Análisis de expedientes

For the further research, there are some suggestions. First, it is critical to have data on online activities of people in order to see social relationships more accurately, because people tend to be more active online than before. And this trend is getting intensified. For example, it is needed to do survey of which group is the most frequently connected by Social Network Service(SNS) such as Facebook and Instagram, Blogs, and club activities online. Not only that, chat rooms on mobile phone such as “kakaotalk”, “wechat” and “whatsapp” are also places where people most frequently communicate with others. These online platforms are places where people form network ordinary connections as well as the people sharing similar concerns.

Also, there is another way to understand people’ social relationships when people’s network becomes online-basis. It is useful to investigate how much money people spend or contribute to each group for meetings or common purposes, because people gather money in order to organize regular meetings or activities and celebrations of the members, etc. It is reasonable to guess that people participate more or put a premium on some group activities where they spend more money.

47

Second, it is crucial to figure out the principle of forming “exclusive network” in elite cartel in current society, because the connections get more complicated and diversified. As the social class of Korean society gets solidified, and more ultimately the society becomes diversified, the connections in elite cartel are not just categorized by nepotism network.

Last but not least, it is significant to look into the reason why nepotism has been continued and solidified during the modernization. It has rarely been studied

comprehensively to find the characteristics of Korea’s governance or institutional inertia which made a room for nepotism to work, distorting the allocation of public resources and weakening the public confidence in institutions and authority. In other words, research on the social systemic factors of Korea’s modernization periods that weakened social capital of the society should be undertaken.

48

Reference

Anti-Corruption & Civil Rights Commission. (2006).

Briquet Jean-Louis. Definition of “Clientelism”. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/topic/clientelism

Corruption Perception Index of OECD countries. (2018). Transparency International.

Cha Kyung-yeop. (2017). Analysis on the type and characteristics of public corruption. Audit and Inspection Research Institute.

Cho Eun-Kyung & Lee Chung-Joo. (2006). Analyzing the Corruption-inducing Elements of Nepotism Culture among Countries. Korean Public Administration Review. 40(4). pp.

491-509.

Chung Won-mo. (2008). Nepotism in Korea in View of Cross-Cultural. Graduate School, Kookmin University. Seoul, Korea.

Global Knowledge Exchange and Development Center. (2019a). Averting Sovereign Default and Leaping Forward. English Panel of Economic Development Hall.

Global Knowledge Exchange and Development Center. (2019b). Intro of Industrial Development Hall. Retrieved from https://www.gkedc.go.kr/exhibition/hall/industry Han Seungwan. (2004). From a ‘closed network’ to a ‘open network’. Korean Society for

Social Philosophy, (8), 97-121.

Hong Chan-sook. (2017). Scenarios of Female Individualization in Korea: Focused on the Context of Northeast Asian Familism. Economy and society.

Jang Soo-chan. (2008). The Origin of Korea’s Nepotism Society and Social Capital. NGO research. Vol. 6(1). pp. 37-70.

Jang Ji-won. (2010). Analysis on corruption of Korea’s public sector. The Korea Institute of Public Administration. Vol. 14.

Jang Deok-jin. (2014). The reality and condition of connected society. 지식의 지평 vol. 17.

Kaufmann F. X. (1997). Religion and Modernization in Europe. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics. Vol. 153 (1).

KBS. (2017). 명견만리.

Kang Jun-man. (2007). Definition of “familism”. Retrieved from

49

https://terms.naver.com/entry.nhn?docId=1838332&cid=42044&categoryId=42044 Kaufmann Franz-Xaver. (1997). Religion and Modernization in Europe. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (JITE). Vol. 153. Issue 1.

80-Kim Tae-jong, Han Jun, Park Jong-min, Yang Jung-ho, Jang Won-ho, Park Jung-hoo.

(2006a). Korea’s social capital. Ministry of Economy and Finance.

Kim Tae-young, Lee Hwan-beom, Choi Won-seok, Park Keun-soo, Lim Byeong-yeon, Son Bae-won, … Won Jun-yun. (2006b). A Study on the Characteristics of Ingroup

Favoritism, Paternalism of Corruption in Korea. University of Seoul

Kim Jung-Hoon. (2010). Korea’s modernity in rapid political change – The absence of modernity or the excess of modernity?. Economy and Society. 10-38.

Krishan Kumar. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved from

https://www.britannica.com/topic/modernization (Access: 10th September, 2018).

Kwon yong seok. (2016). Family and Familism. Retrieved from

https://openlectures.naver.com/contents?contentsId=109997&rid=2907#literature_conten ts

Kwon Yong-hyeok. (2017). The modernization and modernity in Korea. Society and Philosophy. Vol. 34.

Lee, Jong-eun. (2006). The Modernization of Korea: The Differentiation of the State and the Society. Korea’s politics research, Vol. 15 (1).

Lee Jong-soo. (2009). Science of Public Administration Dictionary.

Lee. (2014). The meaning and origin of Family-ism in Contemporary Korea. The Study of Confucianism, 20. 45-66.

Lim Hae-ran. (2007). Comparative Studies of the Social Capital among Korea, Taiwan and Japan: With a Focus on Trust in Cluster. Korea’s politics research. Vol. 16 (2).

News watch. (2016). 대기업의 악몽, 차떼기 사건이란. Retrieved from

http://www.newswatch.kr/news/articleView.html?idxno=8134

Newton Kenneth and Norris Pippa. (1999). Confidence in Public Institutions. John F. Kennedy School of Governance.

OECD. What is social capital?. OECD Instights: Human Capital.

Oh Kyung-Hoon. (2012). The effectiveness of nepotism and fairness of appointment on the efficiency of organization. The Journal of Korean Policy Studies, 12(4). 385-409 Park, Chan-woong. (2000). Social capital and societal trust. Korea Comparative Societal

Study. Vol. 3.

50

Rothstein Bo & Stolle Dietlind. (2008). The State and Social Capital: An Institutional Theory of Generalized Trust. Newyork, the United States: Comparative Politics, Vol. 40, No. 4, pp. 441-459

Seok Kwon yong. (2016). Family and Familism. Retrieved from https://openlectures.naver.com/contents?contentsId=109997&rid=2907#literature_conten ts

Suh Moon-Gi. (2014). Modernization Theory Revisited: Some Reflections on Development.

Journal of Social Science, vol. 16, pp. 101-123

The economist. (2008). Chilly welcome. Retrieved from

https://www.economist.com/asia/2008/02/28/chilly-welcome The Korea Economic Daily. Concept of Social Capital.

Welzel C. & Ronald I. (2007). Modernization. Encyclopedia of Sociology. Edition 1. pp.

3071-3078.

<data>

World Value Survey data. (1982-2010). World Value Survey. Retrieved from http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/wvs.jsp

Korean Statistical Information Service. (2015). Social relationship data. Retrieved from http://kosis.kr/eng/