ATLAS: Probing four-top-quark production with the ATLAS detector
Anıl Sonay
XIV CPAN DAYS, November 23-25, 2022, Bilbao
Introduction
Anil Sonay 2 / 13 CPAN 2022
❖ Four top production: pp→tt̄tt̄ , an extremely rare and theoretically challenging process
❖ σNLO (tttt) = 12.0+/-2.4 fb at NLO QCD+EW at 13 TeV arXiv:1711.02116 [hep-ph]
❖ Sensitive to the top-Higgs Yukawa coupling
❖ Extremely high energy scale production makes it naturally sensitive to many BSM models, e.g.
➢ Gluino pair production in SUSY
➢ Heavy pseudoscalar/scalar boson in 2HDM
➢ Four-fermion contact interaction within EFT
❖ Signatures:
➢ 2ℓSS/3ℓ: 2ℓSS (7%) / 3ℓ (5%)
■ Low branching fraction, but small background (ttW, ttZ, non-prompt leptons, charge
misidentification) Eur. Phys. J. C (2020) 80:1085
➢ 1ℓ/2ℓOS: 1ℓ (42%) / 2ℓOS (14%)
■ Dominant branching fraction, but large irreducible background from tt+jets JHEP 11 (2021) 118
Top Quark Production in ATLAS
ATL-PHYS-PUB-2021-014 Top pair
production
4 top
❖ The main background is top pair production
❖ Four top quark production highly suppressed by the main background
➢ Five orders of magnitude
❖ MVA strategy used for the signal background
discrimination
2ℓSS / 3ℓ
Eur. Phys. J. C (2020) 80:1085Anil Sonay 4 / 13 CPAN 2022
❖ Process characterised by leptonic signatures creating a cleaner signal
➢ Main challenge is handling of dominant tt̄W+jets background
■ Mismodelled at high jet multiplicities
■ Dedicated control region (CR) for proper tt̄W+jets estimation
➢ Further CRs for Fake/Non-prompt lepton background estimations
➢ Data-driven charge misassignment background estimation
➢ One inclusive signal region (SR) with a BDT distribution
First Evidence in ATLAS
Eur. Phys. J. C (2020) 80:1085❖ First evidence of tt̄tt̄ production in SSML at ATLAS, observed (expected) significance 4.3(2.4)σ
1ℓ/2ℓOS
JHEP 11 (2021) 118Anil Sonay 6 / 13 CPAN 2022
❖ Event signature characterized by one or two OS leptons and high jet multiplicity and b-jet multiplicities
❖ Main background: tt̄+jets (incl heavy-flavor) production, which is challenging to model accurately by the MC simulation
❖ Signal extracted via profile likelihood fit across all event categories including for a complex model of systematic uncertainties
➢ Simultaneous fit performed on the scalar sum of the pT at control region and the BDT on the SR
1ℓ/2ℓOS Results
JHEP 11 (2021) 118❖ Good agreement obtained between data and post-fit prediction
❖ Dominant uncertainties on signal strength from tt̄tt̄ theoretical cross-section and modelling, and from tt̄+>=1b modelling.
❖ The extracted signal strength is:
Combined Results
JHEP 11 (2021) 118Anil Sonay 8 / 13 CPAN 2022
❖ Measurements in 1ℓ/2ℓOS and 2ℓSS/3ℓ channels found to be in good agreement
➢ Combine for improved sensitivity
❖ The combined four-top-quark production cross section is measured to be:
❖ with a corresponding observed (expected) signal significance of 4.7 (2.6) standard deviations over background-only hypothesis
❖ It is consistent within 2.0 standard deviations with the Standard Model expectation:
Beyond the Standard Model – Heavy Higgs Search
arXiv:2211.01136❖ Search for a new heavy scalar or pseudo-scalar Higgs boson (𝐻/𝐴) in association with a pair of top quarks
❖ Targeting 2HDM type-I/II tt̄H/A → tt̄tt̄ signal
➢ interpretation on low tanβ region (where A/H → tt̄
dominates)
➢ alignment limit sin(β − α) → 1 for which the lighter Higgs boson is SM like
➢ Mass range 400 GeV to 1 TeV
❖ Same-sign dilepton and multilepton (2ℓSS / 3ℓ) final states is explored
➢ Exploration in the 1ℓ/2ℓOS final state is ongoing
❖ A SM four-top like analysis performed due to similar signature using full Run 2 dataset (139 fb-1)
❖ Two Boosted Decision Tree (BDT) models using XGBoost
Background Modeling
arXiv:2211.01136Anil Sonay 10 / 13 CPAN 2022
❖ Template fit method to estimate fake backgrounds and t t̄W QCD with normalization factors from the fit to real data in 5 dedicated CRs using shape from MC
❖ tt̄W validation region to check tt̄W modeling:
N+−N− to remove charge symmetric processes with
≥ 4 jet and ≥ 2 b-jet
Validation region Control region
Signal Discrimination
arXiv:2211.01136❖ SM BDT used to extract tt̄tt̄ -like events and to define the BSM SR
❖ BSM mass-parameterized BDT (BSM pBDT): discriminate BSM tt̄tt̄ from the SM backgrounds (important input: HT and SM BDT)
➢ BSM pBDT trained in the baseline SR but reweighing on the background fractions to mimic BSM SR yields in the training
➢ Baseline SR split into two fitted regions with two BDTs sequentially
■ BSM SR: Additional BSM pBDT as Data / Bkg. discrimination
■ CR low BDT: Use SM BDT to control the background modeling
Results
arXiv:2211.01136Anil Sonay 12 / 13 CPAN 2022
❖ No excess of events above the SM expectation is observed
❖ Four times stronger expected upper limits at 95% CL on cross-section times branching ratio than previous ATLAS 36 fb-1 search (JHEP12(2018)039) with improved multivariate technique and larger dataset
❖ The exclusion on tanbeta ranges from 1.6 to 0.6, depending on the assumed mass, when both H and A are considered
Summary and Prospects of the Four-Top-Quark Production
❖ The SM four-top-quark production has been measured to be 25 fb with a significance of 4.7 standard deviations
❖ The potential BSM scenarios under investigation
➢ The heavy higgs search via four-top-quark production with the 2ℓSS / 3ℓ final state preprint available recently
■ No significant excess on the SMtop cross-section
➢ The study for 1ℓ/2ℓOS final state ongoing
❖ ATLAS Extrapolation relies on knowledge of ATLAS Run2 measurements of tt̄tt̄ in 2ℓSS / 3ℓ (and 1ℓ/2ℓOS) decay channels
➢ Two different syst. assumptions:
■ Conservative
ATL-PHYS-PUB-2022-004