• No se han encontrado resultados

Capítulo II: Material y métodos de estudio

2.1.2. Analítico – sintético





1

n ifn mod 4∈ {0, 1}

1n if n mod 4∈ {2, 3}. Define the partial sums Sk:=Pk

n=0ck. We claim that the following chain of inequalities holds 0≤ S4k+3< Sa) 4k

b)< S4k+4 c)< S4k+2

d)< S4k+1≤ 1.

To verify this, note that

S4k+3− S4k= c4k+1+ c4k+2+ c4k+3=− 16k2+ 8k− 1

(4k + 1)(4k + 2)(4k + 3) < 0, hence a) S4k+4− S4k= c4k+3+ c4k+4=− 1

4k + 3+ 1

4k + 4 < 0, hence c) S4k+2− S4k+1= c4k+2< 0, hence d).

Relation b) is obvious and so are the upper bound c1= 1 and the non-negativity constraint. We remark that {S4k+l}k≥1, l∈ {0, 1, 2, 3} describe bounded and monotone subsequences that converge to some point. Now that|cn| & 0 the difference between S4k+land S4k+m, l, m ∈ 0, 1, 2, 3 tends to zero, i.e. all subsequences converge to the same limit. Therefore the power series converges also in the case of z = i.

3.2 Analytic functions

Exercise 1. Show that f (z) =|z|2= x2+ y2has a derivative only at the origin.

Solution. The derivative of f at z is given by

f0(z) = lim

h→0

f (z + h)− f (z)

h , h∈ C

provided the limit exist. We have f (z + h)− f (z)

h

= |z + h|2− |z|2 h

= (z + h)(¯z + ¯h)− z¯z h

= z¯z + h¯z + z¯h + h¯h− z¯z h

= ¯z + ¯h + z¯h h =: D.

If the limit of D exists, it may be found by letting the point h = (x, y) approach the origin (0,0) in the complex plane C in any manner.

1.) Take the path along the real axes, that is y = 0. Then ¯h = h and thus D = ¯z + h + zh

h = ¯z + h + z

and therefore, if the limit of D exists, its value has to be ¯z + z.

2.) Take the path along the imaginary axes, that is x = 0. Then ¯h =−h and thus D = ¯z− h − zh

h = ¯z− h − z and therefore, if the limit of D exists, its value has to be ¯z− z.

Because of the uniqueness of the limit of D, we must have

¯z + z = ¯z− z ⇐⇒ z = −z ⇐⇒ z = 0,

if the limit of D exists. It remains to show that the limit of D exists at z = 0. Since z = 0, we have that D = ¯h and thus the limit of D is 0.

In summary, the function f (z) =|z|2= x2+ y2has a derivative only at the origin with value 0.

Exercise 2. Prove that if bn, an are real and positive and 0 < b = lim bn < ∞, a = lim sup an then ab = lim sup(anbn). Docs this remain true if the requirement of positivity is dropped?

Solution. Let a = lim sup

n→∞

an<∞. Then there exists a monotonic subsequence {ank} of {an} that converges to a. Since lim

k→∞bnk = b, lim

n→∞ankbnk = ab. Hence,{ankbnk} is a subsequence of anbnthat converges to ab. So ab≤ lim sup

n→∞

anbn. Hence, lim sup

n→∞

anbn ≥ b lim sup

n→∞

an. Now, let a = lim sup

n→∞

an =∞. Then there exists a subsequence {ank} of {an} such that limk

→∞ank = a > 0.

And, since lim

n→∞bn > 0, lim

k→∞ankbnk = ∞. Hence lim sup

n→∞

anbn = ∞. In this second case, lim sup

n→∞

anbnb lim sup

n→∞

an.

In both cases, we have established that ab≤ lim sup

n→∞

anbn. Now, since for all n∈ N, an> 0 and bn> 0, consider lim

n→∞

1 bn

= 1

b. Applying the inequality we have established replacing bnwith b1

n and anreplaced with anbn:

lim sup

n→∞

an= lim sup

n→∞

1 bn

(anbn)≥1 blim sup

n→∞

anbn. Rearranging,

lim sup

n→∞

anbn≤ b lim sup

n→∞

an. It follows that ab = lim sup

n→∞

anbnas required.

