• No se han encontrado resultados

1.4. Computación de altas prestaciones

1.4.1. Arquitecturas paralelas

8.1 Summary

P

revious research in the U.S. has shown that the probability of a trade at the ask

is related to the time of day and the price level. This paper is the first in Australia that looks into this area of research. Our main aim was to explore time- related differences in the probability of a trade at the asking price, for instance across time and days of the week, and their relationship to intraday average rates of return. In addition, other determinants of the probability are examined.

We demonstrate that systematic intraday patterns in mean returns, ranging from the end-of-day to the size anomaly, can be related to patterns in the probability of a trade at the asking price. This observation helps us to interpret the anomalies literature and potentially has broad implications for how we interpret event studies, particularly where events are concentrated on a particular day of the week or time of day.

The probability of a trade at the asking price was significantly related to seven factors other than the time of day: it was inversely related to dollar volume of the trade, buy order imbalance, bid-ask spread and firm size; and directly related to the average trading frequency in the stock, its price level, and whether the stock is approved for short selling.

8.2 Suggestions for Future Research

This paper could be refined in various ways.

First, the fact that we correctly predict 53.3% of trades means that there is a sizeable random element in whether the next trade will be at the ask, as well as several other explanatory variables which are omitted from our model. Four factors potentially important are risk, the depth of the bid-ask schedule, movements in interest rates across time and trading by informed market agents. These are all related to changes in demand for a stock.

McInish and Wood (1992) found that the level of the bid-ask spread is directly related to both differential risks across stocks and differential risks across time intervals of a trading day. Although risk may partly be inferred from the bid- ask spread, other risk dimensions are not captured.

Interest rates movements could affect the decision of investors to hold stocks instead of bonds. Thus, when there is an upward shift in the interest rate, we

investors attempt to sell stocks to buy bonds. Likewise, the presence of informed traders would push the probability up or down, depending on whether they were buyers or sellers. A greater proportion of market buy orders implies a greater demand for stock. It would be interesting to see if the number of market orders, relative to the number of limit orders, is relevant. These variables might not be effectively captured in our proxy, order imbalance.

Our robustness tests across years strongly indicate a significantly larger probability of a trade at the asking price in the 1991–1992 period. We presume this was caused by some macroeconomic factors, such as changes in interest rates.

Holiday effects could be taken into account by the inclusion of a sub-sample pre-holiday period. Following this, the U.S. explanation of the holiday anomalies, through a change in the probability of a trade at the asking price, could be confirmed.

We leave these refinements to a future paper.

(Date of receipt of final typescript: November 1995.)

References

Admati, A.R. and P. Pfleiderer, 1989, Divide and conquer: a theory of intraday and day-of-the- week mean effects, The Review of Financial Studies, 2, 2, Summer, 189–223.

Admati, A.R. and P. Pfleiderer, 1988, A theory of intraday patterns: volume and price variability,

The Review of Financial Studies, 1, 1, Spring, 3–40.

Aitken, M., P. Brown, C. Buckland, H.Y. Izan and T. Walter, 1995. Price clustering on the Australian stock exchange, Unpublished manuscript, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands.

Aitken, M., P. Brown and T. Walter, 1995a, Intraday patterns in returns, trading volume, volatility and trading frequency on SEATS, Unpublished manuscript, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands.

Aitken, M., P. Brown and T. Walter, 1995b, The intraday behaviour of the bid/ask schedule under an automated trading regime, Working Paper Series, Research Centre in Accounting and Finance, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands.

Aitken, M. and P. Swan, 1993, Principal and agency trades by stockbrokers are complementary: the welfare effects of deregulating agency trading and banning principal trades, Accounting

and Finance, 33, 2, November, 19–42.

Ball, R. and J. Bowers, 1988, Daily Seasonals in Equity and Fixed-interest Returns: Australian

Evidence and Tests of Plausible Hypothesis, Stock Market Anomalies (Cambridge, Cambridge

University Press) pp.74–90.

Benston, G.J. and R. L. Hagerman, 1974, Determinants of bid-ask spreads in the over-the-counter markets, Journal of Financial Economics, 1, 4, December, 353–364.

Blume, M. and R. Stambaugh, 1983, Biases in computed returns: an application of the size effect,

Journal of Financial Economics, 12, 3, November, 387–404.

Branch, B. and W. Freed, 1977, Bid-ask spreads on the AMEX and the big board, Journal of

Finance, 32, 1, March, 159–163.

Brock, W.A. and A.W. Kleidon, 1992, Periodic market closure and trading volume, a model of intraday bids and asks, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 16, 3/4, July/October, 451–489.

Brown, P., G. Clinch and G. Foster, 1992, Market microstructure and capital market information content research, Studies in Accounting Research No. 32, American Accounting Association, Sarasota,FL.

