• No se han encontrado resultados

ANTECEDENTES Y OBJETIVOS

In document 63 Llipsy Santiago García (página 105-113)

The 72 articles are compliant with the selection criteria as the articles referred to lean, agile and green, as well as several combinations of these to a large extent. Figure 2.2 shows that for this review, 17% of the publications for this were conference papers, while 82% were journal articles from the Journal of Cleaner Production; Journal of Management Development; International Journal of lean six sigma; Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management; International Journal of Production Economics; International Journal of Production Research and so on. 1% of the publications represent PhD thesis.

81.69%

16.90%

1.41%

Proportion of publications

Journal artucles Conference papers Thesis

Figure 2.2: Proportion of publications

In terms of the combinations available, lean and agile accounted for 18% of the articles (12 articles) of which 5 of the articles included some direction involving the product life cycle or at least a mention of it, covering the period between 2002 and 2012. The earliest combination of lean and agile in this review occurred in 1997 and the latest in 2016. The majority of the papers were released after 2010 indicating that the lean and agile combination gained some prominence since then. Lean and green produced similar results, accounting for 18% of the publications covering the period 2010 to 2016. Four of the lean and green publications included some form of discussion on the product life cycle between 2012 and 2015.

The agile and green combination recorded 1 journal publication which involved the product

agile and green combination accounted for 10% of the publications between 2011 and 2016 with none of the papers discussing the product life cycle or offering any direction given the product life cycle concept.

Figure 2.3: Publications on Lean, Agility and Green by year

Some other important aspects of the search showed some individual paradigms with consideration of the product life cycle. Paper discussing green and product life cycle accounted for slightly over 16% of the publications with 11 papers covering the period between 2002 and 2016 with majority of the paper released between 2010 and 2016; the agile paradigm with some discussion on product life cycle accounted for 4.4% of the publications with 3 papers and 1 paper offered some discussion on lean and product life cycle.

Regardless of the combinations of lean, agile and green offered by the publications in this review, 75% of the publications discussed them in some relation to competitiveness, in conjunction with some key performance indicators such as lead time and cost. This implies that researchers recognise the capability of each of the paradigms and/or a combination of them to have some impact on competitiveness. Table 2.2 shows the individual articles which are part of this review, their titles and the databases from which they have been drawn.

Figure 2.3 shows the number of publications on Lean, Agility and Green by year of publication and figure 2.4 shows the number of publications per database.

Inderscience EBSCO

Business source premier IEEE Springer

Taylor and Francis Emerald

Google scholar Elsevier 0

5 10 15 20 25 30

Number of publications per database

Number of publications

Figure 2.4: Publications per database

Table 2.2: Literature published on lean, agility and green with PLC

No Author Title Database

1 Abdollahi et al. (2015) An integrated approach for supplier portfolio selection: lean or agile? Elsevier 2 Adhitya et al. (2011)

Decision Support for Green Supply Chain Operations by Integrating

Dynamic Simulation and LCA Indicators: Diaper Case Study. Google scholar 3 Agarwal et al. (2006)

Modeling the metrics of lean, agile and leagile supply chain: An

ANP-based approach. Elsevier

4 Agyapong-Kodua et al. (2012)

Development of a multi-product cost and value stream modelling

methodology. Taylor and Francis

5 Aitken et al. (2002) The impact of product life cycle on supply chain strategy. Elsevier 6 Alaskari et al. (2016)

Development of a methodology to assist manufacturing SMEs in the

selection of appropriate lean tools. Emerald

7 Al Sheyadi (2014)

Antecedents and consequences of the complementarities between green

operations management practices: an empirical investigation in Oman. Google scholar 9 Ameri and Patil (2012)

Digital manufacturing market: a semantic web-based framework for

agile supply chain deployment Springer

8 Amin and Karim (2013)

A time-based quantitative approach for selecting lean strategies for

manufacturing organisations. Taylor and Francis

10 Anand and Kodali (2010) Analysis of lean manufacturing frameworks Google scholar

11 Anvari et al. (2013)

Application of a modified VIKOR method for decision making-making

problems in lean-tool selection Springer

12 Azevedo et al. (2012)

Proposal of a conceptual model to analyse the influence of LARG

practices on manufacturing supply chain performance Google scholar 13 Banihashemi (2011)

Improving supply chain performance: The strategic integration of lean

and agile supply chain. Google scholar

14 Bapat (2013)

Supply Chain Management: Green Approach For Enhanced

Sustainability. Google scholar

No Author Title Database 15 Borchadt et al. (2011)

Redesign of a component based on ecodesign practices:

environmental impact and cost reduction achievements. Elsevier 16

Brones and Monteiro de Carvalho (2015)

From 50 to 1: integrating literature toward a systemic ecodesign model.

Elsevier

17 Buchert et al. (2015) Design and Manufacturing of a Sustainable Pedelec. Elsevier

18 Cabral et al. (2011b) An information model in lean, agile, resilient and green supply chains IEEE 19

Cabral et al. (2011a) Modelling Lean, Agile, Resilient, and Green Supply Chain Management

IEEE

20 Cabral et al. (2012)

A decision-making model for Lean, Agile, Resilient and Green supply

chain management. Taylor and Francis

21 Carvalho et al. (2011) Lean, agile, resilient and green: divergences and synergies. Emerald

22 Chaurasia et al. (2015)

An Integrated Fuzzy-based Multi Criteria Decision Making System to Selection of Lean Tool Performance: An Indian Automotive Parts

