Percolación elástica
2.4 Aproximaciones simples
2.4.2 Aproximación de agujeros perfectos
The Justification of Faith
withthemotionofhisownwill,lethimbeaccursed.”AndBellarmine,
consissiststsininananinfinfusiusiononofofrigrightehteousousnesness,s,andand isisaacercertaitainnphyphysisicalcal motmotionion,,
whichdemandspreviousdispositionsinthesubjectbeforethe
faiththisisthethe orgorganianiccananddinsinstrutrumenmentaltal caucausese ofofourour jusjustiftificaicatiotion,n, andand thathatt
justi
justificaficationistionisascrascribedibed totoit,it,notnotpropproperlyerly andandbybyitseitself,lf,inasinasmuchmuch asas
itisawork,orasifitwastherighteousnessitself,bywhichweare
faith apprehends, is the foundation and meritorious cause on account of which we faith apprehends, is the foundation and meritorious cause on account of which we are justified. So that it is said to justify relatively and organically: relatively,
Romanistsists,,mustmust bebeputoutputoutofofthetheway.way. SecSecondlyondly,,affiaffirmatrmativelyively,,thethetruetrue andgenuinesensemustbeestablished.Astotheformer,faith,orthe
andgenuinesensemustbeestablished.Astotheformer,faith,orthe
actofbelieving,isnotconsideredasourrighteousnesswithGodbya
actofbelieving,isnotconsideredasourrighteousnesswithGodbya
gra
graciocioususaccaccepteptatiation:on: 1.1.BecBecausauseewhawhattisisonlonlyythethe insinstrutrumenmenttforfor recreceiveivinging righteousnesscannotbeourrighteousnessitselfformally.Nowfaith
ofChrist, John1:12John1:12,,andtheacceptanceofrighteousness,andtheacceptanceofrighteousness, Rom.5:17Rom.5:17,and,and
oftheremissionofsins,
oftheremissionofsins, Acts26:18Acts26:18;andfromthesubordinationofthe;andfromthesubordinationofthe
causesofjustificationtothesameeffect,towit,thegraceofGod,the
causesofjustificationtothesameeffect,towit,thegraceofGod,the
redem
redemptioptionnofofChriChrist,andst,andfaithfaith,,whicwhichhisalludedtoisalludedtobybyPaulPaul,, Rom.3:24Rom.3:24,,
where
where faitfaithhcanncannototsustsustainainanyanyotheotherrmeanmeaningthaningthanthatthat ofofananinstinstrumerument,nt,
since
since thegracethegraceofofGodGod holdholdsstherelationtherelation ofofananeffiefficiencienttprincprincipleiple,,andand
theredemptionofChristthatofthemeritoriouscause.
Rom.1:17,and,and 3:223:22,, Phil.3:9Phil.3:9,andbecauseChristwithhisobedienceand,andbecauseChristwithhisobedienceand
satisfactionisthatrighteousness,whichisimputedtous,
satisfactionisthatrighteousness,whichisimputedtous, Isa.53:11Isa.53:11,,
Jer.23:6
Jer.23:6,,1Cor.1:301Cor.1:30,, 2Cor.5:212Cor.5:21,, Gal.3:13,14Gal.3:13,14,whichfaithindeed,whichfaithindeed
appre
apprehendhendssasasitsitsobjeobject,ct,butbutwithwith whichwhich ititcanncannototbebeidenidentifietified.d.WhenWhencece
ScripturenowheresaysthatGodwilledtocountourfaith Jehovah our righteousness, and that we are the righteousness of God
Jehovah our righteousness, and that we are the righteousness of God in him.in him.
3.
3.BecaBecauseusewewearearenotnot justjustifieifieddexceexceptptbybyaaperfperfectectrighrighteousteousnessness..SinceSince wehavetodealwiththestrictjusticeofGod,whichcannotbedeceived.
inthethecourcourttofofdivindivineejustjustice,whichice,whichdemademandsndsananadeqadequateuate andandabsabsoluteolutelyly
perfectpayment,therecannotberoomforagraciousacceptation,which
perfectpayment,therecannotberoomforagraciousacceptation,which
isanimaginarypayment.Again,sinceourjustificationisaforensicand
isanimaginarypayment.Again,sinceourjustificationisaforensicand
judicialact,whereGodshowshimselfjust,
judicialact,whereGodshowshimselfjust, Rom.3:25Rom.3:25,,itdoesnotadmititdoesnotadmit
ofagraciousacceptation,whichneverproceedsfromtheauthorityand
ofagraciousacceptation,whichneverproceedsfromtheauthorityand
sente
sentencenceofofthethejudgjudge,e,butbutfromthefromthevoluvoluntarntaryyandandprivaprivatetestipstipulatulationionofof
theparties.
theparties.
