Asistencia social en el Estado de México

Table 1.A and 1.B (all years)

Year 1996 Year 2000

weighted mean u.v. max to min u.v. weighted mean u.v. max to min u.v.

Log RCA 0.161 0.218 0.068 0.340 Log RCA 0.181 0.240 0.077 0.370 (0.013)*** (0.007)*** (0.007)*** (0.008)*** (0.013)*** (0.007)*** (0.006)*** (0.008)*** Product FE YES YES YES YES Product FE YES YES YES YES

Exporter FE NO YES YES YES Exporter FE NO YES YES YES

Observations 257296 257296 257296 257296 Observations 267008 267008 267008 267008 R squared 0.05 0.4 0.16 0.51 R squared 0.06 0.4 0.14 0.52

Year 1997 Year 2001

Dependent Variable: all in logarithms

weighted mean u.v. max to min u.v. maximum unit value weighted mean u.v. max to min u.v.

Log RCA 0.161 0.220 0.068 0.345 Log RCA 0.179 0.240 0.075 0.379 (0.013)*** (0.007)*** (0.006)*** (0.008)*** (0.013)*** (0.006)*** (0.005)*** (0.009)*** Product FE YES YES YES YES Product FE YES YES YES YES

Exporter FE NO YES YES YES Exporter FE NO YES YES YES

Observations 258409 258409 258409 258409 Observations 269238 269238 269238 269238 R squared 0.04 0.4 0.15 0.51 R squared 0.05 0.4 0.13 0.52

Year 1998 Year 2002

Dependent Variable: all in logarithms

weighted mean u.v. max to min u.v. maximum unit value weighted mean u.v. max to min u.v.

Log RCA 0.165 0.227 0.070 0.354 Log RCA 0.184 0.240 0.074 0.378 (0.012)*** (0.007)*** (0.006)*** (0.009)*** (0.013)*** (0.007)*** (0.006)*** (0.009)*** Product FE YES YES YES YES Product FE YES YES YES YES

Exporter FE NO YES YES YES Exporter FE NO YES YES YES

Observations 260569 260569 260569 260569 Observations 271384 271384 271384 271384 R squared 0.05 0.4 0.15 0.51 R squared 0.06 0.4 0.13 0.53

Year 1999 Year 2003

Dependent Variable: all in logarithms

weighted mean u.v. max to min u.v. maximum unit value weighted mean u.v. max to min u.v.

Log RCA 0.174 0.238 0.075 0.371 Log RCA 0.187 0.235 0.072 0.375 (0.013)*** (0.007)*** (0.007)*** (0.009)*** (0.013)*** (0.006 )*** (0.006)*** (0.008)*** Product FE YES YES YES YES Product FE YES YES YES YES

Exporter FE NO YES YES YES Exporter FE NO YES YES YES

Observations 259090 259090 259090 259090 Observations 278231 278231 278231 278231 R squared 0.05 0.4 0.14 0.51 R squared 0.06 0.41 0.15 0.52

Dependent Variable: all in logarithms

maximum unit value

Dependent Variable: all in logarithms

maximum unit value

Dependent Variable: all in logarithms

maximum unit value

Dependent Variable: all in logarithms

maximum unit value

Dependent Variable: all in logarithms

maximum unit value

Year 2004 Year 2007

weighted mean u.v. max to min u.v. weighted mean u.v. max to min u.v.

Log RCA 0.187 0.225 0.070 0.364 Log RCA 0.173 0.195 0.061 0.305 (0.012)*** (0.006)*** (0.005)*** (0.008)*** (0.011)*** (0.005)*** (0.004)*** (0.006)*** Product FE YES YES YES YES Product FE YES YES YES YES

Exporter FE NO YES YES YES Exporter FE NO YES YES YES

Observations 285329 285329 285329 285329 Observations 307183 307183 307183 307183 R squared 0.06 0.41 0.15 0.51 R squared 0.07 0.42 0.15 0.52

Year 2005 Year 2008

Dependent Variable: all in logarithms

weighted mean u.v. max to min u.v. maximum unit value weighted mean u.v. max to min u.v.

Log RCA 0.161 0.188 0.054 0.303 Log RCA 0.175 0.192 0.060 0.300 (0.011)*** (0.005)*** (0.005)*** (0.006)*** (0.011)*** (0.005)*** (0.004)*** (0.006)*** Product FE YES YES YES YES Product FE YES YES YES YES

Exporter FE NO YES YES YES Exporter FE NO YES YES YES

Observations 305239 305239 305239 305239 Observations 308570 308570 308570 308570 R squared 0.06 0.42 0.16 0.53 R squared 0.08 0.41 0.15 0.52

Year 2006 Year 2009

Dependent Variable: all in logarithms

weighted mean u.v. max to min u.v. maximum unit value weighted mean u.v. max to min u.v.

