Análisis de microscopia de barrido electrónico

1_​. If I could, I would’ve worked longer to complete a set amount of annotations (e.g. 50, 100, 200, 500 etc.).

At F(2,27) = 1.487, p = 0.244, the result is not statistically significant.

There is no statistically significance in whether users would’ve worked longer to complete a set amount of annotations.

2_​. Having done a set amount of annotations (e.g. 50, 100, 200, 500) would give me satisfaction.

At F(2,27) = 3.556, p=0.043, the result is statistically significant.

Users report a lower agreement with the statement “ Having done a set amount of annotations (e.g. 50, 100, 200, 500) would give me satisfaction.” when given feedback in the non-gamified format.

The results indicate that amongst no pairs of the conditions are significant differences in the answers to the statement. Thus, no difference in agreement with the statement can be claimed.

3_​. I feel like I accomplished something.

At F(2,27) = 0.198, p=0.822, the result is not statistically significant.

There is no statistically significant difference in how users agreed to the statement “I feel like I accomplished something”.

4_​. To see my progress grow, I would often pick up the annotation task often inbetween other tasks.

At F(2,27) = 1.013, p=0.376, the result is not statistically significant.

There is no statistically significant difference in how users agreed to the statement “ To see my progress grow, I would often pick up the annotation task often inbetween other tasks”.

5_​. I felt challenged to do more annotation work.

At F(2,27)=4.998, p=0.142, the result is statistically significant.

Users report a higher agreement with the statement “I felt challenged to do more annotation work” when given feedback in the gamified format.

POST-HOC TUKEY TEST

As taken from the online Tukey test tool, the condition comparison results are as follows:

In condition comparison, there is a significant difference in the agreement on the statement between conditions C2 (B) and C3 (C ). Users given gamified feedback had significantly higher agreement with the statement, and users given the non-gamified feedback had significantly lower agreement with the statement.

6_​. In the second round, I looked forward to seeing the results of my work.

At F(2,27)=8.765, p=0.001, the result is statistically significant.

Users report a higher agreement with the statement “ In the second round, I looked forward to seeing the results of my work. ” when given feedback in the gamified format.

POST-HOC TUKEY TEST

As taken from the online Tukey test tool, the condition comparison results are as follows:

In condition comparison, there is a significant difference in the agreement on the statement between conditions C3 (C ) and the other two conditions. This means that users given the gamified feedback had significantly higher agreement with the statement than users given either other format of feedback.

7_​. I would’ve updated my feedback more often, if I could’ve.

At F(2,27) = 2.639, p=0.089, the result is not statistically significant.

There is no statistically significant difference in how users agreed to the statement “ I would’ve updated my feedback more often, if I could’ve”.

8_​. The feedback I got was childish.

At F(2,27)=4.889, p=0.015, the result is statistically significant.

Users report a lower agreement with the statement “The feedback I got was childish” when given feedback in the non-gamified format.

POST-HOC TUKEY TEST

As taken from the online Tukey test tool, the condition comparison results are as follows:

In condition comparison, there is a significant difference in the agreement on the statement between conditions C1 and C2. This means that users given the file feedback had significantly higher agreement with the statement than users given the non-gamified feedback.

9_​. The feedback I got was unappropriate for a workplace, such as an office.

At F(2,27) = 1.045, p=0.365, the result is not statistically significant.

There is no statistically significant difference in how users agreed to the statement “The feedback I got was unappropriate for a workplace, such as an office”.

10_​. I feel a sense of ownership over the work I’ve done.

At F(2,27)=0.934, p=0.405, the result is not statistically significant.

There is no statistically significant difference in how users agreed to the statement “ I feel a sense of ownership over the work I’ve done”.

11_​. I feel like my work was not significant.

At F(2,27)=0.282, p=0.757, the result is not statistically significant.

There is no statistically significant difference in how users agreed to the statement “ I feel like my work was not significant”.

12_​. Doing the annotation work was satisfying.

At F(2,27)=0.328, p=0.723, the result is not statistically significant.

There is no statistically significant difference in how users agreed to the statement “Doing the annotation work was satisfying”.

13_​. I would share my feedback with others who were tasked to do the same work.

At F(2,27)=0.626, p=0.542, the result is not statistically significant.

There is no statistically significant difference in how users agreed to the statement “I would share my feedback with others who were tasked to do the same work”.

14_​. I would be interested in seeing the feedback of others such as colleagues, who also did this annotation work.

At F(2,27)=0.618, p=0.547, the result is not statistically significant.

There is no statistically significant difference in how users agreed to the statement “I would be interested in seeing the feedback of others such as colleagues, who also did this annotation work”.

15_​. I was interested in the content of the database.

At F(2,27)=0.916, p=0.412, the result is not statistically significant.

There is no statistically significant difference in how users agreed to the statement “I was interested in the content of the database”.