2.2. BASES TEORICOS CIENTÍFICAS
2.2.7. El área de comunicación en niños de educación inicial
The world health community endorsed the goal of 'health for
all by the year 2000' in 1979. This milestone in global
health policy was to ensure the provision of 'health care
based on practical, scientifically sound and socially
acceptable methods and technology, made universally
available to the community through their full participation
and at a cost that the community and country can
afford in the spirit of self reliance and self
The primary health care concept was not new to PNG. For
many years the Aid Post Orderly had provided village level
curative health care to rural populations. Many developing
countries did not have this basic level health service. If
malaria control by this approach was to be successful then
it should work in PNG. What was needed was an extension of
the responsibility for health care to the people.
The differing patterns of malaria epidemiology from village
to village suggested that 'no subset of measures will have
universal application' and 'control measures should be
tailored to the local situation' (Charlwood 1984). For
malaria control this approach demanded a complete
reorganisation of concepts and strategies. The people were
to take charge of their own health, including malaria, and
the government health services would facilitate their
efforts through education, instruction and technical
support. What had been an entirely government administered
programme was to be reoriented so that the stimulus,
impetus and manpower would come from the community (Reilly
1986, Moir & Garner 1986).
The response to the primary health care approach was mixed.
It was difficult to disband the already monumental malaria
service with its one thousand employees. It was more
difficult to encourage provincial health and village
authorities to pick up the responsibility for malaria
control. We shall examine what progress has been made
Involvement of villagers in malaria control was not a new
concept in PNG. In 1954, before spraying with residual
insecticides commenced, rural people in the Trobriand
Islands (D'Entrecasteaux Islands) had demonstrated that, at
least in the short term, they were able to supervise their
own mosquito control programmes (Black 1954 a, 1955 b ) .
At the same time it was demonstrated that totaquine
(extracted from cinchona trees grown in the Highlands) was
not effective as a traditional suppressive of malaria but
it did demonstrate that the people in these islands could
take a regular prophylactic if necessary (Gunther JT 1974).
Black expressed reservations about the feasibility of
prophylaxis over a long period (Black 1956 c ) .
Very early in the war against malaria it was realised that
a programme of 'bonification' of villages would do more to
control malaria than house spraying and drugs;
'Integral bonification implied a three-fold policy of
hydraulic, agricultural and hygienic intervention with the
primary aim of reducing breeding sites for malaria'
(Gunther JT 1974). Christian had already demonstrated that
drainage of large areas would reduce breeding sites
(Christian 1969) and naturalistic methods would support
this approach. Gambusia affinis fish had already proven
useful (Harper et al 1947). Gunther repeatedly encouraged
an emphasis on bonification through health education rather
than in applying all efforts into residual spraying and
drug reinforcement. Health education was essential to the
such control from the people any intervention would have a
short lived effect (Carlaw & Saave 1963).
A prerequisite to integrating malaria control into village
level primary health care activities was their integration
into general health services (Saave 1964, Black 1974, Farid
1974) . Only in 1984 when malaria control became an
entirely provincial responsibility was the national malaria
service trimmed to a core of technical advisers.
The World Health Organisation formalised the primary health
approach to malaria control by stressing the importance of
a national commitment and by demonstrating that community
participation was indispensable (World Health Organisation
1978). Malaria control was an integral part of any
economic development programme and if government programmes
had failed in their attempts to achieve this then clearly
another approach should be tried. The basic premise was
that immediate decreases in mortality could be expected
from village-based treatment for malaria and that source
reduction, larvicides and oiling would achieve more in the
long run, be less expensive and would be on-going methods
administered at a village level.
As transmission of malaria in an evolving community was
changing, so the concept of the epidemiology of malaria
being a function of both biological and psychosocial
factors was born (McMahon 197 4 b ) . Human behaviour was
possibly a more important influence on attempts at malaria
An almost certain factor in the failure of the mass
campaigns in malaria eradication was the fact that the
integrity of such campaigns was determined by factors of an
administrative, social and political nature rather than by
technical aspects (Gonzales 1965). For treatment and
prophylaxis alone the costs may be outside the health
budget of many countries (Bruce-Chwatt 1979, Pampana 1969).
Village based treatment and source reduction remain the
cornerstones of the primary health care approach to malaria
control in PNG, with residual insecticide spraying as an
additional control measure in supportive villages.