Recast of SUSY searches in ATLAS and CMS for global fits
Isabel Su´arez Fern´andez
Instituto Galego de F´ısica de Altas Enerx´ıas (IGFAE) University of Santiago de Compostela (USC)
October 23, 2017
Index
1 Introduction Standard Model
Supersymmetry (SUSY)
Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM)
Constrained Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (CMSSM)
2 ATLAS SUSY searches Likelihood
Efficiency SM background Exclusion contour
3 CMS SUSY searches
4 Application to CMSSM
5 Conclusions
Isabel Su´arez Fern´andez (USC) October 23, 2017 2 / 37
Standard Model problems
Gravity
Gravitational interaction isnot included in th SM.
Dark matter and dark energy
Matter described by SM is only around∼4 % from the total energy density of the Universe.
Neutrino mass
SM predictsmassless neutrinos
Standard Model problems
Gravity
Gravitational interaction isnot included in th SM.
Dark matter and dark energy
Matter described by SM is only around∼4 % from the total energy density of the Universe.
Neutrino mass
SM predictsmassless neutrinos
Isabel Su´arez Fern´andez (USC) October 23, 2017 3 / 37
Standard Model problems
Gravity
Gravitational interaction isnot included in th SM.
Dark matter and dark energy
Matter described by SM is only around∼4 % from the total energy density of the Universe.
Neutrino mass
SM predictsmassless neutrinos
Indications
The number of fermionic families
Experimentally, three fermionic families have been found.
However, the number of families is not theoretically derivedfrom SM, it is an experimental fact.
Higgs boson mass
In the SM the Higgs boson mass has a quadratic divergence
⇒ mH ∼ Planck scaleMPl '1018GeV
Experimentally, it is known that this mass is in the electroweak scale. Coupling constats
Interactions coupling constants run with the energy scale. In the SM model the three coupling constants are never unified at once.
Isabel Su´arez Fern´andez (USC) October 23, 2017 4 / 37
Indications
The number of fermionic families
Experimentally, three fermionic families have been found.
However, the number of families is not theoretically derivedfrom SM, it is an experimental fact.
Higgs boson mass
In the SM the Higgs boson mass has a quadratic divergence
⇒ mH ∼ Planck scaleMPl '1018GeV
Experimentally, it is known that this mass is in the electroweak scale.
Coupling constats
Interactions coupling constants run with the energy scale. In the SM model the three coupling constants are never unified at once.
Indications
The number of fermionic families
Experimentally, three fermionic families have been found.
However, the number of families is not theoretically derivedfrom SM, it is an experimental fact.
Higgs boson mass
In the SM the Higgs boson mass has a quadratic divergence
⇒ mH ∼ Planck scaleMPl '1018GeV
Experimentally, it is known that this mass is in the electroweak scale.
Coupling constats
Interactions coupling constants run with the energy scale. In the SM model the three coupling constants are never unified at once.
Isabel Su´arez Fern´andez (USC) October 23, 2017 4 / 37
Indications
How do we fix all this?
Isabel Su´arez Fern´andez (USC) October 23, 2017 6 / 37
Supersymmetry (SUSY)
What is it?
SUSY is a frameworkto build models⇒ It is not a theory itself!
Where does it come frome?
1 Coleman and Mandula theorem→ Algebra with anticonmmutators
2 Generalization of space-time symmetries
3 Bosons and fermions relation
Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM)
MSSM
Minimal supersymmetric extension of the SM.
Each SM particle has aSUSY partner particle Higgs extended sector (doublets)
Supertransformations
bosons↔ gauginos fermions↔ sfermions photon↔ photino electron↔ selectron
Isabel Su´arez Fern´andez (USC) October 23, 2017 8 / 37
Constrained Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (CMSSM)
CMSSM
Constrained MSSM phenomenological extension of minimal SuperGravity (mSUGRA), where SUSY is broken by gravity mediation.
