1. Aspectos generales de la investigación
2.2 Estado del arte
Abrams, L. M., Pedulla, J. J., & Madaus, G. F. (2003). Views from the classroom: Teachers’ opinions of statewide testing programs. Theory into Practice, 42(1), 18- 29.
Aldridge, B. G. (1992). Project on scope, sequence, and coordination: A new synthesis for improving science education. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 1(1), 13-21.
Allchin, D. (2000). How not to teach historical cases in science. Journal of College Science Teaching, 30(1), 33-37.
American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989). Science for all Americans: Project 2061. New York: Oxford University Press.
American Association for the Advancement of Science (1993). Benchmarks for science literacy: Project 2061. New York: Oxford University Press.
Atkin, J. M., & Black, P. (2003). Inside science education reform: A history of curricular and policy change. New York: Teachers College Press.
Barron, B. J. S., Schwartz, D. L., Vye, N. J., Moore, A., Petrosino, A., Zech, L., & Brandsford, J. D. (1998). Doing with understanding: Lessons from research on
problem- and project-based learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7(3/4), 271-311.
Barrows, H., & Kelson, A. C. (1995). Problem-based learning applied to medical education, Springfield: Southern Illinois University Press.
Beyer, L. E. (1997). William Heard Kilpatrick. Prospectus: The quarterly review of comparative education (Paris, UNESCO: International Bureau of Education), 27(3), 470-485.
Bianchini, J. A., & Kelly, G. J. (2003). Challenges of standards-based reform: The example of California’s science content standards and textbook adoption process.
Science Education, 87, 378-389.
Boaler, J. (1998). Open and closed mathematics: Student experiences and understandings.
Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 29(1), 41-62.
Bogdan, R. C. & Biklen, S. K. (2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theories and methods (5th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Boud, D. & Feletti, G. (1991). The challenge of problem based learning. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
Bredderman, T. (1983). Effects of activity-based elementary science on student outcomes: A quantitative synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 53, 499- 518.
Brown, D. F. (2005). The significance of congruent communication in effective classroom management. The Clearing House, 79(1), 12-15.
Bruner, J. (1966). Toward a theory of instruction. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bruner, J. (1973). Going beyond the information given. New York: Norton.
Brush, S. G. (1989). History of science and science education. Interchange, 20(2), 60-70. Cassady, J. C., Speirs Neumeister, K. L., Adams, C. M., Cross, T. L., Dixon, F. A., &
Pierce, R. L. (2004). The differentiated classroom observation scale. Roeper Review, 26(3), 139-147.
Center for Excellence in Research, Teaching, and Learning. (2008). Training manual. Winston-Salem: Wake Forest University School of Medicine.
Chiappetta, E. L. & Koballa Jr., T. R. (2006). Science instruction in the middle and secondary schools: Developing fundamental knowledge and skills for teaching
(6th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Merrill Prentice Hall.
Chin, C. & Chia, L. (2004). Problem-based learning: Using students’ questions to drive knowledge construction. Science Education. 88:707-727.
Clements, D. (1997). (Mis?) Constructing constructivism. Teaching Children Mathematics, 4(4), 198-200.
Crawford, B. A. (2000). Embracing the essence of inquiry: New roles for science teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 916-937.
Crotty, M. (1998). The foundations of social research: Meaning and perspective in the research process. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Dana, T. M. & Davis, N. T. (1993). On considering constructivism for improving
mathematics and science teaching and learning. In K. Tobin (Ed.), The practice of constructivism in science education (pp. 325-333). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erbaum Associates.
De Boer, G. (1991). History of ideas in science education: Implications for practice. New York: Teachers College Press.
Dewalt, K. & Dewalt, B. (2002). Participant Observation: A guide for fieldworkers. New York: AltaMira.
Dewey, J. (1915/1991). The school and society/The child and the curriculum. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education. New York: The Free Press.
Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5-12.
Donahue, D. M. (1993). Serving students, science, or society? The secondary school physics curriculum in the United States, 1930-65. History of Education Quarterly, 33(3), 321-352.
Donnelly, L. A. & Sadler, T. D. (2009, April 2). High school science teachers’ views of standards and accountability. Science Education, 26. Retrieved August 28, 2009, from http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/122301439.
Duschl, R. A. (2000, July). Using and abusing: Relating history or science to learning and teaching science. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the British Society for the History of Science, London, England.
Duschl, R. A. (1990). Restructuring science education: The importance of theories and their development. New York: Teachers College Press.