Manufacturing Company Case Study. Google scholar

23 Cherrafi et al. (2016)

The integration of lean manufacturing, Six Sigma and sustainability: A literature review and future research directions for developing a

specific model. Elsevier

24 Dombrowski et al. (2016) Impact Analyses of Lean Production Systems. Elsevier

25 Dubey and Gunasekaran (2015) Agile manufacturing: framework and its empirical validation. Springer

26 Dues et al. (2012) Green as the new lean Elsevier

27 Esfandyari et al., (2015)

A Lean Based Overview on Sustainability of Printed Circuit Board

Production Assembly. Elsevier

28 Espadinha-Cruz et al. (2011)

A model for evaluating Lean, Agile, Resilient and Green practices

interoperability in supply chains IEEE

29 Eswaramoorthi et al. (2010)

Developing An Effective Strategy to Configure Assembly Systems

Using Lean Concepts. Google scholar

30 Fisher (1997) What Is the Right Supply Chain for Your Product? B. Source Premier

31 Garza-Reyes (2015a) Lean and green – a systematic review of the state of the art literature. Elsevier

No Author Title Database 32 Garza-Reyes et al. (2014)

Lean and Green – Synergies, Differences, Limitations, and the Need

for Six Sigma Springer

33 Garza-Reyes (2015b) Green lean and the need for Six Sigma Emerald

34 Garza-Reyes et al. (2016)

Lean and green in the transport and logistics sector – a case study of

simultaneous deployment. Taylor and Francis

35 Hasanian and Hojjati (2016)

A Framework for Supplier Selection Criteria in "LARG" Supply Chain

based on a Literature Review. B.Source Premier

36 Helo (2004) Managing agility and productivity in the electronics industry. Emerald

37 Hines et al. (2006)

Towards lean product lifecycle management: A framework for new

product development. Emerald

38 Ho and Choi (2012)

A Five-R analysis for sustainable fashion supply chain management in

Hong Kong: a case analysis. Emerald

39 Johansson and Sundin (2014) Lean and green product development: two sides of the same coin? Elsevier 40 Kainuma and Tawara, (2006)

A multiple attribute utility theory approach to lean and green supply

chain management. Elsevier

41 Khiewnavawongsa and Schmidt (2009)

An Essay Of Green Supply Chain Management In The Electronics

Industry. EBSCO

42 Kwak and Kim (2015)

Design for life-cycle profit with simultaneous consideration of initial

manufacturing and end-of-life remanufacturing. Taylor and Francis 43 Lake et al. (2015)

An application of hybrid life cycle assessment as a decision support

framework for green supply chains. Taylor and Francis

44 Li and Found (2016) Lean and Green Supply Chain for the Product-Services System (PSS):

The Literature Review and A Conceptual Framework. Elsevier 45 Li et al. (2010)

A methodology for selecting a green technology portfolio based on

synergy. Taylor and Francis

The Impact of Integrated Practices of Lean, Green, and Social

Management Systems on Firm Sustainability Performance—Evidence

No Author Title Database 48 Luna and Aguilar-Slaven (2004) Manufacturing Strategy Linked to Product Life Cycle Google Scholar 49 Madu et al. (2002)

A hierarchic metric approach for integration of green issues in

manufacturing: a paper recycling application. Elsevier 50 Matawale et al., (2016) A fuzzy embedded leagility assessment module in supply chain. Emerald

51 Mollenkopf et al. (2010) Green, lean and global supply chains. Emerald

52 Moreira and Tjahjono(2016)

Applying performance measures to support decision-making in supply

chain operations: a case of beverage industry. Taylor and Francis

53 Naim and Gosling (2011) On leanness, agility and leagile supply chains. Elsevier

54 Naylor et al. (1999)

Leagility: Integrating the lean and agile manufacturing paradigms in

the total supply chain. Elsevier

55 Pampanelli et al. (2013) A Lean and Green Model for a production cell. Elsevier

56 Pham and Thomas (2012) Fit manufacturing: a framework for sustainability. Emerald

57 Prince and Kay (2003)

Combining lean and agile characteristics: Creation of virtual groups by

enhanced production flow analysis. Elsevier

58 Pullan et al. (2013) Decision support tool for lean product and process development. Taylor and Francis 59 Rauch et al. (2015)

Axiomatic Design Based Guidelines for the Design of a Lean Product

Development Process. Elsevier

60 Rehman and Shrivastava (2012)

Green manufacturing (GM): past, present and future (a state of art

review). Inderscience

61 Sabet et al. (2017) Supply chain integration strategies in fast evolving industries. Emerald 62 Seyed et al. (2013)

A Decision-Making Process for Selecting of Lean Tools Implementation

Methods by Means of Analytical Hierarchy Process in Health Center Google Scholar 63 Shi et al. (2016)

Remanufacturing decision and sustainability under product life cycle

uncertainty. Taylor and Francis

64 Singh and Vinodh (2017)

Modeling and performance evaluation of agility coupled with

sustainability for business planning. Emerald

No Author Title Database 65 Smith and Perks (2010)

A perceptual study of the impact of green practice implementation on

the business functions Google Scholar

66 Soosay et al. (2016) Strategies for sustaining manufacturing competitiveness. Emerald 67 Sorli et al. (2012)

Expanding lean thinking to the product and process design and

development within the framework of sustainability. Google Scholar 68

Tseng et al., (2013) Improving performance of green innovation practices under

uncertainty. Elsevier

69 Vinodh (2010)

Improvement of agility and sustainability: A case study in an Indian

rotary switches manufacturing organisation. Elsevier

70 Yang et al. (2010)

Mediated effect of environmental management on manufacturing

competitiveness: An empirical study. Elsevier

71 Yang (2014) Lean production system design and implementation in the product life

cycle Google scholar

72 Zhang (2011)

Towards theory building in agile manufacturing strategies—Case

studies of an agility taxonomy. Elsevier

In document 63 Llipsy Santiago García (página 105-113)