2. PROCEDIMIENTO PARA EL LLENADO DE BASE DE DATOS PARA REGISTRO DE INFORMACION
2.4 Archivo del atributo Continuidad del Servicio de Recolección de Agua Servidas (Ind.AS)
As outlined above, the approach taken to the study of play and empowerment was
interpretive, and considered the social play actions of children within the context of
existing and established social practices. Denzin and Lincoln (2011) warn that an
interpretive approach may produce a one sided view as the study may be compromised
by the ‘blinkered’ perspective of the researcher. However, the thesis argues that the very
nature of the interpretive paradigm created a web of perspectives throughout the study
between the process of data gathering and the relationships, which developed between
the researcher, settings, children and parents. The multiple perspectives that emerged
through the research contributed to a reflexive process of analysis; systematically
questioning what was seen and heard to find patterns and themes in the data. This
In questioning my own position as a researcher I was able to reflect on how the data might
be viewed by others and how my potential bias could influence the research findings.
Consequently, Weber (1964) believed that in order to understand the wider implications
for society, it is important to consider the meanings attached to individual actions. He
suggests that attempting to analyse the underlying intentions of those actions and the
choices and decisions that appear to inform them at the time, is significant in
understanding behaviour. Weber argues that for a researcher it is unavoidable to draw on
personal cultural values when interpreting children’s play actions and choices and making
connections with parents and early years practitioners’ views. Consequently the choices
made for the study, conscious and unconscious became entwined in the interpretive
nature of the research. If Weber’s argument is to be accepted, therefore, it is better to
accept that ‘reality can never be independent of the person researching it’ (Pring, 2000,
p45) and to acknowledge and reflect on the researcher’s influence than to deny its
existence. In this way, I acknowledge that the decisions about the research method and
design were shaped by my own personal ethnography and influenced by my particular
cultural beliefs and values (Crotty, 1998). I am in agreement with Stake (1995, p45) when
he argues that:
The intent of qualitative researchers to promote a subjective research paradigm is
a given. Subjectivity is not seen as a failing needing to be eliminated but as an
essential element of understanding’.
Throughout the research I acknowledge my influence in the decisions and formulation of
the research design and my subjectivity in the collection and interpretation of data. I
recognise my impact on the whole process, yet conducted the research with integrity and
awareness of my potential to influence the findings. I would argue that the attention to
of the data collected and analysed went some way to balancing the interpretive nature of
the study. This is elaborated upon in the next section.
3 .5 .1 1nternal validity and reliability
The integrity of the methods used to collect the data and the positioning of the researcher
were central to the study. The context of the research, the culture specific nature of the
case studies, the geographical location of the study and the socio-economic status of
families were acknowledged as bound by the constraints and timeframe of the research.
However the triangulation of the data and multimodal nature of analysis supported the
internal validation of the study (Dicks et al., 2011; Flewitt, 2006).
Figure 3.1: Researcher at the centre of the process
Video of child initiated, social
play
Parent , Researcher _ Early years interviews ^ ^ practitioner interviews
Talk with children
The multimodal approach provided a framework for analysis through the collection of
visual and oral data (Kress, 2009). Accordingly a case study approach was used,
(detailed in the next section), as this allowed the researcher to gain multiple viewpoints
from parents, practitioners and the children themselves on how they experienced social
participants and involved through the video and interview data an insight into children’s
lives, their family circumstances and influences.
In qualitative research Silverman (2001) argues that triangulation ignores the context-
bound nature of collected data and therefore it cannot be representative of a single
objective truth. Silverman suggests that constant comparison and comprehensive data
treatment are more likely to result in validity. In this study a rigorous coding system
supported the analytic strategy throughout the research. This ensured that alternative
interpretations were considered rather than applying researcher assumptions (see chapter
6.4 on reliability testing of the operational codes). The validity of the study was also
supported through constant reflection of the potential impact of my reactivity and bias to
the data.
It could be argued that the use of multiple case studies meant that the flexibility of the
design was open to multiple alternative interpretations of the data, thus Robson (2002,
p176) warns that ‘researchers need to be thorough, careful and honest in carrying out
research’, but also able to show others that this is the case. I would argue, therefore, that
the reliability of the research was supported by adopting a rigorous approach to ensuring
consistency in coding decisions, by clearly outlining the rationale for those decisions and
by justifying the methods adopted for the study. As Silverman (2001) suggests, providing
clear and comprehensive detail in these areas provides a measure of reliability that should
enable other researchers to replicate the project.