C OMPARACIÓN DE LOS M ODELOS DE M OVIMIENTO

Ahearn, E. (2009). Growth Models and Students with Disabilities: Report of State

Interviews. Alexandria, VA: Project Forum, National Association of State

Directors of Special Education. Retrieved September 15, 2012, from

http://www.projectforum.org/docs/GrowthModelsandStudentswithDisabilities- ReportofStateInterviews.pdf.

Albrecht, S. & Joles, C. (2003), Accountability and Access to Opportunity: Mutually

exclusive tenets under high-stakes testing mandate. Preventing School

Failure, 47(2), 86-91.

Altman, J. R., Lazarus, S. S., Quenemoen, R. F., Kearns, J., Quenemoen, M., &

Thurlow, M. L. (2010). 2009 survey of states: Accomplishments and new

issues at the end of a decade of change. Minneapolis, MN: University of

Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.

American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Counsel on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for

educational and psychological testing. American Educational Research

Association: Washington, DC.

American Educational Research Association. (2000, July). AERA position statement

on high-stakes testing in pre-K–12 education. Washington, DC: Author.

Retrieved January 30, 2011, from

126

Baumgartner, T., Lipowski, M., & Rush, C. (2003). Increasing reading achievement

of primary and middle school students through differentiated instruction.

Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Saint Xavier University, Chicago.

Biddle, S. (2006). Attitudes in education: Assessing how teachers ‘attitudes about inclusion of learning disabled students affects their use of accommodations.

The Science Teacher, March, 52-56.

Brehm, S. S., & Kassin, S. M. (1996). Social psychology. Boston: Houghton Mifflin. Brookhart v. Board of Education, 699 F.2d 179 (5th Cir. 1983).

Brohpy, J. (1982). Research on the self-fulfilling prophecy and teacher expectations.

Institute for Research on Teaching. Michigan State University. Brophy, J., & Good, T. L. (1970). Teachers’ communication of differential

expectations for children’s classroom performance: Some behavioral data.

Journal of Educational Psychology, 61, 365-374.

Brophy, J., & Good, T. (1974). Teacher-student relationships: Causes and

consequences. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.

Bulgren, J., Marquis, J., Deshler, D., Schumaker, J., & Lenz, B. (2006). The

instructional context of inclusive Secondary general education classes: Teachers’ instructional roles and practices, curricular demands, and research-

127

based practices and standards. Learning Disabilities: A Contemporary Journal. 4(1), 39-65.

Chudowsky, N., Chudowsky, V., and Keber, N. (2009). State Test Score Trends

Through 2007–08, Part 4: Has Progress Been Made in Raising Achievement for Students with Disabilities? Washington, DC: Center on Education Policy.

Retrieved September 15, 2012, from

http://www.edweek.org/media/studentswdisabilities.pdf

Cook, B. G. (2001). A comparison of teachers’ attitudes toward their included

students with mild and severe disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 34 (2), 203-213.

Crano, W., & Mellon, P. (1978). Causal influence of teachers’ expectations on children’s academic performance: A cross lagged panel analysis. Journal of

Educational Psychology, 71, 169-182.

Crawford, L., Almond, P., Tindal, G., & Hollenbeck, K. (2001). Teacher perspectives

on inclusion of students with disabilities in high-stakes assessments. Special

Services in the Schools, 18(1/2), 95–118.

Crawford, L., & Tindal, G. (2006). Policy and practice: Knowledge and beliefs of

education professionals related to the inclusion of students with disabilities in a state assessment. Remedial and Special Education. v27 (4), 208-217.

128

Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods

approaches. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications, Inc.

Darley, J. and Fazio, R. (1980). Expectancy confirmation processes arising in the

social interaction sequence. American Psychologist, 35, 867-881.

DeBard, R., & Kubow, P. K. (2002). From compliance to commitment: The need for

constituent discourse in implementing testing policy. Educational Policy, 16, 387-405.

Debra P. v. Turlington, 644 F.2d 397 (5th Cir. 1981).

Deno, S. L. (1985). Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternative.

Exceptional Children, 52, 219-232.

Deno, S., Fuchs, L., Marston, D., & Shinn, J. (2001). Using curriculum-based

measurement to establish growth standards for students with learning disabilities. School Psychology Review, 30, 507-524.

Destefano, L., Shriner, J., & Lloyd, C. (2001). Teacher decision making in

participation of students with disabilities in large scale assessments.

Exceptional Children, 68, 7-22.

Disability Rights Advocates (2001). Do No Harm-High Stakes Testing and students

with learning disabilities. Oakland, CA: Author. Retrieved January 30, 2011, from www.dralegal.org.

129

Dillon, W. R. & Goldstein, M. (1984). Multivariate Analysis: Methods and

Applications. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons Inc.

Ellins, J. & Porter, J. (2005). Departmental differences in attitude to special

educational needs in the secondary school. British Journal of Special

Education, 32(4), 188-195.

