• No se han encontrado resultados

PDF From B anomalies to flavored searches at the LHC

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2024

Share "PDF From B anomalies to flavored searches at the LHC"

Copied!
25
0
0

Texto completo

(1)

From B anomalies to flavored searches at the LHC

J. Martin Camalich

June 13th 2019

(2)

The SM quark Flavor Puzzle

CKM and mass matrices: Parametrizations of flavor phenomena in the SM Strong hierarchies in masses and mixings (PDG)

m

up

= 0.0022(5) GeV m

top

= 173.0(4) GeV

Specific values of light quarks seem “tuned” (Anthropic arguments!) Origin of CP-violation

Why does Nature need three generations at all?

Where is “flavor” coming from?

(3)

Precision physics programme in (quark) Flavour Physics

Quark mixing in precision regime since decades ago!

I

High-Luminosity LHC: Expected 10

15

b ¯ b pairs !!

HL-LHC Yellow Book A. Cerriet al., arXiv: 1812.07638

ca. 200 pages PDG

I

3 mixing angles and 1 CPV phase

I

6 quark masses

CKM: Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa paradigm

V

CKM

'

1−λ2/2 λ Aλ3(ρ−iη)

−λ 1−λ2/2 Aλ2

3(1−ρ−iη) −Aλ2 1

λ = 0.2253(7), A = 0.808(22),

¯

ρ = 0.132(22), η ¯ = 0.341(13)

Jure Zupan, arXiv: 1903.05062

J. Martin Camalich (IAC) FromBanomalies to flavored searches at the LHC June 13th 2019 3 / 18

(4)

Precision physics programme in (quark) Flavour Physics

Quark mixing in precision regime since decades ago!

I

High-Luminosity LHC: Expected 10

15

b ¯ b pairs !!

HL-LHC Yellow Book A. Cerriet al., arXiv: 1812.07638

ca. 200 pages PDG

I

3 mixing angles and 1 CPV phase

I

6 quark masses

CKM: Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa paradigm

(5)

The Flavor Changing Neutral Currents (FCNC)

Theorem: FCNC are “Loop-Suppressed” in the SM!

I

Prototypical example: FCNCs

M

SM

Weak

z}|{ G

F Loop

z }| { y

t2

16π

2

Flavor

z }| { (V

ts

V

tb

)

2

| {z }

GIM

I

Flavour observables probe (indirectly) very high energy scales!

M. Neubert at EPS 2011

J. Martin Camalich (IAC) FromBanomalies to flavored searches at the LHC June 13th 2019 4 / 18

(6)

Effective field theories and bottom-up approach to new physics

Legacy of Flavor Physics Program

I

High precision measurements of SM mixing parameters

I

Discover New Physics OR set the lower bounds on Λ

Flavor
(7)

Flavor physics was instrumental in discovering and shaping the SM

I

Nuclear β-decays: Discovery weak interactions and neutrino

I

Rare Kaon-decays: Discovery of the charm quark

I

Kaon decays: Discovery of CP violation = ⇒ Discovery of 3 generations

Expect the unexpected ...

Thanks to Zoltan Ligeti for sharing this

J. Martin Camalich (IAC) FromBanomalies to flavored searches at the LHC June 13th 2019 6 / 18

(8)

The Flavor Anomalies

Gauge interactions are generation independent!

Hints for Lepton Flavor Universality Violation (LFUV)?

“The flavour of new physics”, JMC & J. Zupan, CERN courier, May/June 2019

(9)

Anomalies I: Status of LFUV in b → s` + ` −

Leptons do not feel the strong force!

R

K(∗)

=

B( ¯B→K(∗)µ+µ)

B( ¯B→K(∗)e+e) SM

' 1

Deficits on R

K(∗)

measured by LHCb

Signal of µ-to-e LFUV at (combined) 4σ!

