From B anomalies to flavored searches at the LHC
J. Martin Camalich
June 13th 2019
The SM quark Flavor Puzzle
CKM and mass matrices: Parametrizations of flavor phenomena in the SM Strong hierarchies in masses and mixings (PDG)
m
up= 0.0022(5) GeV m
top= 173.0(4) GeV
Specific values of light quarks seem “tuned” (Anthropic arguments!) Origin of CP-violation
Why does Nature need three generations at all?
Where is “flavor” coming from?
Precision physics programme in (quark) Flavour Physics
Quark mixing in precision regime since decades ago!
I
High-Luminosity LHC: Expected 10
15b ¯ b pairs !!
HL-LHC Yellow Book A. Cerriet al., arXiv: 1812.07638ca. 200 pages PDG
I
3 mixing angles and 1 CPV phase
I
6 quark masses
CKM: Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa paradigm
V
CKM'
1−λ2/2 λ Aλ3(ρ−iη)
−λ 1−λ2/2 Aλ2
Aλ3(1−ρ−iη) −Aλ2 1
λ = 0.2253(7), A = 0.808(22),
¯
ρ = 0.132(22), η ¯ = 0.341(13)
Jure Zupan, arXiv: 1903.05062
J. Martin Camalich (IAC) FromBanomalies to flavored searches at the LHC June 13th 2019 3 / 18
Precision physics programme in (quark) Flavour Physics
Quark mixing in precision regime since decades ago!
I
High-Luminosity LHC: Expected 10
15b ¯ b pairs !!
HL-LHC Yellow Book A. Cerriet al., arXiv: 1812.07638ca. 200 pages PDG
I
3 mixing angles and 1 CPV phase
I
6 quark masses
CKM: Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa paradigm
The Flavor Changing Neutral Currents (FCNC)
Theorem: FCNC are “Loop-Suppressed” in the SM!
I
Prototypical example: FCNCs
M
SM∼
Weak
z}|{ G
F Loopz }| { y
t216π
2Flavor
z }| { (V
ts∗V
tb)
2| {z }
GIM
I
Flavour observables probe (indirectly) very high energy scales!
M. Neubert at EPS 2011
J. Martin Camalich (IAC) FromBanomalies to flavored searches at the LHC June 13th 2019 4 / 18
Effective field theories and bottom-up approach to new physics
Legacy of Flavor Physics Program
I
High precision measurements of SM mixing parameters
I
Discover New Physics OR set the lower bounds on Λ
FlavorFlavor physics was instrumental in discovering and shaping the SM
I
Nuclear β-decays: Discovery weak interactions and neutrino
I
Rare Kaon-decays: Discovery of the charm quark
I
Kaon decays: Discovery of CP violation = ⇒ Discovery of 3 generations
Expect the unexpected ...
Thanks to Zoltan Ligeti for sharing this
J. Martin Camalich (IAC) FromBanomalies to flavored searches at the LHC June 13th 2019 6 / 18
The Flavor Anomalies
Gauge interactions are generation independent!
Hints for Lepton Flavor Universality Violation (LFUV)?
“The flavour of new physics”, JMC & J. Zupan, CERN courier, May/June 2019
Anomalies I: Status of LFUV in b → s` + ` −
Leptons do not feel the strong force!
R
K(∗)=
B( ¯B→K(∗)µ+µ−)B( ¯B→K(∗)e+e−) SM
' 1
Deficits on R
K(∗)measured by LHCb
Signal of µ-to-e LFUV at (combined) 4σ!
J. Martin Camalich (IAC) FromBanomalies to flavored searches at the LHC June 13th 2019 8 / 18
Anomalies I: Status of LFUV in b → s` + ` −
Leptons do not feel the strong force!
R
K(∗)=
B( ¯B→K(∗)µ+µ−)B( ¯B→K(∗)e+e−) SM
' 1
Deficits on R
K(∗)measured by LHCb
I
LHCb: poor efficiency in electrons!
I
Measure double ratios: Robust and validation
Other “anomalies” in ∼ 100 observables of the b → sµ
+µ
−(S. Jäger talk)
Current-current interpretation!
L
eff⊃
C9(10)Λ2New−Physics
(¯ sγ
µP
Lb)(¯ µγ
µ(γ
5)µ) Λ
New−Physics∼ 30 TeV!!!
UV completions: Z
0’s and leptoquarks
Extra bounds from low energy e.g. Z
0I
B
s- B ¯
smixing
Z′
b s
¯
s ¯b
I
Requires small Z
0bs coupling! (e.g MFV)
I
Neutrino trident production
I
Controls Z
0µµ coupling!
J. Martin Camalich (IAC) FromBanomalies to flavored searches at the LHC June 13th 2019 9 / 18
Other “anomalies” in ∼ 100 observables of the b → sµ
+µ
−(S. Jäger talk)
Current-current interpretation!