Education of All Handicapped Children Act (EHCA) of 1975, Pub. L. No. 94–142, §2, 89 Stat. 77. (1975).

Fletcher, J., Francis, D., Boudousquie, A., Copeland, K., Young, V., Kalinowski, S., &

Vaughn, S. (2006). Effects of accommodations on high stakes testing for students with reading disabilities. Exceptional Children, 72, 136-150.

Fosnot, C. T. (1996). Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice. New York:

Teacher’s College Press.

Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1993). Formative evaluation of academic progress: How much growth can we expect? School Psychology Review, 22 (1), 1-30. Fuchs, L., & Fuchs, D. (1996). Combining performance assessment and curriculum-

based measurement to strengthen instructional planning. Learning Disabilities

Research and Practice, 11, 183-192.

130

teacher judgments of test accommodations with objective data sources. School

Psychology Review, 29, 65-85.

Gersten, R., Walker, H. & Darch, C. (1988). Relationship between teacher

effectiveness and their tolerance for handicapped students. Exceptional

Children, 54, 433-438.

Harris, M., & Rosenthal, R. (1985). Mediation of interpersonal expectancy effects: 31

meta-analyses. Psychological Bulletin, 97 363-385. (Beginning of 4 Factor Theory)

Harr-Robins, J., Song, M., Hurlburt, S., Pruce, C., Danielson, L., Garet, M., and

Taylor, J. (2012). The Inclusion of Students With Disabilities in School

Accountability Systems (NCEE 2012-4056). Washington, DC: National Center

for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.

Hornstra, L. Dennessen, E. Bakker, J. van den Bergh, L. & Voeten, M. (2010).

Teacher attitudes toward dyslexia: Effects on teacher expectations and the academic achievement of students with dyslexia. Journal of Learning

Disabilities, 43(6), 515-529.

Humphreys, L., & Stubbs, J. (1977). A longitudinal analysis of teacher expectation,

student expectation, and student achievement. Journal of Educational

131

Hurwitz, J., Elliot, S., & Braden, J. (2007). The influence of test familiarity and

student disability status upon teachers’ judgments of students’ test performance. School Psychology Quarterly. 22(2), 115-144.

Individuals with disabilities Education Act Amendments of (IDEA) 1997, P.L.

105-17, U.S.C. (1997).

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) of 2004, P. L. 108–446, 20 U.S.C. (2004).

Infoworks LIVE! A Rhode Island Education Data Initiative (2012). Retrieved online March 31, 2912, from http://infoworks.ride.ri.gov.

Jussim, L., & Eccles, J. (1992). Teacher expectations: II. Construction and reflection of student achievement. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 63(3), 947-961.

Katsiyannis, A., Zhang, D., Ryan, J. B., & Jones, J. (2007). High-stakes testing and

students with disabilities: Challenges and promises. Journal of Disability

Policy Studies, 18, 160-167.

Kettler, R., Niebling, B., Mroch, A., Feldman, E., Newell, M., Elliot, S., Kratochwill,

T., & Bolt, D. (2005). Effects of testing accommodations on math and reading scores: An experimental analysis of the performance of students with and without disabilities. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 31, 38-48.

132

attitude survey (HST-SWD). Teacher attitudes: The effects of teacher beliefs

on teaching practices and achievement of students with disabilities.

Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Rhode Island and Rhode Island College.

Koretz, D. (1997). Using student assessment for educational accountability. In E. A.

Hanushek & D. W. Jorgenson (Eds.), Improving America’s schools: The role

of incentives (pp. 171-195). Washington DC: National Academy Press.

LaVoie, J., & Adams, G. (1973). Pygmalion in the classroom: An Experimental

investigation of the characteristics on teacher expectancy. Midwest

Psychological Association. Chicago, Illinois, May, 1973.

Lawrence-Brown, D. (2004). Differentiated instruction: Inclusive strategies for standards-based learning that benefit the whole class. American Secondary

Education, 32, 34–62.

Levy, H. M. (2008). Meeting the needs of all students through differentiated

instruction: Helping every child reach and exceed standards. Clearing House:

A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues, and Ideas, v81, n4, 161-164.

Lombardi, A., & Murray, C. (2010). Measuring university faculty attitudes toward

disability: Willingness to accommodate and adopt universal design principles.

Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 34, 43-56.

133

perceptions regarding curricular and instructional adaptations. Teacher

Education and Special Education, 25,(1), 41-54.

McTighe, J., & Brown, J. (2005). Differentiated instruction and educational standards: Is détente possible? Theory Into Practice, 44, 234–244.

Mehrens, W. (1998). Consequences of assessment: What is the evidence? Education

Policy Analysis Archives 6(13). Retrieved online August 30, 2012, from

http://epaa.asu.edu/v6n13.html.

Merton, R. K. (1948). The self fulfilling prophecy. Antioch Review, 8, 193-210.

McDonnell, L. M., McLaughlin, M., & Morison, P. (Eds.). (1997) Educating one and

all: Students with disabilities and standards based reform. Washington, DC:

National Academy Press.

