2. Elementos teóricos y metodológicos
2.2. Acciones metodológicas
Reentry Service Provider Consent Form IRB #: 16-3335
You are being asked to take part in a research study evaluating the service environment for individuals who are transitioning from time in the criminal justice system to independent living. Please read this form carefully and ask any questions you may have before agreeing to take part in the study.
What the study is about: The purpose of this study is to learn more about the programs offered by organizations that offer employment and/or substance-use related services to individuals who were formerly involved in the justice system. The primary objective of this study is to identify barriers and challenges to effective service provision and to provide policy recommendations to overcome or mitigate those circumstances.
What I will ask you to do: If you agree to be in this study, we will ask you to complete an online survey and/or interview you. The online survey will ask about funding sources, operating budget, and data collection practices of your organization. The survey will take approximately 10
minutes to complete. During the interview, you will be asked about your role, your
organization’s programs, and for your perspective on challenges the organization faces. The interview will last between 15-30 minutes. You will not be asked any questions that would lead you to reveal any identifying information about anyone you serve.
Your answers will be recorded and digitally transcribed. All files will be password protected. If requested, your answers can be de-identified. (Initial here if you wish your answers to be de- identified:_______) Otherwise, your name and the name of your organization may be included in the final published version of this study. If a direct quote from your interview is to be used in the study, you will be contacted in order to confirm that I have your permission to publish the quote(s).
Risks and benefits:
I do not anticipate any major risks to you participating in this study other than those encountered in day-to-day life. There is a small risk that you may find some of the questions about your job or the organization you work for to be sensitive.
There are no guaranteed benefits to you for participating in this study. Findings from this study may help your organization (and organizations like yours) identify strategies to better serve your clients.
Compensation: There is no compensation for participation in this study.
Taking part is voluntary: Taking part in this study is completely voluntary. You may skip any questions that you do not want to answer. If you decide to take part, you are free to withdraw at any time.
If you have questions: The researcher conducting this study is Devon Genua. Please ask any questions you have now. If you have questions later, you may contact Devon Genua at (919) 455-3068 or [email protected] If you have any questions or concerns regarding your rights as a subject in this study, you may contact the UNC Institutional Review Board (IRB) at (919)- 966-3113 or access their website at http://www.research.unc.edu.
You will be given a copy of this form to keep for your records.
Statement of Consent: I have read the above information, and have received answers to any questions I asked. I consent to take part in the study.
Your Signature ___________________________________ Date ________________________ Your Name (printed) ____________________________________________________________ In addition to agreeing to participate, I also consent to having the interview recorded. Only sign if you intend to be interviewed.
Your Signature ___________________________________ Date _________________________ Signature of person obtaining consent ______________________________ Date
_____________________
Printed name of person obtaining consent ______________________________ Date _____________________
References
Aos, S., Miller, M., and Drake, E. (2006). Evidence-based adult corrections programs: what works and what does not. Washington State Institute for Public Policy. Retrieved from:
http://www.wsipp.wa.gov/ReportFile/924
Atkinson, D.V. & Lockwood, K. (2014). The benefits of ban the box: A case study of Durham, NC. The Southern Coalition for Social Justice. Retrieved from:
http://www.southerncoalition.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/BantheBox_WhitePaper.pdf Bales, W.; Van Slyke, S.; Blomberg, T. (2006). Substance Abuse Treatment in Prison and