Now, consider the case where we drop the positivity requirement. Let bn = 0,−12, 0,−13, 0,−14, . . . and note 0 = b = lim

n→∞bn <∞. Also let an = 0,−2, 0, −3, 0, −4 . . . and note lim sup

n→∞

an = a = 0. In this case, ab = 0 , 1 = lim sup

n→∞

anbn.

Exercise 3. Show that lim n1/n= 1.

Solution. Let n∈ N. Also let a = n1/n. Then

a = n1/n

⇐⇒ log a = log n1/n

⇐⇒ log a = log n n

⇐⇒ limn

→∞log a = lim

n→∞

log n n

Now, let f (x) = log(x)

x . Then lim

n→∞f (x) = 0 by L’Hopital’s Rule. Thus, lim

n→∞

log n n = lim

n→∞f (n) = 0 also. So

nlim→∞a = lim

n→∞n1/n= 1.

Exercise 4. Show that (cos z)0=− sin z and (sin z)0= cos z.

Solution. We have by definition

(cos z)0= 1 2

eiz+ e−iz!0

= i 2

eiz− e−iz

=−1 2i

eiz− e−iz

=− sin z and similarly

(sin z)0= 1 2i

eiz− e−iz!0

= i 2i

eiz+ e−iz

= 1 2

eiz+ e−iz

= cos z.

Exercise 5. Derive formulas (2.14).

Solution. Not available.

Exercise 6. Describe the following sets: {z : ez = i}, {z : ez = −1}, {z : ez = −i}, {z : cos z = 0}, {z : sin z = 0}.

Solution. Using the definition we obtain

{z : ez= i} =( 1 2 + 2k

! πi

)

, {z : ez=−1} = {(1 + 2k) πi} ,

{z : ez=−i} = (

−1 2+ 2k

! πi

)

, {z : cos z = 0} =( 1 2 + k

! π

) , and

{z : sin z = 0} = {kπ}

where k∈ Z.

Exercise 7. Prove formulas for cos(z + w) and sin(z + w).

Solution. We have

cos(z) = eiz+ e−iz 2 sin(z) = eiz− e−iz

2i .

1. Claim: cos(z) cos(w)− sin(z) sin(w) = cos(z + w).

Proof:

cos(z) cos(w)− sin(z) sin(w) = eiz+ e−iz 2

eiw+ e−iw

2 −eiz− e−iz 2i

eiw− e−iw 2i

= 1

4

eizeiw+ e−ize−iw +1

4

eizeiw+ e−ize−iw

= 1

2eizeiw+1 2e−ize−iw

= 1

2

eizeiw+ e−ize−iw

= cos(z + w).

2. Claim: sin(z) cos(w) + cos(z) sin(w) = sin(z + w).

Proof:

sin(z) cos(w) + cos(z) sin(w) = eiz− e−iz 2i

eiw+ e−iw

2 +eiz+ e−iz 2

eiw− e−iw 2i

= 1

4i

eizeiw− e−ize−iw + 1

4i

eizeiw− e−ize−iw

= 1

2ieizeiw−1 2e−ize−iw

= 1

2i

eizeiw− e−ize−iw

= sin(z + w).

Exercise 8. Define tan z = cos zsin z; where is this function defined and analytic?

Solution. Since both sin z and cos z are analytic in the entire complex plane, it follows from the discussion in the text following Definition 2.3 that tan z = cos zsin z is analytic wherever cos z , 0. Now, cos z = 0 implies that z is real and equal to an odd multiple ofπ2. Thus let

G( (2k + 1)π 2

k ∈Z

) .

Then tan z is defined and analytic on C−G. If z ∈ G, then cos z = 0 so tan z is undefined on the non-extended complex plane.

Exercise 9. Suppose that zn, z∈ G = C − {z : z ≤ 0} and zn = rnen, z = rewhere−π < θ, θn < π. Prove that if zn→ z then θn→ θ and rn→ r.

Solution. Not available.

Exercise 10. Prove the following generalization of Proposition 2.20. Let G and Ω be open in C and suppose f and h are functions defined on G, g : Ω → C and suppose that f (G) ⊂ Ω. Suppose that g and h are analytic, g0(ω) , 0 for any ω, that f is continuous, h is one-one, and that they satisfy h(z) = g( f (z)) for z in G. Show that f is analytic. Give a formula for f0(z).