4.
4.IfIffaitfaithhiscountediscounted forrighteouforrighteousnesssness,,wewewillwill bebejustjustifieifieddbybyworkworks,s,
bec
becausauseethuthussfaifaiththcancannotnot butbut havhaveethethe relrelatiationonofofaaworworkkwhiwhichchjusjustiftifiesies..
AndyetitisclearthatinthisbusinessPaulalwaysopposesfaithto
by itself, unless we slide back to the Old Covenant an
by itself, unless we slide back to the Old Covenant and return to legal justification.d return to legal justification.
ThefaithofAbraham,itissaid,wasimputedtohimforrighteousness,
ThefaithofAbraham,itissaid,wasimputedtohimforrighteousness,
Gen.15:6
Gen.15:6,and,and Rom.4:3Rom.4:3.. NotproperlNotproperly,y,becbecauseinauseinthisthis wayhewayhewouwouldldhavehave beenjustifi
beenjustifiededbybyworkworks,s,whicwhichhtheapostletheapostle denideniesesininthesamethesameplacplace.e.ButBut
1.Relativelyandmetonymically,sothatfaithistakenforitsobject,
1.Relativelyandmetonymically,sothatfaithistakenforitsobject,
Gal.3:25,thatis,forthatwhichfaithbelieves,towit,thatpromise
concerningtheSeed,notsomuchbodily,asspiritual,from Gal.3:16,
whichhereceivedbyfaith,wasthefoundationofhisjustification.This
isconfirmedbythecircumstancethatwhatdoesnotinhereandwhatis
contradistinguishedfromworksisheresaidtobeimputed.Thusinthis
sensefaithissaidtobeimputedforrighteousness,byahypallage,
becauserighteousnessisimputedbyfaith,astheapostledeclaresin
equivalentterms, ver.5,6,and 3:22.NoristhistowresttheScriptures,
andtoexpresscoldlythepowerandefficacyoffaith,asForbes,inconsid.
pacif.dejustif.,c.iv.,falselychargesuponourDivines.Naynotmore
clearlyandtrulycanthegenuinesenseofthat imputationbesetforth.
Forsincethat thing,whichisimputedtousforrighteousness,oughtto
beourrighteousnessbeforeGod,thatis,thatonaccountofwhichGod
justifiesus;norcanfaithbethat,aswehavealreadysaid,andashe
himselfdoesnot deny,whenherecognizesittobethe instrumental cause;
itisclearthatthisphrasecannotbetakenproperly,butonly
metonymicallywithregardtotheobject.Norisanythingmoreusualin
Scripturethanforafacultytobetakenforitsobject.Thisdoesnot
prevent—2.faithfrombeingsaidtobeimputedforrighteousness
organically,becauseitistheinstrumentalcause,whichapprehendsthe
righteousnessofChrist,byametonymyoftheeffectfortheefficient,
asitiselsewherecalledeternallife,John17:3,and 12:50,thatis,
theinstrumentalcauseoflife.
78
Invain,however, does Arminius contendthat therighteousness ofChrist
isnotimputedforrighteousness,sinceitisthatveryrighteousness
itself,towit,supposingthatisnotproperlyrighteousnesswhichis
imputedtousforrighteousness.Becausehefalselyconfounds,toimpute
forrighteousnessbygraciousacceptationthatwhichisnota
righteousness, andtoimputetoapersonforrighteousness that whichhe
didnothave.Thefirstsensehasnoplacehere,butonlythelatter,
accordingtowhichwhatAbrahamhadnot,issaidtobeimputedtohimfor
righteousness,andtherighteousnessofChristisimputedtous,thatis,
reckonedours,whichwas not ours.Thusimputationdoesnot denythe truth ofthething,ortheperfectionoftherighteousness,butonlythetruth
ofthepossession,byascribingtoapersonwhatwasnotproperlyhis.
WhatissaidconcerninganyoneinScriptureoughttobealtogetherin
him,butaccordingtothatmanner,whichitselfteaches.Nowthemanner
inwhichjustificationandsalvationareascribed,tofaith,doesnot
consistinitsownproperefficiency,asifourfaithwroughtoreffected
them,buttheyareplacedonlyinitsfiducialapprehensionand
application.NorotherwisearewesaidtopleaseGodbyfaith, Heb.11:6,
andtobepurgedofsin, Acts15:9,thanbecauseitappliestousthe
righteousnessandbloodofChrist,whopurgesusfromsinsandmakesus
acceptabletoGod.