Community Reentry: Breaking the Cycle of Drugs, Crime, Incarceration, and Recidivism Georgetown Journal on Poverty Law and Policy 13(2), 383-402. Retrieved from:
http://heinonline.org.libproxy.lib.unc.edu/HOL/Page?handle=hein.journals/geojpovlp13&col lection=journals&id=389
Begun, A., Early, T., & Hodge, A. (2015). Mental Health and Substance Abuse Service Engagement by Men and Women During Community Reentry Following Incarceration. Administration And Policy In Mental Health And Mental Health Services Research, 43(2), 207-218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10488-015-0632-2
Binswanger, I., Stern, M., Deyo, R., Heagerty, P., Cheadle, A., Elmore, J., & Koepsell, T. (2007). Release from prison — A high risk of death for former inmates. New England Journal Of Medicine, 356(2), 157-165. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/nejmsa064115
Bloom, D. (2006). Employment-focused programs for ex-prisoners: What have we learned, what are we learning, and where should we go from here. MDRC. Retrieved from:
http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED493008.pdf
Butzin, C., O'Connell, D., Martin, S., & Inciardi, J. (2006). Effect of drug treatment during work release on new arrests and incarcerations. Journal Of Criminal Justice, 34(5), 557-565. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2006.09.010
CEF. (2017). Our Services. Retrieved from: https://communityempowermentfund.org/services/ Cole, J. M. (2012). The Justice Department and reentry policy: Building engagement, improving
outcomes. The Judges' Journal, 51(4), 19-22. Retrieved from
http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/1242473531?accou ntid=14244
Corporation for National and Community Service (n.d.) Budgeting for evaluation. Retrieved from: https://www.nationalservice.gov/resources/evaluation/planning-
evaluation#Budgeting_for_Evaluation
[CSGJC] Council of State Governments Justice Center. (2016). Clean slate clearinghouse. Retrieved from: https://cleanslate.csgjusticecenter.org/
CSGJC. (2013). Frequently asked questions: what are collateral consequences?. National Inventory of Collateral Consequences. Retrieved from: https://niccc.csgjusticecenter.org/description/ CSGJC. (n.d.) Evaluations: Inciardi, et.al., 2009. What Works in Reentry Clearinghouse. Retrieved
CSGJC. (n.d.) Evaluations: Wexler, Melnick, and Cao 2004. What Works in Reentry Clearinghouse. Retrieved from: https://whatworks.csgjusticecenter.org/evaluation/wexler-melnick-and-cao- 2004
CSGJC. (n.d.) Policy statement 6: measuring outcomes and evaluating impact. Retrieved from: https://csgjusticecenter.org/nrrc/policy-statement-6-measuring-outcomes-and-evaluating- impact/
Dean, S. C. (2014). Community-based reentry in arlington county: An evaluation of the OAR reentry program. Available from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (1640913351). Retrieved from
http://libproxy.lib.unc.edu/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/1640913351?accou ntid=14244
Doleac, J.L. (2016, May 31). “Ban the box” does more harm than good. The Brookings Institution. Retrieved from: https://www.brookings.edu/opinions/ban-the-box-does-more-harm-than- good/
Duran, L., Plotkin, M., Potter, P., Rosen, H. (2013). Integrated reentry and employment strategies: Reducing recidivism and promoting job readiness. The Council of State Governments Justice Center.Retrieved from: https://csgjusticecenter.org/wp-
content/uploads/2013/09/Final.Reentry-and-Employment.pp_.pdf
Durham County Criminal Justice Resource Center. (2017). Criminal Justice Resource Center. Retrieved from: http://dconc.gov/government/departments-a-e/criminal-justice-resource- center
Durham County Criminal Justice Resource Center. (2017a). Community-Based Corrections
Programs for Adult Offenders. Retrieved from: http://dconc.gov/government/departments-a- e/criminal-justice-resource-center/community-based-corrections-programs
Durham County Criminal Justice Resource Center. (2017b). Annual Report FY 2016. Retrieved from: http://dconc.gov/home/showdocument?id=19660
[FIRC] Federal Interagency Reentry Council. (2015). Collateral Consequences. Retrieved from: https://csgjusticecenter.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Collateral_Consequences.pdf FIRC. (2015). Reentry mythbuster: on hiring/criminal records guidance. Retrieved from:
https://csgjusticecenter.org/wp-