Free parameters
m0: Scalar particles masses m1/2: Gauginos masses A0: Trillinear couplings
sign(µ): Higgsino mixing parameter
tan(β): Ratio of Higgs doublets vacuum expected values.
tan(β) = νu
ν (1.1)
SUSY: Solves problems
Naturalness
Higgs boson mass doesnot diverge quadratically.
Gravity
Local SUSY needs a curved space-time⇒ Gravity Dark matter and energy
LSP (Lightest Supersymmetric Particle) is adark matter candidate Running coupling constants unificartion
At a certain energy, the coupling constants from different interactions unify at once.
Isabel Su´arez Fern´andez (USC) October 23, 2017 10 / 37
SUSY: Solves problems
Naturalness
Higgs boson mass doesnot diverge quadratically.
Gravity
Local SUSY needs a curved space-time⇒ Gravity
Dark matter and energy
LSP (Lightest Supersymmetric Particle) is adark matter candidate Running coupling constants unificartion
At a certain energy, the coupling constants from different interactions unify at once.
SUSY: Solves problems
Naturalness
Higgs boson mass doesnot diverge quadratically.
Gravity
Local SUSY needs a curved space-time⇒ Gravity Dark matter and energy
LSP (Lightest Supersymmetric Particle) is adark matter candidate
Running coupling constants unificartion
At a certain energy, the coupling constants from different interactions unify at once.
Isabel Su´arez Fern´andez (USC) October 23, 2017 10 / 37
SUSY: Solves problems
Naturalness
Higgs boson mass doesnot diverge quadratically.
Gravity
Local SUSY needs a curved space-time⇒ Gravity Dark matter and energy
LSP (Lightest Supersymmetric Particle) is adark matter candidate Running coupling constants unificartion
At a certain energy, the coupling constants from different interactions unify at once.
Unification in SUSY
Isabel Su´arez Fern´andez (USC) October 23, 2017 11 / 37
MasterCode
MasterCode Collaboration
Collaboration a whose computer code allows to fit different versions of the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM) to currently existing experimental data.
aE. Bagnaschi, K. Sakurai M. Borsato, O. Buchmueller, R. Cavanaugh , V. Chobanova, M. Citron, J. Costa, A. De Roeck, M.J. Dolan, J.R. Ellis, H. Flacher, S. Heinemeyer, G. Isidori, M. Lucio, D. Mart´ınez Santos, K.A. Olive, A. Richards, I. Su´arez Fern´andez, G. Weiglein
ATLAS and CMS direct SUSY searches at √
s = 13 TeV
ATLAS & CMS
Direct SUSY searches in a simplified model at √
s = 13 TeV.
LHC Recast
Building a code to recast these ATLAS and CMS searches in other SUSY models.
What do we do?
Isabel Su´arez Fern´andez (USC) October 23, 2017 13 / 37
ATLAS and CMS direct SUSY searches at √
s = 13 TeV
ATLAS & CMS
Direct SUSY searches in a simplified model at √
s = 13 TeV.
LHC Recast
Building a code to recast these ATLAS and CMS searches in other SUSY models.
What do we do?
ATLAS and CMS direct SUSY searches at √
s = 13 TeV
ATLAS & CMS
Direct SUSY searches in a simplified model at √
s = 13 TeV.
LHC Recast
Building a code to recast these ATLAS and CMS searches in other SUSY models.
What do we do?