L
eff⊃
C9(10)Λ2New−Physics
(¯ sγ
µP
Lb)(¯ µγ
µ(γ
5)µ) Λ
New−Physics∼ 30 TeV!!!
I
“Colored” gauged L
µ− Lτ
Altmannshoferet al.PRD89(2014)095033
Other “anomalies” in ∼ 100 observables of the b → sµ
+µ
−(S. Jäger talk)
Current-current interpretation!
L
eff⊃
Λ2C9(10) New−Physics(¯ sγ
µP
Lb)(¯ µγ
µ(γ
5)µ) Λ
New−Physics∼ 30 TeV!!!
I
“Agnostic” simplified Z
0models: pp → µ
−µ
+X LHC and beyond...
Allanachet al.JHEP1903(2019)137
Could be far from production @ LHC (or FCC!!)
J. Martin Camalich (IAC) FromBanomalies to flavored searches at the LHC June 13th 2019 9 / 18
Anomalies II: Status of LFUV in b → cτ ν decays
R
D(∗)=
B( ¯B→D(∗)τ−ν)¯B( ¯B→D(∗)`−ν)¯
where ` = e, µ
Babar, Belle and LHCb are independently in tension with SM!
G. Caria @ Moriond EW 2019 (arXiv:1904.0879)
I
NEW: Belle with semi-leptonic tag
F
Consistent at ∼ 1σ with SM!!
I
World average now at ∼ 3σ from SM. . . S. Jäger talk
Why studying the R D
(∗)anomalies?
Λ
New−Physics∼ 3 TeV
If true, find the “ultimate” collider search
EFT of new-physics in b → cτ ν
Low-Energy EFT Lagrangian
Leff⊃−GF Vcb√
2 [(1+`L)`γ¯µ(1−γ5)ν`·¯cγµ(1−γ5)b+`R`γ¯µ(1−γ5)ν`¯cγµ(1+γ5)b +`
SL`(1−γ¯ 5)ν`·¯c(1−γ5)b+`
SR`(1−γ¯ 5)ν`·¯c(1+γ5)b+`T`σ¯µν(1−γ5)ν`·¯cσµν(1−γ5)b]+h.c.
,
I
The SM + 5 New-Physics operators
Matching to high-energy Lagrangian – SMEFT
I
Symmetry relations for
Γ FIn charged-currents
`R:
O
Hud= i Λ
2NPH ˜
†D
µH
u ¯
Rγ
µd
RRHC is lepton universal:
`R≡
R+ O(
v4Λ4 NP
) ⇒ Cannot explain LFUV in R
D(∗)!
J. Martin Camalich (IAC) FromBanomalies to flavored searches at the LHC June 13th 2019 11 / 18
EFT of new-physics in b → cτ ν
Low-Energy EFT Lagrangian
Leff⊃−GF Vcb√
2 [(1+`L)`γ¯µ(1−γ5)ν`·¯cγµ(1−γ5)b+`R`γ¯µ(1−γ5)ν`¯cγµ(1+γ5)b +`
SL`(1−γ¯ 5)ν`·¯c(1−γ5)b+`
SR`(1−γ¯ 5)ν`·¯c(1+γ5)b+`T`σ¯µν(1−γ5)ν`·¯cσµν(1−γ5)b]+h.c.
,
I
The SM + 5 New-Physics operators
Introducing light right-handed neutrinos N
R(See e.g.Robinson, Shakya & Zupan, JHEP 1902 (2019) 11) I5 extra New-Physics operators
I
They do not interfere with the SM!
Leff⊃−GF Vcb√
2 ˜`R `γ¯µNR¯cγµ(1+γ5)b
Consider 5 operators to explain R
D(∗):
τL, ˜
Rτ,
τSL,
τSR,
τTTrajectories of EFT scenarios: pre- and post-Moriond ’19
Tensor Vector
Scalar- Tensor
SM
Best scenario also enters through NEW current-current interactions
Rui-xiang Shi, Li-sheng Geng, B. Grinstein, S. Jäger & JMC, 1905.08498
J. Martin Camalich (IAC) FromBanomalies to flavored searches at the LHC June 13th 2019 12 / 18
Crossing-symmetry connection to the mono-tau signature at the LHC
Greljo, JMC & Ruiz-Álvarez, PRL122, 131803
I
The proton is flavored. . .
ICross-section at s m
2Wσ
NPσ
SM∼ P
i
L
ib⊗ |V
ib|
2vs4α
Γ|
τΓ|
2L
ud⊗ |V
ud|
2vs4 M2 W s 2I
NP suppressed by CKM and PDF’s
I
NP enhanced by s
2/M
W4I
NP sensitivity is quadratic
Search excess in tails of pp → τ + MET!
Crossing-symmetry connection to the mono-tau signature at the LHC
Greljo, JMC & Ruiz-Álvarez, PRL122, 131803
I
The proton is flavored. . .