J. Martin Camalich (IAC) FromBanomalies to flavored searches at the LHC June 13th 2019 8 / 18

(10)

Anomalies I: Status of LFUV in b → s` + ` −

Leptons do not feel the strong force!

R

K(∗)

=

B( ¯B→K(∗)µ+µ)

B( ¯B→K(∗)e+e) SM

' 1

Deficits on R

K(∗)

measured by LHCb

I

LHCb: poor efficiency in electrons!

I

Measure double ratios: Robust and validation

(11)

Other “anomalies” in ∼ 100 observables of the b → sµ

+

µ

(S. Jäger talk)

Current-current interpretation!

L

eff

C9(10)

Λ2New−Physics

(¯ sγ

µ

P

L

b)(¯ µγ

µ

5

)µ) Λ

New−Physics

∼ 30 TeV!!!

UV completions: Z

0

’s and leptoquarks

Extra bounds from low energy e.g. Z

0

I

B

s

- B ¯

s

mixing

Z

b s

¯

s ¯b

I

Requires small Z

0

bs coupling! (e.g MFV)

I

Neutrino trident production

I

Controls Z

0

µµ coupling!

J. Martin Camalich (IAC) FromBanomalies to flavored searches at the LHC June 13th 2019 9 / 18

(12)

Other “anomalies” in ∼ 100 observables of the b → sµ

+

µ

(S. Jäger talk)

Current-current interpretation!

L

eff

C9(10)

Λ2New−Physics

(¯ sγ

µ

P

L

b)(¯ µγ

µ

5

)µ) Λ

New−Physics

∼ 30 TeV!!!

I

“Colored” gauged L

µ

− Lτ

Altmannshoferet al.PRD89(2014)095033

(13)

Other “anomalies” in ∼ 100 observables of the b → sµ

+

µ

(S. Jäger talk)

Current-current interpretation!

L

eff

Λ2C9(10) New−Physics

(¯ sγ

µ

P

L

b)(¯ µγ

µ

5

)µ) Λ

New−Physics

∼ 30 TeV!!!

I

“Agnostic” simplified Z

0

models: pp → µ

µ

+

X LHC and beyond...

Allanachet al.JHEP1903(2019)137

Could be far from production @ LHC (or FCC!!)

J. Martin Camalich (IAC) FromBanomalies to flavored searches at the LHC June 13th 2019 9 / 18

(14)

Anomalies II: Status of LFUV in b → cτ ν decays

R

D(∗)

=

B( ¯B→D(∗)τν)¯

B( ¯B→D(∗)`ν)¯

where ` = e, µ

Babar, Belle and LHCb are independently in tension with SM!

G. Caria @ Moriond EW 2019 (arXiv:1904.0879)

I

NEW: Belle with semi-leptonic tag

F

Consistent at ∼ 1σ with SM!!

I

World average now at ∼ 3σ from SM. . . S. Jäger talk

Why studying the R D

(∗)

anomalies?

Λ

New−Physics

∼ 3 TeV

If true, find the “ultimate” collider search

(15)

EFT of new-physics in b → cτ ν

Low-Energy EFT Lagrangian

Leff⊃−GF Vcb

2 [(1+`L)`γ¯µ(1−γ5`·¯cγµ(1−γ5)b+`R`γ¯µ(1−γ5`¯cγµ(1+γ5)b +`

SL`(1−γ¯ 5`·¯c(1−γ5)b+`

SR`(1−γ¯ 5`·¯c(1+γ5)b+`T`σ¯µν(1−γ5`·¯cσµν(1−γ5)b]+h.c.

,

I

The SM + 5 New-Physics operators

Matching to high-energy Lagrangian – SMEFT

I

Symmetry relations for

Γ F

In charged-currents

`R

:

O

Hud

= i Λ

2NP

H ˜

D

µ

H

u ¯

R

γ

µ

d

R

RHC is lepton universal:

`R

R

+ O(

v4

Λ4 NP

) ⇒ Cannot explain LFUV in R

D(∗)

!