Isabel Su´arez Fern´andez (USC) October 23, 2017 13 / 37
Procedure → Example of ATLAS simplified model
Final states with jets and two same-sign leptons three leptons at
√s = 13 TeV [1]
m( ˜χ02) = 12m(˜g) +12m( ˜χ01) , m(˜l/˜ν) = 14m(˜g) +34m( ˜χ01) m(˜g),m( ˜χ01) → Inputs
Procedure→ Likelihood (ATLAS)
Poisson distribution
We start from a Poisson distribution LPoisson(Nobs|Sexp) = 1
Nobs!e−(Sexp+b)(b+Sexp)Nobs (2.1)
Gaussian distribution for background We assume a gaussian distribution forb
Lb= exp
"
−1 2
b−b0 σ(b)
2#
(2.2)
Total Likelihood
L(Nobs|b,Sexp) =LPoissonLb (2.3)
Isabel Su´arez Fern´andez (USC) October 23, 2017 15 / 37
Procedure→ Likelihood (ATLAS)
Poisson distribution
We start from a Poisson distribution LPoisson(Nobs|Sexp) = 1
Nobs!e−(Sexp+b)(b+Sexp)Nobs (2.1) Gaussian distribution for background
We assume a gaussian distribution forb
Lb= exp
"
−1 2
b−b0 σ(b)
2#
(2.2)
Total Likelihood
L(N |b,S ) =L L (2.3)
Procedure → Likelihood profiling (ATLAS)
Likelihood
L(Nobs|b,Sexp) = 1
Nobs!e−(Sexp+b)e−
1 2
b−b
0 σ(b)
2
(b+Sexp)Nobs (2.4)
Maximizing
∂L(Nobs|b,Sexp)
∂b = 0 (2.5)
Analytical solution
bˆ=
b0−Sexp−σ2(b)
2 +1
2
b0−Sexp−σ2(b)2 + 4
σ2(b)Nobs−Sexpσ2(b) +Sexpb01
2 (2.6)
Isabel Su´arez Fern´andez (USC) October 23, 2017 16 / 37
Procedure → Likelihood dependence(ATLAS)
Profiled Likelihood
b →bˆ ⇒ L(Nobs|b,Sexp)→ L(Nobs|Sexp) (2.7) Nobs Number of observed events
b0: Central value of b, the expected SM background σ(b): Uncertainty of b
Sexp: Expected SUSY signal: Sexp =σεL
σCross-section→σ(m(˜g),m( ˜χ01)) εEfficiency→ε(m(˜g),m( ˜χ01)) LLuminosity→Constant
Procedure → Likelihood dependence(ATLAS)
Profiled Likelihood
b →bˆ ⇒ L(Nobs|b,Sexp)→ L(Nobs|Sexp) (2.7) Nobs Number of observed events
b0: Central value of b, the expected SM background σ(b): Uncertainty of b
Sexp: Expected SUSY signal: Sexp =σεL σCross-section→σ(m(˜g),m( ˜χ01)) εEfficiency→ε(m(˜g),m( ˜χ01)) LLuminosity→Constant
Isabel Su´arez Fern´andez (USC) October 23, 2017 17 / 37
Procedure → Efficiency
Simulating the efficiency
1 Inputs: m(˜g), m( ˜χ01)
2 Pythia 8.2: Simulatespp collisions, events generator.
3 Delphes 3: Simulates the ATLAS detector.
4 Signal Regions: Conditions for events are defined.
5 Selection: Events not satisfying the requirements are discarded.
6 Efficiency: ε= Final events Total events
Figure:Signal Regions from [1] arXiv:1602.09058v2 [hep-ex]
Procedure → Efficiency
Simulating the efficiency
1 Inputs: m(˜g), m( ˜χ01)
2 Pythia 8.2: Simulatespp collisions, events generator.
3 Delphes 3: Simulates the ATLAS detector.
4 Signal Regions: Conditions for events are defined.
5 Selection: Events not satisfying the requirements are discarded.
6 Efficiency: ε= Final events Total events
Figure:Signal Regions from [1] arXiv:1602.09058v2 [hep-ex]