content/uploads/2012/11/Reentry_Council_Mythbuster_Employment.pdf
Fishman, N., Jusko, J. (2015, October 21). Many employers not in compliance with EEOC criminal records Guidance, EmployeeScreenIQ research shows. PR Newswire. Retrieved from: http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/many-employers-not-in-compliance-with-eeoc- criminal-records-guidance-employeescreeniq-research-shows-300163212.html
Fletcher, B. W., Lehman, W. E., Wexler, H. K., Melnick, G., Taxman, F. S., & Young, D. W. (2009). Measuring collaboration and integration activities in criminal justice and substance abuse treatment agencies. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 103, S54-S64. Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.01.001
Friedmann, P. D., Taxman, F. S., & Henderson, C. E. (2007). Evidence-based treatment practices for drug-involved adults in the criminal justice system. Journal of Substance Abuse
Treatment, 32(3), 267-277. Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2006.12.020 [GAO] Government Accountability Office. (1990). Case Study Evaluations. Retrieved from:
http://www.gao.gov/special.pubs/10_1_9.pdf
Hansen, W.T. (2012). Reentry evolution: The federal role in supporting state and local efforts. The Council of State Governments. Retrieved from:
http://knowledgecenter.csg.org/kc/system/files/warren_t._henson_2012.pdf
Henderson, C., Young, D., Jainchill, N., Hawke, J., Farkas, S., & Davis, R. (2007). Program use of effective drug abuse treatment practices for juvenile offenders. Journal Of Substance Abuse Treatment, 32(3), 279-290. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2006.12.021
Hettema, J., & Sorensen, J. (2009). Access to Care for Methadone Maintenance Patients in the United States. International Journal Of Mental Health And Addiction, 7(3), 468-474. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11469-009-9204-6
Jason, L.A., Davis, M.I., Ferrari, J.R., & Bishop, P.D. (2001). Oxford House: A review of research and implications for substance abuse recovery and community research. Journal of Drug Education, 31(1), 1-27. Retrieved from:
https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Joseph_Ferrari3/publication/11998136_Oxford_house_ A_review_of_research_and_implications_for_substance_abuse_recovery_and_community_r esearch/links/565355c708ae4988a7af871f.pdf
Joffe, H., & Yardley, L. (2004). Content and thematic analysis. In L. Yardley & D. Martin, Research Methods for Clinical and Health Psychology (1st ed., pp. 56-69). SAGE.
Knezevich, A. (2017). New state laws to help Marylanders clear records. The Baltimore Sun. Retrieved from http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/maryland/bs-md-expungement-changes- 20150926-story.html
Kooy, R. (2007). Evidence-based practices: A framework for sentencing policy. Presented to the National Conference of State Legislatures in September, 2007.Retrieved from:
www.ncsl.org/print/cj/sf-kooyppt.pdf
Latessa, E. (2011). Why the risk and needs principles are relevant to correctional programs (even to employment programs). Criminology & Public Policy, 10(4), 973-977. Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9133.2011.00759.x
Latessa, E., Lowenkamp, C. (2005). What are criminogenic needs and why are they important? For the Record. Retrieved from:
www.uc.edu/content/dam/uc/ccjr/docs/articles/What_Are_Criminogenic_Needs.pdf Lattimore, P.K., Barrick, K., Cowell, C., Dawes, D., Steffey, D., Tueller, S., Visher, C.A. (2012).
Prisoner reentry services: What worked for SVORI evaluation participants. RTI International. Retrieved from: https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/238214.pdf Lipsey, M., & Cullen, F. (2007). The Effectiveness of Correctional Rehabilitation: A Review of
Systematic Reviews. Annual Review Of Law And Social Science, 3(1), 297-320. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.lawsocsci.3.081806.112833
Lutze, F. E., Rosky, J. W., & Hamilton, Z. K. (2014). Homelessness and reentry: a multisite outcome evaluation of Washington State’s reentry housing program for high risk offenders. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 41(4), 471-491. Retrieved from: https://wsicj.wsu.edu/wp-
content/uploads/sites/436/2014/11/Criminal-Justice-and-Behavior-2014-Lutze-471-91.pdf Mallik-Kane, K., Visher, C. (2008). Health and prisoner reentry: How physical, mental, and