Ehrlich, T. (1998). Reinvventing John Dewey’s “Pedagogy as a University Discipline”.
Emma, T. M. & Davis, N. T. (1993). On considering constructivism for improving mathematics and science teaching and learning. In K. Tobin (Ed.), The practice of constructivism in science education (pp. 325-333). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erbaum Associates.
Fisher, K. M. (2000). Inquiry teaching in biology. In J. Minstrell & E. H. van Zee (Eds.),
Inquiring Into Inquiry Learning and Teaching in Science (pp. 258-280). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science. Fowler, M (2000 online) Using history to teach science (accessed July 2008)
http://galileo.phys.virginia.edu/classes/109N/more_stuff/VaBeach.html.
Gagnon, G., & Collay, M. (2001). Designing for learning six elements in constructivist classrooms. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Gallagher, S. A. (1997). Problem-based learning: Where did it come from, what does it do, and where is it going? Journal of the Education of the Gifted, 20(4), 332-362. Gardner, D. P. (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. An open
letter to the American people. A report to the nation and the Secretary of
Education. Washington D. C.: Department of Education. National commission on Excellence in Education.
Garmston, R. & Wellman, B. (1994). Insights from constructivist learning theory.
Educational Leadership. 51(7), 84-85.
Hagen, J. B. (1996). Robert Whittaker & the classification of kingdoms. In J. Hagen, D. Allchin, & F. Singer, Doing biology (pp. 11-22). New York, NY: HarperCollins College Publishers.
Journal of College Science Teaching, 23(4), 221-229.
Herreid, C.F. (2003). The death of problem-based learning? Journal of College Science Teaching. 32(6), 364-366.
Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn?
Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235-265.
Hemlo-Silver, C. E. & Barrows, H. (2006). Goals and strategies of a problem-based learning facilitator. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-baaed Learning, 1(1), 21-39.
Hodson, D. (1988). Toward a philosophically more valid science curriculum. Science Education. 72(1), 19-40.
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1999). Making cooperative learning work. Theory Into Practice, 38(2), 67-73.
Jones, D. (1996). Disadvantages of problem based learning. Retrieved December 17, 2007 from http://edweb.sdsu.edu/clrit/learningresource/PBL/DisPBL.html. Kohn, A. (2005). The (progressive) schools our children deserve. Schools, 2(2), 77-107. Khishfe, R. & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2002). Influence of explicit and reflective versus
implicit inquiry-oriented instruction on sixth graders’ views of nature of science.
Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(7), 551-578.
Krajcik, J. S., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., & Soloway, E. (1994). A collaborative model for helping middle-grade science teachers learn project-based instruction.
The Elementary School Journal, 94, 483-497.
Krynock, K. B. & Robb, L. (1996). Is problem-based learning a problem for your curriculum? Illinois School Research and Development Journal. 33(1), 21-24.
Lebow, D. (1993). Constructivist values for systems design: Five principles toward a new mindset. Educational Technology Research and Development, 41, 4-16.
Martin, M. (1972). Concepts of science education. Glenview, Il: Scott, Foresman, and Company.
Matthews, M. R. (2002). Constructivism and science education: A further appraisal.
Journal of Science Education and Technology, 11(2), 121-134.
Matthews, M. R. (1992). History, philosophy, and science teaching: The present rapprochement. Science & Education. 1, 11-47.
Matthews, M. R. (1989) A role of history and philosophy in science teaching.
Interchange, 20(2), 3-15.
McComas, W. F., Almazroa, H., & Clough, M. P. (1998). The nature of science in science education: An introduction. Science & Education, 7, 511-532.
McComas, W. F., Clough, M. P., & Almazroa, H. (1998). The role and character of the nature of science. In W. F. McComas (Ed.), The Nature of Science in Science Education (pp. 3-20). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishing Company. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education
(2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Miles, M. B. & Huberman, A. M. (1984). Drawing valid meaning from qualitative data: Toward a shared craft. Educational Researcher, 13(5), 20-30.
Murphy, C. & Beggs, J. (2005 online). Primary science in the UK: A scoping study. (accessed July 2008)
http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/stellent/groups/corporatesite/@msh_peda/documents/ web_document/wtx026636.pdf.
National Research Council. (1996). National science education standards: Observe, interact, change, learn. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
Noddings, N. (2006). Educational leaders as caring teachers. School Leadership and Management, 26(4), p. 339-345.