Isabel Su´arez Fern´andez (USC) October 23, 2017 18 / 37
Procedure → Efficiency
Simulating the efficiency
1 Inputs: m(˜g), m( ˜χ01)
2 Pythia 8.2: Simulatespp collisions, events generator.
3 Delphes 3: Simulates the ATLAS detector.
4 Signal Regions: Conditions for events are defined.
5 Selection: Events not satisfying the requirements are discarded.
6 Efficiency: ε= Final events Total events
Figure:Signal Regions from [1] arXiv:1602.09058v2 [hep-ex]
Procedure → Efficiency
Simulating the efficiency
1 Inputs: m(˜g), m( ˜χ01)
2 Pythia 8.2: Simulatespp collisions, events generator.
3 Delphes 3: Simulates the ATLAS detector.
4 Signal Regions: Conditions for events are defined.
5 Selection: Events not satisfying the requirements are discarded.
6 Efficiency: ε= Final events Total events
Figure:Signal Regions from [1] arXiv:1602.09058v2 [hep-ex]
Isabel Su´arez Fern´andez (USC) October 23, 2017 18 / 37
Procedure → Efficiency
Simulating the efficiency
1 Inputs: m(˜g), m( ˜χ01)
2 Pythia 8.2: Simulatespp collisions, events generator.
3 Delphes 3: Simulates the ATLAS detector.
4 Signal Regions: Conditions for events are defined.
5 Selection: Events not satisfying the requirements are discarded.
6 Efficiency: ε= Final events Total events
Figure:Signal Regions from [1] arXiv:1602.09058v2 [hep-ex]
Procedure → Efficiency
Simulating the efficiency
1 Inputs: m(˜g), m( ˜χ01)
2 Pythia 8.2: Simulatespp collisions, events generator.
3 Delphes 3: Simulates the ATLAS detector.
4 Signal Regions: Conditions for events are defined.
5 Selection: Events not satisfying the requirements are discarded.
6 Efficiency: ε= Final events Total events
Figure:Signal Regions from [1] arXiv:1602.09058v2 [hep-ex]
Isabel Su´arez Fern´andez (USC) October 23, 2017 18 / 37
Standard Model Background
SM contributions
SM processes that mimic the final state contribute. We use background data given by [1].
Standard Model Background
SM contributions
SM processes that mimic the final state contribute. We use background data given by [1].
Figure: SM Background from [1] arXiv:1602.09058v2 [hep-ex]
Isabel Su´arez Fern´andez (USC) October 23, 2017 20 / 37
Procedure → Exclusion contours
Exclusion contours
The procedure explained is applied for a wide range of input masses in the plane (m(˜g),m( ˜χ01)). With this we can reproduce the ATLAS plots with theχ2 probability.
200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600
mg˜[GeV]
200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400
m˜χ
0 1[GeV]
atlas_1602_09058
˜g→qq(ll/νν) ˜χ01
LHC_recast w. MC-err ATLAS w. theo-err
10-3 10-2 10-1 100
ATLAS topologies
Isabel Su´arez Fern´andez (USC) October 23, 2017 22 / 37
Other ATLAS analyses
500 1000 1500 2000
mg˜[GeV]
500 1000 1500
m˜χ 0 1[GeV]
atlas_1706_03731
˜ g→qqWZ˜χ01
LHC_recast w. MC-err ATLAS w. theo-err
10-15 10-14 10-13 10-12 10-11 10-10 10-9 10-8 10-7 10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1
500 1000 1500 2000
m
500 1000 1500
m˜χ 0 1[GeV]
atlas_1706_03731
˜ g→qq(ll/νν) ˜χ01
LHC_recast w. MC-err ATLAS w. theo-err
10-15 10-14 10-13 10-12 10-11 10-10 10-9 10-8 10-7 10-6 10-5 10-4 10-3 10-2 10-1
CMS topologies
Figure:CMS topologies from [3] arXiv:1705.04650 [hep-ex]
Isabel Su´arez Fern´andez (USC) October 23, 2017 24 / 37
Procedure → Likelihood (CMS)
Likelihood
LPoisson(Nobs|Sexp) = 1
Nobs!e−(Sexp+b)(b+Sexp)Nobs (3.1) SM background
The 213 Signal Regions are correlated → Correlation matrixfrom [3]
