[PDF] Top 20 Reasoning about intentions: a defeasible argumentation approach
Has 10000 "Reasoning about intentions: a defeasible argumentation approach" found on our website. Below are the top 20 most common "Reasoning about intentions: a defeasible argumentation approach".
Reasoning about intentions: a defeasible argumentation approach
... an approach to solve the problem of having an action-oriented system such as a robot with effectorial capabilities and a goal to ...a defeasible argumentation module ...a defeasible logic ... See full document
12
An approach for Temporal Argumentation Using Labeled Defeasible Logic Programming (l-DeLP)
... abstract argumentation approaches, differ- ent more concrete argumentation systems exists, spec- ifying a knowledge representation language, and how arguments are ...a defeasible argu- mentation ... See full document
8
Embedding defeasible argumentation in the semantic web: an ontology-based approach
... common-sense reasoning (e.g., reasoning with uncertainty or with incomplete and potentially inconsistent information) are present when defining ...years, defeasible argumentation has succeeded ... See full document
5
A first approach to combining ontologies and defeasible argumentation for the semantic web
... common-sense reasoning (e.g., reasoning with uncertainty or with incomplete and potentially inconsistent information) are present when defining ...decade defeasible argumentation has developed ... See full document
12
DBI-DeLP: a framework for defeasible argumentation over databases
... achieve argumentation over a large amount of data. This approach is more efficient than explicit codification of facts because other systems may “give” data to ours without the need of complex ...allows ... See full document
10
Introducing probabilistic reasoning in defeasible argumentation using labeled deductive systems
... will adopt an extensional approach as it can be easily integrated in the existing ontology, as we will see in the next section. Semantical issues are not discussed in this paper. However, it must be noted that ... See full document
5
Consequence operators for defeasible argumentation: characterization and logical properties
... commonsense reasoning. Defeasible argumentation has proven to be a successful approach in many respects, proving to be a con°uence point for many alternative logical ...In defeasible ... See full document
12
Reasoning with inconsistent ontologies in possibilistic defeasible logic programming
... Possibilistic Defeasible Logic Programming (P-DeLP) [9] is a logic program- ming language which combines features from argumentation theory and logic programming, incorporating as well the treatment of ... See full document
10
On the effect of dynamic environments in defeasible reasoning
... This approach has a clear advantage: it admits a seamless transition between theory and ...Several argumentation formalisms [12,10,8,4,13] have been proposed as knowledge representation and reasoning ... See full document
3
Integrating defeasible argumentation with fuzzy ART neural networks for pattern classification
... sense reasoning, complementing thus the pattern classifi- cation process, which relies on quantitative aspects of the data involved (such as numeric attributes or ...the approach outlined in this paper, ... See full document
7
On cumulativity in the context of defeasible argumentation
... that defeasible argumen- tation has evolved in the last twenty years as a successful approach for modelling commonsense rea- ...common-sense reasoning, such as mediation framework for supporting ... See full document
11
Agent programming using defeasible argumentation for knowledgerepresentation and reasoning
... and Intentions to solve complex problems is well known in the literature [11], espe- cially those agents based on BDI theory ...agent reasoning, besides a declarative way to specify its mental ... See full document
12
Events, time and argumentative systems
... of reasoning be- cause its very difficult to represent absolutely all the information related to the objects we count ...information about a new entity becomes available we must revise all the axioms on the ... See full document
5
Integrating defeasible argumentation and machine learning techniques . Preliminary report
... aspects of a generic argument-based framework can be integrated with other ML-based ap- proaches. The paper is structured as follows. First, we briefly introduce the components of most argument-based framework and then ... See full document
5
Combining quantitative and qualitative reasoning in defeasible argumentation
... Computing warrant, on the other hand, can also be better understood in the light of some logical properties of |∼ T ∗ . Restricted inclusion ensures that any non-defeasible fact in a theory Γ can be considered as ... See full document
12
An argumentative formalism for implementing rational agents
... argument in the argumentation line. To see whether B is a circular argument, the set of rules in B must be checked to ensure that it is not a subset of the rules of a previous argument in its argumentative line. ... See full document
12
Formalizing processes in defeasible argumentation using labeled deductive systems
... since argumentation constitutes a con°uence point for characterizing traditional approaches to non-monotonic reasoning systems, such as Gelfond's extended logic programming and Reiter's default logic ... See full document
3
Using defeasible argumentation in progression and regression planning . Some preliminary explorations
... As the reader has noticed, when an action is executed new literals can be added or deleted from Φ, and therefore, new defeaters could appear or disappear interfering somehow with the assumed warrants. As it was shown in ... See full document
10
On the use of contexts for representing knowledge in defeasible argumentation
... On the other hand, we will capture the su ces- sive stages in the process of debate through so-called debate contexts, which are basically 'snapshots' of the arguments in co[r] ... See full document
12
A formalization of defeasible argumentation using labelled deductive systems . Preliminary report
... &XUUHQWO\ WKHUH H[LVW VHYHUDO DOWHUQDWLYH IRUPDOL]DWLRQV RI GHIHDVLEOH DUJXPHQWDWLRQ 5HFHQW ZRUN >36 .7 %'.7@ KDV VKRZQ WKDW GHIHDVLEOH DUJXPHQWDWLRQ FRQVWLWXWHV D SRLQW RI FRQXH[r] ... See full document
13
Related subjects