Solution. Not available.

Exercise 11. Suppose that f : G → C is a branch of the logarithm and that n is an integer. Prove that zn = exp(n f (z)) for all z in G.

Solution. Let f (z) be a branch of the logarithm so that ef (z) = z. Let n ∈ Z and consider en f (z). In the following cases we shall apply several of the properties of the complex exponential function developed in the discussion on page 38 in the text.

CASE 1: Assume n > 0. Then we note that

en f (z)= ef (z)+ f (z)+···+ f (z) (n times)

= ef (z)ef (z)· · · ef (z)(n times)

= ef (z)n

= xn.

CASE 2: Assume n < 0. Then let m =−n so that m > 0 and en f (z)= 1

em f (z)

= 1 zm = zn, the middle step following from Case 1.

CASE 3: Assume n = 0. Then en f (z)= e0 = 1 = z0= zn.

Exercise 12. Show that the real part of the function z12 is always positive.

Solution. We know that we can write z = re ,0,−π < θ < π and Log(z) = ln(r) + iθ. Thus z12 = eLogz

1

2 = e12Logz= e12(lnr+iθ)= e12lnre12θi= e12lnr cos θ

2



+ i sin θ 2



. Hence,

Re(z) = e12lnrcos θ 2



> 0, since e12lnr> 0 and cosθ

2

> 0 since−π < θ < π. Thus, the real part of the function z12 is always positive.

Exercise 13. Let G = C− {z ∈ R : z ≤ 0} and let n be a positive integer. Find all analytic functions f : G→ C such that z = ( f (z))nfor all z∈ G.

Solution. Let Log(z) be the principal branch, then log(z) = Log(z) + 2kπi for some k ∈ Z. Thus, we can write

f (z) = z1/n= elog(z)/n= e(Log(z)+2kπi)/n= eLog(z)/n· e2kπi/n.

We know that the latter factor are the n-th roots of unity and depend only on k and n. They correspond to the n distinct powers of the expression ζ = e2πi/n. Therefore, the branches of z1/non the set U are given by

f (z) = ζk· eLog(z)/n,

where k = 0, . . . , n− 1 and therefore they are all constant multiples of each other.

Exercise 14. Suppose f : G→ C is analytic and that G is connected. Show that if f (z) is real for all z in G then f is constant.

Solution. First of all, we can write f : G→ C as

f (z) = u(z) + iv(z)

where u, v are real-valued functions. Since f : G→ C is analytic, that is f is continuously differentiable (Definition 2.3), we have that u and v have continuous partial derivatives. By Theorem 2.29, this implies that u, v satisfy the Cauchy-Riemann equations. That is,

∂u

∂x =∂v

∂y and ∂u

∂y =−∂v

∂x. (3.1)

Since f (z) is real∀z ∈ G, this implies

v(z)≡ 0 and therefore f (z) = u(z). So, since v(z) = 0, we have

∂v

∂x = ∂v

∂y = 0 and by (3.1) we obtain

∂u

∂x =∂u

∂y = 0

and thus u0(z) = 0 (see reasoning of equation 2.22 and 2.23 on page 41). Hence f0(z) = 0. Since G is connected and f : G→ C is differentiable with f0(z) = 0∀z ∈ G, we have that f is constant.

Exercise 15. For r > 0 1et A =n

ω : ω = exp1

z

 where 0 <|z| < ro

; determine the set A.

Solution. Define the set S ={z : 0 < |z| < r} where r > 0. The image of this set under 1/z is clearly T =

( z : 1

r <|z|

) . To find the image of A is the same as finding the image of T under ez. Claim: The image of A is C− {0} (thus not depending on r).

To proof the claim, we need to show that for w , 0, the equation ez = w has a solution z∈ T . Using polar coordinates we can write w =|w|e. We have to find a complex number z = x + iy such that x2+ y2> 1r and exeiy= w =|w|e. We want ex =|w| and y = θ + 2kπ, for some k ∈ Z. Using x = log |w| and k  0 such that (log|w|)2+ (θ + 2kπ)2> 1r, then we found z = x + iy.

Exercise 16. Find an open connected set G⊂ C and two continuous functions f and g defined on G such that f (z)2= g(z)2= 1− z2for all z in G. Can you make G maximal? Are f and g analytic?