Fit
We obtain theχ2 probability trough a fit using the correlation matrix [3] arXiv:1705.04650 [hep-ex]
Other CMS analyses
[GeV]
g~
m 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 [GeV]01χ∼m
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000
−4 10
−3 10
−2 10
−1 10 1 (13 TeV)
35.9 fb-1
CMS Preliminary NLO+NLL exclusion 1 χ∼0 b
→ b g~ , g~ g~
→ pp
theory σ
± 1 Observed
experiment σ
± 1 Expected
95% CL upper limit on cross section [pb]
500 1000 1500 2000
mg˜[GeV]
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600
m˜χ 0 1[GeV]
cms_1705_04650
˜g→bb˜χ01
LHC_recast w. MC-err ATLAS w. theo-err
10-3 10-2 10-1 100
[GeV]
g~
m 600800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800 2000 2200 [GeV]0 1χ∼m
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600 1800
−3 10
−2 10
−1 10 1 (13 TeV)
35.9 fb-1
CMS Preliminary NLO+NLL exclusion 1 χ∼0 q
→ q g~ , g~ g~
→ pp
theory σ
± 1 Observed
experiment σ
± 1 Expected
95% CL upper limit on cross section [pb]
500 1000 1500 2000
m˜g[GeV]
0 200 400 600 800 1000 1200 1400 1600
m˜χ 0 1[GeV]
cms_1705_04650
˜g→qq˜χ01
LHC_recast w. MC-err ATLAS w. theo-err
10-3 10-2 10-1 100
Figure: [3] arXiv:1705.04650 [hep-ex]
Isabel Su´arez Fern´andez (USC) October 23, 2017 26 / 37
Other analyses I
Implemented
Paper/Conference Note Number of SR
ATLAS 1602.09058 4
ATLAS 1605.04285 6
ATLAS 1706.03731 13
CMS 1705.04650 213
Total 236
In process
Paper/Conference Note Number of SR
ATLAS-CONF-2017-039 37
ATLAS-CONF-2017-035 2
ATLAS-CONF-2016-054 6
Total 45
Application to CMSSM I
Exclusion contour
We apply our algorithm in the CMSSM
We plot an exclusion contour in the (m0,m1/2) plane
Previous best-fit-point
To study the masses plane we fix the other parameters totheir previous best-fit-point value
A0 =−3440 tan(β) = 21 sign(µ)>0
Isabel Su´arez Fern´andez (USC) October 23, 2017 28 / 37
Application to CMSSM II
Exclusion contour
Low energy region is excluded
The new best-fit should be at higher energies
The new restriction is stronger than the previous one
(a) Previous MasterCode result [4] (b) LHC Recast
Summary
Direct ATLAS and CMS SUSY searches
We developed a code to analyse ATLAS and CMS SUSY simplified models
In these simplifications we are able to reproduce the mass constraints using our code
We can recast these ATLAS and CMS searches in other supersymmetric models
CMSSM pMSSM NUHM
Results → CMSSM
In the (m0,m1/2) plane, the low energy region is excluded
The new restriction we obtained using searches at 13 TeV is stronger than the previous one at 7 TeV
Isabel Su´arez Fern´andez (USC) October 23, 2017 30 / 37
Summary
Direct ATLAS and CMS SUSY searches
We developed a code to analyse ATLAS and CMS SUSY simplified models
In these simplifications we are able to reproduce the mass constraints using our code
We can recast these ATLAS and CMS searches in other supersymmetric models
CMSSM pMSSM NUHM
Results → CMSSM
In the (m0,m1/2) plane, the low energy region is excluded
The new restriction we obtained using searches at 13 TeV is stronger
Conclusions
Conclusions
SUSY is a framework that might solve the SM problems.
Our code can predict the energy scales where SUSY is more likely to exist.
We are able to define the energy scales where future accelerators should work.
In case of finding SUSY, these recasts can be used as inputs to fit other SUSY models and find the one that better describes our Universe.