Itisonethingforblessingstobeconferredaccordingtofaith,that
is,undertheconditionoffaith,underwhichtheyarepromisedinthe
Word,whichweacknowledgewiththeScriptures:Another,forfaithto
justifyproperlyand byitself,ortocount faithitself for righteousness,
and thustoimpute itfor righteousnesstothe believer. Therefaithholds therelationofaninstrument.Here,however,thatofaprincipalcause
andfoundation,whichwedeny.
79
Secondly,againsttheRomanistsweprovethatfaithdoesnotjustify
dispositively,ormeritoriously,asthebeginningandrootof
righteousness:1.BecausetheHolySpiritnowhereascribestofaiththe
beginning,oronlyapart,ordispositiontojustification.2.Because
thustheantithesisoftheapostlebetweenworksandfaithwouldnothold
good,sincefaithwouldalwaysjustifylikeawork.3.Because
justificationasbeingaforensicact takesplaceatonceand inamoment,
norcanitadmitofabeginningandprogress.4.Becausethuswecould
besaidtobejustifiedonaccountoffaith.ThistheScriptureneversays,
butalwayseitherbyfaith,orthroughfaith,asbyaninstrument.Nor
ifinvariouspassagestheseprepositions,by,andthrough,havea
causalityproperlysocalled,aswhentheyareconnectedwiththedeath
andbloodofChrist,doesitfollowthattheyhavethesameforcewhen
usedconcerningthejustificationoffaith.Nay,sinceitisevidentthat
amancannot be justifiedby tworighteousnesses, onein himself, theother
inChrist;iftherighteousnessandbloodofChrististhepropercause
ofhisjustification,thiscannotbeascribedtofaith,butonlythe
instrumentalcause.5.Thisopinionfalselysupposesthatjustification
isaphysicalmotioninheringinthesubject,whichneedsprevious
dispositionsbywhichitmaybeacquired,soastobeintroducedintothe
subject,sinceitisaforensicact,aswasprovedbefore,towhichman
holdshimselfobjectively,notsubjectively.Andalthoughfaithis
requiredonthe partofman for receiving thisbenefit,itdoesnot follow thatithas the relationofadisposition, bywhichthe sinner isdisposed
totheinfusionofrighteousness.
Faithisviewedindifferentlights,eitherintheactitselfof
justification,orinthepersonofthejustified,orintheeffectof
justification.Inthepersonofthejustified,itiswellcalledthe
beginningofrighteousness,notimputedbutinherent,
80
because it is the root of all virtues. Thus in the effect of justification it is the principle and cause of new obedience. But in the act of justification, it can be nothing else than an instrument apprehending and applying to man that which justifies, so that he is justified not by the merit of faith, but only by it as a means.
Althoughjustificationisdrawnawayfromworksastomerit,anda
properly-calledefficiency,itdoes notfollowthat thesame isascribed tofaithinthesamemanner.Nay,becauseitistakenawayfromworks,
itcannotforthesamereasonbeascribedtofaith,becauseitwouldthus
justifyasawork,norcouldwebesaidtobejustifiedwithoutworks.
Itsuffices,therefore,inordertosavetheoppositionoftheapostle,
thatfaithshouldbesubstitutedbyhimintheplaceofworks,because
byfaithwemostsurelyobtain,whattheJewsinvainsoughtinworks,
althoughitactsherenotmeritoriously,butonlyinstrumentally.
Faithissaidtosaveus, Luke7:50,notbymeritingsomethinginorder
tojustification,butonlyreceptivelyandorganically,becauseitwas
theinstrumentreceptiveofthatbenefit:andnothingismorefrequent,
thanbyametalepsistoascribetoaninstrumenttheeffectofthe
principalcause;aswhenthegospelissaidtobethepowerofGodunto
salvation, Rom.1:16,thediligenthandissaidtoincreasethehouse,
theploughtoenrichthefarmer,thehandofthegivertorelievethepoor,
andthelike.Norifelsewherethegreatnessofthefaithofthe
Canaanitishwomanisextolled, Matt.15:28,towhomChristgrantedthe
soughtforblessing,isitsmeritandefficiencyonthataccountdenoted,
believingindeedshewashealed,becausefaithbeingthemediumGod
bestowedthisblessinguponher,butbelievinghehealedher,notonthis
account,thatfaithproperlyspeakingeithereffectedormeritedthe
healing.