Copeland, T.E. and D. Galai, 1983, Information effects on the bid-ask spread, Journal of Finance, 38, 5, December, 1457–1469.

Easton, S. and R. W. Faff, 1991, An investigation of the robustness of the day-of-the-week effect, Unpublished manuscript, Monash University, Clayton.

Finn, F. J., A. Lynch and S. Moore, 1991, Intra-week regularities in security returns: further Australian evidence, Australian Journal of Management, 16, 2, December, 129–144.

Fisher, L., 1966, Some new stock market indices, Journal of Business, 39, 1, January, 191–225. Foerster, S., D. Keim and D. Porter, 1990, Intraday spreads, returns and variances: tests of the

informed trader hypothesis, Working paper, University of Western Ontario, London.

Foster, F. D. and S. Viswanathan, 1990, A theory of interday variations in volumes, variance, and trading costs in securities markets, Review of Financial Studies, 3, 4, 593–624.

Glosten, L. and L. Harris, 1988, Estimating the components of the bid/ask spread, Journal of

Financial Economics, 21, 1, May, 123–142.

Harris, L., 1986, A transaction data study of weekly and intradaily patterns in stock returns,

Journal of Financial Economics, 16, 1, March, 99–117.

Harris, L., 1989, A day-end transaction price anomaly, Journal of Financial and Quantitative

Analysis, 24, 1, March, 29–45.

Jaffe, J. and R. Westerfield, 1985, The week-end effect in common stock returns: the international evidence, Journal of Finance, 40, 2, June, 433–454.

Jaffe, J., R. Westerfield and C. Ma, 1989. A twist on the Monday effect in stock prices: evidence from the U.S. and foreign stock markets, Journal of Banking and Finance, 13, 4/5, September, 641–650.

Jain, P. and G. Joh, 1988, The dependence between hourly prices and trading volume, Journal of

Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 23, 3, September, 269–283.

Keim, D.B., 1989, Trading patterns, bid-ask spread, and estimated security returns: the case of common stocks at calendar turning points, Journal of Financial Economics, 25, 1, November, 75–97.

Keim, D.B. and R. F. Stambaugh, 1984, A further investigation of the weekend effect in stock returns, Journal of Finance, 39, 3, July, 819–840.

Lease, R. C., R. W. Masulis and J.R. Page, 1991, An investigation of market microstructure impacts on event study returns, Journal of Finance, 46, 4, September, 1523–1536.

McInish, T.H. and R. A. Wood, 1989, The dependence of hourly volume, trade size and number of trades on returns, Unpublished manuscript, The University of Texas, Arlington.

McInish, T.H. and R. A. Wood, 1990a, A transaction data analysis of the variability of common stock returns during 1980–1984, Journal of Banking and Finance, 14, 1, March, 99–112. McInish, T.H. and R. A. Wood, 1990b, An analysis of transactions data for the Toronto stock

exchange, Journal of Banking and Finance, 14, 2/3, August, 441–458.

McInish, T.H. and R. A. Wood, 1991, Hourly returns, volume, trade size and the number of trades, Journal of Financial Research, 14, 4, Winter, 303–315.

McInish, T.H. and R. A. Wood, 1992, An analysis of intraday patterns in bid/ask spreads for NYSEstocks, Journal of Finance, 47, 2, June, 753–764.

Miller, E.M., 1989, Explaining intra-day and overnight price behaviour, Journal of Portfolio

Management, 15, 4, Summer, 10–16.

Niederhoffer, V. and M. Osborne, 1966, Market making and the reversal on the stock exchange,

Journal of the American Statistical Association, 61, 316, December, 897–916.

Porter, D.C., 1992, The probability of a trade at the ask: an examination of interday and intraday behaviour, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 27, 2, June, 209–227.

Schwartz, R. A., 1988, Equity Markets (New York, Harper and Row).

Stoll, H., 1978, The pricing of security dealer services: an empirical study ofNASDAQ stocks,

Journal of Finance, 33, 4, September, 1153–1172.

Stoll, H., 1989, Inferring the components of the bid-ask spread: theory and empirical tests,

Journal of Finance, 44, 1, March, 115–134.

Terry, E., 1986, End of day returns and the bid-ask spread, Unpublished manuscript, Stanford University, Stanford.

Tinic, S. M. and R. R. West, 1972, Competition and the pricing of dealer services in the over-the- counter stock market, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, 7, 3, June, 1707–1727. Wei, P. H., 1992, Intraday variations in trading activity, price variability, and the bid-ask spread,

Journal of Financial Research, 15, 3, Fall, 265–276.

Wood, R. A., T.H. McInish and J.K. Ord, 1985, An investigation of transactions data forNYSE stocks, Journal of Finance, 40, 3, July, 723–729.