• No se han encontrado resultados

[PDF] Top 20 Sources of parallelism in defeasible argumentation

Has 10000 "Sources of parallelism in defeasible argumentation" found on our website. Below are the top 20 most common "Sources of parallelism in defeasible argumentation".

Sources of parallelism in defeasible argumentation

Sources of parallelism in defeasible argumentation

... ,Q /RJLF 3URJUDPPLQJ GLHUHQW NLQGV RI SDUDOOHOLVP KDYH EHHQ VWXGLHG 47SDUDOOHOLVP LQGHSHQGHQW DQG GHSHQGHQW ,3/SDUDOOHOLVP DQG DOVR XQL‘ FDWLRQ SDUDOOHOLVP $OO RI WKHVH W\SHV RI SDUDOOH[r] ... See full document

15

Defeasible logic programming: language definition, operational semantics, and parallelism

Defeasible logic programming: language definition, operational semantics, and parallelism

... an argumentation formalism is used for deciding between contradictory goals through a dialectical ...set of rules used to de- rive a ...Nute in [16] remarks \An inference is defeasible if it ... See full document

3

Consequence operators for defeasible argumentation: characterization and logical properties

Consequence operators for defeasible argumentation: characterization and logical properties

... used in building more complex ...form of argument (namely, an empty argument), whereas Horn right weakening tells us that strong rules in LDS ar preserve the intuitive semantics of a Horn ... See full document

12

Modeling multiagent deliberation from an abstract standpoint

Modeling multiagent deliberation from an abstract standpoint

... trend of reinterpreting agent interaction as if it were the result of an argumentation ...aspects of multiagent negotiation in terms of defeasible ...approach in ... See full document

3

Agent programming using defeasible argumentation for knowledgerepresentation and reasoning

Agent programming using defeasible argumentation for knowledgerepresentation and reasoning

... seen in Fig.1 and Fig. 2 that the representation of the agent of ...made in Prolog and the other in ...types of answers for a query, whereas Prolog allows only two. Thus some ... See full document

12

DBI-DeLP: a framework for defeasible argumentation over databases

DBI-DeLP: a framework for defeasible argumentation over databases

... the defeasible derivation procedure in DBI-DeLP is looking support for a literal, besides the search for strict rules, facts and defeasible rules as in DeLP, a search for presumptions (using ... See full document

10

An abstract model for the process of deliberation within multiagent systems

An abstract model for the process of deliberation within multiagent systems

... collection of interacting autonomous ...reach of its individual members. This clearly accounts for the boost in research geared towards profitting from this ...modeling of a common kind ... See full document

9

Using defeasible argumentation in progression and regression planning . Some preliminary explorations

Using defeasible argumentation in progression and regression planning . Some preliminary explorations

... aim of this work is to study an argumentation-based formalism that an agent could use for constructing ...plans. In [9] we have introduced a formalism where agents have certain knowledge about their ... See full document

10

Embedding defeasible argumentation in the semantic web: an ontology-based approach

Embedding defeasible argumentation in the semantic web: an ontology-based approach

... Results in this direction have been achieved by defining interoperability between ...representation of information as the information de- scribed by the same ontology can be represented in different ... See full document

5

A first approach to combining ontologies and defeasible argumentation for the semantic web

A first approach to combining ontologies and defeasible argumentation for the semantic web

... content of documents on the Web through the use of ontology defin- ...gies. In recent years, defeasible argumentation has succeeded as an approach to formalize such common-sense ... See full document

12

An argumentation framework with uncertainty management designed for dynamic environments

An argumentation framework with uncertainty management designed for dynamic environments

... elements of the O-DeLP -based architec- ...multiple sources may result in changes in the set of observations in P , handled by the updating mechanism defined in algorithm ... See full document

10

An approach for Temporal Argumentation Using Labeled Defeasible Logic Programming (l-DeLP)

An approach for Temporal Argumentation Using Labeled Defeasible Logic Programming (l-DeLP)

... application in many areas, such as legal reasoning, autonomous agents and multi-agent systems; many are based on Dung’s seminal work char- acterizing Abstract Argumentation Frameworks ...research in ... See full document

8

Integrating defeasible argumentation with fuzzy ART neural networks for pattern classification

Integrating defeasible argumentation with fuzzy ART neural networks for pattern classification

... aspects of the data involved (such as numeric attributes or ...research in information technology is focused on developing argument assistance systems [24], ...track of the different issues that are ... See full document

7

Integrating defeasible argumentation and machine learning techniques . Preliminary report

Integrating defeasible argumentation and machine learning techniques . Preliminary report

... field of machine learning (ML) is concerned with the question of how to construct algorithms that automatically improve with ...experience. In recent years many successful ML applications have been ... See full document

5

On the use of contexts for representing knowledge in defeasible argumentation

On the use of contexts for representing knowledge in defeasible argumentation

... On the other hand, we will capture the su ces- sive stages in the process of debate through so-called debate contexts, which are basically 'snapshots' of the arguments in co[r] ... See full document

12

Combining quantitative and qualitative reasoning in defeasible argumentation

Combining quantitative and qualitative reasoning in defeasible argumentation

... defined in terms of contradic- ...role in determining whether an argument counterargues another. In LDS AR , the usual criterion for defeat among arguments is speci- ficity ...However, ... See full document

12

Formalizing processes in defeasible argumentation using labeled deductive systems

Formalizing processes in defeasible argumentation using labeled deductive systems

... think of a knowledge base as a set of `atomic' arguments (facts and rules), which can be later on extended by incorporating new, more complex ...to defeasible argumentation which is currently ... See full document

3

The role of labelled deductive systems in a formal system for defeasible argumentation

The role of labelled deductive systems in a formal system for defeasible argumentation

... Traditionally, a logical system (f,rv ) allows the inference of new wffs from those available in f using the rules of inference that characterize the notion of logical consequence r[r] ... See full document

10

Reasoning about intentions: a defeasible argumentation approach

Reasoning about intentions: a defeasible argumentation approach

... problem of having an action-oriented system with a single ...scenario in the mobile robotics domain, where a robot has certain effectorial capabilities, along with a given ...out of an available set ... See full document

12

Introducing multiple preference criteria in defeasible argumentation

Introducing multiple preference criteria in defeasible argumentation

... possibility of having multiple preference criteria to compare arguments in in Defeasible ...Argumentation. In this work we are assuming a goal- oriented Argumentative System, to ... See full document

5

Show all 10000 documents...