81
Thereforethetruemodeofthejustificationoffaith,isnootherthan
instrumental.1.Becauseitsproperactconsistsinthereceptionof
Christ,and his righteousness, aswas saidbefore.2.Becauseitjustifies innoothermannerthan byitsbeingdirected tothedeathandobedience
ofChrist,towit,byapprehendingandapplyingChristtoitself,asa
ransomgivenforus,andapropitiationforsin, 1John2:2.3.Because
faithintheScripturesisdescribedbyeating,looking,andtouching,
whichhaveonlyaninstrumentalcausality,notaproperefficiency,as
thelooking attheserpentdidnotofitselfcure,butrelatively tothe brazenserpent,nordoeseatingnourishexceptbyfoodthrownintothe
mouth.4.Becausejustifyingfaithstandsrelatedinnootherwayto
justification,thanthefaithofmiraclestotheworkingofmiracles,not
effectively,butorganically,byapprehendingthespecialpromisegiven
concerningthem.
Notwithoutreason,however,isthisascribedaboveallotherthingsto
the believers,becauseitaloneofall the virtuescan subsistwithgrace, asconsistinginthemerereceptionandapprehensionofanobjectplaced
beyond itself;whence itissaidtobeoffaiththatitmight bebygrace, Rom.4:16,towit,asmanowesthisentireblessingtoGod,hehasnoreason
forgloryinginhimself.Forifhewerejustifiedbyworks,orinherent
righteousness,hewouldseemtohavesomething inwhichtoglory, but when
heisjustifiedbyfaith,whichgivesnothingtoGod, but only receives,
allgloryingisexcluded.ThisToletus,in3,Rom.Ann.xvii.,well
explains,whenhegivesthereasonwhytheScriptureascribes
justificationtofaithalone:“Namely,because,”sayshe,“infaith
itismoremanifested,thatmanisjustifiednotbyhisownvirtue,but
bythe meritofChrist.For asinbeholding the serpentGod placed healing
inthe desert,becausethe lookingindicated morethatthe men werehealed bythevirtueoftheserpent,notofanypersonalwork,orofanymedicine;
thusfaithshowsthatsinnersarejustified
82
by the virtue and merit of Christ, in whom believing they are saved, not by any virtue and merit of their own. And it is the reason, why justification is ascribed to faith especially by Paul, who strives to exclude from justification the works of the law, and human merit or efficacy, and to place it in the virtue and merit of Christ alone; therefore he makes mention of faith in Christ. This neither repentance, nor love, nor hope have, for faith is carried more immediately and distinctly to it, by whose virtue we are justified, etc.”
Althoughthesacramentsareexternalmeansandinstrumentsapplyingon
thepartofGodthepromiseofgraceandjustification,thisdoesnot
hinderfaithfrombeingcalledtheinternalinstrumentandmeansonthe
partofmanforreceivingthis benefitofferedinthewordandsealed by
thesacraments.
Whatjustifiesasaninstrument,doesnotforthwithjustifyasawork,
althoughthatinstrumentisawork.Becauseitisonethingforittobe
awork,andanothertojustifyasawork:whatjustifiesasawork,ought
tobethemeritoriouscauseofjustification,butwhatjustifiesasan
instrument,doesnotjustifymeritoriously,butonlyapprehensivelyand
receptively,notbygiving,butbyreceiving.Theactionoffaith,
therefore,justifiesus,butnotasanactionsimply,asifitwereour
righteousnesswithGod,butinrelationtoitsobject,inasmuchasit
receivesChrist.Astheextensionofthebeggar’shandisindeedtheact
of thebeggar prescribed by therich man, stillas an act it does notenrich thebeggar,butinasmuchasinthiswayheappliestohimselfandmakes
hisownthegiftoftherichman.
AlthoughfaithiscalledtheworkofGod, John6:29,itdoesnotfollow
thatitjustifiesasawork.Becausealthough itisenjoined byGod,and inthissenseiscalledthework ofGod,andisduefrommanthathemay
obtainlife:itisnotonthisaccountdueasthemeritoriouscauseof
thatlife,butonlyas
83
a means and instrument receptive of the righteousness of Christ, which is the true cause of life. And thus it is called by Christ imitatively; and by allusion to the Jewish sense, who sought life by the works of the law: What must we do, said they, that we may work the works of God? To this legal question Jesus answers, not legally, but evangelically, yet in a legal style, taking the legal phrase from the expression of the Jews, and applying it to his discourse, This is the work of God,
a means and instrument receptive of the righteousness of Christ, which is the true cause of life. And thus it is called by Christ imitatively; and by allusion to the Jewish sense, who sought life by the works of the law: What must we do, said they, that we may work the works of God? To this legal question Jesus answers, not legally, but evangelically, yet in a legal style, taking the legal phrase from the expression of the Jews, and applying it to his discourse, This is the work of God,