I
Allows one to do LHC precision physics!
J. Martin Camalich (IAC) FromBanomalies to flavored searches at the LHC June 13th 2019 13 / 18
LHC data and simulations of pp → τ h X + MET
W
0searches available from run 2 (13 TeV)
I
ATLAS: 36.1 fb
−1PRL120, 161802, arXiv:1801.06992 [hep-ex]I
CMS: 35.9 fb
−1PLB792, 107, arXiv:1807.11421 [hep-ex]I
Signal vs. SM background
1000 1500 2000 2500 3000
) [GeV]
miss ,pT τ T( m
−2 10
−1 10 1 10 102
Events ATLAS W+jets estimation
W+jets EFT Tensor coupling W', m=2 TeV, 22% width
“No-loose theorem” for the discovery of NP at the LHC LHC is sensitive to NP scenarios addressing anomalies!
Greljo, JMC & Ruiz-Álvarez, PRL122, 131803
Simplified mediators for the R D
(∗)anomaly
1
Uncolored mediators
¯ c, ¯ b
W
′, H
b, c ¯ ν, τ
+τ
−, ν
I
Jacobian bump search
2
Colored mediators
¯ c, ¯ b
LQ b, c
¯ ν, τ
+τ
−, ν
I
Excess in tails
Mediator SU(3) SU(2) U(1) Current Scalar Tensor
W
µ01 3, 1 0, +1 X X X
H 1 2 +1/2 X X X
S
13 1 -1/3 X X X
R
23 2 +7/6 X X X
U
1µ3 1 +2/3 X X X
Charged Higsses challenged by B
clifetime!
Alonso, Grinstein & JMC,PRL118, 081802A total of 8 different solutions!
J. Martin Camalich (IAC) FromBanomalies to flavored searches at the LHC June 13th 2019 15 / 18
LHC constraints on W 0 and leptoquark solutions
1
W
L0in SU(2)-triplet ruled out by B
smixing and pp → τ
+τ
−Faroughy, Greljo & Kamenik ’16 2W
R0ruled out except if broad (Γ
W0& 0.5M
W0)!
Greljo, JMC & Ruiz-Álvarez, PRL122, 131803 3A total of six leptoquark scenarios
I
E.g. U
1µproduces both LH and RH solutions
Greljo, JMC & Ruiz-Álvarez, PRL122, 131803
Only leptoquarks can explain the R
D(∗)anomalies
Combined explanations of R D
(∗)and R K
(∗)anomalies
New current-current semileptonic operators
Bhattacharya et al. ’14, Alonso et al. ’15, Greljo et al. ’15, . . .SMEFT operators
Q
`q(ijkl)(1)=
Λ12( ¯ Q
Liγ
µQ
Lj)(¯ L
Lkγ
µL
Ll), Q
`q(ijkl)(3)=
Λ12( ¯ Q
Liγ
µ~ τ Q
Lj) · (¯ L
Lkγ
µ~ τ L
Ll)
1
Warning A Coupling to 3
rdgeneration: Large radiative LFUV in τ and Z decays!
O. Sumensari talk,
(Alonsoet al’13, Ferruglioet al.’16)2
Lepton flavor structure:
F
Large enhancements C ˜
τ τC ˜
µµruled out by B → K
(∗)νν unless C
τ τ(1)' C
(3)τ τF
Charged-lepton flavor violation! in e.g. B → K
(∗)τ µ unless there is “flavor alignment”
Glashow et al. ’14, Alonso et al. ’15, . . .
J. Martin Camalich (IAC) FromBanomalies to flavored searches at the LHC June 13th 2019 17 / 18
Combined explanations of R D
(∗)and R K
(∗)anomalies
New current-current semileptonic operators
Bhattacharya et al. ’14, Alonso et al. ’15, Greljo et al. ’15, . . .SMEFT operators
Q
`q(ijkl)(1)=
Λ12( ¯ Q
Liγ
µQ
Lj)(¯ L
Lkγ
µL
Ll), Q
`q(ijkl)(3)=
Λ12( ¯ Q
Liγ
µ~ τ Q
Lj) · (¯ L
Lkγ
µ~ τ L
Ll)
Buttazzo et al. ’17
U
1µvector leptoquark has challenging UV completions!
See also O. Sumensari talk
Conclusions
“Extraordinary claims require Extraordinary evidence”
– C. Sagan
1
Exciting times in Flavor physics!
I
Strong experimental program: LHCb and Belle II (also ATLAS & CMS, NA62 . . . )
I
Potential to discover New Physics!
2
The fate of the Flavour Anomalies:
I
Much more data is needed and coming!
I
Leptoquarks preferred solutions (Only plausible explanation of R
D(∗))
I
Z
0are candidates if only concerned by FCNC anomaly b → s``
3
Strong interplay with LHC searches:
“No loose theorem”: HL-LHC has the potential to discover “the model”. . . . . . whatever it might be ...