Log RCA 0.161 0.185 0.053 0.299 Log RCA 0.157 0.191 0.061 0.294 (0.011)*** (0.005)*** (0.004)*** (0.006)*** (0.011)*** (0.005)*** (0.005)*** (0.006)*** Product FE YES YES YES YES Product FE YES YES YES YES

Exporter FE NO YES YES YES Exporter FE NO YES YES YES

Observations 303236 303236 303236 303236 Observations 286338 286338 286338 286338 R squared 0.07 0.41 0.16 0.52 R squared 0.06 0.4 0.14 0.51

Robust absolute standard errors clustered at the exporter level in parentheses. All regressions include a constant term. * significant at 10%; ** significant at 5%; *** significant at 1%.

Dependent Variable: all in logarithms

maximum unit value

Dependent Variable: all in logarithms

maximum unit value

Dependent Variable: all in logarithms

maximum unit value

Dependent Variable: all in logarithms

Table 2 (full results) (1) (2) (4) Δ(Log RCA)09-95 0.183 0.191 0.185 (0.005)*** (0.005)*** (0.005)*** Δ(Dist. expo-impo)09-95x 1000 0.011 (0.001)*** Δ(Contiguity)06-95 -0.060 (0.021)*** Δ(Common off. language)09-95 -0.017

(0.017) Δ(Common coloniser)09-95 0.013

(0.019) Δ(Common legal origin)09-95 -0.032

(0.015)** Δ(Common currency)09-95 0.012

(0.023) Product fixed effects NO YES YES

Exporter fixed effects NO YES YES

Observations 193084 193084 181197

R squared 0.05 0.09 0.09

Robust absolute standard errors clustered at the exporter level in parentheses. All regressions include a constant term. * significant at 10%; ** significant at 5%; *** significant at 1%.

Dependent Variable:Δ(log of max unit value by each exporter)09-95

Table 3.B (full results)

(1) (3)

Log GDP per head 0.167 0.173 (0.02)*** (0.04)*** Landlocked dummy -0.136 (.064)** Island dummy -0.173 (0.07)*** Area 2.29E-08 (1.46E-08)* Population 2.23E-10 (2.7e-10) Density x 1000 -0.024 (0.0183) Latitude x 100 -.028 (0.168) Dist. to equator x 100 0.148 (0.306) Longitude x 100 0.036 (0.093) Product fixed effects NO YES Continent fixed effects NO YES

Observations 587557 579950

R squared 0.02 0.04

Robust absolute standard errors clustered at the importer level in parentheses.

All regressions include a constant term. * significant at 10%; ** significant at 5%; *** significant at 1%.

References

[1] Alcala, F. (2009). ‘Comparative Advantage across Goods and Product Quality’, DT02/09, BBVA.

[2] Artopoulos, A., Friel, D. and Hallak, J. C. (2011). ‘Lifting the Domestic Veil: The Challenges of

Exporting Di¤erentiated Goods Across the Development Divide’NBER Working Papers 16947.

[3] Bajona, C. (2004). ‘Speci…c Factors, Learning, and the Dynamics of Trade’, International Economic

Review, vol. 45(2), pp. 499-521.

[4] Baldwin, R. and Harrigan, J. (2007). ‘Zeros, Quality and Space: Trade Theory and Trade Evidence’,

NBER Working Paper No. 13214.

[5] Benedetti Fasil, C. and Borota, T. (2009). ’World Trade Patterns and Prices: The Role of Produc-

tivity and Quality Heterogeneity’, Mimeo, Uppsala University.

[6] Bergstrand, J. (1990). ‘The Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson Model, The Linder Hypothesis and the

Determinants of Bilateral Intra-Industry Trade’, Economic Journal, vol. 100, pp. 1216-1229.

[7] Brooks, E. (2006). ‘Why don’t …rms export more? Product quality and Colombian plants’, Journal

of Development Economics, vol. 80, pp. 160-178.

[8] Choi, Y. C., Hummels, D. and Xiang, C. (2009). ‘Explaining Import Quality: The Role of the

Income Distribution’, Journal of International Economics, vol. 77, pp. 265-275.

