[PDF] Top 20 Conflicts in abstract argumentation systems
Has 10000 "Conflicts in abstract argumentation systems" found on our website. Below are the top 20 most common "Conflicts in abstract argumentation systems".
Conflicts in abstract argumentation systems
... formal systems of defeasible argumentation, arguments for and against a proposition are produced and evaluated to verify the acceptability of that ...of argumentation systems has grown ... See full document
3
Abstract argumentation and dialogues between agents
... classified in negotiation, where there is a conflict of interests, persuasion where there is a conflict of opinion or beliefs, indagation where there is a need for an explanation or proof of some proposition, ... See full document
5
An abstract argumentation framework with comparison criterion
... Conclusions In argumentation systems, any proposition will be accepted as true if there exists an argument that supports it, and this argument is acceptable according to an analysis between it and ... See full document
10
Well-formed defeat paths in abstract argumentation frameworks
... Abstract argumentation systems are formalisms for argumentation where some components remains unspecified, usually the structure of ...arguments. In the dialectical process carried out ... See full document
10
Formalizing processes in defeasible argumentation using labeled deductive systems
... Defeasible argumentation [SL92,CML00,PV99] has proven to be a successful approach to ¯nding a suitable formalization for reasoning with incomplete and potentially inconsistent ...information. In recent ... See full document
3
Introducing probabilistic reasoning in defeasible argumentation using labeled deductive systems
... Deductive Systems (LDS) [Gab96] were developed as a rigorous but °exible method- ology to formalize complex logical systems, such as temporal logics, database query lan- guages and defeasible reasoning ... See full document
5
Designing intelligent database systems through argumentation
... rules in A , and a grounded instance R of Q such that h A , Ri is an argument wrt ∆ and Ξ ...structure. In the inference process arguments sustain theirs conclusions trough a dialectical ...arguments ... See full document
5
Uncertainty in conflicts
... sequential conflicts in which some agent has to publicly announce and commit to her ...used in the conflict against some terrorist ...spending in the ... See full document
36
The role of labelled deductive systems in a formal system for defeasible argumentation
... Traditionally, a logical system (f,rv ) allows the inference of new wffs from those available in f using the rules of inference that characterize the notion of logical consequence r[r] ... See full document
10
Complex Argumentation in Elementary School
... complex argumentation is to divide the activity that took place in the class into ...statements in the argumentation in terms of data, conclusions, warrants, backing, and refutations is ... See full document
26
An abstract argumentation framework with proper and blocking defeaters
... Some abstract argumentation systems include these compo- nents, but only one kind of defeat is derived or the preference order is used in other ...for argumentation where two kinds of ... See full document
10
Experiments in abstract interpretation-based code certification for pervasive systems
... valid and the code is deñnitely not safe to run (we should obviously correct the program before continuing the pro- cess); iii) it cannot be proved ñor disproved, which may be due to s[r] ... See full document
6
Introducing dialectical bases in defeasible argumentation
... The complete definition of an argumentative setting extended with a dialectical base demands taking into account several interacting features (argument consistency and min- imality,[r] ... See full document
10
On semantics in dynamic argumentation frameworks
... intervals in which this argument is ...stand-alone in a specific moment of time, but associated with a set of ...time in which a given argument attacks other available ...arguments in these ... See full document
10
Sources of parallelism in defeasible argumentation
... ,Q /RJLF 3URJUDPPLQJ GLHUHQW NLQGV RI SDUDOOHOLVP KDYH EHHQ VWXGLHG 47SDUDOOHOLVP LQGHSHQGHQW DQG GHSHQGHQW ,3/SDUDOOHOLVP DQG DOVR XQL FDWLRQ SDUDOOHOLVP $OO RI WKHVH W\SHV RI SDUDOOH[r] ... See full document
15
Types of argumentation in political economy
... De hecho, la fortaleza de un diálogo en casos de conflicto, dependerá de otros aspectos relacionados con el poder político o militar. En las negociaciones del Caguán los d[r] ... See full document
39
A formalization of defeasible argumentation using labelled deductive systems . Preliminary report
... &XUUHQWO\ WKHUH H[LVW VHYHUDO DOWHUQDWLYH IRUPDOL]DWLRQV RI GHIHDVLEOH DUJXPHQWDWLRQ 5HFHQW ZRUN >36 .7 %'.7@ KDV VKRZQ WKDW GHIHDVLEOH DUJXPHQWDWLRQ FRQVWLWXWHV D SRLQW RI FRQXH[r] ... See full document
13
ABSTRACT PLANNING SYSTEMS IN AUTONOMOUS ROBOTS PLANIFICACIÓN ABSTRACTA EN LOS SISTEMAS DE ROBOTS AUTÓNOMOS
... afgutierezs}@unal.edu.co Abstract: This paper proposes a model of motion planning for a mobile robot that integrates within a hierarchy of abstraction of the problem a planning technique based on cases and path ... See full document
8
Managing conflicts in aspect-oriented software
... medical history is opened and updated, so an order conflict is declared between the ASAssignWard and ASStMedicalHistory aspects. 5. Conclusions This paper briefly describes a multi-level reflective framework and Alpheus, ... See full document
5
Introducing multiple preference criteria in defeasible argumentation
... moving in a given ...system, in this case, a defeasible argumentation ...the argumentation process is highly dependent on the argument comparison policy, since it solves all of the ... See full document
5
Related subjects