• No se han encontrado resultados

ACTO TERCERO

In document EL CELOSO PRUDENTE. Tirso de Molina (página 80-115)

Treats clients

Client substance abuse problem

Treats clients

Regular Intensive

-Continued. See notes at end of table.

Table 6.7. Facility size, according to type of care offered, by state or jurisdiction: March 29, 2013 Median number of clients

Median number of clients per facility2 Type of care offered

Residential (non-hospital) State or jurisdiction1

Total

Regular Intensive

Table 6.7. Facility size, according to type of care offered, by state or jurisdiction: March 29, 2013 (cont.) Median number of clients

SOURCE: Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, National Survey of Substance Abuse Treatment Services (N-SSATS), 2013.

1 Facilities operated by federal agencies are included in the states in which the facilities are located.

Total

residen-tial State or jurisdiction1

Total

2 Of 14,148 facilities, 741 facilities (5 percent) whose client counts were reported by another facility were not asked to respond to these questions. Of the remaining 13,407 facilities, 401 facilities (3 percent) that included client counts for other facilities were excluded from tabulations for this table, and thus, tabulations are based on 13,006 facilities that responded to this question for their facility alone.

Median number of clients per facility2 Type of care offered

3 Includes the Federation of Micronesia, Guam, Palau, and Virgin Islands.

Residential (non-hospital)

94

Total

Table 6.8. Facility size in terms of number of clients, by state or jurisdiction: March 29, 2013 Number and percent distribution

State or jurisdiction1

Continued. See notes at end of table.

Number of facilities2 Percent distribution

95

Total

-SOURCE: Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, National Survey of Substance Abuse Treatment Services (N-SSATS), 2013.

1 Facilities operated by federal agencies are included in the states in which the facilities are located.

State or jurisdiction1

- - Quantity is zero.

Number of facilities2 Percent distribution

NOTE: Percentages may not sum to 100 percent because of rounding.

3 Includes the Federation of Micronesia, Guam, Palau, and Virgin Islands.

Table 6.8. Facility size in terms of number of clients, by state or jurisdiction: March 29, 2013 (cont.) Number and percent distribution

96

No. of

Continued. See notes at end of table.

Table 6.9. Facility capacity and utilization of residential (non-hospital) and hospital inpatient care, by state or jurisdiction: March 29, 2013 Number and utilization rate

State or jurisdiction1

Residential and hospital inpatient2,3 Residential (non-hospital)2 Hospital inpatient3

97

No. of

-^ Data suppressed due to confidentiality issues.

Residential (non-hospital)2 Hospital inpatient3

1 Facilities operated by federal agencies are included in the states in which the facilities are located.

3 Of the 753 facilities reporting that hospital inpatient services were offered, 12 facilities (2 percent) whose client counts were reported by another facility were not asked to respond to this question, and 13 facilities (2 percent) reported for themselves and other facilities. However, the utilization rate and designated beds per facility are based on 483 facilities that reported both designated beds and clients for their facility only. Of the 728 facilities that reported designated beds, 83 facilities (11 percent) were excluded from the utilization rate tabulations because they did not respond to this question, and 162 facilities (22 percent) were excluded because the number of designated beds was reported as zero.

2 Of the 3,450 facilities reporting that residential (non-hospital) services were offered, 98 facilities (3 percent) whose client counts were reported by another facility were not asked to respond to this question. Of the remaining 3,352 facilities, 80 facilities (2 percent) reported for themselves and other facilities. However, the utilization rate and designated beds per facility are based on the 3,082 facilities that reported both designated beds and clients. Of the 3,272 facilities that reported designated beds, 56 facilities (2 percent) were excluded from the utilization rate tabulations because they did not respond to this question, and 134 facilities (4 percent) were excluded because the number of designated beds was reported as zero.

Table 6.9. Facility capacity and utilization of residential (non-hospital) and hospital inpatient care, by state or jurisdiction: March 29, 2013 (cont.) Number and utilization rate

State or jurisdiction1

Residential and hospital inpatient2,3

4 Because substance abuse treatment clients may also occupy non-designated beds, utilization rates may be more than 100 percent.

SOURCE: Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, National Survey of Substance Abuse Treatment Services (N-SSATS), 2013.

- - Quantity is zero.

5 Includes the Federation of Micronesia, Guam, Palau, and Virgin Islands.

98

Individual

Continued. See notes at end of table.

Table 6.10. Type of counseling used, by state or jurisdiction: 2013 Number and percent

Counseling type

Total State or jurisdiction1

Percent3 Counseling type

Number of facilities2

99

Individual

Table 6.10. Type of counseling used, by state or jurisdiction: 2013 (cont.) Number and percent

Percent3

SOURCE: Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, National Survey of Substance Abuse Treatment Services (N-SSATS), 2013.