[9] Dalgin, M., Trindade, V. and Mitra, D. (2008). ‘Inequality, Nonhomothetic Preferences, and Trade:

A Gravity Approach’, Southern Economic Journal, vol. 74, pp. 747-774.

[10] Dalton, J. (2010). ‘Explaining the Growth in Manufacturing Trade’, Mimeo, Wake Forest University.

[11] Dornbusch, R., Fischer, S. and Samuelson, P. (1977). ‘Comparative Advantage, Trade, and Payments

in a Ricardian Model with a Continuum of Goods’, American Economic Review, vol. 67, pp. 823-839.

[12] Fajgelbaum, P., Grossman, G. and Helpman, E. (2011). ‘Income Distribution, Product Quality, and

International Trade’, Mimeo, Harvard University.

[13] Feenstra, R. (1998). ‘Integration of Trade and Disintegration of Production in the Global Economy’,

[14] Flam, H. and Helpman, E. (1987). ‘Vertical Product Di¤erentiation and North-South Trade’, Amer- ican Economic Review, vol. 77, pp. 810-822.

[15] Fieler, A. C. (2007). ‘Quality Di¤erentiation in International Trade: Evidence from the Demand

and Supply Sides’, Mimeo, NYU.

[16] Foellmi, R., Hepenstrick, C. and Zweimuller, J. (2010). ‘Income E¤ects in the Theory of Monopolistic

Competition and International Trade’, Mimeo, University of Zurich.

[17] Francois, J. and Kaplan, S. (1996). ‘Aggregate Demand Shifts, Income Distribution, and the Linder

Hypothesis’, Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 78, pp. 244-250.

[18] Gaulier, G. and Zignago, S. (2010). ‘BACI: International Trade Database at the Product-level. The

1994-2007 Version’, CEPII Working Paper 2010-23.

[19] Hallak, J. C. (2006). ‘Product Quality and the Direction of Trade’, Journal of International Eco-

nomics, vol. 68, pp. 238-265.

[20] Hallak, J. C. (2010). ‘A Product-Quality View of the Linder Hypothesis’, Review of Economics and

Statistics, vol. 92, pp. 453-466.

[21] Hallak, J. C., and Schott, P. (2011). ‘Estimating Cross-Country Di¤erences in Product Quality’,

Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 126, pp. 417-474.

[22] Iacovone, L. and Javorcik, B. (2008). ’Shipping Good Tequila out: Investment, Domestic Unit Values

and Entry of Multi-Product Plants into Export Markets’, Mimeo, Oxford University.

[23] Ishii J. and YI, K-M. (1997). ’The Growth of World Trade’, Manuscript, Federal Reserve Bank of

New York.

[24] Jaimovich, E. and Merella, V. (2010). ‘Quality Ladders in a Ricardian Model of Trade with Nonho-

mothetic Preferences’, Journal of the European Economic Association, forthcoming.

[25] Krugman P. (1995). ‘Growing World Trade: Causes and Consequences’, Brookings Papers on Eco-

nomic Activity, vol. 1, pp. 325-377.

[27] Matsuyama, K. (2000). ‘A Ricardian Model with a Continuum of Goods under Nonhomothetic Preferences: Demand Complementarities, Income Distribution, and North-South Trade’, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 108, pp. 1093-1120.

[28] Markusen, J. (1986). ‘Explaining the Volume of Trade: an Eclectic Approach,’American Economics

Review, vol. 76, pp. 1002-1011.

[29] Mayer, T. and Zignago, S. (2006). ‘GeoDist: the CEPII’s Distances and Geographical Database’,

MPRA Paper 31243.

[30] Murphy, K. and Shleifer, A. (1997). ‘Quality and Trade,’ Journal of Development Economics, vol.

53, pp. 1-15.

[31] Schott, P. (2004). ‘Across-Product versus within-Product Specialization in International Trade’,

Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 119, pp.647-678.

[32] Stokey, N. (1991). ‘The Volume and Composition of Trade between Rich and Poor Countries’, Review

of Economic Studies, vol. 58, pp. 63-80.

[33] Taylor, M. S. (1993). ’Quality Ladders and Ricardian Trade’, Journal of International Economics,

vol. 34, pp. 225-243.

[34] Verhoogen, E. (2008). ‘Trade, Quality Upgrading and Wage Inequality in the Mexican Manufacturing

In document Genealogía de la Inclusión a Grupos Vulnerables en el Estado de México ( ) (página 40-47)