Isabel Su´arez Fern´andez (USC) October 23, 2017 31 / 37
Conclusions
Conclusions
SUSY is a framework that might solve the SM problems.
Our code can predict the energy scales where SUSY is more likely to exist.
We are able to define the energy scales where future accelerators should work.
In case of finding SUSY, these recasts can be used as inputs to fit other SUSY models and find the one that better describes our Universe.
Conclusions
Conclusions
SUSY is a framework that might solve the SM problems.
Our code can predict the energy scales where SUSY is more likely to exist.
We are able to define the energy scales where future accelerators should work.
In case of finding SUSY, these recasts can be used as inputs to fit other SUSY models and find the one that better describes our Universe.
Isabel Su´arez Fern´andez (USC) October 23, 2017 31 / 37
Conclusions
Conclusions
SUSY is a framework that might solve the SM problems.
Our code can predict the energy scales where SUSY is more likely to exist.
We are able to define the energy scales where future accelerators should work.
In case of finding SUSY, these recasts can be used as inputs to fit other SUSY models and find the one that better describes our Universe.
Thanks
Isabel Su´arez Fern´andez (USC) October 23, 2017 32 / 37
BACKUP
Flavour observables
Isabel Su´arez Fern´andez (USC) October 23, 2017 34 / 37
Previous best fit point
Effective mass
meff =
Nlepton
X
i=1
pT,ilepton+
Njets
X
j=1
pT,jjets+ETmiss (5.1)
Isabel Su´arez Fern´andez (USC) October 23, 2017 36 / 37
Superpartners
Fields Symbols Spin
Sleptons e˜L, e˜R , µ˜L, µ˜R , τ˜L, ν˜e , ν˜µ, ν˜τ 0
Squarks q˜L, q˜R 0
Neutralinos B˜0 , W˜0 , H˜u0 , H˜d0 1/2 Charginos W˜±, H˜u±, H˜d± 1/2
Gluinos g˜ 1/2
Goldstino or gravitino G˜ 3/2
Table:Superpartners of SM particles
Georges Aad et al.
Search for supersymmetry at √
s = 13 TeV in final states with jets and two same-sign leptons or three leptons with the ATLAS detector.
Eur. Phys. J., C76(5):259, 2016.
Morad Aaboud et al.
Search for supersymmetry in final states with two same-sign or three leptons and jets using 36 fb−1 of √
s = 13 TeVpp collision data with the ATLAS detector.
JHEP, 09:084, 2017.
CMS Collaboration.
Search for new physics in the all-hadronic final state with the MT2 variable.
2017.
O. Buchmueller et al.
The CMSSM and NUHM1 after LHC Run 1.
Eur. Phys. J., C74(6):2922, 2014.
Probir Roy Manuel Drees, Rohini Godbole.
Isabel Su´arez Fern´andez (USC) October 23, 2017 37 / 37
Theory and Phenomenology of Sparticles.
WS, 2004.
Standard model fit results.
http://utfit.org/UTfit/ResultsSummer2016SM, 2016.
Joao Paulo Silva Gustavo Castelo Branco, Lu´ıs Lavoura.
CP Violation.
International Series of Monographs on Physics. Oxford University Press, USA, 1st edition, 1999.
K. A. Olive et al.
Review of Particle Physics.
Chin. Phys., C38:090001, 2016.
William J. Marciano.
Precise determination of |Vus|from lattice calculations of pseudoscalar decay constants.
Phys. Rev. Lett., 93:231803, Dec 2004.
Christoph Bobeth, Martin Gorbahn, Thomas Hermann, Miko laj
Bs,d →l+l−.
Phys. Rev. Lett., 112:101801, Mar 2014.
J. de Favereau, C. Delaere, P. Demin, A. Giammanco, V. Lemaˆıtre, A. Mertens, and M. Selvaggi.
Delphes 3: a modular framework for fast simulation of a generic collider experiment.
Journal of High Energy Physics, 2014(2):57, Feb 2014.