substance abuse conditions shape the process of reintegration. The Urban Institute. Retrieved from: http://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/31491/411617-Health-and-
Prisoner-Reentry.PDF
Martin, L. (2011). Debt to Society: Asset Poverty and Prisoner Reentry. The Review Of Black Political Economy, 38(2), 131-143. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12114-011-9087-1
MDRC. (2013). Building knowledge about successful prisoner reentry strategies. Retrieved from: http://www.mdrc.org/sites/default/files/Reentry_020113.pdf
Merrall, E., Kariminia, A., Binswanger, I., Hobbs, M., Farrell, M., & Marsden, J. et al. (2010). Meta- analysis of drug-related deaths soon after release from prison. Addiction, 105(9), 1545-1554. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2010.02990.x
Mulhausen, D. (2015). Studies cast doubt on the effectiveness of reentry programs. The Heritage Foundation. Retrieved from: http://www.heritage.org/crime-and-justice/report/studies-cast- doubt-effectiveness-prisoner-reentry-programs
National Center for Education Statistics. (1994). Literacy behind prison walls: Profiles of the prison population from the national adult literacy survey. Retrieved from:
https://nces.ed.gov/pubs94/94102.pdf
National Employment Law Project. (2016). Fact sheet: Research supports fair chance policies. Retrieved from: http://www.nelp.org/content/uploads/Fair-Chance-Ban-the-Box-
Research.pdf
National Institute on Drug Abuse. (2011). Treating offenders with drug problems: Integrating public health and public safety. United States Department of Health and Human Services. Retrieved from: https://www.drugabuse.gov/sites/default/files/drugs_crime.pdf
North Carolina Department of Commerce. (n.d.) Federal bonding. Retrieved from: https://www.nccommerce.com/workforce/businesses/federal-bonding
North Carolina Department of Commerce. (n.d.) Work Opportunity Tax Credit. Retrieved from: https://www.nccommerce.com/workforce/businesses/work-opportunity-tax-credit North Carolina Department of Correction Office of Research and Planning. (2017). Automated
system query. Retrieved from: http://webapps6.doc.state.nc.us/apps/asqExt/ASQ
North Carolina Department of Correction Office of Research and Planning. (2002). Lessons learned: Best practices for criminal justice partnership programs. Retrieved from:
http://randp.doc.state.nc.us/pubdocs/0005167.PDF
North Carolina Department of Correction: Office of Transition Services. (n.d.) Transition and reentry model for prisons and community corrections. Retrieved from:
https://www.ncdps.gov/document/transition-and-reentry-model-prisons-and-community- corrections
North Carolina Department of Correction: Office of Transition Services. (n.d.). Historical overview of NCDOC transition and reentry initiatives. Retrieved from:
http://www.doc.state.nc.us/rap/OTSHistoricalOverview.pdf
North Carolina Department of Public Safety (n.d.) Data/Statistics/Reports. Retrieved from: https://www.ncdps.gov/Juvenile-Justice/Data-Statistics-Reports
North Carolina Department of Public Safety Division of Adult Correction and Juvenile Justice. (2016). Status of the Treatment for Effective Community Supervision program. Retrieved from: http://www.ncleg.net/documentsites/committees/JLOCJPS/Reports/FY%202015- 16/DPS_Treatment_for_Effective_Community_Supervision_Report_2016_03_01.pdf North Carolina Department of Public Safety Office of Research and Planning. (n.d.) County
Resource Guide—County queries. Retrieved from:
http://randp.doc.state.nc.us/scripts/htmSQL.exe/docs/hsql/CM/CountyResourceGuide- COquery.hsql
North Carolina Department of Public Safety. (2014). Evidence-based practices. Retrieved from: https://www.ncdps.gov/Adult-Corrections/Community-Corrections/Evidence-Based- Practices
North Carolina Justice Center. (2015). Collateral consequences explained. Retrieved from: http://www.ncjustice.org/?q=second-chance-alliance/collateral-consequences-explained North Carolina Sentencing and Policy Advisory Commission. (2016). Correctional program
evaluation: Offenders placed on probation or released from prison in FY 2013. Retrieved from: http://www.nccourts.org/Courts/CRS/Councils/spac/Documents/recidivism_2016.pdf North Carolina Sentencing and Policy Advisory Commission. (2016a). Justice Reinvestment Act:
Implementation evaluation report. Retrieved from:
http://www.nccourts.org/Courts/CRS/Councils/spac/Documents/JRIReports-2016.pdf Orange County Criminal Justice Resource Office. (2017). Criminal Justice Resource Office.
