Como alternativa de análisis se puede emplear modelos seudo tridimensionales de pórticos planos, considerando la
RESULTADOS DEL MODULO TIPO UNICON
C: UVCU ILU IIICIUV ' ,VI IUVI 1111 IIU, tJVI v, 1 IUCVCII l l'CI llC 1 Laffi0$ anle 61 pí0u1ema ue 18 recolección de aguas residuales y excretas en forma colectiva, lo cual exige
4.2.2 Cambios de paradigma y movilización del sector privado (Bangladesh)
The results presented in this paper provide two scenario views of U.S. electricity consumption through 2035 different than the AEO 2012 forecast. Combined, the three drivers—advancements in building energy codes and appliance/equipment efficiency standards, ratepayer-funded EE programs, and electric transportation—have a major impact on electricity consumption in the U.S., with building energy codes and appliance/equipment standards having the largest impact and electric transportation having the smallest impact under both scenarios.
Under the moderate scenario, today’s most efficient appliances and equipment become the minimum standard, newly constructed buildings use 35 percent less energy, ratepayer-funded EE programs grow at current trends, and electric vehicles make up 2 percent of the registered vehicle stock by 2035. This scenario is very plausible.
The aggressive scenario expands on the assumptions made in the moderate scenario. By 2035, newly constructed buildings use 60 percent less energy, electric vehicles constitute 12 percent of the registered vehicle stock, and some appliance and equipment efficiency standards are pushed to engineering limits. Ratepayer-funded EE programs follow the same path as in the moderate scenario.
The effect of each factor is summarized below.
Building codes and equipment standards have the largest impact among the factors examined, with the potential to decrease electricity consumption by 420 TWh (9.5%) in 2035 under a moderate scenario and 769 TWh (17.3%) under an aggressive scenario.
Ratepayer-funded electric energy efficiency (EE) programs, including both utility programs and those administered by state or regional program administrators decrease national electricity consumption. Following current trends, these programs reduce electricity consumption by 295 TWh (6.7%) by 2035.
Electrification of the transportation sector has some impact on energy consumption in the U.S. Growth is mainly due to the progressive use of electric light duty and commercial vehicles in 2020 and beyond. Various policy and economic drivers as well as consumer demand will determine the ultimate levels of electric vehicle adoption, including: advances in battery technology, oil prices, and government mandates on fleet fuel efficiency (or CAFE) standards. However, under both scenarios, the electricity growth is modest. It should be noted that this analysis does not capture the electrification of non-road transportation equipment.
Figure 19 shows the combined effect of all three factors, relative to the AEO 2012 reference forecast. As shown, under the moderate scenario, electricity consumption between 2010 and 2035 remains relatively flat, moving from 3,730 TWh in 2010 to 3,805 TWh in 2035. Under the aggressive scenario, electricity consumption declines between 2010 and 2035, moving from 3,730 TWh in 2010 to 3,569 TWh in 2035.
Figure 19: Energy Use in the U.S., Reference Case and IEE Scenarios (2010-2035)
Figure 20 and Figure 21 illustrate how the factors combine with the reference forecast to produce the net energy use projected in IEE’s two scenarios. The purple section of each bar indicates energy use reduction from codes and standards relative to the AEO 2012 Reference Case, the red section represents energy use reductions from ratepayer funded programs, and, the green section indicates additional energy use from electric transportation.
4,440 3,805 3,569 3,000 3,200 3,400 3,600 3,800 4,000 4,200 4,400 4,600 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 TW h
AEO 2012 Reference Case IEE Moderate Scenario IEE Aggressive Scenario
Figure 20: Moderate Scenario – Combined Effect of Factors (2010-2035)
As shown in Figure 20, under the moderate scenario, codes and standards reduce electricity consumption by 420 TWh in 2035 (9.5 percent of AEO Reference Case), with roughly 70 percent of the savings coming from improvements to appliance and equipment standards. Continued support of ratepayer-funded EE programs over the forecast period saves an additional 249 TWh in 2035 (5.6 percent of AEO Reference Case). The gradual introduction of electric light duty vehicles (LDVs) and growth in transit rail increases electricity consumption by 33 TWh (less than 1 percent of AEO Reference Case).
Combined, these factors have a dampening effect on U.S. electricity consumption and midway through the forecast (2020-2025) total U.S. consumption flattens at a low of 3,590 TWh. Electricity consumption turns up between 2025 and 2035 due to projected economic growth and increased use of electricity as a fuel for the transportation sector. In aggregate, under the moderate scenario, accounting for these three factors, IEE projects 2035 electricity consumption to be 3,805 TWh, a mere 75 TWh (2 percent) above 2010 levels and 14.3 percent less than the AEO Reference Case projection for 2035.
3,000 3,200 3,400 3,600 3,800 4,000 4,200 4,400 4,600 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 TW h
Moderate Electric Transportation Moderate Codes and Standards Ratepayer Funded EE Programs IEE Moderate Forecast
AEO 2012 Reference Case
EE Programs (-249 TWh) Codes & Standards (-420 TWh) Electric Transportation (+33 TWh) 3,805 TWh
Figure 21: Aggressive Scenario — Combined Effect of Factors (2010–2035)
As shown in Figure 21, under the aggressive scenario, codes and standards programs have a substantial impact on electricity consumption throughout the forecast period, reducing electricity consumption in 2035 by 769 TWh (17.3 percent of AEO Reference Case). Continued support of ratepayer-funded EE programs over the forecast period saves an additional 249 TWh in 2035. In this scenario, substantial battery technology breakthroughs and increasing oil prices result in greater consumer demand for electric light duty vehicles (LDVs) and commercial light trucks resulting in electricity consumption increasing by 147 TWh (3.3 percent of AEO Reference Case).
Combined, these factors have a substantial dampening effect on U.S. electricity consumption and in 2025 total U.S. consumption drops to a forecast low of 3,431 TWh. Rapid electrification of the transportation sector in the latter part of the forecast partially offsets the downward drivers, resulting in an end of forecast value of 3,569 TWh. In aggregate, under the aggressive scenario, accounting for these three factors, IEE projects 2035 electricity consumption to be 3,569 TWh, which is 161 TWh (4 percent) below 2010 levels and 19.6 percent less than the AEO Reference
3,000 3,200 3,400 3,600 3,800 4,000 4,200 4,400 4,600 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 TW h
Aggressive Electric Transportation Aggressive Codes and Standards Ratepayer Funded EE Programs IEE Aggressive Forecast AEO 2012 Reference Case
EE Programs (-249 TWh) Codes & Standards (-769 TWh) Electric Transportation (+147 TWh) 3,569 TWh