J. Martin Camalich (IAC) FromBanomalies to flavored searches at the LHC June 13th 2019 11 / 18

(16)

EFT of new-physics in b → cτ ν

Low-Energy EFT Lagrangian

Leff⊃−GF Vcb

2 [(1+`L)`γ¯µ(1−γ5`·¯cγµ(1−γ5)b+`R`γ¯µ(1−γ5`¯cγµ(1+γ5)b +`

SL`(1−γ¯ 5`·¯c(1−γ5)b+`

SR`(1−γ¯ 5`·¯c(1+γ5)b+`T`σ¯µν(1−γ5`·¯cσµν(1−γ5)b]+h.c.

,

I

The SM + 5 New-Physics operators

Introducing light right-handed neutrinos N

R(See e.g.Robinson, Shakya & Zupan, JHEP 1902 (2019) 11) I

5 extra New-Physics operators

I

They do not interfere with the SM!

Leff⊃−GF Vcb

2 ˜`R `γ¯µNR¯cγµ(1+γ5)b

Consider 5 operators to explain R

D(∗)

:

τL

, ˜

Rτ

,

τSL

,

τSR

,

τT
(17)

Trajectories of EFT scenarios: pre- and post-Moriond ’19

Tensor Vector

Scalar- Tensor

SM

Best scenario also enters through NEW current-current interactions

Rui-xiang Shi, Li-sheng Geng, B. Grinstein, S. Jäger & JMC, 1905.08498

J. Martin Camalich (IAC) FromBanomalies to flavored searches at the LHC June 13th 2019 12 / 18

(18)

Crossing-symmetry connection to the mono-tau signature at the LHC

Greljo, JMC & Ruiz-Álvarez, PRL122, 131803

I

The proton is flavored. . .

I

Cross-section at s m

2W

σ

NP

σ

SM

∼ P

i

L

ib

⊗ |V

ib

|

2vs4

α

Γ

|

τΓ

|

2

L

ud

⊗ |V

ud

|

2vs4

M2 W s

2

I

NP suppressed by CKM and PDF’s

I

NP enhanced by s

2

/M

W4

I

NP sensitivity is quadratic

Search excess in tails of pp → τ + MET!

(19)

Crossing-symmetry connection to the mono-tau signature at the LHC

Greljo, JMC & Ruiz-Álvarez, PRL122, 131803

I

The proton is flavored. . .

I

Allows one to do LHC precision physics!

J. Martin Camalich (IAC) FromBanomalies to flavored searches at the LHC June 13th 2019 13 / 18

(20)

LHC data and simulations of pp → τ h X + MET

W

0

searches available from run 2 (13 TeV)

I

ATLAS: 36.1 fb

−1PRL120, 161802, arXiv:1801.06992 [hep-ex]

I

CMS: 35.9 fb

−1PLB792, 107, arXiv:1807.11421 [hep-ex]

I

Signal vs. SM background

1000 1500 2000 2500 3000

) [GeV]

miss ,pT τ T( m

2 10

1 10 1 10 102

Events ATLAS W+jets estimation

W+jets EFT Tensor coupling W', m=2 TeV, 22% width

“No-loose theorem” for the discovery of NP at the LHC LHC is sensitive to NP scenarios addressing anomalies!

Greljo, JMC & Ruiz-Álvarez, PRL122, 131803

(21)

Simplified mediators for the R D

(∗)

anomaly

1

Uncolored mediators

¯ c, ¯ b

W

, H

b, c ¯ ν, τ

+

τ

, ν

I

Jacobian bump search

2

Colored mediators

¯ c, ¯ b

LQ b, c

¯ ν, τ

+

τ

, ν

I

Excess in tails

Mediator SU(3) SU(2) U(1) Current Scalar Tensor

W

µ0

1 3, 1 0, +1 X X X

H 1 2 +1/2 X X X

S

1

3 1 -1/3 X X X

R

2

3 2 +7/6 X X X

U

1µ

3 1 +2/3 X X X

Charged Higsses challenged by B

c

lifetime!