Retrieved from: http://orangecountync.gov/departments/criminal_justice_resource_office.php Oxford House. (2017). About Us. Retrieved from: http://www.oxfordhouse.org/userfiles/file/
Pager, D., Western, B. (2009). Investigating prisoner reentry: The impact of conviction status on the employment prospects of young men. Retrieved from:
https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/238214.pdf
Piedmont Triad Regional Council. (2012). Project Reentry. Retrieved from: http://www.ptrc.org/index.aspx?page=296
Roman, C.G. & Travis, J. (2004). Taking stock: housing, homelessness, and prisoner reentry. The Urban Institute. Retrieved from:
http://webarchive.urban.org/UploadedPDF/411096_taking_stock.pdf
Rossman, S.B., Roman, C.G. (2003). Case-managed reentry and employment: Lessons from the opportunity to succeed program. The Urban Institute.Retrieved from:
http://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/64426/1000746-Case-Managed-Reentry- and-Employment.pdf
Sperber, K.G & Manzo, A.N. (2009). Factors influencing medication-assisted treatment in Ohio halfway houses and community-based correctional facilities. Talbert House. Retrieved from: http://www.publicsafety.ohio.gov/links/MAT_CBCFs_Report.pdf
Stahler, G., Mennis, J., Belenko, S., Welsh, W., Hiller, M., & Zajac, G. (2013). Predicting recidivism for released state prison offenders. Criminal Justice And Behavior, 40(6), 690- 711. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0093854812469609
StepUp Ministry. (2017). Programs. Retrieved from: http://www.stepupministry.org/
Stewart, E., Kurbin, C.E. (2011). Predicting who reoffends: The neglected role of neighborhood context in recidivism studies. Criminology, 44, 171-204. Retrieved from:
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2028183
The Arnold Foundation. (2017). Evidence-based decision making and rigorous evaluations. Retrieved from; http://www.arnoldfoundation.org/initiative/evidence-based-policy- innovation/evidence-based-decision-making/
The NCJA Center for Criminal Justice Planning. (2017). Corrections & community corrections programs. Retrieved from:
http://www.ncjp.org/policy_practice/practice/corrections_community_corrections
Tripodi, S., Kim, J., & Bender, K. (2009). Is employment associated with reduced recidivism?: The complex relationship between employment and crime. International Journal Of Offender Therapy And Comparative Criminology, 54(5), 706-720.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0306624x09342980
U.S. Sentencing Commission. (2011). 2011 Report to the Congress: Mandatory minimum penalties in the federal criminal justice system. Retrieved from:
http://www.ussc.gov/research/congressional-reports/2011-report-congress-mandatory- minimum-penalties-federal-criminal-justice-system
United States Census Bureau. (2015). American Fact Finder: Community facts. Retrieved from: https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/index.xhtml
United States Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs, National Institute of Justice. (2011). About the serious and violent offender reentry initiative. Retrieved from:
https://www.nij.gov/topics/corrections/reentry/pages/about-svori.aspx
United States Department of Justice. (1994). Department of Justice fact sheet: Violent crime control and the law enforcement act of 1994. Retrieved from: https://www.ncjrs.gov/txtfiles/billfs.txt US DOJ Bureau of Justice Assistance (n.d.) Frequently asked questions: What does it mean for a
state to participate in the Justice Reinvestment Initiative? Retrieved from: https://www.bja.gov/FAQDetail.aspx?ID=171
US DOJ Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics (n.d). Prisoner Recidivism Analysis Tool. Retrieved from: https://www.bjs.gov/index.cfm?ty=datool&surl=/recidivism/index.cfm US DOJ. (2016). Federal Interagency Reentry Council. Retrieved from:
https://www.justice.gov/reentry/federal-interagency-reentry-council
Vedung, E. (2009). Public policy and program evaluation (1st ed.). New Brunswick USA: Transaction Publ.
Vera Institute of Justice. (2014). Justice in focus: Crime bill @ 20. Retrieved from: http://crimebill20.vera.org/justiceinfocus#chapter-119969
Visher, C.A., Debus-Sherrill, S.A., Yahner, J. (2008). Employment after prison: A longitudinal study of releasees in three states. Retrieved from:
http://www.urban.org/sites/default/files/publication/32106/411778-Employment-after-Prison- A-Longitudinal-Study-of-Releasees-in-Three-States.PDF
Visher, C.A., Winterfield, L., Coggeshall, M. (2005). Ex-offender employment programs and recidivism: A meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 1(3), p. 295-316. DOI: 10.1007/s11292-005-8127-x
Yoon, J., Nickel, J. (2008). Reentry partnerships: A guide for states & faith-based and community organizations. Council of State Governments Justice Center and US DOJ. Retrieved from: https://www.justice.gov/archive/fbci/docs/reentry-partnership.pdf