Sección VI Seguridad Pública
Artículo 99.- A Son facultades del Tribunal Superior de Justicia:
The respondents all began with strong commitments to ecological ethics. They reported varying impacts of the garden project on their ecological ethics in terms of awareness and behavior.
Question 1 (Pre-‐Garden): “Please describe yourself in terms of environmentalism. Do you consider yourself an “environmentalist,” or, if you prefer, do you consider yourself someone who is invested in caring for the Creation? If so, why and how? If not, why not?”
Five of the seven people initially interviewed either embraced the label of environmentalist or noted that they did not reject the term, even if they were not sure if it applied to them. Any resistance to the term stemmed either from a sense that they should be involved in more activism to be worthy of the term, or from a kind of extremism associated with the term. Three people expressed that they tried to have environmental personal habits but did not participate in environmental activism enough to have earned the label of environmentalist:
Interesting. I own the label of environmentalist… I’ll own that label – you can slap it on me – if you’ll listen to my message, to what I have to say. I think the word slightly turns people off sometimes, they make assumptions… without really understanding who I am and where I’m coming from. It shuts down dialog sometimes.5
I wouldn't describe myself as an extreme environmentalist, because of lack of time or other things on my plate… I think I should call myself one, but not an activist. It’s important in our daily living and how I educate my kids, and I have an appreciation for it; it’s just my [lack of] time, but I do appreciate people that do [activism].6
5 Interviews were confidential; names of interviewees are withheld by mutual consent. Tallessyn Z. Grenfell-‐Lee, "Dissertation Interviews: Compiled Transcripts" (Boston University School of Theology, 2016), 14. Transcript file available upon request.
One person rejected the term; she noted that it can alienate people, and she expressed a preference for the integration of ecological ideas into the rest of life:
I don’t like the word “environmentalist”; I’m also resistant to the word “Christian,” although I consider myself both. They carry unfortunate and exaggerated stereotypes… I have been working on behalf of the environment professionally for two decades, but I would never use the word
“environmentalist” to describe myself. And there isn’t another word I use; it doesn’t need a label, it’s something we should all do, like brushing our teeth. “Environmentalist” suggests life on an extreme edge… there’s a judgment there, and I don’t like it.7
Question 1 (Mid-‐ and Post-‐Garden): “Please describe yourself in terms of
environmentalism. Since beginning this project, do you consider yourself more of an “environmentalist,” or, if you prefer, do you consider yourself someone who is more invested in caring for the Creation? If so, why and how? If not, why not?”
Five of the six mid-‐ and post-‐garden interviewees reported that the garden project had raised their personal awareness about issues such as growing food, compassion for the plants in the heat, or spiritual connections to gardening. Three respondents mentioned that the prominent location of the garden raised both participant and congregational awareness about urban food and nature connection and ministries. During the mid-‐garden interviews, the pastor described this
awareness:
Because of where it is, I have to think about it every day – I have to walk right by it when I come in… It’s made me more aware of the seasons around me; I find myself thinking when it rains, well, that will be good for the church
garden; or when it’s hot, I need to throw a bucket of water in there. Having it so front and center has made me more connected… It reminds me of the fragility of life, the importance of caring for one another, the
interdependence of things living on this planet. …I feel I think probably a greater kinship with the environment through this medium.
In the last set of interviews, the pastor also included ideas of food specifically:
It’s the first time I’ve done… a [church] vegetable garden; we’ve had
flowerbeds at other churches that I’ve helped to take care of. It reminded me of some things I don’t always think of in the city… where food comes from, and that it doesn’t grow in grocery stores; it reminded me of the need to care for the sources of production of food. I also appreciated the sort of hospitable way in which it was done, to make it available to passersby… it was a good reminder for me in a number of ways of our connection to the Earth that can easily get forgotten in the city.8
One participant also spoke of the impact on her plans for the future. In her mid-‐garden interview, she described general awareness of the source of food:
Seeing the garden in front of the church was a great reminder not just of the environment but of food and how people are fed – where our food comes from.9
After the project, this participant included ideas of the impact over time and into the future:
Having it out front there, which I’m so glad we did, instead of in someone’s yard, I think that was the best thing we did overall; because it’s a reminder every time you see it. It reminds me of the fact that we can actually grow our own food. It inspires me. It puts thoughts, especially toward the end of the season, about next year: what can I do next year? You look at what’s growing, what’s doing well; it’s like seeds of thought for the next season. Watching something from week to week is a reminder of just how amazing it is that
8 Ibid., 82. 9 Ibid., 51.
plants take sunlight, and water, and dirt, and turn it into food. And the fact that it was right there – you couldn’t miss it – you could watch the progress without going out of your way. It reminds you of how amazing the Creation is.10
The project organizer, who reported no impact, allowed later (in response to Question 2, page 118 below) that the church garden project may have inspired her to plant her own garden this year. She suggested reasons for the lack of an impact, such as already having her own garden and the lack of group cohesion:
I feel like I’m pretty much the same as I’ve been for a long time; I’m a gardener and I do my own garden… Personally, I don’t feel like I’ve been changed; and that’s possibly because there wasn’t that much real connection among the people who were doing the project. People seemed interested at the outset, but I didn’t have the sense of a cohesive group that might have elevated our levels of concern… That’s not to say I don’t think it was
worthwhile or valuable. I love those little boxes in front of the church… They exhibit to the community at large that this is a community that cares about growing things and sharing them outside our community.11