Alonso, Grinstein & JMC,PRL118, 081802

A total of 8 different solutions!

J. Martin Camalich (IAC) FromBanomalies to flavored searches at the LHC June 13th 2019 15 / 18

(22)

LHC constraints on W 0 and leptoquark solutions

1

W

L0

in SU(2)-triplet ruled out by B

s

mixing and pp → τ

+

τ

Faroughy, Greljo & Kamenik ’16 2

W

R0

ruled out except if broad (Γ

W0

& 0.5M

W0

)!

Greljo, JMC & Ruiz-Álvarez, PRL122, 131803 3

A total of six leptoquark scenarios

I

E.g. U

1µ

produces both LH and RH solutions

Greljo, JMC & Ruiz-Álvarez, PRL122, 131803

Only leptoquarks can explain the R

D(∗)

anomalies

(23)

Combined explanations of R D

(∗)

and R K

(∗)

anomalies

New current-current semileptonic operators

Bhattacharya et al. ’14, Alonso et al. ’15, Greljo et al. ’15, . . .

SMEFT operators

Q

`q(ijkl)(1)

=

Λ12

( ¯ Q

Li

γ

µ

Q

Lj

)(¯ L

Lk

γ

µ

L

Ll

), Q

`q(ijkl)(3)

=

Λ12

( ¯ Q

Li

γ

µ

~ τ Q

Lj

) · (¯ L

Lk

γ

µ

~ τ L

Ll

)

1

Warning A Coupling to 3

rd

generation: Large radiative LFUV in τ and Z decays!

O. Sumensari talk,

(Alonsoet al’13, Ferruglioet al.’16)

2

Lepton flavor structure:

F

Large enhancements C ˜

τ τ

C ˜

µµ

ruled out by B → K

(∗)

νν unless C

τ τ(1)

' C

(3)τ τ

F

Charged-lepton flavor violation! in e.g. B → K

(∗)

τ µ unless there is “flavor alignment”

Glashow et al. ’14, Alonso et al. ’15, . . .

J. Martin Camalich (IAC) FromBanomalies to flavored searches at the LHC June 13th 2019 17 / 18

(24)

Combined explanations of R D

(∗)

and R K

(∗)

anomalies

New current-current semileptonic operators

Bhattacharya et al. ’14, Alonso et al. ’15, Greljo et al. ’15, . . .

SMEFT operators

Q

`q(ijkl)(1)

=

Λ12

( ¯ Q

Li

γ

µ

Q

Lj

)(¯ L

Lk

γ

µ

L

Ll

), Q

`q(ijkl)(3)

=

Λ12

( ¯ Q

Li

γ

µ

~ τ Q

Lj

) · (¯ L

Lk

γ

µ

~ τ L

Ll

)

Buttazzo et al. ’17

U

1µ

vector leptoquark has challenging UV completions!

See also O. Sumensari talk

(25)

Conclusions

“Extraordinary claims require Extraordinary evidence”

– C. Sagan

1

Exciting times in Flavor physics!

I

Strong experimental program: LHCb and Belle II (also ATLAS & CMS, NA62 . . . )

I

Potential to discover New Physics!

2

The fate of the Flavour Anomalies:

I

Much more data is needed and coming!

I

Leptoquarks preferred solutions (Only plausible explanation of R

D(∗)

)

I

Z

0

are candidates if only concerned by FCNC anomaly b → s``

3

Strong interplay with LHC searches:

“No loose theorem”: HL-LHC has the potential to discover “the model”. . . . . . whatever it might be ...

J. Martin Camalich (IAC) FromBanomalies to flavored searches at the LHC June 13th 2019 18 / 18

Referencias

Documento similar