State or jurisdiction1

1 Facilities operated by federal agencies are included in the states in which the facilities are located.

3 Percentages sum to more than 100 percent because a facility could use more than one counseling type.

2 Number of facilities sums to more than the Total column because a facility could use more than one counseling type.

Counseling type

4 Includes the Federation of Micronesia, Guam, Palau, and Virgin Islands.

Number of facilities2

100

Table 6.11a. Clinical/therapeutic approaches used always or often or sometimes, by state or jurisdiction: 2013 Number

Continued. See notes at end of table.

Clinical/therapeutic approach used always or often or sometimes

Total State or jurisdiction1

Number of facilities2,3

101

Table 6.11a. Clinical/therapeutic approaches used always or often or sometimes, by state or jurisdiction: 2013 (cont.)

Number

SOURCE: Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, National Survey of Substance Abuse Treatment Services (N-SSATS), 2013.

State or jurisdiction1

2 Number of facilities sums to more than the Total column because a facility could use more than one clinical/therapeutic approach.

- - Quantity is zero.

1 Facilities operated by federal agencies are included in the states in which the facilities are located.

Clinical/therapeutic approach used always or often or sometimes

3 This question used a Likert scale response: Always or Often, Sometimes, Never, Rarely, and Not familiar with this approach. This table combines responses of Always or Often and Sometimes.

4 Includes the Federation of Micronesia, Guam, Palau, and Virgin Islands.

Number of facilities2,3

Total

102

State or jurisdiction1

Number of facilities

Table 6.11b. Clinical/therapeutic approaches used always or often or sometimes, by state or jurisdiction: 2013 Percent

Continued. See notes at end of table.

Clinical/therapeutic approach used always or often or sometimes Percent2,3

103

1 Facilities operated by federal agencies are included in the states in which the facilities are located.

SOURCE: Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, National Survey of Substance Abuse Treatment Services (N-SSATS), 2013.

State or jurisdiction1

2 Percent of facilities sums to more than the Total column because a facility could use more than one clinical/therapeutic approach.

- - Quantity is zero.

3 This question used a Likert scale response: Always or Often, Sometimes, Never, Rarely, and Not familiar with this approach. This table combines responses of Always or Often and Sometimes.

Number of facilities

Percent2,3

Clinical/therapeutic approach used always or often or sometimes

4 Includes the Federation of Micronesia, Guam, Palau, and Virgin Islands.

Table 6.11b. Clinical/therapeutic approaches used always or often or sometimes, by state or jurisdiction: 2013 (cont.) Percent

104

Adult

Table 6.12a. Facilities offering specifically tailored programs or groups for specific client types, by state or jurisdiction (part 1 of 3): 2013 Number and percent

Continued. See notes at end of table.

Any program or group Total

Number of facilities2 Percent3

State or jurisdiction1

Any program or group Client type

105

Adult

SOURCE: Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, National Survey of Substance Abuse Treatment Services (N-SSATS), 2013.

State or jurisdiction1

1 Facilities operated by federal agencies are included in the states in which the facilities are located.

- - Quantity is zero.

Any program or group

2 Number of facilities sums to more than the Total column because a facility could offer a specifically tailored program or group for more than one client type.

Number of facilities2 Percent3

3 Percentages sum to more than 100 percent because a facility could offer specifically tailored programs or groups for more than one client type.

Total

4 Includes the Federation of Micronesia, Guam, Palau, and Virgin Islands.

Client type

Any program or group

Table 6.12a. Facilities offering specifically tailored programs or groups for specific client types, by state or jurisdiction (part 1 of 3): 2013 (cont.) Number and percent

106

Young

Continued. See notes at end of table.

Table 6.12b. Facilities offering specifically tailored programs or groups for specific client types, by state or jurisdiction (part 2 of 3): 2013 Number and percent

State or jurisdiction1

Total

Any program or group

Number of facilities2 Percent3

Any program or group Client type

107

Young

-SOURCE: Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, National Survey of Substance Abuse Treatment Services (N-SSATS), 2013.

Table 6.12b. Facilities offering specifically tailored programs or groups for specific client types, by state or jurisdiction (part 2 of 3): 2013 (cont.) Number and percent

State or jurisdiction1

Total

Number of facilities2 Percent3

1 Facilities operated by federal agencies are included in the states in which the facilities are located.

2 Number of facilities sums to more than the Total column because a facility could offer a specifically tailored program or group for more than one client type.

3 Percentages sum to more than 100 percent because a facility could offer specifically tailored programs or groups for more than one client type.

- - Quantity is zero.

4 Includes the Federation of Micronesia, Guam, Palau, and Virgin Islands.

Client type

108

LGBT

Continued. See notes at end of table.