Solution. Not available.

Exercise 17. Give the principal branch of √ 1− z.

Solution. Not available.

Exercise 18. Let f : G→ C and g : G → C be branches of zaand zbrespectively. Show that f g is a branch of za+b and f /g is a branch of za−b. Suppose that f (G) ⊂ G and g(G) ⊂ G and prove that both f ◦ g and g◦ f are branches of zab.

Solution. Not available.

Exercise 19. Let G be a region and define G = {z : ¯z ∈ G}. If f : G → C is analytic prove that f: G→ C, defined by f(z) = f ( ¯x), is also analytic.

Solution. Let z = x + iy and let f (z) = u(x, y) + iv(x, y). By assumption f is analytic and therefore u and v have continuous partial derivatives. In addition the Cauchy-Riemann Equations ux = vy and uy = −vxare satisfied. Since f(z) = f ( ¯x), we have f(z) = u(x, y) + iv(x, y) where u(x, y) = u(x,−y) and v(x, y) =−v(x, −y). Hence, we have ux(x, y) = ux(x,−y) = vy(x,−y), uy(x, y) =−uy(x,−y) = vx(x,−y), vx(x, y) =−vx(x,−y) and vy(x, y) = vy(x,−y) and therefore ux= vyand uy=−vxso fis analytic.

Exercise 20. Let z1, z2, . . . , znbe complex numbers such that Re zk> 0 and Re(zl. . . zk) > 0 for 1≤ k ≤ n.

Show that log(z1. . . zn) = log z1+. . . + log zn, where log z is the principal branch of the logarithm. If the restrictions on the zkare removed, does the formula remain valid?

Solution. Let z1, . . . , zn ∈ C such that Re(zj) > 0 and Re(z1· · · zj) > 0 for 1≤ j ≤ n. The proof will be by induction. Consider first the case where n = 2. Let z1, z2 ∈ C as above. Then −π2 < arg z1 < π2,π2 <

arg z2<π2 andπ2 < arg(z1z2) <π2. But note arg(z1z2) = arg z1+ arg z2implies that−π < arg z1+ arg z2< π.

Now, recall

log(z1z2) = ln|z1z2| + i arg(z1z2)

= ln|z1| + ln |z2| + i arg(z1) + i arg(z2)

= log(z1) + log(z2)

Assume this formula is true for n = k− 1. Let z1, . . . , zk∈ C as above. Then log(z1. . . zk) = log((z1· · · zk−1)zk)

= log(z1· · · zk−1) + log zk by the case when n = 2

= log z1+ log z2+. . . + log zk−1+ log zkby the case when n = k− 1

Hence, this is true for all n such that zi, 1≤ i ≤ n, satisfy the restrictions.

If the restriction on the zkare removed, does the formula remain valid? Consider the complex numbers z1 =−1 + 2i, z2=−2 + i. Then z1z2= 0− 5i. Clearly, z1, z2, and z1z2do not meet the restrictions as stated above. Now,

log(z1) = ln|z1| + i arg z1 log(z2) = ln|z2| + i arg z2

Thus log z1+ log z2 = ln√

5 + ln√

5 + i(2) = ln 5 + i(2), but note that 2 < (−π, π) and log(z1z2) = ln 5 + i(π2). Thus log z1+ log z2 ,log(z1z2) where log z is the principal branch of the logarithm. Hence, the formula is invalid.

Exercise 21. Prove that there is no branch of the logarithm defined on G = C− {0}. (Hint: Suppose such a branch exists and compare this with the principal branch.)

Solution. Define the subset ˆG of G by ˆG = C− {z ∈ R : z ≤ 0}. We use the notation Log for the principal part of the log on ˆG, that is

Log(z) = log|z| + i arg(z)

where arg(z)∈ (−π, π). We will prove the statement above by contradiction.

Assume f (z) is a branch of the logarithm defined on G. Then restricting f to ˆG gives us a branch of the log on ˆG. Therefore its only difference to the principal branch is 2πik for some k∈ Z. This yields

f (z) = log|z| + i arg(z) + 2πik

where z∈ ˆG. Since f is analytic in G, it is continuous at−1. But we can check that this is not the case, thus we have derived a contradiction

Documento similar