• No se han encontrado resultados

[PDF] Top 20 Formalizing processes in defeasible argumentation using labeled deductive systems

Has 10000 "Formalizing processes in defeasible argumentation using labeled deductive systems" found on our website. Below are the top 20 most common "Formalizing processes in defeasible argumentation using labeled deductive systems".

Formalizing processes in defeasible argumentation using labeled deductive systems

Formalizing processes in defeasible argumentation using labeled deductive systems

... The notion of dialectical tree has proven to be very useful for capturing di®erent aspects of the process of argumentation. It should be remarked that similar approaches have been recently tried in other ... See full document

3

Introducing probabilistic reasoning in defeasible argumentation using labeled deductive systems

Introducing probabilistic reasoning in defeasible argumentation using labeled deductive systems

... (i:e:, defeasible proofs which are non-contradictory wrt the strict knowledge Strict (¡) for a given knowledge base ...and defeasible information, ...discussed in previous sec- tions, these natural ... See full document

5

The role of labelled deductive systems in a formal system for defeasible argumentation

The role of labelled deductive systems in a formal system for defeasible argumentation

... Traditionally, a logical system (f,rv ) allows the inference of new wffs from those available in f using the rules of inference that characterize the notion of logical consequence r[r] ... See full document

10

An approach for Temporal Argumentation Using Labeled Defeasible Logic Programming (l-DeLP)

An approach for Temporal Argumentation Using Labeled Defeasible Logic Programming (l-DeLP)

... abstract argumentation approaches, differ- ent more concrete argumentation systems exists, spec- ifying a knowledge representation language, and how arguments are ...those systems is De- ... See full document

8

A taxonomy for argumentative frameworks based on labelled deduction

A taxonomy for argumentative frameworks based on labelled deduction

... to formalizing complex logical systems, since they allow to characterize the different components involved by using different sorts of ...involved in defeasible argumentation by ... See full document

3

Complex Argumentation in Elementary School

Complex Argumentation in Elementary School

... it in a complete sentence, we must look back to the teacher’s question, which supplies most of the words of the conclusion: “Yes, there are equilateral triangles with a ninety-degree ...data in her ... See full document

26

Integrating defeasible argumentation and machine learning techniques . Preliminary report

Integrating defeasible argumentation and machine learning techniques . Preliminary report

... Searching using keywords is easy to implement but can lead to retrieve unrelated documents or, even worse, to not discover related documents (this can be measured using some metric such as precision and ... See full document

5

DBI-DeLP: a framework for defeasible argumentation over databases

DBI-DeLP: a framework for defeasible argumentation over databases

... technologies in order to achieve argumentation over a large amount of ...other systems may “give” data to ours without the need of complex ...Recommender Systems[3], as well as Desi- cion ... See full document

10

Consequence operators for defeasible argumentation: characterization and logical properties

Consequence operators for defeasible argumentation: characterization and logical properties

... The intuitive meaning of inclusion and idempotence should be clear without further com- ments. The cut rule states that expanding the information in ¡ by adding new propositions from C(¡ ) does not result ... See full document

12

Integration of Correlation Processes in Design Systems.

Integration of Correlation Processes in Design Systems.

... improvements in metric and documental information for the development of architecture and engineering projects (Holland, 2001) along w i t h the progress in the software for computer aided design (Burrough, ... See full document

8

Modeling argumentation with labeled deduction: formalization and theoretical considerations

Modeling argumentation with labeled deduction: formalization and theoretical considerations

... Next we will discuss some interesting theoretical results that were obtained from the preceding formalization. 3 First, we will present an equivalence theorem which links di®erent ways of computing warrant. We will then ... See full document

12

Integrating defeasible argumentation with fuzzy ART neural networks for pattern classification

Integrating defeasible argumentation with fuzzy ART neural networks for pattern classification

... rules; in this context a negated literal ∼ p is treated just as a new predicate name no ...more defeasible in- ...of) defeasible rules in an argu- ment A whenever Π ∪ A entails two ... See full document

7

An approach for identifying design principles in argument systems . A preliminary report

An approach for identifying design principles in argument systems . A preliminary report

... Postulate 2.1 (Self defeating) For an argumen- tation system AS, its inference procedure should be warrant any self defeating argument. If self-defeating arguments are simply avoided this postulate is trivially ... See full document

5

A first approach to combining ontologies and defeasible argumentation for the semantic web

A first approach to combining ontologies and defeasible argumentation for the semantic web

... of defeasible derivation corresponds to the usual query-driven SLD derivation used in logic programming, performed by backward chaining on both strict and defeasible rules; in this context a ... See full document

12

Designing intelligent database systems through argumentation

Designing intelligent database systems through argumentation

... [5] in which we recursively find defeaters for the defeaters and so ...results in a tree structure called dialectical tree, in which arguments are nodes labeled as undefeated (U-nodes) or ... See full document

5

Reasoning about intentions: a defeasible argumentation approach

Reasoning about intentions: a defeasible argumentation approach

... actions. In order to achieve this, other problems must be solved first, from the construction of the robots to knowledge ...known in the literature” [3]. In the BDI model, reasoning about beliefs, ... See full document

12

Using defeasible argumentation in progression and regression planning . Some preliminary explorations

Using defeasible argumentation in progression and regression planning . Some preliminary explorations

... of using argumentation in the definition of actions and combining those actions to form ...lies in exploring the important issues that need to be addressed, the main contribution will be to ... See full document

10

Introducing multiple preference criteria in defeasible argumentation

Introducing multiple preference criteria in defeasible argumentation

... First consider a system that has many components, each one of them has to perform infer- ences from knowledge represented in different domains. These systems need to have multiple comparison criteria ... See full document

5

Agent programming using defeasible argumentation for knowledgerepresentation and reasoning

Agent programming using defeasible argumentation for knowledgerepresentation and reasoning

... detailed in the next section (because they are related to the intention ...goals in 3APL is using the tools to change the deliberative cycle program, which are proposed in ...interpreter. ... See full document

12

Sources of parallelism in defeasible argumentation

Sources of parallelism in defeasible argumentation

... ,Q /RJLF 3URJUDPPLQJ GLHUHQW NLQGV RI SDUDOOHOLVP KDYH EHHQ VWXGLHG 47SDUDOOHOLVP LQGHSHQGHQW DQG GHSHQGHQW ,3/SDUDOOHOLVP DQG DOVR XQL‘ FDWLRQ SDUDOOHOLVP $OO RI WKHVH W\SHV RI SDUDOOH[r] ... See full document

15

Show all 10000 documents...