Torbj¨orn Sj¨ostrand, Stefan Ask, Jesper R. Christiansen, Richard Corke, Nishita Desai, Philip Ilten, Stephen Mrenna, Stefan Prestel,
Christine O. Rasmussen, and Peter Z. Skands.
An Introduction to PYTHIA 8.2.
Comput. Phys. Commun., 191:159–177, 2015.
Sidney R. Coleman and J. Mandula.
All Possible Symmetries of the S Matrix.
Phys. Rev., 159:1251–1256, 1967.
Andrzej J. Buras, Dario Buttazzo, Jennifer Girrbach-Noe, and Robert Knegjens.
Isabel Su´arez Fern´andez (USC) October 23, 2017 37 / 37
K+→π+νν andKL→π0νν in the Standard Model: status and perspectives.
JHEP, 11:033, 2015.
Search for squarks and gluinos in events with an isolated lepton, jets and missing transverse momentum at √
s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector.
Technical Report ATLAS-CONF-2016-054, CERN, Geneva, Aug 2016.
Georges Aad et al.
Search for gluinos in events with an isolated lepton, jets and missing transverse momentum at √
s = 13 Te V with the ATLAS detector.
Eur. Phys. J., C76(10):565, 2016.
Morad Aaboud et al.
Search for squarks and gluinos in final states with jets and missing transverse momentum at √
s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector.
Eur. Phys. J., C76(7):392, 2016.
Chunhui Chen.
New approach to identifying boosted hadronically-decaying particle using jet substructure in its center-of-mass frame.
Phys. Rev., D85:034007, 2012.
E. Bagnaschi et al.
Likelihood Analysis of Supersymmetric SU(5) GUTs.
Eur. Phys. J., C77(2):104, 2017.
The ATLAS collaboration.
Search for supersymmetry with two same-sign leptons or three leptons using 13.2 fb−1 of√
s = 13 TeVpp collision data collected by the ATLAS detector.
2016.
The ATLAS collaboration.
Search for electroweak production of supersymmetric tau leptons in
√s = 13 TeV pp collisions with the ATLAS detector.
2016.
The ATLAS collaboration.
Isabel Su´arez Fern´andez (USC) October 23, 2017 37 / 37
Search for supersymmetry with two and three leptons missing transverse momentum in the final state at √
s = 13 TeV with the ATLAS detector.
2016.
Diego Mart´ınez Santos.
Study of the very rare decay Bs →µ+µ− in LHCb.
PhD thesis, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela.
Kees Jan de Vries.
Global Fits of Supersymmetric Models after LHC Run 1.
PhD thesis, Imperial College London.
J. P. Lees et al.
Measurement of the B →Xsl+l− branching fraction and search for direct CP violation from a sum of exclusive final states.
Phys. Rev. Lett., 112:211802, 2014.
Lawrence Hall, Joe Lykken, and Steven Weinberg.
Supergravity as the messenger of supersymmetry breaking.
G. F. Giudice and R. Rattazzi.
Theories with gauge mediated supersymmetry breaking.
Phys. Rept., 322:419–499, 1999.
Tony Gherghetta, Gian F. Giudice, and James D. Wells.
Phenomenological consequences of supersymmetry with anomaly induced masses.
Nucl. Phys., B559:27–47, 1999.
Alan Barr, Christopher Lester, and P. Stephens.
m(T2): The Truth behind the glamour.
J. Phys., G29:2343–2363, 2003.
Nobelprize.org. Nobel Media AB 2014. Web.
The 2004 nobel prize in physics - popular information.
http://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/physics/
laureates/2004/popular.html, 2004.
ATLAS collaboration.
Atlas supersymmetry (susy) searches.
Isabel Su´arez Fern´andez (USC) October 23, 2017 37 / 37
https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/AtlasPublic/
SupersymmetryPublicResults#13_TeV_data, 2017.
The mastercode project.
http://mastercode.web.cern.ch/mastercode/, 2017.