Noddings, N. (2003). Caring: a feminine approach to ethics and moral education (2nd ed.). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research & evaluation method (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. New York, NY: International University Press.
Rhem, J. (1998). Problem-based learning: An introduction. The National Teaching & Learning Forum, 8, 1-2.
Richardson, V. V. (1996). From behaviorism to constructivism in teacher education.
Teacher Education and Special Education, 19(3), 263-271.
Ross, S. M. & Hurlbert, J. M. (2004). Problem-based learning: An exercise on Vermont’s legalization of civil unions. Teaching Sociology, 32(1), 79-93.
Rubin, H. J. & Rubin, I. S. (2005). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearting data. (2nd ed.) Thousand oaks, CA: Sage.
Russell, T. L. (1981). What history of science, how much and why? Science Education, 65, 51-64.
Savery, J. R. and Duffy, T. M. (1995). Problem based learning: An instructional model and its constructivist framework. Educational Technology, 45(1), 31-38.
Schwartz, R. S. & Lederman, N. G. (2002). It’s the nature of the beast: The influence of knowledge and intentions on learning and teaching nature of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(3), 205-236.
Schwartz, R. S., Lederman, N. C., & Crawford, B. A. (2004). Developing views of nature of science in an authentic context: An explicit approach to bridging the gap between nature of science and scientific inquiry. Science Teacher Education, 88(4). 610-645.
Shaver, A., Cuevas, P., Lee, O., & Avalos, M. (2007). Teachers’ perceptions of policy influences on science instruction with culturally and linguistically diverse elementary students. Journal of Research in ScienceTeaching, 44, 725-746. Smith, C. A. (1995). Features section: Problem based learning. Biochemistry and
Molecular Biology Education, 23(3), 149-152.
Sobral, D. T. (1995). The problem-based learning approach as an enhancement factor of personal meaningfulness of learning. Higher Education, 29(1), 93-101.
Sonmez, D., & Lee, H. (2003). Problem-Based Learning in Science. ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education, Columbus, OH.
Spector, B. S. (2007). Paul Dehart Hurd: Staying the course for 72 years. In S. Totten & J. Pedersen (Eds.), Addressing social issues in the classroom and beyond: The pedagogical efforts of pioneers in the field (pp. 253-265). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
Stake, R. E. (2005). Qualitative case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Ed.), The sage handbook of qualitative research (3rd ed., pp. 433-466). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Stigler, J. W. & Hiebert, J. (1999). The teaching gap: best ideas from the world’s teachers for improving education in the classroom. New York: The Free Press. Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory
procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Taylor, P. C., Fraser, B. J., & Fisher, D. L. (1997). Monitoring constructivist classroom learning environments. International Journal of Education Research, 27(4), 293- 302.
Taylor, P. C., Fraser, B. J., & White, L. R. (1994, April). CLES: An instrument for monitoring the development of constructivist learning environments. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans. Tenenbaum, S. (1951). William heard Kilpatrick, trail blazer in education. New York:
Harper.
Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. Retrieved February 1, 2008 from http://www.bie.org/files/researchreviewPBL_1.pdf. Torp, L. & Sage, S. (1998). Problems as possibilities: Problem-based learning for K-12
education. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Van Berkel, H. J. M. & Schmidt, H. G. (2000). Motivation to commit oneself as a determinant of achievement in problem-based learning. Higher Education, 40(2), 231-242.
Vermette, P. J. (1998). Making cooperative learning work: Student teams in K-12 classrooms. Upper Saddle River: Merrill.
von Glassersfeld, E. (1993). Questions and answers about radical constructivism. In K. Tobin (Ed.), The practice of constructivism in science education (pp. 23-38). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erbaum Associates.
Vygotsky. L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Wadsworth, B. (1996). Piaget’s theory of cognitive and affective development foundations of constructivism. White Plains, NY: Longman.
Wallace, C. S. & Kang, N. H. (2004). An investigation of experienced secondary science teachers’ beliefs about inquiry: An examination of competing belief sets. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(9), 936-960.
Weller, H. & Karp-Boss, L. (2007). Using case studies in science teaching. Retrieved December 26, 2007 from http://misclab.umeoce.maine.edu/boss/classes/ SMS_491_2007/Case%20Studies.pdf.
Yager, R. E., & Weld, J. D. (1999). Scope, sequence and coordination: The Iowa project, a national reform effort in the USA. International Journal of Science Education, 21(2), 169-194.
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
161