Client type

Table 6.12c. Facilities offering specifically tailored programs or groups for specific client types, by state or jurisdiction (part 3 of 3): 2013 Number and percent

State or jurisdiction1

Total

Number of facilities2 Percent3

109

LGBT

SOURCE: Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, National Survey of Substance Abuse Treatment Services (N-SSATS), 2013.

Table 6.12c. Facilities offering specifically tailored programs or groups for specific client types, by state or jurisdiction (part 3 of 3): 2013 (cont.) Number and percent

State or jurisdiction1

Total

Number of facilities2 Percent3

3 Percentages sum to more than 100 percent because a facility could offer special programs or groups for more than one client type.

1 Facilities operated by federal agencies are included in the states in which the facilities are located.

2 Number of facilities sums to more than the Total column because a facility could offer a special program or group for more than one client type.

LGBT = Lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender.

4 Includes the Federation of Micronesia, Guam, Palau, and Virgin Islands.

Client type

110

Staff

Continued. See notes at end of table.

Table 6.13a. Facilities offering services in sign language for the hearing impaired and in languages other than English, by state or jurisdiction: 2013

Number

Sign language State or jurisdiction1

Language services provided by: Languages provided by staff counselor2 Any

Staff

SOURCE: Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, National Survey of Substance Abuse Treatment Services (N-SSATS), 2013.

Table 6.13a. Facilities offering services in sign language for the hearing impaired and in languages other than English, by state or jurisdiction: 2013 (cont.)

Number

State or jurisdiction1

Sign language

- - Quantity is zero.

1 Facilities operated by federal agencies are included in the states in which the facilities are located.

2 Number of facilities based on facilities where languages services are provided by staff counselors only and by both staff counselors and on-call interpreters.

3 Facilities that offered services in any language other than English but did not have a valid response to language provider were classified as providing services by an on-call interpreter only.

4 Includes the Federation of Micronesia, Guam, Palau, and Virgin Islands.

Any language other than English

Language services provided by: Languages provided by staff counselor2

Total

Number of facilities

112

Total

Table 6.13b. Facilities offering services in sign language for the hearing impaired and in languages other than English, by state or jurisdiction: 2013

Percent

Language services provided by:

Any language other than English

Continued. See notes at end of table.

Percent

Languages provided by staff counselor2

113

Total

SOURCE: Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, National Survey of Substance Abuse Treatment Services (N-SSATS), 2013.

Languages provided by staff counselor2 Language services provided by:

- - Quantity is zero.

2 Percentages of facilities based on facilities where languages services are provided by staff counselors only and by both staff counselors and on-call interpreters.

3 Facilities that offered services in any language other than English but did not have a valid response to language provider were classified as providing services by an on-call interpreter only.

Any language other than English

4 Includes the Federation of Micronesia, Guam, Palau, and Virgin Islands.

NOTE: Percentages may not sum to 100 percent because of rounding.

1 Facilities operated by federal agencies are included in the states in which the facilities are located.

Sign language State or jurisdiction1

Number of facilities

Table 6.13b. Facilities offering services in sign language for the hearing impaired and in languages other than English, by state or jurisdiction: 2013 (cont.)

Percent

Percent

114

Opiates Alcohol

Table 6.14. Facilities detoxifying clients, by substance and state or jurisdiction: 2013 Number and percent

Detoxication from: Routine

use of medi-cations

during detox

Continued. See notes at end of table.

State or jurisdiction1

Detoxication from:

Number of facilities2

115

Opiates Alcohol

SOURCE: Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, National Survey of Substance Abuse Treatment Services (N-SSATS), 2013.

State or jurisdiction1

Total3

3 Of 14,148 facilities, 2,581 facilities (18 percent) offered detoxification services.

Detoxication from:

Number of facilities2

Routine

4 Includes the Federation of Micronesia, Guam, Palau, and Virgin Islands.

1 Facilities operated by federal agencies are included in the states in which the facilities are located.

2 Number of facilities sums to more than the Total column and percentages sum to more than 100 percent because a facility could provide detoxification for more than one substance.

- - Quantity is zero.

Percent2

Table 6.14. Facilities detoxifying clients, by substance and state or jurisdiction: 2013 (cont.)

Number and percent

116

Number of

2 Includes the Federation of Micronesia, Guam, Palau, and Virgin Islands.

1 Facilities operated by federal agencies are included in the states in which the facilities are located.

SOURCE: Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, National Survey of Substance Abuse Treatment Services (N-SSATS), 2013.

Outreach to persons who may need treatment Outreach to persons

who may need treatment

Table 6.15. Facilities with client outreach, by state or jurisdiction: 2013 Number and percent

State or jurisdiction1

Total

State or jurisdiction1 Has website Has website

117

State

Table 6.16a. Facility licensing, certification, or accreditation, by state or jurisdiction: 2013 Number

State or jurisdiction1

Continued. See notes at end of table.

