesaw-scalef:σ= 1

2(f0+iJ) L ⊃ −LyN¯ RH− 1

2√ 2

RcλNR f

| {z }

mass term:MR=λf 2

− i 2√

2

RcλNR J

| {z }

interaction

+h.c.

SSB at electroweak scalev L ⊃ − ν¯LyNRv

| {z }

mass term:mD=yv 2

− 1 2√ 2

RcλNRf

| {z }

mass term:MR=λf 2

− i 2√

2 N¯RcλNRJ

| {z }

interaction

+h.c.

Pilaftsis.1994

Tim Brune, December 2018 2/10

(4)

Singlet Majoron Model

PhysicsTIII /

Seesaw Mechanism

Majorana massMR= λf

2, Dirac massmD= yv

√ 2 Neutrino masses in the Seesaw limitMRmD

mheavy≈MR mlight≈ −mDmDT MR MR Couplings of the Majoron to light neutrinos

LlightJ =

3

X

i

giiν¯iγ5νiJ

Minkowski.1977

(5)

Dark Matter

PhysicsTIII /

Majoron Dark Matter via Freeze-In

ExplicitU(1)B−Lbreaking term→m2Jhv2

LHhσ2HH+h.c. ⊃

|{z}

SSB

−1 2m2JJ2

1+h

v

Majoron relic density

Jh2≈21.09×1027 gs

pgρ

mJΓ(h→JJ) m2h . Majoron DM:mJ≈2.8 MeV

Forf ≈109GeV:τJ > τuniverse→stable

Hall et al.2010

Frigerio, Hambye, and Masso.2011

Tim Brune, December 2018 4/10

(6)

Constraints

PhysicsTIII /

Supernova Constraints

In the SN core: neutrinos acquire effective masses due to interactions with the background medium⇒νν→Jis allowed

Deleptonization Constraints

Successful SN explosion requires YL=Ye+Yνe ≥0.375

νeνe,α→JlowerYL,α=µ, τ Bruenn.1985

Constraints on g(m

J

)

Luminosity Constraints

Model predictions are compatible with neutrino signal from SN1987A Neutrinos carry away most of the binding energyEB≈3·1053erg s Majoron carries away binding energy via νν→J

Agreement with signal: Majoron luminosityLJ <Ltotν

Similar aprroach:Heurtier and Zhang.2017 Data:Kamiokande-II.1987,IMB.1987, Baksan.1987

(7)

Constraints

PhysicsTIII /

Supernova Constraints

1 10 100 1000

10-13 10-11 10-9 10-7 10-5

mJ

MeV

È g

ΑΒ

È

ÈgΑΑÈLuminosity

ÈgeeÈDeleptonization ÈgΑeÈLuminosity ÈgeeÈLuminosity DM

α=µ, τ

Brune and P ¨as.2018, see alsoHeurtier and Zhang.2017

Data:Kamiokande-II.1987,IMB.1987,Baksan.1987,Bruenn.1985

Tim Brune, December 2018 6/10

(8)

Constraints

PhysicsTIII /

0νββJ Constraints

ΓJ=GJ(Q,Z,mJ)|gee(mJ)|2|MJ|2

dL uL

e J e

dL uL

W

ν

W

dL uL

e J e

dL uL

W

ν

W

Georgi, Glashow, and Nussinov.1981 Constraints:

Reduced signal-to-background ratio Decreasing phase space:

GJ(mJ)→0 asmJ→Q see alsoBlum, Nir, and Shavit.2018

0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0

T MeV

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 1.2

a.u.

0ΝΒΒJ, mJ=0 0ΝΒΒJ, mJ=me 0ΝΒΒJ, mJ=2me 0ΝΒΒJ, mJ=3me 0ΝΒΒJ, mJ=4me 2ΝΒΒ

1 2 3 4

mJ MeV

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0

GHmJL GH0L

48Ca 136Xe 100Mo 150Nd

NEMO-3.48Ca. 2016,EXO-200.136Xe. 2014,NEMO-3.100Mo. 2014, NEMO-3.150Nd. 2016

(9)

Constraints

PhysicsTIII /

0νββJ Constraints

0.2 0.5 1.0 2.0

mJ

10-6 MeV

10-5 10-4 0.001 0.01 0.1

È g

ee

È

DM

48Ca

136Xe

100Mo

150Nd

DM

Brune and P ¨as.2018, see alsoBlum, Nir, and Shavit.2018

Data:NEMO-3.48Ca. 2016,EXO-200.136Xe. 2014,NEMO-3.100Mo. 2014,NEMO-3.150Nd. 2016

Tim Brune, December 2018 8/10

(10)

Constraints

PhysicsTIII /

Combined Constraints

0.2 0.5 1.0 2.0 5.0

mJ 10-13 MeV

10-10 10-7 10-4 0.1

È g

ee

È

48Ca ÈgeeÈLuminosity DM

Brune and P ¨as.2018

(11)

Conclusion

PhysicsTIII /

Conclusion and Outlook

The Majoron can explain the origin of neutrino masses on the basis of spontaneous symmetry breaking of a global U(1)

B−L

If massive, the Majoron is a dark matter candidate

For m

J

≈ 0.1 MeV − 1 GeV, a large range of couplings is excluded from SN data

Neutrinoless double beta decay excludes couplings g

ee

≥ 10

−4

for m

J

≈ 1 MeV

Properly include background in 0νββJ limits for m

J

> 0

Future 0νββJ experiments and observations of SN can exclude larger regions

Tim Brune, December 2018 10/10

Referencias

Documento similar

The green points show the spectrum for 1.5 TeV DM distributed according to the isothermal profile, annihilating to bb̄, with a cross section chosen such that the number of signal

4: The expected cluster redshift distribution of the MGCDM (solid curve) and ΛCDM (dashed curve) models for the case of two future cluster surveys (upper panels), and the

A convenient and effective way of breaking translational symmetry of the the dual quantum field theory is provided by Massive Gravity MG theories, which constitues a tractable and

Conclusion The PINGU detector will continue the successful trend of neutrino physics started with IceCube by lower- ing the detection threshold for neutrinos and potentially providing

WIMPs and Dark Radiation Nothing forbids that WIMPs can have interactions within the Dark Sector Both sectors are in thermal equilibrium only if WIMPs do SM particles WIMP very

WIMP Dark Matter Indirect Detection ● Neutrinos are detected through Cherenkov light emitted by the products relativistic charged particles of the neutrino interaction ● Neutrinos

Searches towards the Sun I Differential neutrino flux is related with the annihilation rate dΦ dEν = Γ 4πd2 dNν dEν I In equilibrium between capture and annihilation Γ =C/2 with C

Conclusion Flavor Blind Flavor Symmetry • muon g − 2 muon g − 2 • Higgs mass problematic for tanβ & 17 No tension with the Higgs boson mass • Stau and/or chargino NLSP Stau, smuon,