No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, P.L. 107-110, 115 Stat. 1425.

Olson, L. (2004). Enveloping expectations. Education Week, 23, 8–20.

O’Neil, P. (2001). Special education and high stakes testing for high school graduation: An analysis of current law and policy. Journal of Law and

Education, 30(2), 185-222.

Park, P., Singer, G. H., & Gibson. (2005). The Functional Effect of Teacher Positive and Neutral Affect on Task Performance of Students With Significant

Disabilities. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, v7, (4), 237–246. Reid, D. K. & Valle, J. W. (1996). A Constructivist perspective from the emerging

134

field of disability studies. In Fosnot, C. T. (Eds.). Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice (pp. 150-171). New York: Teacher’s College Press.

Rist, R. (1970). Student social class and teacher expectations: The self-fulfilling

prophecy in ghetto education. Harvard Educational Review, 40, 411-451.

Rock, M. L., Gregg, M., & Ellis, E. (2008). REACH: A framework for differentiating classroom instruction. Preventing School Failure, v52, n2, 31-47.

Rosenthal, R. (1997). Interpersonal Expectancy Effects: A 40 Year Perspective.

American Psychological Association Convention. (Chicago, Illinois, August 16, 1997).

Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1968). Pygmalion in the classroom: Teachers’

expectation and pupils’ intellectual development. New York: Holt,

Rinehart and Winston.

Rosnow, R., & Rosenthal, R. (1997). People studying people: Artifacts and ethics in

behavioral research. New York: W.H. Freeman.

Shim, M. K., Felner, R. D., Shim, E., & Brand, S. (2000). Measures of instructional

practices in middle grades. Annual Meeting of the American Statistical

Association: Section on survey research methods (pp. 1-5). Kingston: University of Rhode Island.

135

expected progress standards for students with learning disabilities: A five year study of one district. School Psychology Review, 30(4), 487-506.

Taylor, G., Shepard, L, Kinner, F., & Rosenthal, J. (2003). A survey of teachers’ perspectives on high-stakes testing in Colorado: What get taught, what gets

lost (CSE Report 588). Santa Cruz: University of California, Center for Research on Evaluation, Diversity, and Excellence.

The Alternate Assessment Consortia: National Center and State Collaborative. (2012,

January 6). Retrieved November 11, 2012 from

http://www.ride.rigov/assessment/DOCS/NCSC_Summary_February_2012_E TS.pdf

Thomas B. Fordham Institute. (2009). The Accountability Illusion: Rhode Island.

Thomas B. Fordham Institute.

Thompson, S., & Thurlow, M. (2001). State special education outcomes: A report on

state activities at the beginning of a new decade. Minneapolis, MN: University

of Minneapolis, National Center on Educational Outcomes. Retrieved September 9, 2012, from

http://www.cehd.umn.edu/NCEO/OnlinePubs/statereports.html.

Thurlow, M., & Johnson, D. (2000). High stakes testing of students with disabilities.

136

Thurlow, M., Seyfarth, A., Scott, D., & Ysseldyke, J. (1997). State assessment

policies on participation and accommodations for students with disabilities: 1997 update (Synthesis Report 29). Minneapolis, MN: University of

Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes, (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. 425 595).

Tindal, G., & Fuchs, L. (1999). A Summary of research on testing accommodations:

What we know so far. Lexington: University of Kentucky Mid-south Regional

Resource Center.

Tomlinson, C. A. (2000). Reconcilable differences: Standards-based teaching and differentiation. Educational Leadership, 58, 6–11.

Tomlinson, C. A. (2004). Sharing responsibility for differentiating instruction. Roper

Review, 26, 188.

U.S. Department of Education, Office of Civil Rights. (2000). The use of tests as part of high-stakes decision-making for students: A research guide for educators and policy makers. Washington DC: Author.

Vogler, K. (2002). The impact of high-stakes, state-mandated student performance

assessment on teachers’ instructional practices. Education, 123(1), 39-51. Ward, M. J., Montague, N. & Linton, T. H. (2003). Including students with disabilities

and achieving accountability: Educators’ emerging challenge. Texas A&M University: Corpus Christi. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED481111).

137

Williams, T. (1976). Teacher prophecies and the inheritance of inequality. Sociology

of Education, 49, 223-236.

Wittrock, M. C. (1986) Students Thought Process. Handbook of Research on

Teaching. New York. MacMillian.

Woodrock, S., &Vialle, W. (2011). Are we exacerbating students’ learning disabilities? An investigation of preservice teachers’ attributions of the

educational outcomes of students with learning disabilities. Annals of Dyslexia,

61(2). 223-241.

Ysseldyke, J., Nelson, J. R., Christenson, S., Johnson, D., Dennison, A., Triezenberg,

H., Sharpe, M., & Hawes, M. (2004). What we know and what we need to know about the consequences of high-stakes testing for students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 71(1), 75-94.

In document La evacuación del buque de guerra : estudio del movimiento de personal en situaciones de emergencia (página 101-107)