Any listed agency/

organization

Licensing, certification, or accreditation organization

Total

Number of facilities2

118

State

-SOURCE: Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, National Survey of Substance Abuse Treatment Services (N-SSATS), 2013.

1 Facilities operated by federal agencies are included in the states in which the facilities are located.

3 CARF = Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities; NCQA = National Committee for Quality Assurance; COA = Council on Accreditation.

- - Quantity is zero.

2 Number of facilities sums to more than the Total column because a facility could report more than one licensing, certification, or accreditation organization.

4 Includes the Federation of Micronesia, Guam, Palau, and Virgin Islands.

Table 6.16a. Facility licensing, certification, or accreditation, by state or jurisdiction: 2013 (cont.) Number

State or jurisdiction1 Any listed agency/

organization

Licensing, certification, or accreditation organization

Total

Number of facilities2

119

State

Table 6.16b. Facility licensing, certification, or accreditation, by state or jurisdiction: 2013 Percent

Continued. See notes at end of table.

Licensing, certification, or accreditation organization State or jurisdiction1 Any listed

agency/

State

-Table 6.16b. Facility licensing, certification, or accreditation, by state or jurisdiction: 2013 (cont.) Percent

State or jurisdiction1 Number of

2 Percentages sum to more than 100 percent because a facility could report more than one licensing, certification, or accreditation organization.

Licensing, certification, or accreditation organization

SOURCE: Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, National Survey of Substance Abuse Treatment Services (N-SSATS), 2013.

1 Facilities operated by federal agencies are included in the states in which the facilities are located.

3 CARF = Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities; NCQA = National Committee for Quality Assurance; COA = Council on Accreditation.

- - Quantity is zero.

4 Includes the Federation of Micronesia, Guam, Palau, and Virgin Islands.

121

Total

Table 6.17a. Facilities employing specific practices as part of their standard operating procedures, by state or jurisdiction: 2013

Number

Continued. See notes at end of table.

State or jurisdiction1

Number of facilities2

122

Total

Table 6.17a. Facilities employing specific practices as part of their standard operating procedures, by state or jurisdiction: 2013 (cont.)

Number

SOURCE: Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, National Survey of Substance Abuse Treatment Services (N-SSATS), 2013.

2 Number of facilities sums to more than the Total column because a facility could employ more than one of the practices specified.

1 Facilities operated by federal agencies are included in the states in which the facilities are located.

State or jurisdiction1

3 Includes the Federation of Micronesia, Guam, Palau, and Virgin Islands.

Number of facilities2

123

Required

Table 6.17b. Facilities employing specific practices as part of their standard operating procedures, by state or jurisdiction: 2013

Percent

Percent2 State or jurisdiction1

Continued. See notes at end of table.

Number of facilities

124

Required

2 Percentages sum to more than 100 percent because a facility could employ more than one of the practices specified.

SOURCE: Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, National Survey of Substance Abuse Treatment Services (N-SSATS), 2013.

1 Facilities operated by federal agencies are included in the states in which the facilities are located.

Table 6.17b. Facilities employing specific practices as part of their standard operating procedures, by state or jurisdiction: 2013 (cont.)

Percent

Percent2 State or jurisdiction1

3 Includes the Federation of Micronesia, Guam, Palau, and Virgin Islands.

Number of facilities

125

Cash or

Continued. See notes at end of table.

Table 6.18a. Types of client payments accepted by facility, by state or jurisdiction: 2013 Number

State or jurisdiction1

Sliding fee scale Type of payment accepted

Treatment at no charge for clients who cannot

pay Number of facilities2

126

Cash or

Table 6.18a. Types of client payments accepted by facility, by state or jurisdiction: 2013 (cont.) Number

3 Available only in AK, AR, AZ, CA, CO, CT, DC, FL, HI, IA, ID, IL, IN, LA, MA, MD, MI, MO, MT, NH, NJ, NM, NY, OH, OK, OR, PA, RI, SD, TN, TX, UT, WA, WI, and WY.

1 Facilities operated by federal agencies are included in the states in which the facilities are located.

2 Number of facilities sums to more than the Total column because a facility could accept more than one payment option.

Total

SOURCE: Center for Behavioral Health Statistics and Quality, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration, National Survey of Substance Abuse Treatment Services (N-SSATS), 2013.

State or jurisdiction1

Sliding fee scale Type of payment accepted

Treatment at no charge for clients who cannot

pay

n/a Not applicable; State does not have an ATR voucher program.

- - Quantity is zero.

4 Includes the Federation of Micronesia, Guam, Palau, and Virgin Islands.

4 Includes the Federation of Micronesia, Guam, Palau, and Virgin Islands.

In document EL CELOSO PRUDENTE. Tirso de Molina (página 80-115)

Documento similar